Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would mean that everyone involved in Benghazi lied. You give this little black man too much power that he does not have.
That would mean that everyone involved in Benghazi lied. You give this little black man too much power that he does not have.
Oh, verily I say, this nation has never had to suffer a more goebel like magician of the media. I mean he had the nation focused for a solid year on his birth certificate. he is a veritbable Nebuchadnezzar
I gave you my honest opinion. Are you going to respond in kind?
I've been honest from the jump, I know little about this whole thing. But it seems I'm on the same page as everyone else except I don't go into speculation.
From what I do know I don't believe there is anything nefarious going on but I do believe this is one of those republican moments where they are looking for anything like they did with Monica Lewinsky. Obama says brown shoes, oops he was wearing black ones so GET HIM!
American servicemen ended up dead. So it isn't about shoes.
We know there was a false narrative put out. The question is why. Was it simple incompetence? Obama is supposed to be our smartest president. So it can't be that. That leaves the obvious political angle. An election coming up that many predicted he would lose. He was reaching for anything to make sure that didnt happen and didnt want to be the first president to lose Americans in a terrorist attack since 9/11.
It is the most likely explanation. And with Occam's Razor the logical one.
he said it was "a terror" attack. He also attribitued it to the video, which his intelligence at the time at least partially said was the case, and even now is probably partially the truth, eg there were a bunch of pissed off civilians at the counselate as well as an orgainize militia with at least a mortor.
ps, but yeah the spun Rice like a dradle.
He did not say it was a terror attack and even Crowley admitted she was wrong in claiming he did.
Never let a fact influence you opinion
2012
September 12 -- President Barack Obama
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."
What the Obama administration has said about the Libya attack - CNN.com
I've been honest from the jump, I know little about this whole thing. But it seems I'm on the same page as everyone else except I don't go into speculation.
From what I do know I don't believe there is anything nefarious going on but I do believe this is one of those republican moments where they are looking for anything like they did with Monica Lewinsky. Obama says brown shoes, oops he was wearing black ones so GET HIM!
American servicemen ended up dead. So it isn't about shoes.
We know there was a false narrative put out. The question is why. Was it simple incompetence? Obama is supposed to be our smartest president. So it can't be that. That leaves the obvious political angle. An election coming up that many predicted he would lose. He was reaching for anything to make sure that didnt happen and didnt want to be the first president to lose Americans in a terrorist attack since 9/11.
It is the most likely explanation. And with Occam's Razor the logical one.
I agree the question is why...Like Why does it matter?
You guys are fishing and whether you snag a trout or a plastic bucket you're just happy fishing.
This is just how Clinton got caught up....ask about nothing, then specifics about the nothing...uncover something completely unrelated then claim victory
he said it was "a terror" attack. He also attribitued it to the video, which his intelligence at the time at least partially said was the case, and even now is probably partially the truth, eg there were a bunch of pissed off civilians at the counselate as well as an orgainize militia with at least a mortor.
ps, but yeah the spun Rice like a dradle.
He did not say it was a terror attack and even Crowley admitted she was wrong in claiming he did.
Never let a fact influence you opinion
2012
September 12 -- President Barack Obama
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."
What the Obama administration has said about the Libya attack - CNN.com
American servicemen ended up dead. So it isn't about shoes.
We know there was a false narrative put out. The question is why. Was it simple incompetence? Obama is supposed to be our smartest president. So it can't be that. That leaves the obvious political angle. An election coming up that many predicted he would lose. He was reaching for anything to make sure that didnt happen and didnt want to be the first president to lose Americans in a terrorist attack since 9/11.
It is the most likely explanation. And with Occam's Razor the logical one.
I agree the question is why...Like Why does it matter?
You guys are fishing and whether you snag a trout or a plastic bucket you're just happy fishing.
This is just how Clinton got caught up....ask about nothing, then specifics about the nothing...uncover something completely unrelated then claim victory
So the president lies about what happened and that's OK with you? Do you think he has any accountability at all for things his administration does, or is it just whatever he wants and since he's the president we all need to shut up and go along?
Clinton was hiding a bunch of stuff, like payoffs from the Chinese military. The sex thing was just the most provable.
I agree the question is why...Like Why does it matter?
You guys are fishing and whether you snag a trout or a plastic bucket you're just happy fishing.
This is just how Clinton got caught up....ask about nothing, then specifics about the nothing...uncover something completely unrelated then claim victory
So the president lies about what happened and that's OK with you? Do you think he has any accountability at all for things his administration does, or is it just whatever he wants and since he's the president we all need to shut up and go along?
Clinton was hiding a bunch of stuff, like payoffs from the Chinese military. The sex thing was just the most provable.
Obviously it does not matter that he lies to the people. The suppoerters will support it, point to Bush and any other obfuscation they can find. meanwhile, they call lying by Bush a terrible act and any supporter of Bush has problems.
It's the old "run from kettle" cognition failure.
He did not say it was a terror attack and even Crowley admitted she was wrong in claiming he did.
Never let a fact influence you opinion
2012
September 12 -- President Barack Obama
"The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."
What the Obama administration has said about the Libya attack - CNN.com
Cue the switcharoo. He calls it a spontaneous demostration based on an anti-Islamic film made here in the US on September 26, 2012.
So the president lies about what happened and that's OK with you? Do you think he has any accountability at all for things his administration does, or is it just whatever he wants and since he's the president we all need to shut up and go along?
Clinton was hiding a bunch of stuff, like payoffs from the Chinese military. The sex thing was just the most provable.
Obviously it does not matter that he lies to the people. The suppoerters will support it, point to Bush and any other obfuscation they can find. meanwhile, they call lying by Bush a terrible act and any supporter of Bush has problems.
It's the old "run from kettle" cognition failure.
i'm curious as to who died because of obama's "lie." Assuming you actually believe he lied, and i really don't doubt your sincerity no matter it's partisan basis, but the four guys were already dead.
Yes, it doesn't matter that the president of the US lied to the American people.
So the president lies about what happened and that's OK with you? Do you think he has any accountability at all for things his administration does, or is it just whatever he wants and since he's the president we all need to shut up and go along?
Clinton was hiding a bunch of stuff, like payoffs from the Chinese military. The sex thing was just the most provable.
Obviously it does not matter that he lies to the people. The suppoerters will support it, point to Bush and any other obfuscation they can find. meanwhile, they call lying by Bush a terrible act and any supporter of Bush has problems.
It's the old "run from kettle" cognition failure.
i'm curious as to who died because of obama's "lie." Assuming you actually believe he lied, and i really don't doubt your sincerity no matter it's partisan basis, but the four guys were already dead.
Obama described Benghazi as an act of terror the day after it happened. He didn't deceive anyone.
There was nothing to gain by intentionally scheming to lie about Benghazi.
Bullshit. He may have said it the first day but then he back tracked and blamed the video [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vSzdOPz1X0][FLASHBACK] At the UN Obama blames an internet video for Benghazi and the other attack - YouTube[/ame]
Obviously it does not matter that he lies to the people. The suppoerters will support it, point to Bush and any other obfuscation they can find. meanwhile, they call lying by Bush a terrible act and any supporter of Bush has problems.
It's the old "run from kettle" cognition failure.
i'm curious as to who died because of obama's "lie." Assuming you actually believe he lied, and i really don't doubt your sincerity no matter it's partisan basis, but the four guys were already dead.
Still waiting for an answer to my question.
There has been suggestions floating around but repubs wont say it directly. Are you guys saying Romney would've won if Obama didn't lie about Benghazi?
No I don't think that and that is the irony of this whole situation I think Obama made the decision to mislead people or lie for those who prefer that word because he feared it could sway the election while it might have made the election closer I don't think it would have changed the end result. The Obama administration created this mess by making a decision to mislead based on a political calculation that the truth would hurt their reelection chances.
There has been suggestions floating around but repubs wont say it directly.
