And now the Dictatorship begins

[JustAGuy1]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Patience Grasshopper, the Ukranian investigation is just starting. They'll get to them

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine?

Good question.

Why haven't we seen all of Obama's emails relating to the Iran deal?

 

[BlindBoo]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

 

[BlindBoo]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine?

Good question.

Why haven't we seen all of Obama's emails relating to the Iran deal?

Good question. Release the emails!

 

[jc456]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

it wasn't an impeachment. hmmmm facts sure slide by you dude.

 

[BlindBoo]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

it wasn't an impeachment. hmmmm facts sure slide by you dude.

What wasn't?

 

[jc456]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

it wasn't an impeachment. hmmmm facts sure slide by you dude.

What wasn't?

anything to do with obammy and GOP subpoenas

 

[bripat9643]

Hillary confessed to her crimes, she claimed ignorance of the law as a defense.

What court found her guilty again?

What court found Trump guilty again?

Clinton testified before Congress, under oath, for 11 hours.

Trump wont let anyone testify under oath, much less himself.

Trump is under no obligation to testify, he has the same right you and I do.

so, with your diversion, what court found Trump guilty?

Neither was Clinton. She could have made them subpoena her and even fought that subpoena in court too.

Refusing to testify and defying subpoenas just makes one look guilty. Not allowing anyone around to testify even more so.

Using any means at your disposal to fight sleazy lying douchebags only makes you look smart. You gain nothing by complying with the scum of the earth who are out to destroy you. We aren't discussing dispassionate public servants here. We're talking about political hit men.

 

[yidnar]

Did Biden commit a corrupt political act? Yep.

In doing what? Carrying out Obama's foreign policy?

I though quid quo pro was evil

If I bought a car from you that is a quid pro quo. I give you money you give me a car. Not illegal or corrupt

If I pay you to kill my boss that is a quid pro quo. Not legal, very corrupt.

The policy Biden was carrying out was not an attempted attack the other half of our country.

nahhh he was just using tax payer dollars as leverage to enrich his family ....

Thank you for the Russian perspective. What's next? The Ukrainian StrikerCrowd hacked the DNC to help Hillary by framing Russia by making is seem that they were ones helping "The Don" by publishing damning DNC emails, not the Ukraine. They're the guilty ones your honor.

this is next !

 

[BlindBoo]

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

it wasn't an impeachment. hmmmm facts sure slide by you dude.

What wasn't?

anything to do with obammy and GOP subpoenas

Neither were the initial investigations into the Ukraine Scheme. But they were held in the same "really scary" Capitol Subbasement.

 

[jc456]

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

it wasn't an impeachment. hmmmm facts sure slide by you dude.

What wasn't?

anything to do with obammy and GOP subpoenas

Neither were the initial investigations into the Ukraine Scheme. But they were held in the same "really scary" Capitol Subbasement.

so, it wasn't impeachment. Impeachment is all different. funny, you all lose your facts all the time.

 

[daveman]

Why did the corrupt Ukrainian regime want Vindman as their SecDef?

I don't know that they did.

But if they did, it's because they wanted a good and honest man.

Lt. Col Vindmen put his life on the line for this country and was injured.

Have you ever done something so brave?

Sure you know. You just want to pretend that you are an idiot when really you are just a liar.

Don't you realize that most of us know that All Commie-Socialists-Globalist Pigs Lie?

When you resort to juvenile name calling, then you have lost.

And that means you will scream even louder and resort to worse names.

I've seen this from your kind many times.

They say the definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing over again and expecting a different result.

Perhaps if you concentrate on facts? You would either convince others or change your position.

Calling someone a liar, is not name calling, when we see what you write on this forum every day. It is a character assessment, and you are lacking in character. You have no Ethical Currency, to afford discussions of Moral Values.

You shall not bear false witness.
"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor."
-Exodus 20:16

That's number 9 in the 10 Commandments.

This is number 7:

You shall not commit adultery.
"You shall not commit adultery."
-Exodus 20:14

Seeing someone who hates God, Christians, and America attack others for not being patriotic or Christian enough for you rings insanely hollow.

 

[jc456]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

Yes, but they still require EVERYONE on the committee to sign off on the subpoenas. That didn't happen. the only signify was by three chairs. Not the whole Judicial committee = invalid subpoenas.

there were no committees with the Dems subpoena's.

 

[BlindBoo]

In doing what? Carrying out Obama's foreign policy?

I though quid quo pro was evil

If I bought a car from you that is a quid pro quo. I give you money you give me a car. Not illegal or corrupt

If I pay you to kill my boss that is a quid pro quo. Not legal, very corrupt.

The policy Biden was carrying out was not an attempted attack the other half of our country.

nahhh he was just using tax payer dollars as leverage to enrich his family ....

Thank you for the Russian perspective. What's next? The Ukrainian StrikerCrowd hacked the DNC to help Hillary by framing Russia by making is seem that they were ones helping "The Don" by publishing damning DNC emails, not the Ukraine. They're the guilty ones your honor.

this is next !View attachment 305384

I've already turn Grey. Fuck, does that mean I gotta go bald now?

Oh wait, you meant the next "We got'um now" moment?

hahahahahahahaha

 

[Ken Mac]

That's not the case under a system of justice where the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,

Congress is not our system of justice. It's 95% politics. We are the jurors now. Why are they withholding all the emails relating to the Ukraine? Why wont those who the initial witnesses implicated had knowledge of the Ukraine situation testify?

Actually, there were no initial witnesses in the Ukraine situation. The Whistleblower refused to testify at all. None of the so-called witnesses that the libs brought into the Capitol Subbasement had any first hand knowledge at all.

The initial witnesses who were interviewed in the Houses investigations. Not the guy who reported the corruption.

On a side note, that Capitol Subbasement you referred to is the same one the Republicans used to conduct their investigatory interviews. This was after they changed the House rules to give the Chairs of some committees standing subpoena power, meaning they didn't need to bother with a vote of the entire house to issue subpoenas to the Obama administration.

Yes, but they still require EVERYONE on the committee to sign off on the subpoenas. That didn't happen. the only signify was by three chairs. Not the whole Judicial committee = invalid subpoenas.

there were no committees with the Dems subpoena's.

Ignore my post. I was thinking of current impeachment. My apologies

 

[Polishprince]

What really happened is that the Democrat Party and the Liberal Establishment put their best case forward, and the Senate acquitted. Trump is Forever Innocent.

Acquittals now have consequences, and we'll see Donald Unchained doing what he came to Washington to do in the first place for. To return America to greatness.

 

[BlindBoo]

What court found her guilty again?

What court found Trump guilty again?

Clinton testified before Congress, under oath, for 11 hours.

Trump wont let anyone testify under oath, much less himself.

Trump is under no obligation to testify, he has the same right you and I do.

so, with your diversion, what court found Trump guilty?

Neither was Clinton. She could have made them subpoena her and even fought that subpoena in court too.

Refusing to testify and defying subpoenas just makes one look guilty. Not allowing anyone around to testify even more so.

Using any means at your disposal to fight sleazy lying douchebags only makes you look smart. You gain nothing by complying with the scum of the earth who are out to destroy you. We aren't discussing dispassionate public servants here. We're talking about political hit men.

So your visceral hatred of the opposition is your justification for accepting the Rulers corrupt acts.

 

[Norman]

Trump absolutely should pursue the enemies, twice as hard as they come after him.

He was elected to drain the swamp.

 

[BlindBoo]

What really happened is that the Democrat Party and the Liberal Establishment put their best case forward, and the Senate acquitted. Trump is Forever Innocent.

Acquittals now have consequences, and we'll see Donald Unchained doing what he came to Washington to do in the first place for. To return America to greatness.

In reality, as expected the Trumpublicans in the Senate White-Washed The Don's corrupt act, but his actions and their undying support for those acts have been exposed to the public. Novembers coming.

 

[Polishprince]

Trump absolutely should pursue the enemies, twice as hard as they come after him.

He was elected to drain the swamp.

Donald J. Trump doesn't need to be told what he absolutely needs to do.

Payback is a bitch, and the man knows what he needs to do and will do it when the time is right