jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,405
- 29,200
- 2,180
sure, I proof read it too.I ask again, are you on acid or something?
Did you read what you posted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sure, I proof read it too.I ask again, are you on acid or something?
Did you read what you posted?
dude, I completely know that you can't sustain a logical discussion with me.And I can't help, you're kind of stupid.
Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
They are domestic terrorist, of course he can.Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
And when was the trial that determined they were domestic terrorists?They are domestic terrorist, of course he can.Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
name me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
Mark Pettibone and Connor O'Sheaname me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
got a link???Mark Pettibone and Connor O'Sheaname me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
got a link???Mark Pettibone and Connor O'Sheaname me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.
I'm not seeing where either of them were arrested or their rights were violated,,,got a link???Mark Pettibone and Connor O'Sheaname me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.![]()
Federal Officers Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab People In Portland, DHS Confirms
Agents are deployed in the Oregon city amid anti-police protests. Homeland Security official Ken Cuccinelli tells NPR the tactic is being used to move detainees to a "safe location for questioning."www.npr.org
when the crime happened on federal property they have the authority,,,It's unconstitutional to use federal policing power....
It was not delegated to the federal gvt, in the Constitution, thus it is reserved to the State.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Being hauled off in a van isn't an arrest?I'm not seeing where either of them were arrested or their rights were violated,,,got a link???Mark Pettibone and Connor O'Sheaname me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.![]()
Federal Officers Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab People In Portland, DHS Confirms
Agents are deployed in the Oregon city amid anti-police protests. Homeland Security official Ken Cuccinelli tells NPR the tactic is being used to move detainees to a "safe location for questioning."www.npr.org
nope,,,Being hauled off in a van isn't an arrest?I'm not seeing where either of them were arrested or their rights were violated,,,got a link???Mark Pettibone and Connor O'Sheaname me one person arrested,,,,That's exactly what happened. They're substituting reasonable suspicion for probable cause, which is a violation of the Constitution.if you took time to educate yourself on the subject you would know that never happened,,,Apparently not because Trump's thugs can now arrest people without probable cause.are you saying the citizens of the city have no rights?So you're going on record as supportive of a police state.
tRumplings have always been fascists. Now we have confirmation.![]()
Federal Officers Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab People In Portland, DHS Confirms
Agents are deployed in the Oregon city amid anti-police protests. Homeland Security official Ken Cuccinelli tells NPR the tactic is being used to move detainees to a "safe location for questioning."www.npr.org
Where does the Constitution say such? If it does, which I haven't found, then please post it.... otherwise, policing is reserved to the States.when the crime happened on federal property they have the authority,,,It's unconstitutional to use federal policing power....
It was not delegated to the federal gvt, in the Constitution, thus it is reserved to the State.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
more so when the locals refuse to do their job,,,
we know youre an ignorant moron,,,but you really shouldnt flaunt it in public,,,Where does the Constitution say such? If it does, which I haven't found, then please post it.... otherwise, policing is reserved to the States.when the crime happened on federal property they have the authority,,,It's unconstitutional to use federal policing power....
It was not delegated to the federal gvt, in the Constitution, thus it is reserved to the State.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
more so when the locals refuse to do their job,,,
If it's to protect a federal building, and that is somehow permitted, then they surround the federal building to protect the federal building, but that does or would not allow them to go out in the public streets to police, the protesters as if they were state or local police.
you can thank Obama for signing off on ndaa 2012 indefinite detention yeah thanks ObamaYea not like having a leader say people do what they do as they rear down the county.
ya fuck.
So the actions of tin pot dictatorships are fine so long as they go after people you don’t like. Quick question, and only one question. What happens when they come after you?
Obama signed off on the ndaa 2012 indefinite detention authorized by CongressWhere does the Constitution say such? If it does, which I haven't found, then please post it.... otherwise, policing is reserved to the States.when the crime happened on federal property they have the authority,,,It's unconstitutional to use federal policing power....
It was not delegated to the federal gvt, in the Constitution, thus it is reserved to the State.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
more so when the locals refuse to do their job,,,
If it's to protect a federal building, and that is somehow permitted, then they surround the federal building to protect the federal building, but that does or would not allow them to go out in the public streets to police, the protesters as if they were state or local police.