Alito refuses to recuse

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2018
75,368
71,952
3,615

Alito’s Aggrieved Letter to Congress Tips His Hand in the Jan. 6 Cases


And his excuse is flat ridiculous.

It also proves that the ethics thing they engineered for themselves is useless just like I said when it was agreed to. Iy has no teeth and assume the justices are honest, which is a huge mistake in this day.

In Alito’s telling, he not only won’t recuse but in fact can’t recuse from the insurrection cases. Why? Because, he suggests, the nonbinding and entirely subjective ethics code to which the nine justices half-heartedly committed themselves this past fall requires that they remain on cases when they personally decide there’s no legitimate reason to recuse. Alito therefore asserts an “obligation” to hear the Trump-related cases.

So the ethics code is, we discover, mandatory, but only in the sense that it converts a justice’s hostility toward recusal into an affirmative duty not to recuse. (We trust that Alito, like the other Republican-appointed justices, will continue to disregard the ethics suggestions he dislikes.)
 

Alito’s Aggrieved Letter to Congress Tips His Hand in the Jan. 6 Cases


And his excuse is flat ridiculous.

It also proves that the ethics thing they engineered for themselves is useless just like I said when it was agreed to. Iy has no teeth and assume the justices are honest, which is a huge mistake in this day.

In Alito’s telling, he not only won’t recuse but in fact can’t recuse from the insurrection cases. Why? Because, he suggests, the nonbinding and entirely subjective ethics code to which the nine justices half-heartedly committed themselves this past fall requires that they remain on cases when they personally decide there’s no legitimate reason to recuse. Alito therefore asserts an “obligation” to hear the Trump-related cases.

So the ethics code is, we discover, mandatory, but only in the sense that it converts a justice’s hostility toward recusal into an affirmative duty not to recuse. (We trust that Alito, like the other Republican-appointed justices, will continue to disregard the ethics suggestions he dislikes.)
as he should,,

never bow down to the liberal mob,,

stand above them and piss on their heads,,
 
Why are democrats so out to jail J-6 protestors?... I mean that's the argument... that Alito must recuse himself from J-6 trials....
The vengeance within the neo democrat party is so Nazi like its frightening to watch....
 
Alito blamed the flag on his wife. This is the equivalent of saying the dog ate your homework. No one believes Alito’s idiotic lie.
Do you believe Bob Menendez's idiotic lie that his wife is the one who stashed the gold bars away in his house?
 

Alito’s Aggrieved Letter to Congress Tips His Hand in the Jan. 6 Cases


And his excuse is flat ridiculous.

It also proves that the ethics thing they engineered for themselves is useless just like I said when it was agreed to. Iy has no teeth and assume the justices are honest, which is a huge mistake in this day.

In Alito’s telling, he not only won’t recuse but in fact can’t recuse from the insurrection cases. Why? Because, he suggests, the nonbinding and entirely subjective ethics code to which the nine justices half-heartedly committed themselves this past fall requires that they remain on cases when they personally decide there’s no legitimate reason to recuse. Alito therefore asserts an “obligation” to hear the Trump-related cases.

So the ethics code is, we discover, mandatory, but only in the sense that it converts a justice’s hostility toward recusal into an affirmative duty not to recuse. (We trust that Alito, like the other Republican-appointed justices, will continue to disregard the ethics suggestions he dislikes.)
the piece of crap in NYC who's family is making money on the Trump trial is the one who should recuse ..

 

Forum List

Back
Top