TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 37,095
- 48,113
- 2,915
Hillary should be charged with copyright infringement for her Mao pantsuits
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I assume you didn't find it?so you're saying that all other presidents did something outside the constitution? oh boy that is some fking news there. Trump already fired on Syria. how did he do that? shit obummer did drone strikes all over the world. how did he do that. dude you are just a confused puppy, go find the paper and take a pee.Let's try again.sure there is.
Where is it written in the constitution?
Then the war powers resolution is unconstitutional.Then there is nothing wrong with the legislation being proffered, Thank you.There is no power granted in the constitution that permits the CIC to initiate a first strike against NK. And if he did so, he would further violate the constitution by violating the UN Charter.The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States
It doesn't say he can call them into service. And it would totally undermine the checks and balances incorporated in our constitution if he could. One person does not have the power to commit this nation to war. You're thinking of Nazi Germany.
OMG ...
Please post where I mentioned ANYTHING about commitment to war.
Indeed, there is no text referring to "first strike" authorization.
"Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye."
Except it's unconstitutional.
I don't need to. It's already been done. I have my evidence and that you are a deflector. I don't go down rat holes of others.I assume you didn't find it?so you're saying that all other presidents did something outside the constitution? oh boy that is some fking news there. Trump already fired on Syria. how did he do that? shit obummer did drone strikes all over the world. how did he do that. dude you are just a confused puppy, go find the paper and take a pee.Let's try again.sure there is.
Where is it written in the constitution?
Then the war powers resolution is unconstitutional.Then there is nothing wrong with the legislation being proffered, Thank you.There is no power granted in the constitution that permits the CIC to initiate a first strike against NK. And if he did so, he would further violate the constitution by violating the UN Charter.OMG ...
Please post where I mentioned ANYTHING about commitment to war.
Indeed, there is no text referring to "first strike" authorization.
"Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye."
Except it's unconstitutional.
Am I supposed to be scared?But N. Korea needs no authority to nuke us like they have said they would.He doesn't have the constitutional authority to take us to war.I am correct, they can make that idiot think twice about what he does. Something he doesn't seem to do often.i think that you are incorrect , President is Commander in Chief of the USA Military and all its men , weapons and nukes . I don't think that the Presidents CiC war powers are going to be over run by a committee of dem , lefty enemies Tehon !!
Congress cannot legislate itself direct control of the military over the CinC's Constitutional authority, which such legislation would attempt to implement.