All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Sixties Fan]

Canada’s Conservative Party Recognizes Jerusalem As Israel’s Capital

 

[Sixties Fan]

As a small Islamic sect of an estimated 20 million people—about 1 percent of the global Muslim population—the Ahmadiyya community is a persecuted minority across the Middle East. But at the southern entrance of the northern Israeli city of Haifa lies Kababir village, home to 2,000 residents, 70 percent of whom are Ahmadi Muslims.

(full article online)

Ahmadi Muslims, Persecuted in Mideast, Find Freedom in Israel

 

[Sixties Fan]

Iranian drone, Israeli counter-strike: Probing defenses is the new normal - Liberty Unyielding

 

[Sixties Fan]

The IDF said, that this time the man was sent by Hezbollah to test ways of infiltrating into and out of Israel.

Under interrogation the man said he was forced by two Hezbollah men, named Mahadi and Ali Shachror, to try and cross the border and test the security fence for them. They drove him to the border by motorcycle and left him there to make his way across.

(full article online)

Lebanese Man Caught Infiltrating into Israel (Again)

 

[Sixties Fan]

And when Israel shows, again and again, how liberal and tolerant its citizens are towards women/gays/transgendered/Arabs/minorities, the only way that Israel haters can explain it is the absurd idea that millions of Israelis only pretend to be liberal in order to divert attention from "the Occupation."

(full article online)

Israel is once again guilty of Arab/Christian/Transgender/Ballerina-Washing ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[ForeverYoung436]

The British Mandate for Palestine came from the Treaty of Sevres, which is very clear in that it was the Muslim Arabs who were being given independence and sovereignty in Palestine, not the Jewish People. In fact, the Jews were almost all immigrants, so a quota was established so that they would not immigrate in too large of numbers and cause problems.
But the problem was that too many did immigrate illegally, and they brought arms and trained veterans, who then started massacring Arab villages, like Dier Yassin.

It is true that it was decided that Jews did need protection, but it was NEVER intended to allow Jews to at all have any role in governing the country. They were only supposed to be involved in local government.

And YES, land ownership most certainly DOES have to do with sovereignty.
It is a basic and long standing legal principle that land ownership is the basis for sovereignty.
That is why in the US originally, only land owners could vote.
Land ownership is one of the main ways you determine who is native and who have native rights and sovereignty.
The Jewish immigrants not only did not own hardly any of the land at all, but never even tried to pay for what land they occupied. The Arab refugees are the legal owners of almost all of Israel.

WHICH Treaty of Sevres did you read?

British Mandate for Palestine

Main article: British Mandate of Palestine

The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres:

ARTICLE 95: The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on 2 November 1917 by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

Treaty of Sèvres - Wikipedia


Where does is it mention in that Treaty that:

<<The British Mandate for Palestine came from the Treaty of Sevres, which is very clear in that it was the Muslim Arabs who were being given independence and sovereignty in Palestine, not the Jewish People.>>>

You obviously have never read the Treaty of Severe.
It clearly says the inhabitants were to be given independent sovereignty, and that Jews were only to be allowed facilitated immigration to a local homeland INSIDE of Palestine, which was to be ruled by the native Arabs.

{...
ARTICLE 95.


The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
...}

Section I, Articles 1 - 260 - World War I Document Archive

There is no way to even remotely interpret the Treaty of Sevres as giving Jewish immigrants sovereignty over the native Arab majority.
It clearly says the civil rights of non-Jews in Palestine were not to be infringed.
That means the native Arab Majority was to have sovereignty, not the immigrant Jewish minority.

I read it very clearly.

Palestine is a region, named by the Romans to make the Jewish Nation forget their homeland. It did not work and Jews continued to live on the land through the Romans, the Byzantine, the Muslims (Arabs), Crusaders and the Ottoman invasion and conquest during all of those 2000 since the Roman invasion.

You may try to make the Arabs the native people of the land all you like. They totally do not agree with you as they will tell you that their native land is called the Arabian Peninsula.

You seem to want to understand only what you wish to understand out of the Mandate for Palestine. Or any of the other three Mandates.

So be it.

Denialism is a region of the mind most preferred by those who reject the Jewish Nation/People's right to sovereignty on their own Ancient Land.

Totally and completely wrong!
Palestine was named after the Philistine and Phoenician city states, and existed hundreds of years berfore the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC.
It is NOT at all the Hebrew homeland, and their massacre of Canaanites like at Jericho, deny them having any right to the region at all. Not only did the Hebrew leave when the Romans forced them out, but previously the Assyrian and Babylonians got fed up and made them leave as well. Later the Crusaders also wiped them out, and it was only the Moslem protection that allowed some Jews to return. But in 1900, the population was only about 5% Jewish in all of Palestine. Even in Jerusalem the majority was always Muslim Arab.

And only an ignorant person would say that Arabs are from the Arabian peninsula or that the Palestinan Arabs came from there. Anyone who knows any history at all know that the Arab in the Arabian Peninsula came from Palestine, and that the Palestinians, like the Canaanites, Akkadians, Amorites, Urites, Philistine, Phoenicians, Nabatians, Chaldeans, etc., all predated the Arabian Peninsula and are the original Palestine natives.
The ONLY thing they got from the Arabian Peninsula was the unified language of Arabic.

It is not at all hard to understand the British Mandate for Palestine.
Since you clearly do not understand it, try reading the Churchill White Paper of 1922, that was intended to make most clear.

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922
{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.

During the last two or three generations the Jews have recreated in Palestine a community, now numbering 80,000
...}

Let's look at all these peoples who you say are native to Palestine, while ONLY the Hebrews are not. Phoenicinans lived in Sidon, or what is modern-day Lebanon. Queen Jezebel was formerly a Phoenician princess, daughter of King Ethbaal of Sidon, when she married King Ahab of Israel. Chaldeans were Babylonians from modern-day Iraq. Abraham was born there, so if the Chaldeans were somehow indigenous to Palestine, then so was Abraham. The Akkadians were also from that general area (Iran). The Philistines, from whom Palestine derives its name, were invaders from Greece and are not even Semitic at all while the others are. The Nabatians are the only people, from all those that you mentioned, that were Arabs from Transjordan. I've never heard of the Urites. Now finally, we come to the Canaanites and Amorites (to a lesser degree because the Amorites also lived in other lands) that were native to Canaan/ Israel/ Palestine. The ones who weren't killed off, were assimilated into the Hebrew nation. So my question to you is this: According to you, the Hebrews originated in the Sinai, which is very close to Israel/ Palestine. Why are peoples who come from present-day Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, and even Greece, native to "Palestine" while the Hebrews, from the Sinai, aren't native to it?

If by Urites, you mean ppl from the city Ur of the Chaldees (in Babylonia), then how are they "indigenous to Palestine"? In fact, the Hebrews (aside from the Canaanites who assimilated into Israel) are the ONLY indigenous-to-"Palestine" ppl on your list. Ironic.

 

[fanger]

Israel PM Netanyahu 'should be charged with corruption'
Netanyahu corruption charges 'recommended'

 

[Sixties Fan]

NOT Satire

Iran Discovers Our Zionist Death Lizardsᵀᴹ

 

[Sixties Fan]

[Wow !! ]

'Please attack'

Syrian children urge Israel to bomb Assad regime

 

[fanger]

NOT Satire

Iran Discovers Our Zionist Death Lizardsᵀᴹ

Aussie Dave and erika lange, look like lizards

 

[fanger]

[Wow !! ]

'Please attack'

Syrian children urge Israel to bomb Assad regime

Their hebrew writing looks good for arab kids

 

[Shusha]

We (global community 'we') really need to stop using children for political purposes.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

[Wow !! ]

'Please attack'

Syrian children urge Israel to bomb Assad regime

Their hebrew writing looks good for arab kids

I don't know about Syrian Arabs, but most Israeli Arabs can speak Hebrew better than many Jews around the world.

 

[Sixties Fan]

[Wow !! ]

'Please attack'

Syrian children urge Israel to bomb Assad regime

Their hebrew writing looks good for arab kids

I don't know about Syrian Arabs, but most Israeli Arabs can speak Hebrew better than many Jews around the world.

More than likely they asked someone who knew Hebrew and Arabic to write it for them, for the community.

 

[Sixties Fan]

In a documentary now making the rounds of film festivals, an Israeli photojournalist trained her lens on a small Gazan child whose remarkably paradoxical existence reflects the complicated mix of humanitarianism, hatred and bureaucracy that governs relations between Israel and the Gaza Strip.

(full article online)

Film zooms in on 8-year-old amputee from Gaza living in an Israeli hospital

 

[Sixties Fan]

Besides the hilariously over the top prose, there are two interesting omissions in the brief history of King Hussein's reign.

One is that it described the violent Palestinian uprising in 1970 as a "vicious conspiracy" without mentioning that the main instigator was the PLO - and that Jordanian forces killed thousands of Palestinians during the Black September uprising.

And the other is that the peace treaty between Israel and Jordan isn't mentioned.

Jordan is too embarrassed to admit that it once considered Palestinians to be mortal enemies, and that it ever made peace with Israel.

(full article online)

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2018/02/what-you-can-learn-from-jordanian-pro.html

 

[Sixties Fan]

First of three security structures constructed at entrance to Old City to protect against stabbing attacks, sparking outrage over 'plan to Judaize Jerusalem'

(full article online)

Palestinians threaten protests over new Damascus Gate watchposts

 

[Sixties Fan]

Factually Inaccurate and Legally Flawed: HRW’s 2017 Report

 

[P F Tinmore]

Factually Inaccurate and Legally Flawed: HRW’s 2017 Report

These clowns don't even know that Israel does not have borders.

 

[Shusha]

Factually Inaccurate and Legally Flawed: HRW’s 2017 Report

These clowns don't even know that Israel does not have borders.

Speaking of "factually inaccurate"....