txlonghorn
Senior Member
- Mar 9, 2009
- 3,042
- 400
- 48
MLK's niece does not represent MLK. She says gays are an abomination and MLK was all about acceptance. Its insulting to not address the fact that no one in MLK's family is standing with her.
MLK's son has nothing to do with her and for you or beck to think that showing this pro life, anti gay nut as a representative for MLK is insulting.
By the way, Its funny how Beck and the word God is being thrown around. I wonder why he didn't mention the fact that he is Mormon. Christians and Mormons have opposing views of God. Very Opposing.
Beck is a clown, alcoholic Mormon who had a rally with Fox fans and tea baggers. Big woop. The irony of all this is, MLK's views would have been looked down on my beck..in a heart beat. Example...Fox would have HATED mlk and his stance on the vietnam war.
Oh Zona...why do all of you haters of the right have to show your true colors with stupid statements like
Beck is a clown, alcoholic Mormon who had a rally with Fox fans and tea baggers. Big woop.
Beck is a recovering alcoholic...I assume you aren't one because if you were, you'd respect that. And he has, on more than one occasion, made acknowledgement of his Morman faith...anyone who actually pays attention to what he says would know that.
It is the playbook of the left to try to demoralize anything that shows the right gaining ground against a faultering left.
To claim that MLK's views would have been looked down on by Beck seems incredibly moronic on your part since he spent a lot of time over the weeks prior to yesterday and then some of his time in his speech praising the work of MLK and doing his best to give King's message a connection to ALL Americans, not just black Americans that we can use to apply to our current state of chaos.
At any rate, it's troubling that you don't support Mr. Beck's views that there are things that we WILL disagree on, but there are so many things that we can do in agreement that will change this country for the better...for all of us. I know you probably won't take this in the spirit in which I tried to convey it...but I had to try.
He is a classic dry drunk. I am not an alcoholic, but I did get training on substance abuse because I was after care specialist (collateral duty) in the Navy. He shows all the signs of being one. Recovering or not, he is still an alcoholic skippy.
MLK would have been against the Iraq war. We all agree with this. Now be truthful here..how would fox have treated him because of this?
Do you think Fox would have called HIM a socialist? Beck himself said being for social justice was wrong...do you think MLK was for social justice?
Be honest for just one second here and address what I just wrote.
According to wikipedia...
Social justice is based on the concepts of human rights and equality and involves a greater degree of economic egalitarianism through progressive taxation, income redistribution, or even property redistribution. These policies aim to achieve what developmental economists refer to as more equality of opportunity than may currently exist in some societies, and to manufacture equality of outcome in cases where incidental inequalities appear in a procedurally just system.
Do you think that MLK was after redistribution or was he after equal rights for all Americans reguardless of their skin color, origin or beliefs?
The social justice that is defined here at refers to redistribution is what Beck is opposed to.
I would venture to say that Dr. King would have been against ANY war so I'm not sure that picking just this one is fair. But you may be right that FOX...and maybe even a few others would have not given him much toleration...but then again, who knows...I guess it's all fair in love and war when it comes to the press and politics...I mean, let's face it...MSNBC hasn't been the Welcome Wagon for Sarah Palin.
I'm just wondering if you're maybe too focused on the whole "FOX is bad" concept. I don't think FOX would have called an equal rights activist such as MLK a socialist...have they done so? I'm not looking for generalizations here...have you heard ANYONE on FOX call MLK a socialist? Since we're being honest...I'll look forward to your answer.
And then finally, to your hideous and continuous remarks about alcholics, I'm curious as to whether or not you missed portions of your training. Or do they not offer any training on support of individuals with addictions that included a level of compassion for their condition?