YES!! House Judiciary Republicans Call For 2nd Special Counsel To Investigate Clinton, Comey, Lynch!

[jc456]

Do you remember that time when Obama refused to enforce DOMA? Yeah, me neither.

I did see when obummer refused to enforce his little red line in the sand. what a wimp and traitor

So you don't recall Obama not enforcing DOMA either? Makes sense considering that never occurred.

I didn't research it until now, here:

Vern Buchanan says Obama will no longer

"In a mailer, Buchanan said that "the Obama administration recently announced it will no longer enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the federal law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman."

The Human Rights Campaign said that was wrong.

"While President Obama announced last year that his administration believed the law to be unconstitutional and could not continue to defend it in court, he also made clear that the law would continue to be enforced unless struck down or repealed," said the HRC."

 

[Oldstyle]

Kewl. Get the rubes salivating. Maybe they'll find out the real truth behind Benghazi, Fast-n-Furious, the Sandy Hook false flag attack, her Alien Baby, and that Child/Slave/Porn/Prostitute pizzeria she was running.

Good for the Republicans, glad to see they're concentrating on the important stuff.

Wait...let me see if I understand how this works, Boo! Spending the better part of a year obsessing about alleged "collusion" even though none actually exists is "important stuff" but looking into widespread corruption of an administration that used it's Justice Department to obstruct justice isn't? God, I love you progressives!

 

[radical right]

[So you don't recall Obama not enforcing DOMA either? Makes sense considering that never occurred.

Within the 1st days of his Presidency Obama stated in a Press Conference that he was ordering his criminal DOJ NOT to enforce DOMA because HE did not agree with it...ah, the birth of a dictator....

DOMA was unconstitutional, the USSC said so. Obama refused to enforce unconstitutional law, just like Obama enforced Obamacare, a law which was constitutional, the USSC said so.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[easyt65]

What a crock of utter bullshit. DOMA was enforced the entire time until it was ruled in unconstitutional by United States v. Windsor. I am sorry if those facts don't ape with your narrative.

You are a filthy, partisan LIAR just like all the delusional snowflakes. You want FACTS? here you go:

"In a decision described as "shocking" and "breathtaking," the Obama administration announced this afternoonthat the Justice Department will no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

The highly unusual move hands gay rights advocates a major victory they have worked years to secure--but is also certain to provoke intense controversy and trigger a heated political battle with Congressional Republicans, who support the law and have refused to repeal it.

The Justice Department is tasked with defending laws passed by Congress--even those laws the sitting President may not like or have supported. Only a few times in history has a President decided his Justice Department will not defend an existing federal law. "

Obama Administration decision to not defend Defense of Marriage Act will trigger heated political battle


Now STFU, snowflake.

 

[jc456]

Do you remember that time when Obama refused to enforce DOMA? Yeah, me neither.

I did see when obummer refused to enforce his little red line in the sand. what a wimp and traitor

So you don't recall Obama not enforcing DOMA either? Makes sense considering that never occurred.

I saw him wimper in the corner cause his red line in the sand was breached, yep.

Besides nothing, what does that have to do with the lie that Obama didn't enforce DOMA?

Do you remember that time when Obama refused to enforce DOMA? Yeah, me neither.

I did see when obummer refused to enforce his little red line in the sand. what a wimp and traitor

So you don't recall Obama not enforcing DOMA either? Makes sense considering that never occurred.

I didn't research it until now, here:

Vern Buchanan says Obama will no longer

"In a mailer, Buchanan said that "the Obama administration recently announced it will no longer enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the federal law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman."

The Human Rights Campaign said that was wrong.

"While President Obama announced last year that his administration believed the law to be unconstitutional and could not continue to defend it in court, he also made clear that the law would continue to be enforced unless struck down or repealed," said the HRC."[/QUOTE

 

[J.E.D]

YES!! House Judiciary Republicans Call For 2nd Special Counsel To Investigate Clinton, Comey, Lynch!

YES!! More tax payer money wasted!

 

[mdk]

Do you remember that time when Obama refused to enforce DOMA? Yeah, me neither.

I did see when obummer refused to enforce his little red line in the sand. what a wimp and traitor

So you don't recall Obama not enforcing DOMA either? Makes sense considering that never occurred.

I didn't research it until now, here:

Vern Buchanan says Obama will no longer

"In a mailer, Buchanan said that "the Obama administration recently announced it will no longer enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the federal law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman."

The Human Rights Campaign said that was wrong.

"While President Obama announced last year that his administration believed the law to be unconstitutional and could not continue to defend it in court, he also made clear that the law would continue to be enforced unless struck down or repealed," said the HRC."

Thank you accenting my point rather elegantly that DOMA was enforced the entire time until it was found unconstitutional by The Supreme Court.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[easyt65]

YES!! House Judiciary Republicans Call For 2nd
Special Counsel To Investigate Clinton, Comey, Lynch!

 

[BlindBoo]

You are so full of shit.

You had no problem with the Democrats running a proven criminal as their candidate

I was wondering how long it would be before you lied. Please list the crimes Sec. Clinton was been convicted of.

That type of propaganda may work on a large segment of the Russian population, and to some extent the certain types of Americans, but the pendulum is going to swing to the left, biggly.

 

[jc456]

Do you remember that time when Obama refused to enforce DOMA? Yeah, me neither.

I did see when obummer refused to enforce his little red line in the sand. what a wimp and traitor

So you don't recall Obama not enforcing DOMA either? Makes sense considering that never occurred.

I didn't research it until now, here:

Vern Buchanan says Obama will no longer

"In a mailer, Buchanan said that "the Obama administration recently announced it will no longer enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the federal law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman."

The Human Rights Campaign said that was wrong.

"While President Obama announced last year that his administration believed the law to be unconstitutional and could not continue to defend it in court, he also made clear that the law would continue to be enforced unless struck down or repealed," said the HRC."

Thank you accenting my point rather elegantly that DOMA was enforced the entire time until it was found unconstitutional by The Supreme Court.

if one doesn't defend it, how does one enforce it? you're lost.

 

[easyt65]

OUT - FREAKING - STANDING! That's funny as hail, right there!

 

[jc456]

You are so full of shit.

You had no problem with the Democrats running a proven criminal as their candidate

I was wondering how long it would be before you lied. Please list the crimes Sec. Clinton was been convicted of.

That type of propaganda may work on a large segment of the Russian population, and to some extent the certain types of Americans, but the pendulum is going to swing to the left, biggly.

one doesn't need a conviction to know a criminal and that is just stupid. OJ didn't murder anyone either right?

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[bodecea]

You are so full of shit.

You had no problem with the Democrats running a proven criminal as their candidate

I was wondering how long it would be before you lied. Please list the crimes Sec. Clinton was been convicted of.

That type of propaganda may work on a large segment of the Russian population, and to some extent the certain types of Americans, but the pendulum is going to swing to the left, biggly.

one doesn't need a conviction to know a criminal and that is just stupid. OJ didn't murder anyone either right?

"one doesn't need a conviction to know a criminal".....actually, in America, you do. If you don't like that, Comrade, go back to Mother Russia.

 

[radical right]

Congress has the power to refer charges to the US attorney. They didn't, get over it. The republicans in congress didn't refer any criminal charges. They washed their hands of it. To them, it was fully investigated, and was OVER.

you are truly a sad fk. sorry you don't understand the US constitutional law.

Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia;according to the law it is the "duty" of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action.

 

[easyt65]

I was wondering how long it would be before you lied. Please list the crimes Sec. Clinton was been convicted of.

Bwuhahaha...what a pathetic ploy from another pathetic snowflake trying to defend their proven criminal politician.

I never said she had been convicted...but I did point out her crimes, how Comey under oath laid out her crimes, exposed her crimes, and then gave some bullshit excuse why she should not be indicted by giving an excuse that is NOT a legally accepted defense for breaking the law.

YOU are a JOKE. Your continued attempt to defend proven criminals is embarrassing.

 

[mdk]

You are a filthy, partisan LIAR just like all the delusional snowflakes. You want FACTS? here you go:

"In a decision described as "shocking" and "breathtaking," the Obama administration announced this afternoonthat the Justice Department will no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

The highly unusual move hands gay rights advocates a major victory they have worked years to secure--but is also certain to provoke intense controversy and trigger a heated political battle with Congressional Republicans, who support the law and have refused to repeal it.

The Justice Department is tasked with defending laws passed by Congress--even those laws the sitting President may not like or have supported. Only a few times in history has a President decided his Justice Department will not defend an existing federal law. "

Obama Administration decision to not defend Defense of Marriage Act will trigger heated political battle


Now STFU, snowflake.

DOMA was still enforced during that whole process, dumb fuck. How many gays got married as result of the alleged lapse of DOMA's enforcement? Hint: Zero.

Again, I am sorry those facts hurt your delicate little pussy and narrative. Truly, I am.

 

[jc456]

You are so full of shit.

You had no problem with the Democrats running a proven criminal as their candidate

I was wondering how long it would be before you lied. Please list the crimes Sec. Clinton was been convicted of.

That type of propaganda may work on a large segment of the Russian population, and to some extent the certain types of Americans, but the pendulum is going to swing to the left, biggly.

one doesn't need a conviction to know a criminal and that is just stupid. OJ didn't murder anyone either right?

"one doesn't need a conviction to know a criminal".....actually, in America, you do. If you don't like that, Comrade, go back to Mother Russia.

well no you don't. a crime is a crime is a crime. again, did oj commit murder? Are you saying murder isn't a crime? The courts said he was one and took all of his money in a civil case. still don't get it do you?