2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,220
- 52,455
- 2,290
This is like suggesting that pathologists support murder.
Was the baby murdered or did they die of natural causes....big difference if that is how it breaks down.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
This is like suggesting that pathologists support murder.
If tissue, any tissue, was about to be thrown out, but research said wait, we can use that to save lives.........
Why is that objectionable if the tissue is donated?
Is it just the idea of it not yet being human? It is rejected tissue. If the donor does not care what happens, why should you, it's not your tissue?
It's Shipping and Handling Costs, not just shipping alone, and I would imagine that depending on how the specimen had to be handled costs less or more...as example, in blood banking, from a whole unit of blood comes packed red blood cells and plasma and platelets and factor 8 (Cryo) all come from a fresh, whole unit of Blood, through different measures taken with the whole unit of blood...to have a unit of Red Packed blood cells, you centrifuge a whole unit of blood for a certain time period at a certain speed to draw off the plasma and leave the packed red blood cells...so, even though a whole unit of blood is red blood cells and plasma and platelets etc all in one....it was the CHEAPEST blood component to buy, because it did not have to be handled more than once, other than type/ matching...(but the whole unit of blood had to be at a certain refrigeration temperature at all times, while the Plasma drawn off of it, did not have to be refrigerated at all when shipping it), but the platelets drawn off of the whole unit of blood after it's protocol spin in the centrifuge had to be FROZEN immediately and transported frozen and stored frozen....in a specific container, so the separated blood components, for the handling, which includes drawing it off of the whole blood and specific protocols for doing such and in maintaining the temperature for each component differently, would be included in the handling charge....The issue isn't the use of the tissue Lakoturd, it's the fact that PP is profiting off the murder of babies and lying about it.
If you bed wetters weren't so dangerously stupid, not to mention souless, moraless and thoughtless you'd know it. You'd know SOMETHING, but you prove everyday that you don't know shit.
Unspinning the Planned Parenthood Video
Several Republican presidential candidates have claimed that Planned Parenthood is “profiting” from abortions. But the full, unedited video they cite as evidence shows a Planned Parenthood executive repeatedly saying its clinics want to cover their costs, not make money, when donating fetal tissue from abortions for scientific research.
Four experts in the field of human tissue procurement told us the price range discussed in the video — $30 to $100 per patient — represents a reasonable fee. “There’s no way there’s a profit at that price,” said Sherilyn J. Sawyer, the director of Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s “biorepository.”
Republicans made their claims following the release of a secretly recorded video showing Deborah Nucatola, the senior director of medical services at Planned Parenthood, discussing the procurement of fetal tissues when conducting abortions. The edited video, released July 14 by an anti-abortion group called the Center for Medical Progress, leaves the impression that Nucatola is talking about Planned Parenthood affiliates making money from fetal tissue. But the edited video ignores other things Nucatola said that contradict that idea.
More: Unspinning the Planned Parenthood Video
Yet NaziCons keep making shit up.
The $30-100 is for shipping. And if anyone has ever tried to overnight anything from the east coast to California on UPS/Fedex they know that's still about half of what it actually costs for a one-pound box.
The makers of these videos have very good editors.
So why different amounts "shipping" costs for different parts? Why do they get more money if it's intact, if it's just shipping?
Baby killers. Nasty.
I am thinking that each type of tissue transfers, have protocols on how and what kind of container for whatever specific size, and maintained at whatever protocol temperature is part of the handling charges and this is why shipping and handling fees change and are higher or lower....and even fees from one part of the country verses another part of the country could change those fees as well.... handling fees is exactly what it has always been, and that is the cost of every action taken, and every container used to retrieve, and maintain to protocol, the tissue specimen.
False the party that would become the Republican party bought and sold slaves with same regularly as the democrats.According to Ben Carson, fetal tissue used to be obtained from miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. He would welcome a discussion on the use of killing babies for their component parts.
Democrats used to be the party of slavery, buying and selling human beings. They are STILL buying and selling black people today! Their justification is "Well, we kill them first now."
As we all know it was republicans that tried to distroy the civil rights movement legal abortions and same sex marriage.
Which begs the question who fucked up more.
So....(wading thru all the bullshit)...Carson wants to defund planned parenthood due to the unethical usage or selling of aborted fetuses yet was the recipient of one of those dead fetuses so he could do tests and shit...which makes him a HUGE hypocrite. Amirite?
Not really. Dead is dead. What do you propose they do with aborted fetuses? Just flush 'em?So....(wading thru all the bullshit)...Carson wants to defund planned parenthood due to the unethical usage or selling of aborted fetuses yet was the recipient of one of those dead fetuses so he could do tests and shit...which makes him a HUGE hypocrite. Amirite?
Not until we find out if the baby came from abortion, or a still birth.......big difference....
No.So....(wading thru all the bullshit)...Carson wants to defund planned parenthood due to the unethical usage or selling of aborted fetuses yet was the recipient of one of those dead fetuses so he could do tests and shit...which makes him a HUGE hypocrite. Amirite?
Not really. Dead is dead. What do you propose they do with aborted fetuses? Just flush 'em?So....(wading thru all the bullshit)...Carson wants to defund planned parenthood due to the unethical usage or selling of aborted fetuses yet was the recipient of one of those dead fetuses so he could do tests and shit...which makes him a HUGE hypocrite. Amirite?
Not until we find out if the baby came from abortion, or a still birth.......big difference....
"We have banked material in the pathology lab from people from every age -- from day 1 of concept to 120 years told. Those specimens are available for people who want to do comparisons," Carson said. "To not use the tissue that is in a tissue bank, regardless of where it comes from, would be foolish. Why would anybody not do that?"
Carson also issued a statement, saying, "There is absolutely no contradiction between the research I worked on in 1992 and my pro-life views. The issue of fetal tissue has everything to do with how the tissue is acquired. My primary responsibility in that research was operating on people to obtain diseased tissue for comparison to banked tissue samples. Killing babies and harvesting tissue for sale is very different than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it, which is exactly the source of the tissue used in our research."
And later Thursday, Carson went on Facebook to further defend his work.
"I, nor any of the doctors involved with this study, had anything to do with abortion or what Planned Parenthood has been doing," he said in a post. "Research hospitals across the country have microscope slides of all kinds of tissue to compare and contrast. The fetal tissue that was viewed in this study by others was not collected for this study."
Carson defends his research on aborted fetuses - CNNPolitics.com
Turns out this entire thread is moot because its an attempted propaganda hit on Carson.
okNot really. Dead is dead. What do you propose they do with aborted fetuses? Just flush 'em?So....(wading thru all the bullshit)...Carson wants to defund planned parenthood due to the unethical usage or selling of aborted fetuses yet was the recipient of one of those dead fetuses so he could do tests and shit...which makes him a HUGE hypocrite. Amirite?
Not until we find out if the baby came from abortion, or a still birth.......big difference....
Bury them with dignity they didn't receive when they were alive....
The abortionists already get money from the women and the state to kill the babies. If you allow them to profit from the sale of dead babies, then the GOAL is to harvest as many, as late, as possible...which puts the women at high risk. It's why doctors aren't allowed to sell the dead. It rewards them for killing their patients. You can't serve the best interests of women if you get extra money for putting them at higher risk. It also results in coercion.Not really. Dead is dead. What do you propose they do with aborted fetuses? Just flush 'em?So....(wading thru all the bullshit)...Carson wants to defund planned parenthood due to the unethical usage or selling of aborted fetuses yet was the recipient of one of those dead fetuses so he could do tests and shit...which makes him a HUGE hypocrite. Amirite?
Not until we find out if the baby came from abortion, or a still birth.......big difference....
"We have banked material in the pathology lab from people from every age -- from day 1 of concept to 120 years told. Those specimens are available for people who want to do comparisons," Carson said. "To not use the tissue that is in a tissue bank, regardless of where it comes from, would be foolish. Why would anybody not do that?"
Carson also issued a statement, saying, "There is absolutely no contradiction between the research I worked on in 1992 and my pro-life views. The issue of fetal tissue has everything to do with how the tissue is acquired. My primary responsibility in that research was operating on people to obtain diseased tissue for comparison to banked tissue samples. Killing babies and harvesting tissue for sale is very different than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it, which is exactly the source of the tissue used in our research."
And later Thursday, Carson went on Facebook to further defend his work.
"I, nor any of the doctors involved with this study, had anything to do with abortion or what Planned Parenthood has been doing," he said in a post. "Research hospitals across the country have microscope slides of all kinds of tissue to compare and contrast. The fetal tissue that was viewed in this study by others was not collected for this study."
Carson defends his research on aborted fetuses - CNNPolitics.com
The big thing....he has changed his opinion on anything planned parenthood does.........much like obama changed his opinion on gay marriage, going for all his life being against it and then 2 years into his second term changing his mind.....at least Carson knows what he is talking about..right you lefties out there?