“Everyone in the Western community wanted Shokin sacked.”

You ran a long time ago and admitted as such. I tried to steer you back but you had no intention.

“the topic is lost” because you didn’t want to discuss it.
I already Won the debate. You admitted Trump would win in 2020. Case closed. You also admitted you lied about your profession
You’re behaving like a child. I told a joke. Don’t be such asshole.
You lied. It was not a joke. You got caught. In my profession I know more or less what people make as I have worked with 1000s of companies. Only joke is that impeachment.

Then you’re not very smart.

Do you know how much doctors make?
Of course. But I am 100% sure you’re not a doctor. Plus many do not make as much as you think. Insurance costs are killer.

You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. Insurance costs? How much do you think insurance costs? I know how much a lot of doctors make. I don’t know that you do, but it’s pretty easy to search.

Your intuition sucks.
 
I already Won the debate. You admitted Trump would win in 2020. Case closed. You also admitted you lied about your profession
You’re behaving like a child. I told a joke. Don’t be such asshole.
You lied. It was not a joke. You got caught. In my profession I know more or less what people make as I have worked with 1000s of companies. Only joke is that impeachment.

Then you’re not very smart.

Do you know how much doctors make?
Of course. But I am 100% sure you’re not a doctor. Plus many do not make as much as you think. Insurance costs are killer.

You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. Insurance costs? How much do you think insurance costs? I know how much a lot of doctors make. I don’t know that you do, but it’s pretty easy to search.

Your intuition sucks.
Malpractice insurance. LOL. You’re so dumb. You have no idea how much they make. I have helped finance several doctor clinics from proctologists to dentists to other specialists. You won’t tell me your specialty because you know I ll bust you. Little Lying Leftist.
 
I already Won the debate. You admitted Trump would win in 2020. Case closed. You also admitted you lied about your profession
You’re behaving like a child. I told a joke. Don’t be such asshole.

wait until he insists you are a drinker, because well.... he just 'knows'. sounds an awful like trumpese.
My intuition is rarely off. You’re not a drinker. You’re a drunk.
Except when you accused me of being from a foreign nation.

Oh, and you believe Shokin without question.

Oh, and you still can’t explain why the US embassy staff and the head of the IMF wanted Shokin fired.
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
 
You’re behaving like a child. I told a joke. Don’t be such asshole.
You lied. It was not a joke. You got caught. In my profession I know more or less what people make as I have worked with 1000s of companies. Only joke is that impeachment.

Then you’re not very smart.

Do you know how much doctors make?
Of course. But I am 100% sure you’re not a doctor. Plus many do not make as much as you think. Insurance costs are killer.

You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. Insurance costs? How much do you think insurance costs? I know how much a lot of doctors make. I don’t know that you do, but it’s pretty easy to search.

Your intuition sucks.
Malpractice insurance. LOL. You’re so dumb. You have no idea how much they make. I have helped finance several doctor clinics from proctologists to dentists to other specialists. You won’t tell me your specialty because you know I ll bust you. Little Lying Leftist.

I doubt you’ve heard of my specialty. Most people haven’t. How would that prove anything anyway? You’ll just keep calling me a liar. It proves nothing.

Do you know how much malpractice insurance costs?
 
You’re behaving like a child. I told a joke. Don’t be such asshole.

wait until he insists you are a drinker, because well.... he just 'knows'. sounds an awful like trumpese.
My intuition is rarely off. You’re not a drinker. You’re a drunk.
Except when you accused me of being from a foreign nation.

Oh, and you believe Shokin without question.

Oh, and you still can’t explain why the US embassy staff and the head of the IMF wanted Shokin fired.
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
 
wait until he insists you are a drinker, because well.... he just 'knows'. sounds an awful like trumpese.
My intuition is rarely off. You’re not a drinker. You’re a drunk.
Except when you accused me of being from a foreign nation.

Oh, and you believe Shokin without question.

Oh, and you still can’t explain why the US embassy staff and the head of the IMF wanted Shokin fired.
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
 
My intuition is rarely off. You’re not a drinker. You’re a drunk.
Except when you accused me of being from a foreign nation.

Oh, and you believe Shokin without question.

Oh, and you still can’t explain why the US embassy staff and the head of the IMF wanted Shokin fired.
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
 
Except when you accused me of being from a foreign nation.

Oh, and you believe Shokin without question.

Oh, and you still can’t explain why the US embassy staff and the head of the IMF wanted Shokin fired.
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
 
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
I ll Dumb it down for you.


Biden brags about holding $1bn. Hunter gets a job paying him $50k per month because of his daddy’s name. Trump asks the new President to please investigate what happened and says “help us”. “Our country has been through a lot”.

Democrats impeach over that.

You then admitted Trump would win anyway in 2020. So why am I wasting my time with a Leftist Liar like you? Here is your biased link. You lost this debate. You’re a loser.

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show


The one from the Hill is most damning. Ouch.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
 
I asked You to show a link. You didn’t. I said Shokin was on the investigation, you conceded you were mistaken. You’re a Leftist. I have Said this 100x (hyperbole). Leftists are like the Alt Right to me. Awful people. You’re also a liar.

Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
Even your own Leftist source questioned it. LOL

Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
 
Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
I ll Dumb it down for you.


Biden brags about holding $1bn. Hunter gets a job paying him $50k per month because of his daddy’s name. Trump asks the new President to please investigate what happened and says “help us”. “Our country has been through a lot”.

Democrats impeach over that.

You then admitted Trump would win anyway in 2020. So why am I wasting my time with a Leftist Liar like you? Here is your biased link. You lost this debate. You’re a loser.

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show


The one from the Hill is most damning. Ouch.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

You don’t need to dumb it down for me. I know what you all are alleging. The problem is, there’s no evidence for it.

For starters, Biden’s explanation that Shokin was fired for corruption makes sense. It’s consistent with what everyone in the decision making process has been claiming all along. The only one claiming anything different is the guy that was fired because he was corrupt. If that’s your sole source, then admit it but be aware that his credibility is quite poor. There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden to policy set at the State Department.

Now, if Joe Biden showed up in Ukraine and decided unilaterally that Shokin needs to be fired and demanded that everyone go along with his decision, you’d have a different matter on your hands. The problem is; that’s the exact opposite of what happened. The push to fire Shokin originated from the embassy staff in Ukraine, not Biden.

John Solomon’s story doesn’t really corroborate your allegation either. None of these memos he’s touting have any evidence that anyone in Burisma was pushing for Shokin to be fired.
 
Here’s a link. Contemporary to the event too. It was covered by the media at length.

Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

Bonus, a letter from Republicans talking about the corruption in the Prosecutor General office.

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

Shokin wasn’t on the investigation. There was no investigation. I expect ad hominems for the sources above but they have quotes and primary documents so it’s going to be a waste of time.
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
Even your own Leftist source questioned it. LOL

Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
I would question it too.

But there’s still no evidence of any crime.
 
The title of this topic is incorrect.

It should read

Everyone who was getting KICKBACKS from the US foreign aid to Ukraine wanted Shokin fired
 
IDGAF what other countries think. They also agreed to the Iran deal (stupid) and Europe is so bad, the UK voted for Brexit. Berg is such a little childish dolt.
Clearly, YDGAF about the facts either.
The next fact you post will be your first. Any monkey can cut and paste. Put yourself out there and give an opinion. See how that goes. Here is another fact. Trump will not get convicted. Troll.

It’s entirely possible that Trump won’t be convicted, this time, but he will be impeached again, as long as continues to violate the law and trample the Constitution.

But Trump also won’t be re-elected. He’s done too much damage. The American people are done with him.
 
IDGAF what other countries think. They also agreed to the Iran deal (stupid) and Europe is so bad, the UK voted for Brexit. Berg is such a little childish dolt.
Clearly, YDGAF about the facts either.
The next fact you post will be your first. Any monkey can cut and paste. Put yourself out there and give an opinion. See how that goes. Here is another fact. Trump will not get convicted. Troll.

It’s entirely possible that Trump won’t be convicted, this time, but he will be impeached again, as long as continues to violate the law and trample the Constitution.

But Trump also won’t be re-elected. He’s done too much damage. The American people are done with him.

LOL, why do you lefty's saying these stupid things? Will you have a heart attack when he is elected? Will you leave the hemisphere?
 
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
Even your own Leftist source questioned it. LOL

Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
I would question it too.

But there’s still no evidence of any crime.

It’s entirely possible that the President of Burisma hired Hunter Biden thinking it would help him but there’s no evidence that it did.
 
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
I ll Dumb it down for you.


Biden brags about holding $1bn. Hunter gets a job paying him $50k per month because of his daddy’s name. Trump asks the new President to please investigate what happened and says “help us”. “Our country has been through a lot”.

Democrats impeach over that.

You then admitted Trump would win anyway in 2020. So why am I wasting my time with a Leftist Liar like you? Here is your biased link. You lost this debate. You’re a loser.

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show


The one from the Hill is most damning. Ouch.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

You don’t need to dumb it down for me. I know what you all are alleging. The problem is, there’s no evidence for it.

For starters, Biden’s explanation that Shokin was fired for corruption makes sense. It’s consistent with what everyone in the decision making process has been claiming all along. The only one claiming anything different is the guy that was fired because he was corrupt. If that’s your sole source, then admit it but be aware that his credibility is quite poor. There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden to policy set at the State Department.

Now, if Joe Biden showed up in Ukraine and decided unilaterally that Shokin needs to be fired and demanded that everyone go along with his decision, you’d have a different matter on your hands. The problem is; that’s the exact opposite of what happened. The push to fire Shokin originated from the embassy staff in Ukraine, not Biden.

John Solomon’s story doesn’t really corroborate your allegation either. None of these memos he’s touting have any evidence that anyone in Burisma was pushing for Shokin to be fired.
I did that because it encapsulates what DJT believed. What he asked for was for an investigation. If that investigation shows zippo then he looks bad. DJT didn’t ask for Zelensky to make up information LOL.
 
NYT and Vox are Leftist sources and are not credible. Sorry. Neither is CNN. Biden stated publicly he would hold $1bn is aid. Quid pro Quo. You also never explained how Hunter got that job as he had zero experience in the field. Do you believe he would have garnered that job if not for Joes role as VP? Even Maria Yavanavoch said Obama and his cabinet told her to tread lightly around Hunter and Burisma. She said that herself at the hearing or confirmed it. Lastly you admitted Trump would
Win in 2020 so why do we keep going back and forth? You lost the debate.
Yeah; that’s what I thought you’d say. Ad hominems are another dishonest debate tactic. You ask for a link and refuse to acknowledge the content.

Here’s a direct link to their letter:
Portman, Durbin, Shaheen, and Senate Ukraine Caucus Reaffirm Commitment to Help Ukraine Take on Corruption | Senator Rob Portman

I’ve explained why I think Hunter got his job to other people. He got it because of his name. After Euromaiden, Ukrainian countries were trying to reestablish their reputation as the alignment of their country shifted to the western nations. Burisma restricted their board with people that they thought would make them look legitimate. Hunter Biden was one such person.

The debate is whether the allegations against Biden make any sense. You’re losing this debate badly.

I don’t know why we’re still talking because all you do is troll.
“He got it because of his name”

Case closed. Poor Little Leftist. Want me to source biased right leaning sources? No. STFU. You lost. Game over. Lie to someone else. You don’t even know what AGI is.
He got it because of his name.

Great. What case is closed? Getting a job because of your name isn’t illegal and it’s rather common.

Personally, I’d settle for any sources but you don’t really have a habit of providing any. If you did provide a right leaning source, all the better because it’s usually trivially easy to point out where they screwed up.

You’re a liar.
Even your own Leftist source questioned it. LOL

Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
I would question it too.

But there’s still no evidence of any crime.
Trump asked for an investigation to gauge if there was. That’s all and he was impeached. There is certainly enough smoke to gauge if there is a fire.
 
IDGAF what other countries think. They also agreed to the Iran deal (stupid) and Europe is so bad, the UK voted for Brexit. Berg is such a little childish dolt.
Clearly, YDGAF about the facts either.
The next fact you post will be your first. Any monkey can cut and paste. Put yourself out there and give an opinion. See how that goes. Here is another fact. Trump will not get convicted. Troll.

It’s entirely possible that Trump won’t be convicted, this time, but he will be impeached again, as long as continues to violate the law and trample the Constitution.

But Trump also won’t be re-elected. He’s done too much damage. The American people are done with him.
You don’t vote. You’re not American. Your POV is worthless.
 

Forum List

Back
Top