FBI STILL hasn't looked at DNC server

[The Original Tree]

I've been saying this for quite a long time. nothing new. no government agency, none, nada have looked at that server. evah!!!!!!!! That's how I know without a doubt and can say factually, Russia did not hack the DNC server. See how fking easy that is?

They also didn't look at the water cooler! The microwave!

You don't need to hand over a server to prove a hack . Especially a hack where they just stole a password .

Yes, you do NEED TO LOOK AT THE SERVER.
Why don't you quit lying? You are awful at it.

THE FBI "NEEDED TO LOOK AT CLINTON'S SERVER" to assure us (to save her campaign) that her server was not hacked.

So your assertion that we do not need to look at THE DNC SERVER LOGS to determine if it was hacked......IS A BOLD FACED LIE.

Do you work in IT? or are you one of those people we have to deal with that constantly creates "ID Ten T" errors?

Again, you are full of shit. Assange said Seth Rich gave him The Emails and they were not obtained through Russia, or any Russia Intermediaries.

STOP POSTING STUPID NONSENSE IN BOLDED CAPS.

I work in IT - security logs do not require looking at the server hardware, they are completely portable, just like any piece of data on any server.

Dear Dufas:

You should quit your job in IT as you are no good at it. I am sure your password is probably password come to think of it.

You have to look at THE SERVER, The Server logs, The Event Logs, or The Firewall, or some piece of hardware within the DNC Network to determine if there was an INTRUSION.

Answer me this Mr. IT..... Why did not even "Crowd Strike" look at the actual server? And why were they forced to "retract" the majority of the original report THE DNC paid for them to write?

The Server Logs IS NOT HARDWARE. It is a software component, mr Crazy.

You are a phucking moron. When I say you have to look at some kind of hardware on the network, Switches though they are hardware generate logs, which yes are software based. But since you are losing this argument and badly, you want to split hairs.

Firewalls, though they are hardware generate logs, which can be analyzed to detect and intrusion. A Router, though it is hardware generates logs which can be used to detect an intrusion.

I doubt you work in IT. You are too phucking stupid and too much of an dick to be working in that field.

POST THE LOGS show us THE DNC SERVER, or STFU!

 

[AntonToo]

Yes FBI's security experts did not need to go on DNC's server, Crowdstrike did that and provided them all relevant data from the server. It was good enough the fucking FBI, why is it not good enough for YOU? Because you are exactly what I described you to be.

wooooooo, you said they didn't need to, to look at the server because one didn't to see a hack. you just flipped your line stupid fk.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report

Except they did not. Cool story otherwise.

Here you go sparky. They revised it. Other cyber firms are calling them on it. AND they even made their presentation look like a comic book.Amateur hour.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

One more time dummy:

Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

 

[Siete]

DNC just wants us to take their word for it that they were hacked. There is no way a Bernie supporter could have just leaked the information

DNC email server most wanted evidence for Russia investigations

How can they? That their offices are being cluttered with all sorts of frivolous investigations that the DEMS are conjuring up every second. They has a log jam right at their front door steps of investigations.

name the dem intel agency conducting the investigation

You means the seventeen that Hillary has conjured up in her little brainless head? I said that the FBI are unable to do any investigations, and Session because he is too busy trying to round up Hillary's Branch intel agency, the pedophilia.


Report claims DOJ probe of Clinton Foundation, emails ongoing

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


TRUMP/RUSSIA ... FOCUS take some meds or something, and try to concentrate

 

[The Original Tree]

The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust  

 

[tinydancer]

Yes FBI's security experts did not need to go on DNC's server, Crowdstrike did that and provided them all relevant data from the server. It was good enough the fucking FBI, why is it not good enough for YOU? Because you are exactly what I described you to be.

wooooooo, you said they didn't need to, to look at the server because one didn't to see a hack. you just flipped your line stupid fk.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report. now it's time to look at the server. still no russia hack never was never was a hack btw. Seth Rich took the info to wikileaks. already confirmed.

wooooooo, you said they didn't need to, to look at the server because one didn't to see a hack. you just flipped your line stupid fk.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report

Except they did not. Cool story otherwise.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. I bet you beleive the fake Russian dossier fairy tale too. CrowdStrike even made their presentation look like a freaking comic book. Talk about amateur hour.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

They used it to buttress their claims. So yes it is part of the original report sparky. And they flat out lied in it.

USA
Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report
March 24, 2017 8:31 PM

• Oleksiy Kuzmenko
• Pete Cobus

The original CrowdStrike report, dated Dec. 22, 2016, was revised and reposted on March 23, 2017. (Courtesy of CrowdStrike)

WASHINGTON —
U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented data published by an influential British think tank.

In December, CrowdStrike said it found evidence that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, contributing to heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine's war with pro-Russian separatists.

VOA reported Tuesday that the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which publishes an annual reference estimating the strength of world armed forces, disavowed the CrowdStrike report and said it had never been contacted by the company.

Ukraine's Ministry of Defense also has stated that the combat losses and hacking never happened.

Some see overblown allegations

CrowdStrike was first to link hacks of Democratic Party computers to Russian actors last year, but some cybersecurity experts have questioned its evidence. The company has come under fire from some Republicans who say charges of Kremlin meddling in the election are overblown.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

 

[AntonToo]

They also didn't look at the water cooler! The microwave!

You don't need to hand over a server to prove a hack . Especially a hack where they just stole a password .

Yes, you do NEED TO LOOK AT THE SERVER.
Why don't you quit lying? You are awful at it.

THE FBI "NEEDED TO LOOK AT CLINTON'S SERVER" to assure us (to save her campaign) that her server was not hacked.

So your assertion that we do not need to look at THE DNC SERVER LOGS to determine if it was hacked......IS A BOLD FACED LIE.

Do you work in IT? or are you one of those people we have to deal with that constantly creates "ID Ten T" errors?

Again, you are full of shit. Assange said Seth Rich gave him The Emails and they were not obtained through Russia, or any Russia Intermediaries.

STOP POSTING STUPID NONSENSE IN BOLDED CAPS.

I work in IT - security logs do not require looking at the server hardware, they are completely portable, just like any piece of data on any server.

Dear Dufas:

You should quit your job in IT as you are no good at it. I am sure your password is probably password come to think of it.

You have to look at THE SERVER, The Server logs, The Event Logs, or The Firewall, or some piece of hardware within the DNC Network to determine if there was an INTRUSION.

Answer me this Mr. IT..... Why did not even "Crowd Strike" look at the actual server? And why were they forced to "retract" the majority of the original report THE DNC paid for them to write?

The Server Logs IS NOT HARDWARE. It is a software component, mr Crazy.

You are a phucking moron. When I say you have to look at some kind of hardware on the network, Switches though they are hardware generate server logs, which yes are software based. But since you are losing this argument and badly, you want to split hairs. Firewalls, though they are hardware generate logs, which can be analyzed to detect and intrusion. A Router, though it is hardware generates logs which can be used to detect an intrusion.

I doubt you work in IT. You are too phucking stupid and too much of an dick to be working in that field.

POST THE LOGS show us THE DNC SERVER, or STFU!

I love how you curse me out while confirming that I am correct. Always the best.

It is software, it is portable and was provided by Crowdstrike to FBI.

 

[Aletheia4u]

DNC just wants us to take their word for it that they were hacked. There is no way a Bernie supporter could have just leaked the information

DNC email server most wanted evidence for Russia investigations

How can they? That their offices are being cluttered with all sorts of frivolous investigations that the DEMS are conjuring up every second. They has a log jam right at their front door steps of investigations.

name the dem intel agency conducting the investigation

You means the seventeen that Hillary has conjured up in her little brainless head? I said that the FBI are unable to do any investigations, and Session because he is too busy trying to round up Hillary's Branch intel agency, the pedophilia.


Report claims DOJ probe of Clinton Foundation, emails ongoing

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


TRUMP/RUSSIA ... FOCUS take some meds or something, and try to concentrate

I did not know that Pres. Trump and Russian Pres. has the DNC servers.

 

[The Original Tree]

wooooooo, you said they didn't need to, to look at the server because one didn't to see a hack. you just flipped your line stupid fk.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report

Except they did not. Cool story otherwise.

Here you go sparky. They revised it. Other cyber firms are calling them on it. AND they even made their presentation look like a comic book.Amateur hour.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

One more time dummy:

Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

Show me THE DNC SERVER LOGS
Show me THE DNC SERVER EVENT LOGS
Show me THE DNC SERVER SECURITY LOGS
Show me THE DNC SWITCH LOGS
Show me THE DNC FIREWALL LOGS
Show me THE DNC ROUTER LOGS
Show me THE DNC ISP's ROUTER, and FIREWALL LOGS

Prove to me that THE DNC IS NOT A BUNCH OF LYING SUBVERSIVE LIBERAL NAZIS BENT ON FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING AND DESTROYING THIS NATION!

 

[AntonToo]

wooooooo, you said they didn't need to, to look at the server because one didn't to see a hack. you just flipped your line stupid fk.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report. now it's time to look at the server. still no russia hack never was never was a hack btw. Seth Rich took the info to wikileaks. already confirmed.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report

Except they did not. Cool story otherwise.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. I bet you beleive the fake Russian dossier fairy tale too. CrowdStrike even made their presentation look like a freaking comic book. Talk about amateur hour.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

They used it to buttress their claims. So yes it is part of the original report sparky. And they flat out lied in it.

USA
Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

STFU ALREADY.


Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report

Except they did not. Cool story otherwise.

Here you go sparky. They revised it. Other cyber firms are calling them on it. AND they even made their presentation look like a comic book.Amateur hour.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

One more time dummy:

Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

Show me THE DNC SERVER LOGS

Moron that is not publicly available - you seriously don't know that?

What. The. Fuck. Is. Your. Deal.?

 

[Aletheia4u]

The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust

That is why that Hillary and her disciples are cluttering up the office. So that they can hand pick who they want since they has labeled the President as a Russian's spy.

 

[The Original Tree]

The FBI Never Asked For Access To Hacked Computer Servers

 

[jc456]

Yes, you do NEED TO LOOK AT THE SERVER.
Why don't you quit lying? You are awful at it.

THE FBI "NEEDED TO LOOK AT CLINTON'S SERVER" to assure us (to save her campaign) that her server was not hacked.

So your assertion that we do not need to look at THE DNC SERVER LOGS to determine if it was hacked......IS A BOLD FACED LIE.

Do you work in IT? or are you one of those people we have to deal with that constantly creates "ID Ten T" errors?

Again, you are full of shit. Assange said Seth Rich gave him The Emails and they were not obtained through Russia, or any Russia Intermediaries.

STOP POSTING STUPID NONSENSE IN BOLDED CAPS.

I work in IT - security logs do not require looking at the server hardware, they are completely portable, just like any piece of data on any server.

Dear Dufas:

You should quit your job in IT as you are no good at it. I am sure your password is probably password come to think of it.

You have to look at THE SERVER, The Server logs, The Event Logs, or The Firewall, or some piece of hardware within the DNC Network to determine if there was an INTRUSION.

Answer me this Mr. IT..... Why did not even "Crowd Strike" look at the actual server? And why were they forced to "retract" the majority of the original report THE DNC paid for them to write?

The Server Logs IS NOT HARDWARE. It is a software component, mr Crazy.

You are a phucking moron. When I say you have to look at some kind of hardware on the network, Switches though they are hardware generate server logs, which yes are software based. But since you are losing this argument and badly, you want to split hairs. Firewalls, though they are hardware generate logs, which can be analyzed to detect and intrusion. A Router, though it is hardware generates logs which can be used to detect an intrusion.

I doubt you work in IT. You are too phucking stupid and too much of an dick to be working in that field.

POST THE LOGS show us THE DNC SERVER, or STFU!

I love how you curse me out while confirming that I am correct. Always the best.

It is software, it is portable and was provided by Crowdstrike to FBI.

again, crowdstrike had to retract their findings. oops. you got nothing mr IT!!!

 

[Siete]

Yes, you do NEED TO LOOK AT THE SERVER.
Why don't you quit lying? You are awful at it.

THE FBI "NEEDED TO LOOK AT CLINTON'S SERVER" to assure us (to save her campaign) that her server was not hacked.

So your assertion that we do not need to look at THE DNC SERVER LOGS to determine if it was hacked......IS A BOLD FACED LIE.

Do you work in IT? or are you one of those people we have to deal with that constantly creates "ID Ten T" errors?

Again, you are full of shit. Assange said Seth Rich gave him The Emails and they were not obtained through Russia, or any Russia Intermediaries.

STOP POSTING STUPID NONSENSE IN BOLDED CAPS.

I work in IT - security logs do not require looking at the server hardware, they are completely portable, just like any piece of data on any server.

Dear Dufas:

You should quit your job in IT as you are no good at it. I am sure your password is probably password come to think of it.

You have to look at THE SERVER, The Server logs, The Event Logs, or The Firewall, or some piece of hardware within the DNC Network to determine if there was an INTRUSION.

Answer me this Mr. IT..... Why did not even "Crowd Strike" look at the actual server? And why were they forced to "retract" the majority of the original report THE DNC paid for them to write?

The Server Logs IS NOT HARDWARE. It is a software component, mr Crazy.

You are a phucking moron. When I say you have to look at some kind of hardware on the network, Switches though they are hardware generate server logs, which yes are software based. But since you are losing this argument and badly, you want to split hairs. Firewalls, though they are hardware generate logs, which can be analyzed to detect and intrusion. A Router, though it is hardware generates logs which can be used to detect an intrusion.

I doubt you work in IT. You are too phucking stupid and too much of an dick to be working in that field.

POST THE LOGS show us THE DNC SERVER, or STFU!

I love how you curse me out while confirming that I am correct. Always the best.

It is software, it is portable and was provided by Crowdstrike to FBI.

garsh, ya kin get it outta that plastic box n ever thang like that ?

whew .. whut'll they thank of nexxt


es

 

[Aletheia4u]

The FBI Never Asked For Access To Hacked Computer Servers

Well, they have to have an excuse for not probing the servers.

 

[tinydancer]

The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust

What is truly disturbing is that the FBI under Comey was actually ready to pay Christopher Steele $$$$$$$$$$ to dig up more fairy tale dirt on Trump. Very unsettling that the FBI is outsourcing intelligence.

Can't wait till McCabe is gone. Sadly the FBI leadership is part of the swamp.

 

[The Original Tree]

You assholes lied to us and tried to say 17 intelligence agencies stated that Russians hacked The DNC Server. It was just 3 and even they did not agree, and none of them did their own investigation.

And yet not one of these 17 intelligence agencies looked at THE DNC SERVER.
What are they hiding?
Why won't they let anyone near that server?

"Something Stinks Here" - CrowdStrike Revises, Retracts Parts Of Explosive Russian Hacking Report | Zero Hedge

 

[AntonToo]

STOP POSTING STUPID NONSENSE IN BOLDED CAPS.

I work in IT - security logs do not require looking at the server hardware, they are completely portable, just like any piece of data on any server.

Dear Dufas:

You should quit your job in IT as you are no good at it. I am sure your password is probably password come to think of it.

You have to look at THE SERVER, The Server logs, The Event Logs, or The Firewall, or some piece of hardware within the DNC Network to determine if there was an INTRUSION.

Answer me this Mr. IT..... Why did not even "Crowd Strike" look at the actual server? And why were they forced to "retract" the majority of the original report THE DNC paid for them to write?

The Server Logs IS NOT HARDWARE. It is a software component, mr Crazy.

You are a phucking moron. When I say you have to look at some kind of hardware on the network, Switches though they are hardware generate server logs, which yes are software based. But since you are losing this argument and badly, you want to split hairs. Firewalls, though they are hardware generate logs, which can be analyzed to detect and intrusion. A Router, though it is hardware generates logs which can be used to detect an intrusion.

I doubt you work in IT. You are too phucking stupid and too much of an dick to be working in that field.

POST THE LOGS show us THE DNC SERVER, or STFU!

I love how you curse me out while confirming that I am correct. Always the best.

It is software, it is portable and was provided by Crowdstrike to FBI.

again, crowdstrike had to retract their findings. oops. you got nothing mr IT!!!

No they didn't bullshiter.

Neither Crowdstrike, nor FBI retracted anything about Russians doing this hacking with direction from Kremlin. PERIOD.

Time to get to that final phase of acceptance.

 

[The Original Tree]

The FBI says the Democratic Party wouldn't let agents see the hacked email servers

 

[jc456]

wooooooo, you said they didn't need to, to look at the server because one didn't to see a hack. you just flipped your line stupid fk.

Yes, they, FBI, didn't, because they were provided with all the data from the company hired by the DNC to do this analysis.

This is not rocket science. You can do this.

a company that later retracted their report

Except they did not. Cool story otherwise.

Here you go sparky. They revised it. Other cyber firms are calling them on it. AND they even made their presentation look like a comic book.Amateur hour.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

One more time dummy:

Wrong report dummy, NOTHING to do with their DNC and other findings.

we know, it was retracted. we know, we know.

Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report

"WASHINGTON —

U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented data published by an influential British think tank."