$4,700

[Lesh]

a meeting in which the FBI 'bugs' before it happens and in which Obama's own personal Russian translator is in the room
I did not hear about that.

I have only brought it up several times, providing the associated links and articles, and we have only discussed it several times...

The meeting between Jr and the Russian lawyer was only made possible by Obama overriding his own Dept of Immigration's ban on her. The Obama administration obviously already knew this was going to happen as well as when and where. The FBI had the meeting location bugged, and Obama's own translator - a retired FBI agent - was in the room. This, of course, has all been 'explained away' by snowflakes as 'mere coincidences'. Coincidences are when 'shit happens'. Overriding your Dept of Immigration's ban to allow someone into the country so a meeting can take place is not 'coincidence'.

WHere do you get this crap from? Do you just do a couple shrooms and start riffing?

 

[easyt65]

Trump is an international businessman. Can oppo research be limited to things that happen within the boundaries of the United States? If you think that should be a rule, have at it.

you're the one that said:

"Using information obtained from a foreign source in an election in itself is illegal."

is steele american? pretty simple yes or no here, so please don't run to moving goalposts around so one side can do what the other can't. also understand i am not defending trump - i'm asking people to be consistent with the application of rules they expect others to follow.

No, Easy said that.

my mistake then. i don't read a lot of his posts to know you were referencing him.

but again - what law was broken by what action?

IF 'Collusion' is illegal which according to snowflakes is despite the fact that it is not, then Hillary and the Democrats are guilty of that crime, seeing as how Hillary paid Russians and a Trump-Hating foreign spy for their help in attempting to win the 2016 election. Jr, as pointed out, walked away from the meeting with the Russian Lawyer without taking anything.

What was illegal was the conspiracy against Trump involving Obama's Cabinet Members - the top Directors in his DOJ, NIA, CIA, and FBI...was Brennan, Strzok, and Clapper using the Dossier as the basis for the Intel Community Assessment and Intel Community Report they criminally passed off to the Intel Community, FISA Court, and Congress as REAL US-collected Intel in order to illegally get warrants to spy on the Trump team and to open the witch Hunt led by Mueller based on LIES...all proven with evidence that includes texts and testimony and more....

Of course none of that is true but it won't stop you from repeating it endlessly

Just curious....in the face of co much continuous evidence how can you bare to post these blatant lies and still expect anyone to take anything you say seriously?

The evidence of all of this has only been posted dozens of times in numerous threads on this board, yet 'gopher trolls' like you continue to pop up repeatedly without anything to support what you say just to say, 'NUH-uh!'

Good grief....I truly hope TDS is terminal.

 

[Rustic]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election and spent a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

Who cares what they found--the investigation isn't over.
The Russians are still dressing up as Americans and spreading their ill will on American boards, like this one. And you don't care, do you? What in hell is wrong with you people? You say Democrats are unAmerican for not wanting a Wall, yet the Republicans are just as bad, closing their eyes to any thought of foreign influence in our elections.
They are still here. You are their dupes.

...and still no Russian connection

 

[OldLady]

a meeting in which the FBI 'bugs' before it happens and in which Obama's own personal Russian translator is in the room
I did not hear about that.

I have only brought it up several times, providing the associated links and articles, and we have only discussed it several times...

The meeting between Jr and the Russian lawyer was only made possible by Obama overriding his own Dept of Immigration's ban on her. The Obama administration obviously already knew this was going to happen as well as when and where. The FBI had the meeting location bugged, and Obama's own translator - a retired FBI agent - was in the room. This, of course, has all been 'explained away' by snowflakes as 'mere coincidences'. Coincidences are when 'shit happens'. Overriding your Dept of Immigration's ban to allow someone into the country so a meeting can take place is not 'coincidence'.

She was allowed into the country, despite the ban, because she was counsel of record for a Russian firm being sued by the US Attorneys office, Manhattan branch. (money laundering via real estate in Manhattan) She had been handling the case for some time. Even Russians are allowed legal representation, Easy.
It's highly interesting, too, what happened to that case once Trump was sworn in. I have a feeling we'll hear more about it at some point.

 

[Dale Smith]

a meeting in which the FBI 'bugs' before it happens and in which Obama's own personal Russian translator is in the room
I did not hear about that.

I have only brought it up several times, providing the associated links and articles, and we have only discussed it several times...

The meeting between Jr and the Russian lawyer was only made possible by Obama overriding his own Dept of Immigration's ban on her. The Obama administration obviously already knew this was going to happen as well as when and where. The FBI had the meeting location bugged, and Obama's own translator - a retired FBI agent - was in the room. This, of course, has all been 'explained away' by snowflakes as 'mere coincidences'. Coincidences are when 'shit happens'. Overriding your Dept of Immigration's ban to allow someone into the country so a meeting can take place is not 'coincidence'.

WHere do you get this crap from? Do you just do a couple shrooms and start riffing?

Easyt65 is 100 percent correct. Why not look it up yourself instead of coming across as an uniformed, Trump hating moron? This all came out over a year ago.

 

[Care4all]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

please supply a link/source for your statement and claim that Hillary paid Russians....

 

[Dale Smith]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

please supply a link/source for your statement and claim that Hillary paid Russians....

Fusion GPS???? HELLLLOOOOO?????

 

[easyt65]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

I have repeatedly done so again and again and again....only to get the response from ignorant reality-denying snowflakes like yourself of 'NUH-UH'!

Next......

 

[iceberg]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

please supply a link/source for your statement and claim that Hillary paid Russians....

funny.

when i ask you for such things, you simply stop talking to me.

 

[Dale Smith]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

I have repeatedly done so again and again and again....only to get the response from ignorant reality-denying snowflakes like yourself of 'NUH-UH'!

Next......

The ol "UH-UHHH?!?!?!?!?" defense is the "tried and true" counter to any argument that they are clueless about.......I mean, if they can't refute? Simply deny it and put their hands over their eyes and/or ears.

 

[gipper]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

please supply a link/source for your statement and claim that Hillary paid Russians....

funny.

when i ask you for such things, you simply stop talking to me.

She has to consult with MSLSD.

 

[iceberg]

Hillary paid Russians

put up, or shut up!

please supply a link/source for your statement and claim that Hillary paid Russians....

funny.

when i ask you for such things, you simply stop talking to me.

She has to consult with MSLSD.

well to be fair it's "put up or shut up" so she shuts up.

 

[Care4all]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations


All of the emphasis on Facebook has obscured the huge role of Instagram, as well as the Russian activity on many smaller platforms.
Most of the early media coverage of the Russian campaign focused on Facebook. The New Knowledge report argues that the Internet Research Agency’s presence on Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has been underestimated and may have been as effective or even more effective than its Facebook effort. The report says there were 187 million engagements on Instagram — users “liking” or sharing the content created in Russia — compared with 76.5 million engagements on Facebook.

“Our assessment is that Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report concludes.

Both reports note that there was hardly a social platform, however obscure, that the Internet Research Agency did not invade: Reddit, Google+, Vine, Gab, Meetup, Pinterest, Tumblr and more. The Russian trolls even created a podcast on SoundCloud.



Why are we still talking about this more than two years after the election?
Russia had used similar online influence tactics inside Russian borders and in neighboring countries, including Estonia, Georgia and Ukraine. But the campaign against the United States in 2016 was historic on several counts: It was the first major foreign influence campaign aimed at affecting a presidential election; it was the biggest influence operation ever to be aimed at Americans from another country; and it was the biggest attack ever — using virtual, not physical weapons — on the United States by its old Cold War adversary, albeit slimmed down from the Soviet Union to Russia alone. It will be studied for years.

It is impossible to measure what effect the Russian campaign — along with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails — had on the outcome of the very close 2016 election. But some political scientists believe it may have won the presidency for Donald J. Trump — a remarkable conclusion, even if it cannot be proved or disproved.

Inevitably, some American political operatives are learning from Russia’s example, testing the tools of chicanery in their online operations. So the Internet Research Agency may have taught a new generation of tricksters how to swing an election in the cyberage.

 

[gipper]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations


All of the emphasis on Facebook has obscured the huge role of Instagram, as well as the Russian activity on many smaller platforms.
Most of the early media coverage of the Russian campaign focused on Facebook. The New Knowledge report argues that the Internet Research Agency’s presence on Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has been underestimated and may have been as effective or even more effective than its Facebook effort. The report says there were 187 million engagements on Instagram — users “liking” or sharing the content created in Russia — compared with 76.5 million engagements on Facebook.

“Our assessment is that Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report concludes.

Both reports note that there was hardly a social platform, however obscure, that the Internet Research Agency did not invade: Reddit, Google+, Vine, Gab, Meetup, Pinterest, Tumblr and more. The Russian trolls even created a podcast on SoundCloud.



Why are we still talking about this more than two years after the election?
Russia had used similar online influence tactics inside Russian borders and in neighboring countries, including Estonia, Georgia and Ukraine. But the campaign against the United States in 2016 was historic on several counts: It was the first major foreign influence campaign aimed at affecting a presidential election; it was the biggest influence operation ever to be aimed at Americans from another country; and it was the biggest attack ever — using virtual, not physical weapons — on the United States by its old Cold War adversary, albeit slimmed down from the Soviet Union to Russia alone. It will be studied for years.

It is impossible to measure what effect the Russian campaign — along with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails — had on the outcome of the very close 2016 election. But some political scientists believe it may have won the presidency for Donald J. Trump — a remarkable conclusion, even if it cannot be proved or disproved.

Inevitably, some American political operatives are learning from Russia’s example, testing the tools of chicanery in their online operations. So the Internet Research Agency may have taught a new generation of tricksters how to swing an election in the cyberage.

Please explain how the Russians made the CEO of Google tell a House committee that Russia spent $4,700 on Google platforms, for the benefit of Donnie?

 

[iceberg]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations.

funny. "very very little money in advertising"

yet we have others on "the left" swearing they spent $1.25 mil A MONTH. "the left" doesn't even know their own talking points anymore.

putting that aside:



this is the CEO of google telling you that russian accounts only spent $4700 on their platform. how can YOU and anyone else call this russian propaganda when he's saying it directly and that is readily available?

and the ads they spread were simply lighting a fire of hate. we did the rest to ourselves.

how you and so many on both sides can't see that is exactly why it works so well and alabama adopted this tactic against moore

 

[iceberg]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations


All of the emphasis on Facebook has obscured the huge role of Instagram, as well as the Russian activity on many smaller platforms.
Most of the early media coverage of the Russian campaign focused on Facebook. The New Knowledge report argues that the Internet Research Agency’s presence on Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has been underestimated and may have been as effective or even more effective than its Facebook effort. The report says there were 187 million engagements on Instagram — users “liking” or sharing the content created in Russia — compared with 76.5 million engagements on Facebook.

“Our assessment is that Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report concludes.

Both reports note that there was hardly a social platform, however obscure, that the Internet Research Agency did not invade: Reddit, Google+, Vine, Gab, Meetup, Pinterest, Tumblr and more. The Russian trolls even created a podcast on SoundCloud.



Why are we still talking about this more than two years after the election?
Russia had used similar online influence tactics inside Russian borders and in neighboring countries, including Estonia, Georgia and Ukraine. But the campaign against the United States in 2016 was historic on several counts: It was the first major foreign influence campaign aimed at affecting a presidential election; it was the biggest influence operation ever to be aimed at Americans from another country; and it was the biggest attack ever — using virtual, not physical weapons — on the United States by its old Cold War adversary, albeit slimmed down from the Soviet Union to Russia alone. It will be studied for years.

It is impossible to measure what effect the Russian campaign — along with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails — had on the outcome of the very close 2016 election. But some political scientists believe it may have won the presidency for Donald J. Trump — a remarkable conclusion, even if it cannot be proved or disproved.

Inevitably, some American political operatives are learning from Russia’s example, testing the tools of chicanery in their online operations. So the Internet Research Agency may have taught a new generation of tricksters how to swing an election in the cyberage.

Please explain how the Russians made the CEO of Google tell a House committee that Russia spent $4,700 on Google platforms, for the benefit of Donnie?

she's about to go away again...

 

[Votto]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election and spent a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

Who cares what they found--the investigation isn't over.
The Russians are still dressing up as Americans and spreading their ill will on American boards, like this one. And you don't care, do you? What in hell is wrong with you people? You say Democrats are unAmerican for not wanting a Wall, yet the Republicans are just as bad, closing their eyes to any thought of foreign influence in our elections.
They are still here. You are their dupes.

Exactly! Who cares what they find so long as they continue to make Trump's life hell with the knowledge that no matter what is found he needs to be impeached anyway

Romney will lead the charge in the US Senate after taking Trump's endorsement to win his seat.

Lovely people those Swamp creatures.

 

[gipper]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations


All of the emphasis on Facebook has obscured the huge role of Instagram, as well as the Russian activity on many smaller platforms.
Most of the early media coverage of the Russian campaign focused on Facebook. The New Knowledge report argues that the Internet Research Agency’s presence on Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has been underestimated and may have been as effective or even more effective than its Facebook effort. The report says there were 187 million engagements on Instagram — users “liking” or sharing the content created in Russia — compared with 76.5 million engagements on Facebook.

“Our assessment is that Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report concludes.

Both reports note that there was hardly a social platform, however obscure, that the Internet Research Agency did not invade: Reddit, Google+, Vine, Gab, Meetup, Pinterest, Tumblr and more. The Russian trolls even created a podcast on SoundCloud.



Why are we still talking about this more than two years after the election?
Russia had used similar online influence tactics inside Russian borders and in neighboring countries, including Estonia, Georgia and Ukraine. But the campaign against the United States in 2016 was historic on several counts: It was the first major foreign influence campaign aimed at affecting a presidential election; it was the biggest influence operation ever to be aimed at Americans from another country; and it was the biggest attack ever — using virtual, not physical weapons — on the United States by its old Cold War adversary, albeit slimmed down from the Soviet Union to Russia alone. It will be studied for years.

It is impossible to measure what effect the Russian campaign — along with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails — had on the outcome of the very close 2016 election. But some political scientists believe it may have won the presidency for Donald J. Trump — a remarkable conclusion, even if it cannot be proved or disproved.

Inevitably, some American political operatives are learning from Russia’s example, testing the tools of chicanery in their online operations. So the Internet Research Agency may have taught a new generation of tricksters how to swing an election in the cyberage.

Please explain how the Russians made the CEO of Google tell a House committee that Russia spent $4,700 on Google platforms, for the benefit of Donnie?

Did you know out this? Just a coincidence, no doubt.
Journalist Who Broke Story Of Mueller Deleting Text Messages Dies Mysteriously

 

[Dale Smith]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations


All of the emphasis on Facebook has obscured the huge role of Instagram, as well as the Russian activity on many smaller platforms.
Most of the early media coverage of the Russian campaign focused on Facebook. The New Knowledge report argues that the Internet Research Agency’s presence on Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has been underestimated and may have been as effective or even more effective than its Facebook effort. The report says there were 187 million engagements on Instagram — users “liking” or sharing the content created in Russia — compared with 76.5 million engagements on Facebook.

“Our assessment is that Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report concludes.

Both reports note that there was hardly a social platform, however obscure, that the Internet Research Agency did not invade: Reddit, Google+, Vine, Gab, Meetup, Pinterest, Tumblr and more. The Russian trolls even created a podcast on SoundCloud.



Why are we still talking about this more than two years after the election?
Russia had used similar online influence tactics inside Russian borders and in neighboring countries, including Estonia, Georgia and Ukraine. But the campaign against the United States in 2016 was historic on several counts: It was the first major foreign influence campaign aimed at affecting a presidential election; it was the biggest influence operation ever to be aimed at Americans from another country; and it was the biggest attack ever — using virtual, not physical weapons — on the United States by its old Cold War adversary, albeit slimmed down from the Soviet Union to Russia alone. It will be studied for years.

It is impossible to measure what effect the Russian campaign — along with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails — had on the outcome of the very close 2016 election. But some political scientists believe it may have won the presidency for Donald J. Trump — a remarkable conclusion, even if it cannot be proved or disproved.

Inevitably, some American political operatives are learning from Russia’s example, testing the tools of chicanery in their online operations. So the Internet Research Agency may have taught a new generation of tricksters how to swing an election in the cyberage.

The New York Times???? The CFR mouthpiece that practically attempted to carry the Hildbeast over the finish line? The lamestream media that even admitted that they gave her favorable coverage while trying to make Trump's candidacy into a joke that would be the punchline of late night talkshows for years to come? The same media that gave her the debate questions in advance? The same media that conspired with the Hildebeast campaign to film the "bulldogging" tactics to provoke Trump supporters and then paint them as the "out of control" Trumpers?

You honestly believe that Russian bots held more sway over the voters than the lamestream media with 1/100000000000th of the budget???? I WAS on facebook A LOT during the election cycle and I never came across one single anti-Hillary ad or anything about her that wasn't fact as it pertained to her e-mail server and the classified information that she claimed never came across her multiple devices outside of the DOT Gov secured servers. I certainly saw biased coverage and negative articles about Trump though........and leftards laughing about what a rout the election would be for the Hildebeast. The gloating started in early August and continued right up to election day....get the fuck outta here with that "THE ROOSKIES STOLE OUR ELECTION" bullshit.

 

[OldLady]

Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election by spending a whopping $4,700. LOL!

The gaslighting of some Americans is too easy.

‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’
View attachment 238085
‘4,700 on Google ads – that’s it? We never found evidence of Russian collusion’

100% pure Russian PROPAGANDA..... HOW can you and other USMB right wing members not recognize this...? It's in-explainable HOW LITTLE you all know and truly ignorant you guys are on this topic??? BLOWS MY MIND!!! For very very little money in advertising, the Russians found a way through trolls and Bots to spread those ads to hundreds of millions of people...

Five Takeaways From New Reports on Russia’s Social Media Operations


All of the emphasis on Facebook has obscured the huge role of Instagram, as well as the Russian activity on many smaller platforms.
Most of the early media coverage of the Russian campaign focused on Facebook. The New Knowledge report argues that the Internet Research Agency’s presence on Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has been underestimated and may have been as effective or even more effective than its Facebook effort. The report says there were 187 million engagements on Instagram — users “liking” or sharing the content created in Russia — compared with 76.5 million engagements on Facebook.

“Our assessment is that Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report concludes.

Both reports note that there was hardly a social platform, however obscure, that the Internet Research Agency did not invade: Reddit, Google+, Vine, Gab, Meetup, Pinterest, Tumblr and more. The Russian trolls even created a podcast on SoundCloud.



Why are we still talking about this more than two years after the election?
Russia had used similar online influence tactics inside Russian borders and in neighboring countries, including Estonia, Georgia and Ukraine. But the campaign against the United States in 2016 was historic on several counts: It was the first major foreign influence campaign aimed at affecting a presidential election; it was the biggest influence operation ever to be aimed at Americans from another country; and it was the biggest attack ever — using virtual, not physical weapons — on the United States by its old Cold War adversary, albeit slimmed down from the Soviet Union to Russia alone. It will be studied for years.

It is impossible to measure what effect the Russian campaign — along with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails — had on the outcome of the very close 2016 election. But some political scientists believe it may have won the presidency for Donald J. Trump — a remarkable conclusion, even if it cannot be proved or disproved.

Inevitably, some American political operatives are learning from Russia’s example, testing the tools of chicanery in their online operations. So the Internet Research Agency may have taught a new generation of tricksters how to swing an election in the cyberage.

Well done, my dear.