Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is assumed that any issue during the course of a marriage are the marriage-father's responsibility.
The basis is consideration, first and foremost, for children.
I just don't agree with this, I would refuse to pay support for a child my wife had when she was whoring around. Take me to jail if you have to.
But your problem is with the wife....and everyone agrees on that point......
...perhaps you'd go to jail for assault on one of the participants in the affair...maybe on both.
But not with the child.
You wouldn't stop loving a child you've been raising....and loving....and who calls you 'daddy.'
True?
This isn't old England, we know those kids are not his. Why do the guys who fathered these children get a free pass? because she was married when she was whoring around?
Yes, because she was married and because her husband accepted the children as his for 12, 14 and 16 years. You gotta feel sorry for these kids.
So he knew they were not his and accepted them? or is he just finding out about all this right now?
Look at it this way, if she were trying to prevent him from seeing the children, he would use the same law to stop her.
He has spent those children's entire lives fathering them, and the people who come 1st in family law are the children.
What about the actual fathers of those children?
Yes, because she was married and because her husband accepted the children as his for 12, 14 and 16 years. You gotta feel sorry for these kids.
So he knew they were not his and accepted them? or is he just finding out about all this right now?
It doesn't matter. He's raised the kids as his since the day they were born. Do you stop loving someone just because you find out they aren't blood related? What the hell does that do to the kids who've always loved him as their father? Only an ass would claim the kids aren't his after he raised them from birth. It would be like an adoptive father suddenly decided the kid he adopted 16 years ago isn't his because the kid wasn't from his sperm.
Look at it this way, if she were trying to prevent him from seeing the children, he would use the same law to stop her.
He has spent those children's entire lives fathering them, and the people who come 1st in family law are the children.
What about the actual fathers of those children?
When you are married to a woman, all children born during that marriage, unless otherwise stated, are the responsibility of the husband under our law. Family court puts children above everyone else, those kids have spent the last 16 years believing he is their dad, the court says he can't divorce himself from that now.
By the way, the husband in this story was a bit of an idiot. He was well aware of his wife multiple affairs, and never bothered to care enough for DNA testing the children because she was still with him, but the moment she walks, he's demanding proof the kids are his.
So he knew they were not his and accepted them? or is he just finding out about all this right now?
It doesn't matter. He's raised the kids as his since the day they were born. Do you stop loving someone just because you find out they aren't blood related? What the hell does that do to the kids who've always loved him as their father? Only an ass would claim the kids aren't his after he raised them from birth. It would be like an adoptive father suddenly decided the kid he adopted 16 years ago isn't his because the kid wasn't from his sperm.
Thats not the same thing, an adoptive father knows the kids are not his from the start. And yes it does matter, those kids are not his and the real fathers are out there chilling not having to pay a red cent, and thats ok with you just because she was married when she was a whore?
It doesn't matter. He's raised the kids as his since the day they were born. Do you stop loving someone just because you find out they aren't blood related? What the hell does that do to the kids who've always loved him as their father? Only an ass would claim the kids aren't his after he raised them from birth. It would be like an adoptive father suddenly decided the kid he adopted 16 years ago isn't his because the kid wasn't from his sperm.
Thats not the same thing, an adoptive father knows the kids are not his from the start. And yes it does matter, those kids are not his and the real fathers are out there chilling not having to pay a red cent, and thats ok with you just because she was married when she was a whore?
So he raised these kids for 12, 14 and 16 years and now, because he no longer wants them or their mother, he just walks away. What does that do to a child?
By law, even if those kids sperm donors knew those kids were theirs and sued for custody/visiting rights, the law would have found in favor of the husband. You can't change the law 16 years later just because the husband had decided he no longer wants the mom. No winner in this case, only losers, especially the children.
BTW, supposing someone came to you 16 years after you had an affair with a married woman and told you you were the child's father and demanded 16 years back child support as well as continued child support, what would your answer be?
Because trust me, if the sperm donors are on the hook for child support, they are on the hook for all of it, not just for the last part of the kids life because the husband decided he no longer wanted them.
Yes, because she was married and because her husband accepted the children as his for 12, 14 and 16 years. You gotta feel sorry for these kids.
So he knew they were not his and accepted them? or is he just finding out about all this right now?
It doesn't matter. He's raised the kids as his since the day they were born. Do you stop loving someone just because you find out they aren't blood related? What the hell does that do to the kids who've always loved him as their father? Only an ass would claim the kids aren't his after he raised them from birth. It would be like an adoptive father suddenly decided the kid he adopted 16 years ago isn't his because the kid wasn't from his sperm.
By the way, the husband in this story was a bit of an idiot. He was well aware of his wife multiple affairs, and never bothered to care enough for DNA testing the children because she was still with him, but the moment she walks, he's demanding proof the kids are his.
What about the actual fathers of those children?
When you are married to a woman, all children born during that marriage, unless otherwise stated, are the responsibility of the husband under our law. Family court puts children above everyone else, those kids have spent the last 16 years believing he is their dad, the court says he can't divorce himself from that now.
So they can make him pay support, but they cannot force this man to be their father unless he wants to. I am never getting married again, that law is a joke and a slap in the face.
Look at it this way, if she were trying to prevent him from seeing the children, he would use the same law to stop her.
He has spent those children's entire lives fathering them, and the people who come 1st in family law are the children.
What about the actual fathers of those children?
When you are married to a woman, all children born during that marriage, unless otherwise stated, are the responsibility of the husband under our law. Family court puts children above everyone else, those kids have spent the last 16 years believing he is their dad, the court says he can't divorce himself from that now.
Not news. It's the law there.
By the way, the husband in this story was a bit of an idiot. He was well aware of his wife multiple affairs, and never bothered to care enough for DNA testing the children because she was still with him, but the moment she walks, he's demanding proof the kids are his.
If he did ask for a paternity test the day the babies were born, you would be calling him a jerk for doing that.
Anyway you look at it, the law fucked him over. There's hardly anything fair or just about this decision.
So he knew they were not his and accepted them? or is he just finding out about all this right now?
It doesn't matter. He's raised the kids as his since the day they were born. Do you stop loving someone just because you find out they aren't blood related? What the hell does that do to the kids who've always loved him as their father? Only an ass would claim the kids aren't his after he raised them from birth. It would be like an adoptive father suddenly decided the kid he adopted 16 years ago isn't his because the kid wasn't from his sperm.
In other words, you don't give a flying fuck about the husband's rights, but we already knew that, Fakey. You'll defend your fascist state no matter how oppressive and unjust it is.
No wonder men turn into serial killers. No justice in this world for them
Dad must pay child support for 3 kids that aren't his: Court rules | Canada | News | Calgary Sun
FEBRUARY 06, 2013 04:04 AM MST
MONTREAL - A father has been ordered to pay child support to his ex-wife despite results of DNA testing that found three of the four children he helped raise are not biologically his, a Quebec Superior Court ruled.
The man learned the shocking news after he demanded DNA testing when he and his wife of 16 years separated in April 2010.
His daughters are aged 12, 14, and 16, and his son is nine. DNA testing revealed the son is his only biological child.
To make matters worse, his ex-wife told him his three daughters were all fathered by different men, he said.
No wonder men turn into serial killers. No justice in this world for them
Dad must pay child support for 3 kids that aren't his: Court rules | Canada | News | Calgary Sun
FEBRUARY 06, 2013 04:04 AM MST
MONTREAL - A father has been ordered to pay child support to his ex-wife despite results of DNA testing that found three of the four children he helped raise are not biologically his, a Quebec Superior Court ruled.
The man learned the shocking news after he demanded DNA testing when he and his wife of 16 years separated in April 2010.
His daughters are aged 12, 14, and 16, and his son is nine. DNA testing revealed the son is his only biological child.
To make matters worse, his ex-wife told him his three daughters were all fathered by different men, he said.
So, he's considered himself their father for that any years and because of DNA, he doesn't want to help support them?
(Mother is NOT blameless here, mind you)
There is nothing new in this. A man who is the legal father of children has always been obliged to pay child support. This is the way it has always been in America.
