Constructive Anarchy
Senior Member
I believe all the politicians and media personalities who are currently fomenting war with Russia to distract from their own petty failures, should be arrested for treason, tried and hanged as traitors.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever suits your partisan political agenda, sounds good.There are no surgeons in the CIA or any other intelligence agencies, just professional liars. Have they found the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet? Have they stopped importing cocaine to finance operations? Are they still supporting ISIS in Syria? You could have just stopped at "...I'm a sucker...." and left it at that.Human nature, as I would cautiously place trust in the hands of my surgeon or in the decisions of a CEO.What would that trust be based on?Weird question. I trust them as much as I trust any human, I suppose.Just a big fan of intelligence agencies then?Look at my sig. I have no use for either "major" party, I'm just an independent. This whole thing was a horror show for me.
.
And I do trust them more than I trust Putin. Ya got me there. I wish the GOP did.
.
But I admit, I'm a bit of sucker for my country, and I'll place more faith in them than in Putin.
I love America, and I tend to give her the benefit of the doubt. I don't trust Russia or Putin that much, despite what I'm hearing from the GOP.
.
Whatever suits yours Hilarybot.Whatever suits your partisan political agenda, sounds good.There are no surgeons in the CIA or any other intelligence agencies, just professional liars. Have they found the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet? Have they stopped importing cocaine to finance operations? Are they still supporting ISIS in Syria? You could have just stopped at "...I'm a sucker...." and left it at that.Human nature, as I would cautiously place trust in the hands of my surgeon or in the decisions of a CEO.What would that trust be based on?Weird question. I trust them as much as I trust any human, I suppose.Just a big fan of intelligence agencies then?
And I do trust them more than I trust Putin. Ya got me there. I wish the GOP did.
.
But I admit, I'm a bit of sucker for my country, and I'll place more faith in them than in Putin.
I love America, and I tend to give her the benefit of the doubt. I don't trust Russia or Putin that much, despite what I'm hearing from the GOP.
.
.
I believe all the politicians and media personalities who are currently fomenting war with Russia to distract from their own petty failures, should be arrested for treason, tried and hanged as traitors.
The FBI is an amazing organization. They managed to find PROOF the Russians hacked the DNC server without actually looking at the server. They just took the word of a private left leaning company that was hired by the DNC that the hacking was done by the Russians. I tend to believe the leak was a disgruntled DNC Hillary campaign worker. Maybe someone that turned up dead last year but I don't have any proof of that either. Well as much proof as they have tha Ruskies did it.Okay, just for the hell of it, let's try to define what the question "Did Russia Hack the Election?" actually means.
If I have this right, I don't believe anyone is saying that Russia somehow got into voting booths or hacked into voting machines or computers or servers and changed votes from Hillary to Trump. If I'm wrong on that, if you believe that, please say so and provide whatever evidence you have.
I believe that what is being said is that the Russians "hacked" into Podesta's and other DNC people's email accounts via phishing and got oodles of seriously damning shit on the Democrats, spilled the beans, and here we are. They are saying that an unfriendly foreign power found and used a method of influencing opinions on a major party presidential candidate, and it may have made enough of a difference in a close race. That's it, unless I'm missing something.
So, four reasonable questions:
So what is YOUR definition of "hacking"?
- Was Podesta, was the DNC, an easy mark for this activity, did they screw up? Yeah, it appears so.
- Did the Russians try to hack the RNC too? Entirely possible, no one can say for sure either way.
- Could all the shit that came out from the hacked emails been the final straw against Clinton, particularly in those rust belt states where Trump barely beat her and gained critical electoral votes? Yeah, that seems like a reasonable possibility.
- And finally, if Trump had been the one whose party's emails were hacked and Hillary won critical electoral states by a hair, would his supporters be screaming right now? Of course.
.
Duh, it's been sufficiently proven by 17 members of the U.S. intelligence community that Russia hacked the DNC.
Why won't Trump at least admit that Russians hacked the DNC - even if he won't admit that it influenced the election?
SPY REPORT LANDS
PUTIN ‘ORDERED’ HACK
‘INFLUENCE’ ELECTION FOR TRUMP
U.S. Intel Report Identifies Russians Who Gave Emails To WikiLeaks
TRUMP: IT CHANGED NOTHING
Funny to watch so called liberals fall in love with the CIA and the security state apparatus.I believe all the politicians and media personalities who are currently fomenting war with Russia to distract from their own petty failures, should be arrested for treason, tried and hanged as traitors.
i think you sound pretty ridiculous and delusional. "russia if you're listening..." - trump
![]()
Trump picks corrupt people who made money in business, while Obama and Clinton choose corrupt people who made money in politics. You can choose which is more disgusting.Trumps choice for Secretary of State - Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson
![]()
Okay, just for the hell of it, let's try to define what the question "Did Russia Hack the Election?" actually means.
If I have this right, I don't believe anyone is saying that Russia somehow got into voting booths or hacked into voting machines or computers or servers and changed votes from Hillary to Trump. If I'm wrong on that, if you believe that, please say so and provide whatever evidence you have.
I believe that what is being said is that the Russians "hacked" into Podesta's and other DNC people's email accounts via phishing and got oodles of seriously damning shit on the Democrats, spilled the beans, and here we are. They are saying that an unfriendly foreign power found and used a method of influencing opinions on a major party presidential candidate, and it may have made enough of a difference in a close race. That's it, unless I'm missing something.
So, four reasonable questions:
So what is YOUR definition of "hacking"?
- Was Podesta, was the DNC, an easy mark for this activity, did they screw up? Yeah, it appears so.
- Did the Russians try to hack the RNC too? Entirely possible, no one can say for sure either way.
- Could all the shit that came out from the hacked emails been the final straw against Clinton, particularly in those rust belt states where Trump barely beat her and gained critical electoral votes? Yeah, that seems like a reasonable possibility.
- And finally, if Trump had been the one whose party's emails were hacked and Hillary won critical electoral states by a hair, would his supporters be screaming right now? Of course.
.
big baby trump with the teeny weeny hands blames the media because he knows his fans are mostly dumbos.
Trump to the Russians:
"If you're listening, I hope you find Hillary Clinton's missing emails"
Who could possibly argue with such a deep thoughtful analysis.big baby trump with the teeny weeny hands blames the media because he knows his fans are mostly dumbos.
Trump to the Russians:
"If you're listening, I hope you find Hillary Clinton's missing emails"