WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Moderator
- #221
He know the name and employment history of everyone on the Grand jury.You are one of the biggest haters of the 1%ers, and you want to let our entire justice system be tribunals that can be bought?
When you get the opportunity to read all the evidence the grand jury had access to, let me know. Otherwise you are just spouting bullshit.
Except you make sure they can't be bought. You have frequent forensic audits of their accounts and track every receipt and expendature.
This really isn't complicated.
So 12 stupid mutants without jobs do what they are told by a corrupt prosecutor. Are we surprised by any of this?
NO.
THe only question is, will Obama have the balls to do what he should hvae done from day one, launch a federal prosecution.
No, this is not complicated. The evidence was presented and the grand jury said no indictment. It is simple.
That you sit there, not knowing all the evidence, and demand that the officer be indicted is simply your own bias and prejudice on display.
Of course he does. He also knows the extent of their knowledge of ballistics and forensics. Oh, and he also knows their views on racism. Plus, he has every bit of the evidence that they were presented with.