Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol, more dreaming in alice in wonderland, full of wild speculation and other assorted loonbat tales.
Well, WHO could possibly argue with the well-researched above assertion....(go back to bed) LOL
Get help girl.....
As a 70 year old man.......I find your perception....."amazing"...........LOL
If I were Trump, and it looked like congress was seriously about to impeach, I would pardon every non-violent incarcerated swinging dick from Portland Maine to San Diego.Some of us have speculated that the Arpaio pardon was a "silent" assurance to the long list of Trump former and current staff that if they were ever indicted for their misdeeds, they need NOT worry since Trump could always pardon them also.
Perhaps foreseeing this underhanded plan of Trump to further obstruct the course of justice (to save his own sorry orange hide), Mueller, as the clever prosecutor that he is, is now teaming up with New York state's AG to possibly eventually bring charges against these "people of interest" in STATE courts; probably prompting the convening of yet another grand jury in NY..
Now, unbeknownst to many of us, a president CANNOT pardon a conviction that was ruled in a state's court....only federal courts.
This may then place the fear right back on the spines of those witnesses who will be called to testify under oath, that the pardon option may no longer apply as a "get out of jail free" card...
Interesting.
None of that is occurring. Nothing in the Constitution requires the President to put his holdings into a blind trust or divest himself from his holdings.Wrong. He's admitting that Mewler and his douche bag defenders don't give a damn about the rule of law. They want to take down anyone in the Trump administration they can, and they don't care if they have to wipe their ass on the Constitution to do it.So what you are saying anything they can do to get Trump is just fine. Perhaps you haven't heard, but I guarantee that all the people called have by now, their testimony at the grand jury can be I refuse to answer that question. The only way to compel testimony is through immunity. Now, thanks to you and Mueller, that is off the table since every state would have to grant immunity as well as the Feds.
Every underhanded trick you come up with sitting there fantasizing about Trump going just makes it more unlikely.
No, what he's saying is there is something called " the rule of law". Even the president is not above it.
Trump and his minions are the ones wiping their asses on the Constitution. Daily. No blind trusts, selling their tacky goods from the White House, getting gifts worth millions from foreign governments, failing to divest their holdings.
Deplorable.
However, when Obama made his own immigration laws, that was a clear violation of the Constitution.
You're just another lying left-wing cockroach.
If I were Trump, and it looked like congress was seriously about to impeach, I would pardon every non-violent incarcerated swinging dick from Portland Maine to San Diego
What's the president's call? A pardon for Federal offences? Yup! He can't pardon for State offences.It's not possible.....put your chubs away boys. it's the presidents call.
None of that is occurring. Nothing in the Constitution requires the President to put his holdings into a blind trust or divest himself from his holdings.Wrong. He's admitting that Mewler and his douche bag defenders don't give a damn about the rule of law. They want to take down anyone in the Trump administration they can, and they don't care if they have to wipe their ass on the Constitution to do it.So what you are saying anything they can do to get Trump is just fine. Perhaps you haven't heard, but I guarantee that all the people called have by now, their testimony at the grand jury can be I refuse to answer that question. The only way to compel testimony is through immunity. Now, thanks to you and Mueller, that is off the table since every state would have to grant immunity as well as the Feds.
Every underhanded trick you come up with sitting there fantasizing about Trump going just makes it more unlikely.
No, what he's saying is there is something called " the rule of law". Even the president is not above it.
Trump and his minions are the ones wiping their asses on the Constitution. Daily. No blind trusts, selling their tacky goods from the White House, getting gifts worth millions from foreign governments, failing to divest their holdings.
Deplorable.
However, when Obama made his own immigration laws, that was a clear violation of the Constitution.
You're just another lying left-wing cockroach.
The Emollients Clause specifically precludes Trump from profiting from foreign governments, so yes, he is in violation. He's also hiring family in violation of the Nepotism Act, using Harvey to promote his new merchandise in every press appearance related to the hurricane, and skimming money from the Secret service by "vacationing" at one of his golf resorts nearly every weekend since his inauguration.
You idiot Trumpanzees will overlook his lies, and his blatant profiting from the Presidency, and continue to call for Clinton to be prosecuted.
Deplorable.
It's not possible.....put your chubs away boys. it's the presidents call.
The Congress should make it very clear to Trump. Issue pardons and we go straight to impeachment hearings based on obstruction of justice. That would cut out that foolishness.
A Russian - backed political party.Report: Mueller, New York AG to work together on Manafort - CNNPolitics" Washington CNN Department special counsel Robert Mueller is teaming up with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to investigate Paul Manafort and his financial transactions, several people familiar with the matter told Politico. Since the US president is unable to pardon state crimes, the collaboration could also be seen as an effort to pressure Manafort to cooperate in the broader Russia investigation under Mueller, Politico reported. CNN has not independently confirmed the report. The move, which Politico reported on Wednesday night, is another indication that Mueller is ramping up pressure on Manafort, who served as the former chairman of President Donald Trump's campaign. Manafort has not been accused of any wrongdoing, but he is seen as a central figure in Mueller's investigation into Russia's 2016 election meddling."
Paul Manafort was recently forced by the DOJ to register as a Foreign agent. He was working for the Russians during the 2012-2014 era and receiving 17 MILLION from them to advise on U.S./Ukraine policies.
Paul Manafort retroactively registers with Justice Dept. as foreign agent"WASHINGTON -- President Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, has registered with the Justice Department as a foreign agent for political consulting work he did for a Ukrainian political party, acknowledging that he coached party members on how to interact with U.S. government officials. Manafort says in a Justice Department filing Tuesday that his firm, DMP International, received more than $17 million from the Party of Regions, the former pro-Russian ruling party in Ukraine, for consulting work from 2012 through 2014. Manafort is the second member of the Trump campaign to register as a foreign agent. In March, former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn registered with the Justice Department for work his consulting firm performed for a Turkish businessman that he said could have aided the Turkish government. Both registrations came after the work had been completed."
Then this clause showed up in the Republican party platform in July 2016 at the RNC convention--or around the same time that Comey testified that U.S. Intelligence started the investigation into the Trump team. But Trump and team were being watched prior to that by the U.K and other foreign intelligence.
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia
Comey: FBI launched Trump-Russia probe in July
More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPoliticsGordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful. But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine.
In July of this year, Paul Manafort's home was raided--and his computer and files were siezed.
FBI raided Paul Manafort home as part of Russia probe - CNNPoliticsWashington (CNN) FBI agents raided a home of President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort last month, a source familiar with the matter told CNN. The agents seized materials in Manafort's home as part of the ongoing Russia investigation led by Justice Department Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the source said.
The special Grand Jury has also subpoened Paul Manforts former attorney.
Special counsel subpoenas Manafort's former attorney and spokesman - CNNPolitics
It makes sense because Trump has repeatedly stated he would pardon Michael Flynn and other who may be involved in this Russian investigation. So they have felt safe from any consequences. So it's going to be Paul Manafort that will be the squealer, because Trump cannot pardon him for State crimes. This is a very clever manuver by Robert Mueller.
You're own article points out it was a political party in the Ukraine he worked for. Do you need a map of Eastern Europe?
That would require integrity and putting the country ahead of Party.The Congress should make it very clear to Trump. Issue pardons and we go straight to impeachment hearings based on obstruction of justice. That would cut out that foolishness.
Trumps been on Forbes 400 for 3 decades. The Presidency is losing him opportunities to expand Trump Org
None of that is occurring. Nothing in the Constitution requires the President to put his holdings into a blind trust or divest himself from his holdings.Wrong. He's admitting that Mewler and his douche bag defenders don't give a damn about the rule of law. They want to take down anyone in the Trump administration they can, and they don't care if they have to wipe their ass on the Constitution to do it.No, what he's saying is there is something called " the rule of law". Even the president is not above it.
Trump and his minions are the ones wiping their asses on the Constitution. Daily. No blind trusts, selling their tacky goods from the White House, getting gifts worth millions from foreign governments, failing to divest their holdings.
Deplorable.
However, when Obama made his own immigration laws, that was a clear violation of the Constitution.
You're just another lying left-wing cockroach.
The Emollients Clause specifically precludes Trump from profiting from foreign governments, so yes, he is in violation. He's also hiring family in violation of the Nepotism Act, using Harvey to promote his new merchandise in every press appearance related to the hurricane, and skimming money from the Secret service by "vacationing" at one of his golf resorts nearly every weekend since his inauguration.
You idiot Trumpanzees will overlook his lies, and his blatant profiting from the Presidency, and continue to call for Clinton to be prosecuted.
Deplorable.
Trumps been on Forbes 400 for 3 decades. The Presidency is losing him opportunities to expand Trump Org
The Congress should make it very clear to Trump. Issue pardons and we go straight to impeachment hearings based on obstruction of justice. That would cut out that foolishness.
Well the danger for Trump doing this, once he pardons someone, they can no longer plead the 5th under direct testimony. They have to answer the questions. So that may be a little deterent, but I think he's too stupid to realise that. And he certainly can't pardon himself.
Trump destroys the federal witch hunt against Arpaio so the left conspire to launch a state witch hunt to get around the presidents power to pardon victims of left witch hunts, interesting.
