iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
in the story oldlady put up i believe that was her own account. this is where she doesn't remember when the party was, who's house it was, how she got there and so forth. i'm not saying something didn't happen but for someone to have so few details she's sure of, it seems convenient this one she *is* sure of.I believe her actual account is in the post article so I’d go off that. The rest is media spin. She describes the event in pretty good detail. You’re fine to question it but you should also take all statements and scenarios into account. Like if she is making the whole thing up how do you explain the therapy notes? Are they fakes? Was the polygraph test a fake too?dunno yet. i've heard 2 guys were attacking her and 4. i've heard she had no idea how she even got to the party but yet she now has a rock solid memory on who did what? i've heard kavenaughs name was mentioned to the therapist, i've heard it wasn't.So you think she made this whole thing up? Planted the story in therapy 6 years ago and then trained on how to pass a polygraph just in case he got nominated to the Supreme Court and is now using it to try and stop him?i still question the timing. given this is a normal tactic for the left and previous judges, i question it even more. next time the dems lob out a nomination you can now expect this to be added to the theatrics.That looks like she is trying to protect her private life as she knew she was about to get put through the ringer. I bet that was advised by her attorney and isn’t evidence of anything to do with the accusation. This is a mans life being effected to so the accusation does deserve question on that fact alone. I think everything is happening as it should except for those partisans that have already made up there minds.her deleting her entire social history first, do you think that calls her accusation into question?
the only thing we do have is confusion.