A day in the life of Net Neutrality

it's actually the opposite of that.
your op is a very good example of what could happen without net neutrality.

Yes, yes, war is peace, slavery is freedom, changing the internet keeps it the same. We've heard your doublethink newspeak.

Verizon sued to overturn the Federal Communications Commission's 2010 Open Internet Order, forcing the FCC to try again. The commission tentatively approved rules in May that would prevent Internet service providers from blocking or degrading traffic from third-party Web services while allowing "fast lane" deals in which companies could pay for faster access to consumers.


Verizon ISPs will sue unless government adopts weaker net neutrality rules Ars Technica
 
157p1yd.jpg


4md5h.jpg


2w5mu6x.jpg
 
How are you guys arguing with Censor on this? You do realize that the teeth of the net neutrality argument is whether it goes title II or the way of Section 706. Net Neutrality, like so many bills that cross the halls of congress these days and end up with a newspeak catch phrase, isn't neutrality at all. It's the opposite.

So, are you guys now going to argue with me that the teeth of N.N is not the difference between Section 706 and Title II?
 
And right now the FCC is leaning toward Title II. They claim a stripped down version of title II, but that's always the type of lip service we get from some govt. agency when they plan to butt fuck the life out of something, including consumers. It's also been noted that an additional tax would come into play almost immediately under what Obama is encouraging.

It's like we don't see the forest fro the trees here anymore.
 
And right now the FCC is leaning toward Title II. They claim a stripped down version of title II, but that's always the type of lip service we get from some govt. agency when they plan to butt fuck the life out of something, including consumers. It's also been noted that an additional tax would come into play almost immediately under what Obama is encouraging.

It's like we don't see the forest fro the trees here anymore.

Link
 
no you're right. i could get a dsl service, at less than 1Mbps. or i suppose there are dial up services available to me - of course then i'd have to get a phone line.

A lot of the quality is crap for the small providers. And all of them ride on the backbone of the large providers. You might well only have one backbone carrier in your area, but they have no impact on content.

One has to grasp what the OSI model is and what the physical layer means before one can grasp the actual issue. Those of you who come here righteously chanting the mantra that ThinkProgress trained you to spout, are not qualified to discuss that actual issue involved.

According to the leftist hate sites (and thus you're firmly held belief), backbone providers can censor content they don't like - granted they never have - despite a deliberate lie by "Wired" regarding the Website "Blue Room" and a Pearl Jam concert.

So you are programmed to claim that backbone providers are going to censor content - can you explain to us HOW they would accomplish this? Please link to the OSI model as you explain this.
 
And right now the FCC is leaning toward Title II. They claim a stripped down version of title II, but that's always the type of lip service we get from some govt. agency when they plan to butt fuck the life out of something, including consumers. It's also been noted that an additional tax would come into play almost immediately under what Obama is encouraging.

It's like we don't see the forest fro the trees here anymore.

Link

ED FEULNER A backdoor tax on the Internet - Washington Times
 
The scare tactics are horrible on this one too. People are actually bleating that if the government doesn't take action the internet will turn into mad max n shit.

It's pathetic.
 
You wake up early, you pick up your iPhone and check your VZ-Connect page, you got 7 VZ-Likes on the cat video you posted, you would have gotten more, but an FCC censor found it objectionable and removed it. Not for the first time, you find yourself yearning for the days of Facebook. But after Verizon was named the exclusive backbone carrier by the FCC, weeks after President Obama issued the Executive Order making the internet a Title II utility. Facebook held on for awhile, but the FCC revoked their netcasting license after repeated violations of the net neutrality seditious content rules. Verizon quickly replaced Facebook with VZ-Connect, which was monitored by FCC content custodians.

You need to send Aunt Martha a thank you note for the sweater she sent you for your birthday. So you log on to VZ-Banking to check your balance. Aunt Martha is half a country away and the long distance charges for an email to her will be in the hundreds of dollars. Your balance is low, but you keep the message down to just a few words to keep the costs down.

A pile of mail is in the corner and you dread your Verizon bill. Opening it you see the usual $200 base charge, along with TTY charges, Baseline services taxes to provide internet to families on assistance. The netuse tax has gone up again, now $73.42 for a month. The tax is needed to pay the FCC regulators. But what you really dread are the long distance charges, email in the same zip code is still free, but a per mile charge for email outside of the zip code adds up quickly.

You are tempted to log on to VZ-Chatter and post a complaint, but last time you complained about your Verizon bill you got a stern letter from an FCC guardian advising you that such complaints have no place on the internet.

On the bright side, hand written letters through postal mail have made a resurgence.

Who is the sockpuppet? You or Swimexpert?
 
Did the FCC censor people's phone calls before 1996?

Was Bill Clinton stupid? Is that why he signed into law the 1996 Telecommunications act? Is the reason that you and the other leftists seek to place the Internet under the 1934 rules that Clinton was incompetent?

{Today I have signed into law S. 652, the "Telecommunications Act of 1996." This landmark legislation fulfills my Administration's promise to reform our telecommunications laws in a manner that leads to competition and private investment, promotes universal service and open access to information networks, and provides for flexible government regulation. The Act opens up competition between local telephone companies, long distance providers and cable companies; expands the reach of advanced telecommunications services to schools, libraries, and hospitals; and requires the use of new Vchip technology to enable families to exercise greater control over the television programming that comes into their homes} - Bill Clinton
William J. Clinton Statement on Signing the Telecommunications Act of 1996

Why do you and your fellow progressives demand that this progress be thrown away, and the internet placed under the rules that this supplanted?

You probably don't even know, but I do - a lust for power by your rulers.
 
You wake up early, you pick up your iPhone and check your VZ-Connect page, you got 7 VZ-Likes on the cat video you posted, you would have gotten more, but an FCC censor found it objectionable and removed it. Not for the first time, you find yourself yearning for the days of Facebook. But after Verizon was named the exclusive backbone carrier by the FCC, weeks after President Obama issued the Executive Order making the internet a Title II utility. Facebook held on for awhile, but the FCC revoked their netcasting license after repeated violations of the net neutrality seditious content rules. Verizon quickly replaced Facebook with VZ-Connect, which was monitored by FCC content custodians.

You need to send Aunt Martha a thank you note for the sweater she sent you for your birthday. So you log on to VZ-Banking to check your balance. Aunt Martha is half a country away and the long distance charges for an email to her will be in the hundreds of dollars. Your balance is low, but you keep the message down to just a few words to keep the costs down.

A pile of mail is in the corner and you dread your Verizon bill. Opening it you see the usual $200 base charge, along with TTY charges, Baseline services taxes to provide internet to families on assistance. The netuse tax has gone up again, now $73.42 for a month. The tax is needed to pay the FCC regulators. But what you really dread are the long distance charges, email in the same zip code is still free, but a per mile charge for email outside of the zip code adds up quickly.

You are tempted to log on to VZ-Chatter and post a complaint, but last time you complained about your Verizon bill you got a stern letter from an FCC guardian advising you that such complaints have no place on the internet.

On the bright side, hand written letters through postal mail have made a resurgence.
If Obama or the FCC did anything like in your scenario then it would not be net neutrality. I wouldn't put it past corporate cronies in the FCC to due something bad under the title of "net neutrality" taking advantage of the public's confusion about the subject.
 

Forum List

Back
Top