Do you remember when Merrick Garland was presented as a moderate?

[Pete7469]

absolutely a FUCKING LIE. And you know it.

That bed wetter doesn't "know" shit. It's a fuckin drone. Wrongwinger is a parrot, arguing with it is a waste of time.

 

[rightwinger]

I wonder how you'll like it when the next AG politicizes the DoJ to intimidate you?

What specifically do you object to?

 

[Pete7469]

So, you're good with a politicized DoJ trying to intimidate citizens?

OldCocks would be the guy dumping Zyklon-B into the shower.

 

[tyroneweaver]

I'm just trying to get a bead on your definition of "radical extremist". It appears to be anyone who does something with which you don't agree.

Okay.

garland's SIL loses money if Idaho doesn't adopt his race bait classess

 

[j-mac]

The FBI only gets involved if an outside group is disrupting the meeting.
Other than that, they offer guidance on how a School Board should respond and what remedies they have

You have yet to offer what "outside group" you're afraid of here...

Look, this is typical corrupt politics...The National association complains to Garland, and Garland jumps into action with a cleverly worded memo designed to make the parents complaining about ciriculum in local meetings intimidated into not complaining, thinking an agent will be knocking on their door....

It's a hack move....But then again Garland is revealed as a hack.

 

[JWBooth]

View attachment 548558

It was not long ago that Merrick Garland was presented as a moderate for SCOTUS, just like they did Biden.

Hopefully, we are done with thinking any of these radical extremists are moderates.

F#ck'em all!!!!!!!

Do you remember when Merrick Garland was presented as a moderate?​

If he was a moderate he wouldn’t have been nominated to SCOTUS. He’s just making the most of his consolation prize.

 

[rightwinger]

You have yet to offer what "outside group" you're afraid of here...

Look, this is typical corrupt politics...The National association complains to Garland, and Garland jumps into action with a cleverly worded memo designed to make the parents complaining about ciriculum in local meetings intimidated into not complaining, thinking an agent will be knocking on their door....

It's a hack move....But then again Garland is revealed as a hack.

You have yet to respond to my questions

What specifically do you object to that Garland is doing?

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has directed federal authorities to meet with local law enforcement over the next month to discuss strategies for addressing the increase in "harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers" in public schools across the country.

 

[j-mac]

What specifically do you object to?

I object to the DoJ trying to intimidate parents into silence at local civic meetings they have a constitutional right to voice their opinion at...It's a nasty little fascist move...

What specifically do you like about it?

 

[rightwinger]

I object to the DoJ trying to intimidate parents into silence at local civic meetings they have a constitutional right to voice their opinion at...It's a nasty little fascist move...

What specifically do you like about it?

In no way is DoJ doing that

Right now, DoJ is meeting with local law enforcement to find out what the problem is and develop strategies

What do you object to?

 

[j-mac]

School boards try to silence parents - Search Videos

www.bing.com

 

[rightwinger]

I object to the DoJ trying to intimidate parents into silence at local civic meetings they have a constitutional right to voice their opinion at...It's a nasty little fascist move...

What Garland actually said…

"While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views," Garland wrote, characterizing threats against public servants as both illegal and "counter to our nation's core values."


Do you disagree?

 

[j-mac]

In no way is DoJ doing that

Right now, DoJ is meeting with local law enforcement to find out what the problem is and develop strategies

What do you object to?

That is exactly what the DoJ is doing with this memo, at the behest of the National association...It's naked fascism...

They want to stop the parents voicing their opinions at these meetings...

Here is Clinton long time ally Terry Mcaulffe saying he doesn't believe that parents have a say in the education of their children....




This is how you people think....And it is disgusting....

 

[j-mac]

What Garland actually said…

"While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views," Garland wrote, characterizing threats against public servants as both illegal and "counter to our nation's core values."


Do you disagree?

So, voicing a complaint at a school board meeting is now a threat?

 

[rightwinger]

So, voicing a complaint at a school board meeting is now a threat?

Read what Garland ACTUALLY said


While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views,"

Do you agree?

 

[rightwinger]

That is exactly what the DoJ is doing with this memo, at the behest of the National association...It's naked fascism...

They want to stop the parents voicing their opinions at these meetings...

How is meeting with local police departments to discuss the issue and possible strategies fascism?

Where has ANYONE opposed parents voicing opinions?
Not the School Board Association and not the DoJ

 

[j-mac]

Read what Garland ACTUALLY said


While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views,"

Do you agree?

You have yet to show any of that…Are you saying that parents complaining at a school board meeting are now threats?

 

[j-mac]

How is meeting with local police departments to discuss the issue and possible strategies fascism?

Where has ANYONE opposed parents voicing opinions?
Not the School Board Association and not the DoJ

It’s worded, and intended to intimidate parents speaking out.

 

[j-mac]

Read what Garland ACTUALLY said


While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views,"

Do you agree?

The intimidation is coming from Garland, as he intended.

 

[rightwinger]

You have yet to show any of that…Are you saying that parents complaining at a school board meeting are now threats?

Rinse/Repeat
I keep giving you the facts about what Garland ACTUALLY said and you keep repeating the lie

Not playing

 

[j-mac]

Rinse/Repeat
I keep giving you the facts about what Garland ACTUALLY said and you keep repeating the lie

Not playing

You’re the one parsing words here trying to obscure their intent.