A Muslim and a Professor Argue… The UCSD Student admits she is FOR the eradication of ALL Jews.

From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.
 
..
I would hardly call advocacy-for and maintenance-of a high degree of vigilance, directed against a belief-system that also doubles as a cultural and philosophical and spiritual and legal opposite and adversary, as fear-mongering, or keeping-the-fear-up. More like: naming the source of modern troubles, and calling for a sustained skepticism and watchfulness.

I think "fear" describes your post perfectly, actually.

The fact that you believe that any "belief system" is our "spiritual and legal adversary" just nails that point home even more.

You mean the Nazis weren't our enemy?

Our enemy in WWII was a nation led by an autocratic government.

Not a "belief system".
It was Hitler's belief system that was prevalent in Germany.

No, it wasn't.

Hitler's "belief system" was a tool of his government. Not the other way around.
The man was a fucking brutal dictator and you think his belief system didn't guide the actions his government took?
 
Is that why they passed Obamacare, because they were "annoyed with scared conservatives?"
Scared, annoying conservatives are a byproduct of every accomplishment in human history. They are just byproducts; not catalysts.

Liberalism accomplished the massacre in France. That's why we're afraid.
No you're afraid because you're a conservative.

Charlie Hebdo is publishing Muhommad on the cover of their next issue because they're NOT afraid. And that's because they are and have always been extremely liberal.

If they're not afraid, they should be. 12 of their colleagues are dead. They can thank the liberals who thought it was a good idea to import 7 million Muslims into the country for that.
Of course, as a conservative, you think that everyone should be scared. That's why you could never work for a place like Charlie Hebdo.

I think people should be scared when there is something to fear. You, on the other hand, think people should not be concerned when 12 of their colleagues get gunned down in a massacre.

Fools leap where angels fear to tread.
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.
 
His credibility

Honestly, I don't give a shit how credible you find me.

But I am curious as to your logic.

Well, hair brain. Read my other post

You mean the one where you quoted two posts of mine? That's what I'm asking you about.

Do you think those posts are somehow contradictory?

Go ahead. Try talking your way around it :rolleyes:

Talk around what? I still have no idea what you think the "gotcha" is in those posts.
 
Scared, annoying conservatives are a byproduct of every accomplishment in human history. They are just byproducts; not catalysts.

Liberalism accomplished the massacre in France. That's why we're afraid.
No you're afraid because you're a conservative.

Charlie Hebdo is publishing Muhommad on the cover of their next issue because they're NOT afraid. And that's because they are and have always been extremely liberal.

If they're not afraid, they should be. 12 of their colleagues are dead. They can thank the liberals who thought it was a good idea to import 7 million Muslims into the country for that.
Of course, as a conservative, you think that everyone should be scared. That's why you could never work for a place like Charlie Hebdo.

I think people should be scared when there is something to fear. You, on the other hand, think people should be concerned when 12 of their colleagues get gunned down in a massacre.

Fools leap where angels fear to tread.

You are terrified. The terrorists have beaten you. You poor thing...

Try your best to grow a spine.
 
..
Um...the true subject of this thread, since you cared enough to post in it in the first place. Perhaps I'm asking too much.

What is the "true" subject of this thread, in your opinion?

From where I'm sitting, the subject of this thread is that 4 years ago, a Muslim girl fell into David Horowitz's rhetorical trap and embarrassed herself, and now it's just another tool for you guys to bring back up to increase the fear, as Kondor so succinctly expressed already.
I would hardly call advocacy-for and maintenance-of a high degree of vigilance, directed against a belief-system that also doubles as a cultural and philosophical and spiritual and legal opposite and adversary, as fear-mongering, or keeping-the-fear-up. More like: naming the source of modern troubles, and calling for a sustained skepticism and watchfulness.

I think "fear" describes your post perfectly, actually.

The fact that you believe that any "belief system" is our "spiritual and legal adversary" just nails that point home even more.

You mean the Nazis weren't our enemy?

Our enemy in WWII was a nation led by an autocratic government.

Not a "belief system".
And just how much more dangerous do you believe an autocratic government will be when it becomes a sin to disobey that government, run by ayatollahs and mullahs and degenerate and savage caliph-wannabes, who herd the faithful into mosques, whip them up with religious hate-rhetoric against non-Muslims, then sends them out into the world and into The West to do mischief?

The trick is, not to let them grow into such a monster, on any kind of broad scale that might endanger The West.

That means watchfulness, not complacency.
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.

She didn't think through the fact that she was speaking to a famous journalist in a venue that was being recorded before she blurted out the truth.
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.
I see an old man defending her and her "belief system."
 
Scared, annoying conservatives are a byproduct of every accomplishment in human history. They are just byproducts; not catalysts.

Liberalism accomplished the massacre in France. That's why we're afraid.
No you're afraid because you're a conservative.

Charlie Hebdo is publishing Muhommad on the cover of their next issue because they're NOT afraid. And that's because they are and have always been extremely liberal.

If they're not afraid, they should be. 12 of their colleagues are dead. They can thank the liberals who thought it was a good idea to import 7 million Muslims into the country for that.
Of course, as a conservative, you think that everyone should be scared. That's why you could never work for a place like Charlie Hebdo.

I think people should be scared when there is something to fear. You, on the other hand, think people should be concerned when 12 of their colleagues get gunned down in a massacre.

Fools leap where angels fear to tread.

When there is something to fear. That's the key.

Remember the "yellow peril"?
 
His credibility

Honestly, I don't give a shit how credible you find me.

But I am curious as to your logic.

Well, hair brain. Read my other post

You mean the one where you quoted two posts of mine? That's what I'm asking you about.

Do you think those posts are somehow contradictory?

Go ahead. Try talking your way around it :rolleyes:

Talk around what? I still have no idea what you think the "gotcha" is in those posts.
I believe he refers to the second of the two of your posts he quoted.
 
Liberalism accomplished the massacre in France. That's why we're afraid.
No you're afraid because you're a conservative.

Charlie Hebdo is publishing Muhommad on the cover of their next issue because they're NOT afraid. And that's because they are and have always been extremely liberal.

If they're not afraid, they should be. 12 of their colleagues are dead. They can thank the liberals who thought it was a good idea to import 7 million Muslims into the country for that.
Of course, as a conservative, you think that everyone should be scared. That's why you could never work for a place like Charlie Hebdo.

I think people should be scared when there is something to fear. You, on the other hand, think people should be concerned when 12 of their colleagues get gunned down in a massacre.

Fools leap where angels fear to tread.

When there is something to fear. That's the key.

Remember the "yellow peril"?
Militant Islam is FAR more dangerous.

The Yellow Peril never blew up two of our skyscrapers nor suicide-rammed the Pentagon nor crashed an airliner into a Pennsylvania airfield nor killed 3,000 Americans upon our own soil.

Faux comparison.

Apples and oranges.
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.

She didn't think through the fact that she was speaking to a famous journalist in a venue that was being recorded before she blurted out the truth.

David Horowitz isn't a "journalist", either.

Other than that, yes. That's exactly what I'm saying.
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.

She didn't think through the fact that she was speaking to a famous journalist in a venue that was being recorded before she blurted out the truth.

David Horowitz isn't a "journalist", either.

Other than that, yes. That's exactly what I'm saying.
Does it matter?

He was a fellow that got a Muslim college student to admit that she supports the extermination of the Jews.

You are defending the indefensible.

Or so it seems, at first glance.
 
Honestly, I don't give a shit how credible you find me.

But I am curious as to your logic.

Well, hair brain. Read my other post

You mean the one where you quoted two posts of mine? That's what I'm asking you about.

Do you think those posts are somehow contradictory?

Go ahead. Try talking your way around it :rolleyes:

Talk around what? I still have no idea what you think the "gotcha" is in those posts.
I believe he refers to the second of the two of your posts he quoted.

Here's the post again, for reference. Maybe you can tell me why the two statements somehow equal a "gotcha".

Oh, so supporting exterminating millions of Muslims is ok, as long as some Muslims survive?
She didn't say Muslims. She said Jews. And she said ALL, as in none survive.

No, she didn't say that. David Horowitz did.

A more experienced person would have been together enough not to "endorse" killing all the Jews.

You lose
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.

She didn't think through the fact that she was speaking to a famous journalist in a venue that was being recorded before she blurted out the truth.

David Horowitz isn't a "journalist", either.

Other than that, yes. That's exactly what I'm saying.
Your persuasive arguments are starting to sway me. I think perhaps it is a good idea to exterminate all the Jews.

Of course, maybe the rhetoric on an internet message board has tricked me into saying that. I don't believe you are a real doctor, so that makes it a-ok.
 
From a less hysterical source, 4 years ago when it actually happened:

In a statement, the student apologized for her comments by saying, she didn't fully hear the question she was asked.

“Had I understood the nature of the question,” she wrote, “I would never have responded the way that I did- by providing an answer that misrepresented my beliefs.”


Source: UCSD Student s Remark Triggers Controversy NBC 7 San Diego
Apologized? Didn't hear the question? Give me a huge fucking break.
What is it with you lefties and Muslim extremism....Don't fall into the trap of being unsophisticated. it is clear what this woman believes and for the purpose of deflecting any potential back lash, she tried to walk away from here statement.
Ironic how you libs show your contempt for Jewish people yet, a majority of Jews vote democrat.

:lol:

I love it when you guys try to play the anti-semite card. It's almost as good as the 9/11 card.

That is only "clear" to you because that's what you want to see. You want her to be an evil villain, a bogeyman for you to be afraid of - so that's what you see.

I see a kid being railroaded into making a statement she didn't think through, and then apologizing for it.

She didn't think through the fact that she was speaking to a famous journalist in a venue that was being recorded before she blurted out the truth.

David Horowitz isn't a "journalist", either.

Other than that, yes. That's exactly what I'm saying.
Does it matter?

He was a fellow that got a Muslim college student to admit that she supports the extermination of the Jews.

You are defending the indefensible.

Or so it seems, at first glance.

That's the point, right there.

He got her to say it.

People say things they don't mean, or don't think through, in the heat of a confrontation.
 
When did liberals ever want anyone to live his life free?
Since the first moment a person got annoyed of scared conservatives. :cool:

Is that why they passed Obamacare, because they were "annoyed with scared conservatives?"
Scared, annoying conservatives are a byproduct of every accomplishment in human history. They are just byproducts; not catalysts.

Liberalism accomplished the massacre in France. That's why we're afraid.
No you're afraid because you're a conservative.

Charlie Hebdo is publishing Muhommad on the cover of their next issue because they're NOT afraid. And that's because they are and have always been extremely liberal.
Sissies at CNN
 

Forum List

Back
Top