Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eric Cantor says the government doesn't create jobs, while he's in one, lol
Eric Cantor - The government doesn t create jobs the... Facebook
Liberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.Liberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.Well... I guess we should round up all black people and put them back in shackles again because SCOTUS ruled they were property and held that decision until we passed a Constitutional amendment to override it. Then they ruled segregation and Jim Crow was Constitutional until Congress passed an Act to overturn that. So... IF the SCOTUS is the final decider... we need to enslave the blacks again, right?
That puts you at 150 years ago
You have a long way to go. No court is going to agree with the simplistic interpretation that the Constitution is a be all and end all established 200 years ago
I just don't understand why you want a bunch of beauocrats running every aspect of your life. Are you so incompetent that you cannot care for yourself. Why are you willing to turn your individual freedom over to a bunch of assholes in DC? and before you answer, those assholes may all be conservative republicans in a couple of years.
every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
The courts provide wide latitude on those powersWrong.Evidently, the courts disagree with you.The General Welfare clause is not permission for the gov't to do anything and everything. If that were the case the Constitution would not have spelled out precisely what Congress' powers are.Sorry libertarian......but The Federalist Papers are not lawAgain... The SCOTUS ruling was that slaves are property and blacks can be segregated. IF, as you argue, the Court decides what the Constitution means... we need to enslave black again because this was their ruling. We had no right to override that and it remains the court's decision on the matter.
Also, I notice you have not addressed the previous argument that Federal government can "do what needs doing" under the general welfare clause. I assume you read what Madison had to say on the subject, so was Madison wrong? Do you have some kind of explanation for how the Constitution grants government unlimited power under "general welfare" but then turns around and specifies enumerated powers?
So much so that they were anonymously published
Madison had to edit and re-edit the constitution to satisfy all signatories. What is in there is the law.....not what Madison may have wanted
The courts decide....not the Federalist Papers
It hasn't been interpreted your way.....ever
The Constitution is a document of enumerated powers. That is basic ConLaw doctrine and every Court has recognized that.
Only asshole libertarians look at the Constitution like a fundamentalist looks at the bible
Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.Liberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.That puts you at 150 years ago
You have a long way to go. No court is going to agree with the simplistic interpretation that the Constitution is a be all and end all established 200 years ago
I just don't understand why you want a bunch of beauocrats running every aspect of your life. Are you so incompetent that you cannot care for yourself. Why are you willing to turn your individual freedom over to a bunch of assholes in DC? and before you answer, those assholes may all be conservative republicans in a couple of years.
every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Communism and fascism are not opposite ends. They are the same. Hitler preached National Socialism. Stalin preached International Socialism.I thought you said liberals worship communismLiberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.That puts you at 150 years ago
You have a long way to go. No court is going to agree with the simplistic interpretation that the Constitution is a be all and end all established 200 years ago
I just don't understand why you want a bunch of beauocrats running every aspect of your life. Are you so incompetent that you cannot care for yourself. Why are you willing to turn your individual freedom over to a bunch of assholes in DC? and before you answer, those assholes may all be conservative republicans in a couple of years.
Two opposite ends of the political spectrum yet you seem to claim Liberals are all of them
Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.Liberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.I just don't understand why you want a bunch of beauocrats running every aspect of your life. Are you so incompetent that you cannot care for yourself. Why are you willing to turn your individual freedom over to a bunch of assholes in DC? and before you answer, those assholes may all be conservative republicans in a couple of years.
every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Very true..Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.Liberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.
every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Hmmm, like obozo being against gay marriage before he was for it? Like Hillary and Bubba getting rich on bribes from foreign governments who treat women as property?
that kind of evolution?
The majority does not support it. If it did the faghaddis wouldnt need to go crying to the courts.Very true..Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Hmmm, like obozo being against gay marriage before he was for it? Like Hillary and Bubba getting rich on bribes from foreign governments who treat women as property?
that kind of evolution?
Ten years ago, most Americans opposed gay marriage
A majority now support it
The question is...why does it take conservatives so long?
More Rabbi "statistics"The majority does not support it. If it did the faghaddis wouldnt need to go crying to the courts.Very true..Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Hmmm, like obozo being against gay marriage before he was for it? Like Hillary and Bubba getting rich on bribes from foreign governments who treat women as property?
that kind of evolution?
Ten years ago, most Americans opposed gay marriage
A majority now support it
The question is...why does it take conservatives so long?
Very true..Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Hmmm, like obozo being against gay marriage before he was for it? Like Hillary and Bubba getting rich on bribes from foreign governments who treat women as property?
that kind of evolution?
Ten years ago, most Americans opposed gay marriage
A majority now support it
The question is...why does it take conservatives so long?
Both are necessaryback to the OP.
the government can create an environment that is conducive to the creation of private sector jobs and the government can create government jobs that must be paid for with tax collections.
In one case govt revenue is increased in the other govt spending is increased.
Does anyone really have to ask which is better?
Both are necessaryback to the OP.
the government can create an environment that is conducive to the creation of private sector jobs and the government can create government jobs that must be paid for with tax collections.
In one case govt revenue is increased in the other govt spending is increased.
Does anyone really have to ask which is better?
Is that another way of saying they no longer believe in anything they believed in during the 18th century?Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.Liberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.I just don't understand why you want a bunch of beauocrats running every aspect of your life. Are you so incompetent that you cannot care for yourself. Why are you willing to turn your individual freedom over to a bunch of assholes in DC? and before you answer, those assholes may all be conservative republicans in a couple of years.
every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
Is that another way of saying they no longer believe in anything they believed in during the 18th century?Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.Liberals worship fascism and yearn for the day Big Daddy will tell them what to do and take care of them.
every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
...Cons say Obama doesn't deserve credit for cutting unemployment in have, because the government can't create jobs.
But now Jeb Bush is promising to create 19 million jobs. And Trump is promising to create the most jobs of any previous POTUS.
Hypocrisy IS the GOP.
I think he's trying to say that modern liberals bear no resemblance to 18th Century liberals, but they are actually exactly the same.Is that another way of saying they no longer believe in anything they believed in during the 18th century?Nor should they....liberals evolve to face new challengesLiberals founded this country and are responsible for every major advance.every day I am more convinced that liberalism is a mental disease. No sane person could think they way they do.
18th century liberals bear no resemblance to your ilk.
what he is saying is that the liberals of 1776 are the conservatives of 2015.
Both are necessaryback to the OP.
the government can create an environment that is conducive to the creation of private sector jobs and the government can create government jobs that must be paid for with tax collections.
In one case govt revenue is increased in the other govt spending is increased.
Does anyone really have to ask which is better?
Yes, but its the % relationship between the two that has gotten out of sync. We have way too many people on the govt payroll.
We have already shown the government creates tens of millions of jobs...Cons say Obama doesn't deserve credit for cutting unemployment in have, because the government can't create jobs.
But now Jeb Bush is promising to create 19 million jobs. And Trump is promising to create the most jobs of any previous POTUS.
Hypocrisy IS the GOP.
Yes, they are idiots, government doesn't create jobs. This one's pretty lucid for you
