Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thoroughly disagree and find your opinion simply illogical. A premature baby is still a baby weather five minutes OUT of the vag or five minutes UNTIL jettison. It truly is ridiculous that you go to this length to validate open hunting in a no kill limit Fetus hunting season.
Hey, I don't invent words or assign them meanings. That was done a long time ago. For some strange reason, the word "adult" does not apply to a 10 year old. Nor does the term "child" apply to a 25 year old. Funnily enough, the term "pensioner" doesn't apply to a two year old. There must a reason for all this...
Indeed, and yet they are ALL living humans beings.
Words confuse you, don't they? Not much of a reader, I take it.
Hey, I don't invent words or assign them meanings. That was done a long time ago. For some strange reason, the word "adult" does not apply to a 10 year old. Nor does the term "child" apply to a 25 year old. Funnily enough, the term "pensioner" doesn't apply to a two year old. There must a reason for all this...
I think you have that backwards.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter....what matters is at what time does the interest of government in protecting the potential life outweigh the interest of the pregnant woman in controlling her own body.
It sure isn't when you pull out....
Actually the government DOES have a case simply because THE FEMALE COULD HAVE control over her own body PRIOR by just using contraceptives. If she CHOOSES NOT to use contraceptives guess what...YOU MAY have a baby to be responsible for.
So what you are telling the free world, Jillian, is that YOU of all people APPROVE of females aborting for convenience sake.
Between this and your theories on GW I was correct in stating that you hate humans.
I think you have that backwards.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter....what matters is at what time does the interest of government in protecting the potential life outweigh the interest of the pregnant woman in controlling her own body.
It sure isn't when you pull out....
Indeed, the state does have an interest in prohibiting the purposeful killing of life even if these Americans are five minutes from "officially" being considered worthwile by people who would rather rationalize irresponsible promiscuity than distinct indivudual lives.
Feel free to make your own BETTER zipper decision.
No... I'm FOR government butting OUT... until it's interest in the fetus outweighs my own. Real simple. Not your moral judgment to make for others, regardless of what you might think is the proper choice.
THAT'S what it comes down to... you have no right to insert *your* choice in place of someone else's.
You mean the one where he states the politically correct, liberal answer that claims an unborn human being is something else?
No thanks. Fool yourself with it. It certainly isn't fooling me.
You mean the one where he states the politically correct, liberal answer that claims an unborn human being is something else?
No thanks. Fool yourself with it. It certainly isn't fooling me.
Why not...Isn't THAT EXACTLY what you are doing to me right now?
Larkin, did it take you a day to catch your breath? I wish that I gave a damn about laughing at you more in this thread but I just don't. Turning you into a court jester like Bruce Banner's angry alter ego only entertains for so long.
At the end of the day, the vast majority of abortions are carried out within the first three months. Those "babies" are no more babies than a sperm and an egg are.
The only problem I have with abortion is if a woman has an elective procedure after about the six month period. What I would love to know is, how many abortions are carried out after that time, and how many are elective (as opposed to doing it because the baby is severely disabled or the mother's life is in danger).
Forget all the other crap, that is all that matters IMO. I couldn't give two fucks if some 18 year old floozy is bonking her brains out and gets up the duff, then 8 weeks later decides to end the pregnancy. Too many people in the world anyway, plus from anecdotal evidence I've seen in the societies I have lived in two things stick out: 1) 18-20 year old women and men don't make good parents and their kids generally turn out to be little shits (I am making a generalisation here I know, but it is just from my experience, so I'm willing to concede it might not be the norm; 2) I have yet to meet a woman who's had an abortion or longed for, and then enjoyed, the experience. In fact, of the few I know who've had them, they hated them.
Finally, if your only reason for not wanting abortion is, at the end of the day, a religious one. Fuck off. If you are religious and get knocked up, don't have an abortion. It's none of your business...:O)
Nope. She is not slating your opinion., which you are certainly entitled to. What you have no right doing is stopping somebody doing something they can legally do - like have an abortion.
I'd say it's more about that it's nobody else's business but their own. If you knock up some bird Gunny, make sure she doesnt' have an abortion. Your choice, nobody else's business. If your neighbour does so and both of them want the abortion, their choice, nobody else's business. Quite simple really..
Actually the government DOES have a case simply because THE FEMALE COULD HAVE control over her own body PRIOR by just using contraceptives. If she CHOOSES NOT to use contraceptives guess what...YOU MAY have a baby to be responsible for.
No. This one... where he says if its a religious determination, then everyone can just fuck off.
http://usmessageboard.com/showpost.php?p=684019&postcount=346
