Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Preying upon children. Obviously.Jailed for what?
Child abuse, you do know after surgery it's final? You have to have a parent present for a child to get their ears pierced, but not transitioning. You people are sick.Jailed for what?
And with little ability to empathize with the vast larger number of poor folk struggling all around you
Do tell.
Jailed for what?
If you're arguing they've been groomed to believe they're trans rather then them actually being trans how do you plan to prove that in court?Preying upon children. Obviously.
If a child is groomed to want sex with an adult, is it then perfectly reasonable for adults to fuck them? The same thing goes if they have been groomed to be a tranny and somebody mutilates their bodies.
They can't get a tattoo, because it's permanent and their brains are not developed enough to make such a life-long decision, but they can have body parts cut off? Who has followed up on these kids to see the long-term effects of such surgeries, or aren't we supposed to ask for that?Child abuse, you do know after surgery it's final? You have to have a parent present for a child to get their ears pierced, but not transitioning. You people are sick.
What should be the sentence for metalating the genitals of a child?No, I don't. Is that what cosplayer yell right before they don't do anything?
I'm asking if you morons think we should jail people because their actions hurt your Simp feelings or do you have any actual cause that you could prove, with evidence?
The child drag show fans are here to defend mutilating children.It's hilarious how white wing media frightens their readers with scary numbers sans context.
389% sounds a lot more powerful than 489. Manufactured hype.It's hilarious how white wing media frightens their readers with scary numbers sans context.
They're not old enough to:child abuse. There is no way a 12 year old is mature enough to make such a decision. Do you think a 12 year old is old enough to give consent to have sex?
I think a 12 year old can consent to sexual activity with another 12 year old. The argument was never that it should be illegal for teenagers to explore sexual activity and intimacy with members of their peer group. Children can consent to sexual activity in some context and that goes especially for their medical care.child abuse. There is no way a 12 year old is mature enough to make such a decision. Do you think a 12 year old is old enough to give consent to have sex?
The fact that you're feebly trying to defend the practice is sad, very, very sad.389% sounds a lot more powerful than 489. Manufactured hype.
You do need parental consent at 14 and well as having the sign off of medical professionals.Child abuse, you do know after surgery it's final? You have to have a parent present for a child to get their ears pierced, but not transitioning. You people are sick.
You feel the same way about circumcision or do you have an argument that isn't full of hyperbole?What should be the sentence for metalating the genitals of a child?
What would you suggest?
I think a 12 year old can consent to sexual activity with another 12 year old. The argument was never that it should be illegal for teenagers to explore sexual activity and intimacy with members of their peer group. Children can consent to sexual activity in some context and that goes especially for their medical care.
There are some medical reasons (cancer for example), but I don't think those are included in these figures. Absent a medical reason, I have to agree: how would a parent or doctor permit such?
I'd say the same thing for any plastic surgery like that.
The fact that you're feebly trying to defend the practice is sad, very, very sad.
I have some sympathy ith your stance. But you offer no science or medical opinion to back it up. These kids are not going away and at the very least the extreme right could get off their backs.The fact that you're feebly trying to defend the practice is sad, very, very sad.
First off, a 12 year old is not a teenager....and I disagree that children should be able consent to sexual activity in some context.
They also will have to see a doctor for the rest of their lives. I hope these kids sue the democrat party out of existence after they realize the mistake Democrats groomed them to do.They can't get a tattoo, because it's permanent and their brains are not developed enough to make such a life-long decision, but they can have body parts cut off? Who has followed up on these kids to see the long-term effects of such surgeries, or aren't we supposed to ask for that?
