- Banned
- #2,821
Its called redistribution, read about it.
So we are not a civil society, it is simply survival of the fittest and the richest?
Meaningless babble. There's nothing in the term "civil society" that justifies Social Security, Medicare or welfare. A society where A isn't allowed to plunder the income and assets of B isn't a society where everyone but the rich survive. Somehow, no one starved to death before we had welfare and Social Security.
1. Social Security was, and is, a retirement program, paid for by the same people who "take" from it.
You aren't paying for anyone else's Social Security.
The very, very small segment of Social Security receivers that get their benefits early, due to disability, etc, make up a ridiculously tiny portion of the total.
If that's what your complaining about, you should stop whining...
Because what you are paying for is the money that was taken from social security to pay for other programs that you were the "beneficiary" of. Like our bloated military.
2. There were many, many people who starved in this country before Social Security and Medicare.
Pretty much every time there was a recession/depression, (which was about every twenty years, before the Roosevelt era protections were put in place) there was a large segment of the population that would starve.
Ask your grandfather. I'm sure he'll be happy to tell you about the economic conditions at the beginning of the Great Depression.