Despicable....

what is the LAWFUL PURPOSE for the average joe to own an assault weapon??
assault weapon? You mean a sword? :rolleyes:


sure simpleton, all of them, compare and contrast their LAWFUL PURPOSE right up to the most extreme weapons which is the TOPIC. :itsok:

He is happy the deranged killer in Texas was able to legally own guns. Don't harsh his buzz.
I'm actually sad that you think you are gd and you can stop mental people. you are the crazy one. Got a time machine to go back and make him illegal to buy? that's all you can today. right?
 
thoughts-and-prayers-in-sign-language-23310667.png
Riddle me this dumbfuck :
What laws would have prevented this recent shooting?

From what we know...

450 shots fired from an At-15. Just another case of mass murderers having access to their weapon of choice.
Why do we still allow high capacity magazines?
Why is a convicted wife beater allowed to buy weapons?
Why aren't there effective background checks?

There aren't universal background checks because the Republicans in Congress work for one of the most powerful special interest lobbies in the country,

the NRA.
Much like Liberals refuse to make (/ allow) e-Verify (to be) mandatory and / or enforce it, thereby facilitating the crimes of giving illegals jobs...
 
it wouldn't have mattered here in the Texas massacre. it just wouldn't have. you can mouth off all day, he would have passed it. WOULD HAVE PASSED IT! therefore, there is nothing you can do. NOTHING.

No...he had a domestic violence conviction on his record. That would have disqualified him.
but it wasn't entered into the database. Why didn't you stop him you know about it now? Funny again, you think you are a moral person and you aren't. you point to Monday morning quarterbacking like you could have done something different. you couldn't have, someone already fked up. No matter how many gun laws, he would have gotten them. Pissed isn't a solution. because there is no solution. only defense against it. no more gun free zones that attract mental disordered people?

Why have laws against rape? Drunk driving? Robbing banks? Child molesting? Those crimes are committed every day,

anyhow...
 
What's despicable are the GOP NRA puppets pretending they give a shit.

Like you nimrods actually care about this beyond seeing it as a method to get your agenda pushed.

Our "agenda" is about saving lives, saving the lives of people such as the ones in this massacre, which is the ONLY reason to want stricter gun control. To you people, caring about these people is all pretense; to you they are just collateral.
What laws would have prevented this besides banning guns?

What laws prevent rape?
none, so?
 
but it wasn't entered into the database. Why didn't you stop him you know about it now? Funny again, you think you are a moral person and you aren't. you point to Monday morning quarterbacking like you could have done something different. you couldn't have, someone already fked up. No matter how many gun laws, he would have gotten them. Pissed isn't a solution. because there is no solution. only defense against it. no more gun free zones that attract mental disordered people?

There is a solution...limiting access. If you're making the argument that it's not going to matter because a killer will get a gun anyway, might as well limit the number and type of guns anyone can get, right?
 
what is the LAWFUL PURPOSE for the average joe to own an assault weapon??
assault weapon? You mean a sword? :rolleyes:


sure simpleton, all of them, compare and contrast their LAWFUL PURPOSE right up to the most extreme weapons which is the TOPIC. :itsok:

He is happy the deranged killer in Texas was able to legally own guns. Don't harsh his buzz.
I'm actually sad that you think you are gd and you can stop mental people. you are the crazy one. Got a time machine to go back and make him illegal to buy? that's all you can today. right?

Why do you want it to be easy and legal for the crazies to acquire guns?
 
it wouldn't have mattered here in the Texas massacre. it just wouldn't have. you can mouth off all day, he would have passed it. WOULD HAVE PASSED IT! therefore, there is nothing you can do. NOTHING.

No...he had a domestic violence conviction on his record. That would have disqualified him.
but it wasn't entered into the database. Why didn't you stop him you know about it now? Funny again, you think you are a moral person and you aren't. you point to Monday morning quarterbacking like you could have done something different. you couldn't have, someone already fked up. No matter how many gun laws, he would have gotten them. Pissed isn't a solution. because there is no solution. only defense against it. no more gun free zones that attract mental disordered people?

Why have laws against rape? Drunk driving? Robbing banks? Child molesting? Those crimes are committed every day,

anyhow...
the big word there is committed and there are laws. there is no law that can stop a crime. Not one. I demand you show me one law that can stop a crime.
 
Chicago is way down the list of cities with gun violens. St. Louis is number 1.

St. Louis, MO

49.9
Detroit, MI

43.5
New Orleans, LA

38.7
Jackson, MS

35.4
Baltimore City, MD

33.8
Newark, NJ

33.3
Birmingham, AL

24.5
Buffalo, NY

23.2
Baton Rouge, LA

23.1
Pittsburgh, PA

22.4
North Charleston, SC

21.8
Little Rock, AR

21.7
Memphis, TN

21.4
Atlanta, GA

20.5
Cincinnati, OH

20.2
San Bernardino, CA

20.0
Oakland, CA

19.5
Miami, FL

19.2
Richmond, VA

18.9
Dayton, OH

18.9
Inglewood, CA

17.9
Montgomery, AL

17.5
South Bend, IN

16.9
Kansas City, KS

16.8
Kansas City, MO

16.7
Paterson, NJ

16.4
Stockton, CA

16.4
Cleveland, OH

16.2
Washington, DC

15.9
Philadelphia, PA

15.9
Wilmington, NC

15.9
Indianapolis, IN

15.8
Chattanooga, TN

15.5
Hartford, CT

15.2
Chicago, IL

15.1
Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reports, for cities with populations greater than 100,000.
dudette Chicago is the poster child for gun violence. It is why it came up during the elections in all references. all of them. so don't play games, just admit gun violence isn't your cause. please, not when you can't justify your own list.

From FBI stats, and a bunch of them have Republican mayors.
 
as a gun owner i do believe it is time to examine why these mass shootings are occurring....and perhaps more vetting


More vetting when?

I have weapons I've had for almost 50 years, 40 years, 30 years, 20 years.....5 years, 2 years....2 months
 
the legacy of the NRA: insuring every lunatic their legal choice of weaponry. :eusa_clap:
 
Why have laws against rape? Drunk driving? Robbing banks? Child molesting? Those crimes are committed every day,

Is that the snowflake pitch for anarchy and lawlessness?

A better question is why have those laws when liberals refuse to enforce them / hold people who commit them accountable?
 
what is the LAWFUL PURPOSE for the average joe to own an assault weapon??
assault weapon? You mean a sword? :rolleyes:


sure simpleton, all of them, compare and contrast their LAWFUL PURPOSE right up to the most extreme weapons which is the TOPIC. :itsok:

He is happy the deranged killer in Texas was able to legally own guns. Don't harsh his buzz.
I'm actually sad that you think you are gd and you can stop mental people. you are the crazy one. Got a time machine to go back and make him illegal to buy? that's all you can today. right?

Why do you want it to be easy and legal for the crazies to acquire guns?
because it doesn't matter, they're crazy and don't follow rules. they will do whatever it takes to do what they want to do. no matter what you think. That's why they're crazy.
 
no more gun free zones that attract mental disordered people?

We learned that the Texas shooter didn't even care about gun free zones and the reason he shot up the church was because of a personal dispute he had with his ex.

You're the one who think s letting domestic abusers get guns is OK. Over half of all mass shooters are males with domestic violence records. So wouldn't it make sense to prohibit anyone with a domestic violence charge from buying a gun?
 
it wouldn't have mattered here in the Texas massacre. it just wouldn't have. you can mouth off all day, he would have passed it. WOULD HAVE PASSED IT! therefore, there is nothing you can do. NOTHING.

No...he had a domestic violence conviction on his record. That would have disqualified him.
but it wasn't entered into the database. Why didn't you stop him you know about it now? Funny again, you think you are a moral person and you aren't. you point to Monday morning quarterbacking like you could have done something different. you couldn't have, someone already fked up. No matter how many gun laws, he would have gotten them. Pissed isn't a solution. because there is no solution. only defense against it. no more gun free zones that attract mental disordered people?

Why have laws against rape? Drunk driving? Robbing banks? Child molesting? Those crimes are committed every day,

anyhow...
the big word there is committed and there are laws. there is no law that can stop a crime. Not one. I demand you show me one law that can stop a crime.

Just because you can't stop it doesn't mean you should make it easier
 
He is a bedwetter
Why ban bump stocks? One guy abuses them and all hell breaks loose. Its fucking pathetic.


Notice no one wants to ban two part exploding targets? I mean the guy (Paddok) had pounds of the stuff. He could have set that off with a hammer. Go’s right to your bed wetter comment. They don’t know what to say until they hear it on TV or the radio. Republicans are as bad with their stupidity to.
 
because it doesn't matter, they're crazy and don't follow rules. they will do whatever it takes to do what they want to do. no matter what you think. That's why they're crazy.

If they're not going to follow the rules, then we must limit access to the kind of weaponry used to commit these violent acts. That means no more selling of these kinds of weapons.
 

Forum List

Back
Top