Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 69,906
- 34,854
- 2,300
Said the Republican who was against the Burn Pit Bill and lied about itAgreed. And how can any vote D I’ll never know?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Said the Republican who was against the Burn Pit Bill and lied about itAgreed. And how can any vote D I’ll never know?
They all need to be sent home11 Senate Republicans voted against burn pits bill:
Crapo
Lankford
Lee
Lummis
Paul
Risch
Romney
Shelby
Tillis
Toomey
Tuberville
Of course there isSo yes while this make Senate Republican's look like total fools, there isn't a good and bad side here.
Nice little tap dance. What do you do for an encore?Here's 7 pages of Republican "support for the troops"
There's 80 more
There was no pork. These assholes didn't even look in spite of the Bill being posted about 20 times
Asshole is whining about a different bill and using it to excuse trashing this one
Obviously Trump didn't take care of this
Same bullshit claim as before
I already explained what he lied about. He invented a problem with the bill. His amendment wasn’t going to change anything about where the money would go, it would make it so that care would be rationed when the budget ran out, make it far easier to cut, and make it easier to use as political leverage for unrelated budgetary battles in the future.What did they lie about... they were trying to ensure all of the money got to where it was promised..... why are you against that?....
?Said the Republican who was against the Burn Pit Bill and lied about it
Do I really need to go back and find your posts?
YesDo I really need to go back and find your posts?
Maybe in your world vets get no HC unless this bill passes, but that’s not reality.
Are vets dying in the street because of a lack of HC?
Emotional. Think better.
Are they dying of cancer because of lack of healthcare, as you asserted before…little bitch?
Do I really need to go back and find your posts?
Lies lies lies lies lies![]()
The original that was voted down by the Republicans because it was discretionary spending and not mandatory. The Dems control the budgetary panel that would have moved the money to their own fucking projects than to what the bill is intended. All of it.
And because the GOP said no really the second time, they took absolute shit from the media, Jon Stewart and the veteran community (if you call Grunt Style part of it), and unjustly. Schumer is a fucking scumbag for putting the GOP against the Vets on a loose-loose bill.
The Democrats will never let a budget bill go in clean. They will fill it with pork and do it on an issue that we just saw. Its the only play they have right now.
The original was MANDATORY (as was the final version).The original that was voted down by the Republicans because it was discretionary spending and not mandatory.
What is the opposite of making a budget easier to cut? Making it more difficult to cut, or impossible to cut?I already explained what he lied about. He invented a problem with the bill. His amendment wasn’t going to change anything about where the money would go, it would make it so that care would be rationed when the budget ran out, make it far easier to cut,
So the Republican goal here was to make it easier to cut this spending at a later date.What is the opposite of making a budget easier to cut? Making it more difficult to cut, or impossible to cut?
Making spending permanent and mandatory, then moving on to look for more ways to make spending permanent and mandatory is exactly how we got into the insane deficit and debt.of ours.
Our national debt it more than $91,000 per person. Maybe if the Dems keep that in mind, they will care more about the unborn, considering how much money each unborn American owes.
Anyway, mandatory or discretionary, the money will be spent, so it is a victory for the spend, spend, spend crowd. The amendment won’t save a dime. In a shocking surprise move, the GOP caved again to media pressure.
Someone asked on the dreaded conservative radio this morning, “are the Republicans the Stupid Party, or just knowing members of the Twoparties?”
The answer is “yes.”
Triggered when fact checked by Manchin.
Ummmm. You have a problem. The chart lumps incomes pretty broadly.Do you really think Manchin was right when he said that Americans making under $400,000 per year won’t get a tax increase?
The non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation disagrees. View attachment 677556
Oh and that has nothing to do with this issue.Ummmm. You have a problem. The chart lumps incomes pretty broadly.
It shows a tax increase on income between 200k and 500k. It does not break out anything more as far as I can see.
400k falls between that number