Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is not true.Arpiao illegally detained people based on race instead of citizenship....
If they could not produce proper documentation, they were detained. That the majority were Latinos is irrelevant.
The investigation began in 2008 (coincidence?) looking into whether Arpaio's office discriminated on the basis of national origin, not race.
illegals are not part of the 4th amendment. And they are criminals because they violated our constitution and laws, he is a sheriff sworn to uphold our laws, not illegals. try again. what a wimp ass.Well sure he is. The congress already had a law that someone entering our country illegally is a criminal. He arrested illegals! The fed judge violated the rule of law passed by congress the lawmakers. Fk him the judgeIt shows no respect for the rule of law .
Joe is not a judge. It's not his role to be the arbiter of what is lawful . He was accused and found in contempt . If he doesn't like it, there's an appeal process .
He was not empowered to violate people's 4th Amendment rights. Maybe you don't believe in the Constitution but some of us do. You are nothing but a jack booted thug.
How do you know there was no crime? being in the country is illegal. so you're saying as they cross into the country, border security is not allowed to question their reason for being on our land? why have a customs or border security into the country then? been through an airport where you have to show passports? every fking country has them. there is no crime or deportation if caught with no papers? When there is a police checkpoint, is that not allowed? cops do it routinely, how is it they can pull over every car and check people out? me thinks you don't know our constitution.illegals are not part of the 4th amendment. And they are criminals because they violated our constitution and laws, he is a sheriff sworn to uphold our laws, not illegals. try again. what a wimp ass.Well sure he is. The congress already had a law that someone entering our country illegally is a criminal. He arrested illegals! The fed judge violated the rule of law passed by congress the lawmakers. Fk him the judgeIt shows no respect for the rule of law .
Joe is not a judge. It's not his role to be the arbiter of what is lawful . He was accused and found in contempt . If he doesn't like it, there's an appeal process .
He was not empowered to violate people's 4th Amendment rights. Maybe you don't believe in the Constitution but some of us do. You are nothing but a jack booted thug.
You are right. I am not a jack booted thug. The Constitution protects everyone in this country. The Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement cannot ask for their immigration status unless they are stopped for a crime. These people were not stopped for a crime. They were stopped. You are a enemy of this country because you refuse to accept the Constitution that protects all.
You cannot pull someone off the street and demand their papers.
I agree that if Arpaio did that, he should be in jail. Let's make that clear right now.Sure you can........If you were living in Berlin in the late 1930s you could.....
Yes...he was pardoned...which means that it is confirmed that he was guilty of the crimes he was charged with.Arpaio has been pardoned, suck it. Elections have consequences, in this case Trump put a boot up the ass of the liberal witch hunt traitors.
Whatever he was convicted of......here: Ex-Sheriff Joe Arpaio Convicted Of Criminal ContemptYes...he was pardoned...which means that it is confirmed that he was guilty of the crimes he was charged with.Arpaio has been pardoned, suck it. Elections have consequences, in this case Trump put a boot up the ass of the liberal witch hunt traitors.
And they were ?
The author admits he’s no fan of the sheriff, calling him a grandstander. But his reasoning is right on the spot.
1. Sheriff Joe Is Guilty Only of Upholding the Law
2. Sheriff Joe Was Denied a Jury Trial [Doesn’t the constitution guarantee everyone a trial by a jury of ones’ peers?]
3. All The Right People Are Furious Over Trump’s Pardon
The 3rd one is my favorite. With so many leftists outraged, it has to have been the right thing to do.
Full piece @ Nolte: 3 Reasons Trump's Pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio Is Awesome
Arpaio has been pardoned, suck it. Elections have consequences, in this case Trump put a boot up the ass of the liberal witch hunt traitors.
He put the boot into the ass of people who believe in the Constitution. You are the traitor as you have no regard for Constitutional protections. You are a enemy of this country as is Trump.
It shows no respect for the rule of law .
Joe is not a judge. It's not his role to be the arbiter of what is lawful . He was accused and found in contempt . If he doesn't like it, there's an appeal process .
Besides the obvious fact that you cannot define racism, those who break the law are criminals. Arpiao is a criminal.People who are opposed to enforcing our immigration laws are racist.
People who refuse to accept that America is a sovereign country are racist
People who do not accept that America is an English speaking country are racist
People who block Voter ID laws so that illegals can erase the votes of American citizens are racist
Democrats are RACIST CRETINS.
It shows no respect for the rule of law .
Joe is not a judge. It's not his role to be the arbiter of what is lawful . He was accused and found in contempt . If he doesn't like it, there's an appeal process .
Twit....the power to pardon is part of the rule of law........it can't be disrespectful if it is used as intended.....
But, your constant lying has robbed you of all credibility.
I don't care what you "conclude" about MY credibility.......Worry about your racist Trump.
How do you know there was no crime? being in the country is illegal. so you're saying as they cross into the country, border security is not allowed to question their reason for being on our land? why have a customs or border security into the country then? been through an airport where you have to show passports? every fking country has them. there is no crime or deportation if caught with no papers? When there is a police checkpoint, is that not allowed? cops do it routinely, how is it they can pull over every car and check people out? me thinks you don't know our constitution.illegals are not part of the 4th amendment. And they are criminals because they violated our constitution and laws, he is a sheriff sworn to uphold our laws, not illegals. try again. what a wimp ass.Well sure he is. The congress already had a law that someone entering our country illegally is a criminal. He arrested illegals! The fed judge violated the rule of law passed by congress the lawmakers. Fk him the judgeIt shows no respect for the rule of law .
Joe is not a judge. It's not his role to be the arbiter of what is lawful . He was accused and found in contempt . If he doesn't like it, there's an appeal process .
He was not empowered to violate people's 4th Amendment rights. Maybe you don't believe in the Constitution but some of us do. You are nothing but a jack booted thug.
You are right. I am not a jack booted thug. The Constitution protects everyone in this country. The Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement cannot ask for their immigration status unless they are stopped for a crime. These people were not stopped for a crime. They were stopped. You are a enemy of this country because you refuse to accept the Constitution that protects all.