You were never slaves in Egypt

[Indeependent]

The scholars you are calling shitty and dishonest are Israel's top scholars.

You mean the top atheist scholars.

 

[surada]

You mean the top atheist scholars.

Nope. They are Jewish.

 

[Indeependent]

Nope. They are Jewish.

Orthodox?

 

[surada]

Orthodox?

I don't know whether they are Orthodox or not. Archaeology has to speak for itself.

 

[Indeependent]

I don't know whether they are Orthodox or not. Archaeology has to speak for itself.

No, it doesn’t.
Every 10 or 20 years they find out they were wrong.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

. You are using “magical” to denigrate a religious belief

No, sorry. Religious magic is not different to me than voodoo magic or Wiccan magic. It's all magic.

And you are such an intellectual sissy that you can't even face the material. You just roll up in a ball and suck your thumb and whine like a little bitch about the mean internet man.

I will leave you to it.

 

[surada]

No, it doesn’t.
Every 10 or 20 years they find out they were wrong.

Fevers and Finkelstein have been around longer than 20 years.

 

[Indeependent]

Fevers and Finkelstein have been around longer than 20 years.

So?

 

[surada]

So?

Would you prefer they lie or falsify their findings? It was a perfect shitstorm when Yigal Yadim did that at Masada.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Israel's highest academic society: 108 professors, but not a single Arab

The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities selects its members from among scholars at the peak of their career, usually when they’ve passed 60 years old; academy official says: 'Regrettably, the number of Arab scientists... is too small'.

www.haaretz.com

When one simply can't be bigoted enough:

Orthodox?

 

[Indeependent]

Would you prefer they lie or falsify their findings? It was a perfect shitstorm when Yigal Yadim did that at Masada.

Archeology is soft science.

 

[BackAgain]

No, sorry. Religious magic is not different to me than voodoo magic or Wiccan magic. It's all magic.

And you are such an intellectual sissy that you can't even face the material. You just roll up in a ball and suck your thumb and whine like a little bitch about the mean internet man.

I will leave you to it.

Nobody cares about how you view religion. You’re off topic as well as a pig dog. And as usual, you’re also wrong. I don’t even care about religion. I just note that you need to interject your disdain for religious belief into too many threads. Grow the fuck up, you pissant.

 

[surada]

Archeology is soft science.

It's use to be. You're just behind the times by 40 years.

 

[surada]

Nobody cares about how you view religion. You’re off topic as well as a pig dog. And as usual, you’re also wrong. I don’t even care about religion. I just note that you need to interject your disdain for religious belief into too many threads. Grow the fuck up l, you pissant.

Why do you think Israeli scholars are studying the Ugarit tablets?

 

[BreezeWood]

Nobody cares about how you view religion. You’re off topic as well as a pig dog. And as usual, you’re also wrong. I don’t even care about religion. I just note that you need to interject your disdain for religious belief into too many threads. Grow the fuck up l, you pissant.

how many non religious threads are there in the religious forum -

the jews started the desert regions from their false claim in the beginning - etched tablets from the heavens and have yet to retract the lie made by moses they disingenuously use to this day and base their monotheism on the same lie.

not exactly an avoidable subject matter that relates throughout jewish recorded history. of distortions and other fallacies used to persecute and victimize the innocent.

 

[Woodznutz]

This is a discussion of the historicity of the Bible.

The comment speaks to John 8:33.

 

[Turtlesoup]

You are provably wrong. Seventy percent of the biblical stories has been proven via independent archeological study.

So you lie.

How typical.

No----

take for instance the flood--no world wide flood..No world flood ever on the planet
ONe man and one woman---wouldn't provide enough genes so ergo DNA says no

 

[westwall]

No----

take for instance the flood--no world wide flood..No world flood ever on the planet
ONe man and one woman---wouldn't provide enough genes so ergo DNA says no

Ahhhh, but there WAS a worldwide flood. Mankind congregates near the oceans and rivers today. So he obviously did that in the past. Uniformitarianism. At the end of the last ice age the oceans rose by a couple of hundred feet, so everyone living on the coastline would most surely have experienced a flood. That's why every culture, worldwide, with any kind of longevity, has a legend of a great flood.

 

[Meathead]

Ahhhh, but there WAS a worldwide flood. Mankind congregates near the oceans and rivers today. So he obviously did that in the past. Uniformitarianism. At the end of the last ice age the oceans rose by a couple of hundred feet, so everyone living on the coastline would most surely have experienced a flood. That's why every culture, worldwide, with any kind of longevity, has a legend of a great flood.

If you lived on the shore of the Black Sea 7000 years ago, you would almost surely think the inundation would have been global flooding, at least the world as you knew it.

 

[westwall]

If you lived on the shore of the Black Sea 7000 years ago, you would almost surely think the inundation would have been global flooding, at least the world as you knew it.

Yup. But as I said, it is worldwide. No matter where you go, if there is an ancient culture, they have a great flood legend.