Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Gimme, gimme, gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it."
Acceding to this constant demand is how we have now arrived to the point where there are dipshits who actually believe it is okay to force someone else to give them something, and if that someone else resists, they are intruding into the lives of the dipshits.
Incredible. Absolutely incredible.
No, people should have the freedom to choose what they want to put into their own bodies. Not a corporation deciding for you. That's what the Hobby Lobby decision did. It opened the door to employers dictating their employees health coverage. Considering they save money when they can dictate what medicine you get, it could lead to the needless deaths of millions.
That's the true death panel, the corporate board room.
"Gimme, gimme, gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it."
Acceding to this constant demand is how we have now arrived to the point where there are dipshits who actually believe it is okay to force someone else to give them something, and if that someone else resists, they are intruding into the lives of the dipshits.
Incredible. Absolutely incredible.
No, people should have the freedom to choose what they want to put into their own bodies. Not a corporation deciding for you. That's what the Hobby Lobby decision did. It opened the door to employers dictating their employees health coverage. Considering they save money when they can dictate what medicine you get, it could lead to the needless deaths of millions.
That's the true death panel, the corporate board room.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Because I trust the government more than I trust my employer or their insurance company.
And that is what makes you a total fucking moron.
How? Government is by the people FOR THE PEOPLE. Do corporations do what's best for the people or their bottom line? Let's see if you answer honestly.
No, people should have the freedom to choose what they want to put into their own bodies. Not a corporation deciding for you. That's what the Hobby Lobby decision did. It opened the door to employers dictating their employees health coverage. Considering they save money when they can dictate what medicine you get, it could lead to the needless deaths of millions.
That's the true death panel, the corporate board room.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
No, people should have the freedom to choose what they want to put into their own bodies. Not a corporation deciding for you. That's what the Hobby Lobby decision did. It opened the door to employers dictating their employees health coverage. Considering they save money when they can dictate what medicine you get, it could lead to the needless deaths of millions.
That's the true death panel, the corporate board room.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
its comical you don't trust corporations yet blindly trust the government to be able to do something like universal healthcare competently.
Anything the government touches except when it comes to blowing something up (we are very good at that) becomes mired in bureaucracy and sloth.
And that is what makes you a total fucking moron.
How? Government is by the people FOR THE PEOPLE. Do corporations do what's best for the people or their bottom line? Let's see if you answer honestly.
They do what is best for their stockholders, who happen to be people as well.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
Yeah, but this is America where profit is king...fuck "the people".
How? Government is by the people FOR THE PEOPLE. Do corporations do what's best for the people or their bottom line? Let's see if you answer honestly.
They do what is best for their stockholders, who happen to be people as well.
how is it "best for the stockholders" for me to have to ask permission from my boss to use a medication prescribed to me by my doctor?
how is it "best for the stockholders" for some religious extremist to say that someone who needs medical care, or a transfusion or psychiatric care can't get it because of the religious beliefs of ANOTHER person?
if they want their business to have a religion, they shouldn't avail themselves of the benefits of corporate ownership which SHIELD them from personal liability except under the most extreme circumstances.
the problem is the right whines that our country should be a theocracy so the whims of every religious zealot should be imposed on everyone else (so long as those zealots are self-professed christians, of course, the world would end for the right if they were muslims). on the other hand, the right also doesn't want interference in a system where most of our health insurance is employer-based because of ridiculous cost issues that don't exist in amy other "civilized" country.
you can't have it all ways.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
Yeah, but this is America where profit is king...fuck "the people".
You don't make profits by fucking people.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
its comical you don't trust corporations yet blindly trust the government to be able to do something like universal healthcare competently.
Anything the government touches except when it comes to blowing something up (we are very good at that) becomes mired in bureaucracy and sloth.
Corporations, despite opinions to the contrary, are not people...but the government is. It even says so in our founding documents. Of, for, by...
And then there's that whole "profit margin" thing...which, yes, does tend to make me trust the government more than a corporation when it comes to healthcare.
No, people should have the freedom to choose what they want to put into their own bodies. Not a corporation deciding for you. That's what the Hobby Lobby decision did. It opened the door to employers dictating their employees health coverage. Considering they save money when they can dictate what medicine you get, it could lead to the needless deaths of millions.
That's the true death panel, the corporate board room.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
its comical you don't trust corporations yet blindly trust the government to be able to do something like universal healthcare competently.
Anything the government touches except when it comes to blowing something up (we are very good at that) becomes mired in bureaucracy and sloth.
Which is why healthcare should never have been tied to employment.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
Spoken like a true Socialist.
Ever stop to think that it is because of Left Wing Policies that the Cost of Medicine and Health Care is as high as it is?
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
its comical you don't trust corporations yet blindly trust the government to be able to do something like universal healthcare competently.
Anything the government touches except when it comes to blowing something up (we are very good at that) becomes mired in bureaucracy and sloth.
I don't "blindly trust" government. I trust the entity more than a corporation. A government, in theory and practice, has to answer to the will of the people. Now we have issues like campaign finance reform and recent supreme court decisions like Citizens United and McCutcheon that have shifted the balanced but we still have the vote. That's why it's so slow, because it's accountable to 300 million people.
A corporation makes profits. That's it. They are, like you said, accountable to the shareholders. If they want a higher stock price, they can make a quick decision because they don't have to let 300 million people comment before making it. It's the same with any decision making process. My wife and I making a decision about dinner is going to be quicker than passing a law because it involves less people. So yes it's going to be slower because it involves more people so government can't be run like a business because it's not a business.
Government is not perfect but it's better than corporations running things.
Yes and that's why we should have universal healthcare provided by the government. You know like EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION. Which have managed to have better health outcomes and lower costs than the US.
Spoken like a true Socialist.
Ever stop to think that it is because of Left Wing Policies that the Cost of Medicine and Health Care is as high as it is?
No because as data proves our cost of healthcare was sky high before ACA. ACA has stemmed the increase by a lot. And these evil socialized gave been able to keep down the cost of healthcare in their countries so how would it possible be left wing policies are driving up the costs?
Spoken like a true Socialist.
Ever stop to think that it is because of Left Wing Policies that the Cost of Medicine and Health Care is as high as it is?
No because as data proves our cost of healthcare was sky high before ACA. ACA has stemmed the increase by a lot. And these evil socialized gave been able to keep down the cost of healthcare in their countries so how would it possible be left wing policies are driving up the costs?
You are right.. The cost was high. Why?? Because of Left Wing Policies.
You are forgetting the unbelievable tax rate the people in those countries pay to support those socialized medical policies.
Your misstating this. Employers aren't required to offer insurance but they can get fined if they don't AND they pay low wages.If health insurance is provided as a benefit, the whole of health should be covered."Gimme, gimme, gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it."
Acceding to this constant demand is how we have now arrived to the point where there are dipshits who actually believe it is okay to force someone else to give them something, and if that someone else resists, they are intruding into the lives of the dipshits.
Incredible. Absolutely incredible.
There is no "if" any more, skippy. Thus, the problem. Employers are being FORCED to buy insurance for their employees, thus making everyone hostage to their employer's plan.
This is the exact opposite direction we need to go. It is well known that employer-sponsored health insurance drives the cost of insurance up.
Employer-sponsored insurance is a perq, not a right.
to exclude portions due to some ham handed religious 'mandate' is, in essence forcing someone else's 'religion' upon others. And where in the Bible does it mention contraception? That topic is brought up in tent revivals, not scripture.
You have that completely backwards. Forcing someone to pay for something which violates their beliefs is forcing your religion, or lack of it, onto them.
No because as data proves our cost of healthcare was sky high before ACA. ACA has stemmed the increase by a lot. And these evil socialized gave been able to keep down the cost of healthcare in their countries so how would it possible be left wing policies are driving up the costs?
You are right.. The cost was high. Why?? Because of Left Wing Policies.
You are forgetting the unbelievable tax rate the people in those countries pay to support those socialized medical policies.
Then name specific policies that directly led to the high costs of healthcare. Saying a broad statement like "left wing policies" might get low information, less educated citizens to believe you but not me. So name them.
You are right.. The cost was high. Why?? Because of Left Wing Policies.
You are forgetting the unbelievable tax rate the people in those countries pay to support those socialized medical policies.
Then name specific policies that directly led to the high costs of healthcare. Saying a broad statement like "left wing policies" might get low information, less educated citizens to believe you but not me. So name them.
Hmm, let's see,
Tort system that promotes suing doctors merely for bad outcomes.
Third party payer systems that encourage over use of medical care
Reimbursements from Medicare/Medicaid that are below the cost of the service and must be made up for by private party insurance
Food stamp programs that encourage obesity and poor eating habits
Regulatory regime that makes introducing new drugs and procedures prohibitively expensive
That would account for a lot of it. Some of the cost is simply because health care is worlds better now than it was even 20 years ago. But what I outlined contributes a lot to it.
