Homosexuality is in the bible.

I don't believe Jesus ever say anything against anyone, he was the champion of the downtrodden, the misfits, the sick, even hater guys like you. That he would single out gays is laughable. The guy who wrote your book 200 years after the facts made that shit up, because he certainly wasn't quoting Jesus from memory. :lol:

I can tell you're really really smart. I bet you've been to college.

I can tell you're really smart too, you know I'm right.

Yes, I know you're right. You've convinced me of every point you've made. You're brilliant.
 
Quit propositioning everyone on this goddamn site, Ash!!! Save it for public restrooms.

This is why you and your pals have no credibility. When you can't discuss issues any longer, your inherent evil nature takes over and you can't help yourselves.

Tip dumbfuck: asking if someone is homosexual is not discussing a fucking issue. It's just a stupid, non-tangential, dodge of what was asserted and you quoted in your totally fucking stupid query.

Are you seeing?

If you are a homosexual then there would be a natural bias in your opinion. Duh!!
 
This is why you and your pals have no credibility. When you can't discuss issues any longer, your inherent evil nature takes over and you can't help yourselves.

Tip dumbfuck: asking if someone is homosexual is not discussing a fucking issue. It's just a stupid, non-tangential, dodge of what was asserted and you quoted in your totally fucking stupid query.

Are you seeing?

If you are a homosexual then there would be a natural bias in your opinion. Duh!!

I am not, not that one's sexual orientation has anything to do with intelligence.

Consider your case: fuck a chick. You're still an idiot; pack some fudge. You're still an idiot.

See how that works?
 
Tip dumbfuck: asking if someone is homosexual is not discussing a fucking issue. It's just a stupid, non-tangential, dodge of what was asserted and you quoted in your totally fucking stupid query.

Are you seeing?

If you are a homosexual then there would be a natural bias in your opinion. Duh!!

I am not, not that one's sexual orientation has anything to do with intelligence.

Consider your case: fuck a chick. You're still an idiot; pack some fudge. You're still an idiot.

See how that works?

If it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then why can't you get it through your thick damn head that marriage has always been a man and a woman all over the planet since civilization came into existance. You have to lie to yourself and make billions of people who lived and died bigots for believing marriage was a man and a woman. Silly morons.
 
If you are a homosexual then there would be a natural bias in your opinion. Duh!!

I am not, not that one's sexual orientation has anything to do with intelligence.

Consider your case: fuck a chick. You're still an idiot; pack some fudge. You're still an idiot.

See how that works?

If it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then why can't you get it through your thick damn head that marriage has always been a man and a woman all over the planet since civilization came into existance. You have to lie to yourself and make billions of people who lived and died bigots for believing marriage was a man and a woman. Silly morons.

Because it's not true. MA started marrying same-sex couples on May 17, 2004, and many other countries did before that, even really Christian ones, like Spain, perhaps due to feeling real "christian" and shit.

Ain't learning great, Ash?!
 
I am not, not that one's sexual orientation has anything to do with intelligence.

Consider your case: fuck a chick. You're still an idiot; pack some fudge. You're still an idiot.

See how that works?

If it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then why can't you get it through your thick damn head that marriage has always been a man and a woman all over the planet since civilization came into existance. You have to lie to yourself and make billions of people who lived and died bigots for believing marriage was a man and a woman. Silly morons.

Because it's not true. MA started marrying same-sex couples on May 17, 2004, and many other countries did before that, even really Christian ones, like Spain, perhaps due to feeling real "christian" and shit.

Ain't learning great, Ash?!

Oh my God.
 
If it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then why can't you get it through your thick damn head that marriage has always been a man and a woman all over the planet since civilization came into existance. You have to lie to yourself and make billions of people who lived and died bigots for believing marriage was a man and a woman. Silly morons.

Because it's not true. MA started marrying same-sex couples on May 17, 2004, and many other countries did before that, even really Christian ones, like Spain, perhaps due to feeling real "christian" and shit.

Ain't learning great, Ash?!

Oh my God.

Precisely!!! Emphasis on "yours."

Now then, shit changes when we get smarter and such, about how things really are. Example: Maybe sacrificing a virgin or some goats, WHICH HAS BEEN THE WAY WE'VE DONE IT THROUGHOUT HISTORY!!!, ain't the actual cure for crop failures. Perhaps irrigation is the way to go.

Ditto on what loving relationships are. Today we know better, and thus we're steadily scrapping the old ways, which, frankly, were kinda fucked up, but praisegod no virgins nor goats paid the ultimate price. Only innocent humans were marginalized. So there's that.

Are you seeing?
 
So how does supporting gay marriage make you afraid of Jesus? Jesus loved everyone, didn't he?

How does believing marriage is a man and a woman make a person a homophobe? Do you believe Jesus was a bigot for saying marriage is a man and a woman?
I don't believe Jesus ever say anything against anyone, he was the champion of the downtrodden, the misfits, the sick, even hater guys like you. That he would single out gays is laughable. The guy who wrote your book 200 years after the facts made that up, because he certainly wasn't quoting Jesus from memory. :lol:
First off the book of Matthew was written by a contempory who personally knew Jesus Christ. He was also moved by the Holy Spirit to remember events that happened less than 20 years from the time they happened. Christ was crucified in about 30 AD and Matthew wrote his book likely around 50 AD. Secondly, Jesus was openly vocal against what He noted as hypocrisy.
Matthew 23
New Living Translation (NLT)

Jesus Criticizes the Religious Leaders
23 Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples, 2 “The teachers of religious law and the Pharisees are the official interpreters of the law of Moses. 3 So practice and obey whatever they tell you, but don’t follow their example. For they don’t practice what they teach. 4 They crush people with unbearable religious demands and never lift a finger to ease the burden.

5 “Everything they do is for show. On their arms they wear extra wide prayer boxes with Scripture verses inside, and they wear robes with extra long tassels. 6 And they love to sit at the head table at banquets and in the seats of honor in the synagogues. 7 They love to receive respectful greetings as they walk in the marketplaces, and to be called ‘Rabbi.’

8 “Don’t let anyone call you ‘Rabbi,’ for you have only one teacher, and all of you are equal as brothers and sisters. 9 And don’t address anyone here on earth as ‘Father,’ for only God in heaven is your spiritual Father. 10 And don’t let anyone call you ‘Teacher,’ for you have only one teacher, the Messiah. 11 The greatest among you must be a servant. 12 But those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

13 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you shut the door of the Kingdom of Heaven in people’s faces. You won’t go in yourselves, and you don’t let others enter either.

15 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you cross land and sea to make one convert, and then you turn that person into twice the child of hell you yourselves are!

16 “Blind guides! What sorrow awaits you! For you say that it means nothing to swear ‘by God’s Temple,’ but that it is binding to swear ‘by the gold in the Temple.’ 17 Blind fools! Which is more important—the gold or the Temple that makes the gold sacred? 18 And you say that to swear ‘by the altar’ is not binding, but to swear ‘by the gifts on the altar’ is binding. 19 How blind! For which is more important—the gift on the altar or the altar that makes the gift sacred? 20 When you swear ‘by the altar,’ you are swearing by it and by everything on it. 21 And when you swear ‘by the Temple,’ you are swearing by it and by God, who lives in it. 22 And when you swear ‘by heaven,’ you are swearing by the throne of God and by God, who sits on the throne.

23 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you are careful to tithe even the tiniest income from your herb gardens, but you ignore the more important aspects of the law—justice, mercy, and faith. You should tithe, yes, but do not neglect the more important things. 24 Blind guides! You strain your water so you won’t accidentally swallow a gnat, but you swallow a camel!

25 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you are so careful to clean the outside of the cup and the dish, but inside you are filthy—full of greed and self-indulgence! 26 You blind Pharisee! First wash the inside of the cup and the dish, and then the outside will become clean, too.

27 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs—beautiful on the outside but filled on the inside with dead people’s bones and all sorts of impurity. 28 Outwardly you look like righteous people, but inwardly your hearts are filled with hypocrisy and lawlessness.

29 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you build tombs for the prophets your ancestors killed, and you decorate the monuments of the godly people your ancestors destroyed. 30 Then you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our ancestors, we would never have joined them in killing the prophets.’

31 “But in saying that, you testify against yourselves that you are indeed the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. 32 Go ahead and finish what your ancestors started. 33 Snakes! Sons of vipers! How will you escape the judgment of hell?

34 “Therefore, I am sending you prophets and wise men and teachers of religious law. But you will kill some by crucifixion, and you will flog others with whips in your synagogues, chasing them from city to city. 35 As a result, you will be held responsible for the murder of all godly people of all time—from the murder of righteous Abel to the murder of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you killed in the Temple between the sanctuary and the altar. 36 I tell you the truth, this judgment will fall on this very generation.

Jesus Grieves over Jerusalem
37 “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones God’s messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn’t let me. 38 And now, look, your house is abandoned and desolate. 39 For I tell you this, you will never see me again until you say, ‘Blessings on the one who comes in the name of the Lord!’”
 
Last edited:
To undermine the Christian traditional American culture. That is who they perceive their enemy is, and I'm not speaking about gays. I'm speaking of the Marxists who use anyone and anything to destroy traditional America and erect their leftist utopia. Homosexuals are just more pawns like blacks have been for years.

If guns don't kill people and it's people who kill people, then why send people into war with guns? :dunno:

PS Jesus was gay.

Jesus is God and God does not sin. Jesus did all the right things for all the right reasons.

Actually, you're wrong.

Jesus is the SON of God, not God Himself.

And yes, Jesus DID sin, and it's even written about in the Bible. He was creating birds down by the river on the Sabbath, and that was considered a sin. He was even brought up before the Jewish elders because of it.

Next?
 
If you are a homosexual then there would be a natural bias in your opinion. Duh!!

I am not, not that one's sexual orientation has anything to do with intelligence.

Consider your case: fuck a chick. You're still an idiot; pack some fudge. You're still an idiot.

See how that works?

If it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then why can't you get it through your thick damn head that marriage has always been a man and a woman all over the planet since civilization came into existance. You have to lie to yourself and make billions of people who lived and died bigots for believing marriage was a man and a woman. Silly morons.

Quick question...............did you know that King David and his friend Jonathan had a LEGALLY RECOGNIZED SAME SEX UNION BY THE NATION OF ISRAEL?
 
If you are a homosexual then there would be a natural bias in your opinion. Duh!!

I am not, not that one's sexual orientation has anything to do with intelligence.

Consider your case: fuck a chick. You're still an idiot; pack some fudge. You're still an idiot.

See how that works?

If it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then why can't you get it through your thick damn head that marriage has always been a man and a woman all over the planet since civilization came into existance.
You amuse me. Please, continue.
 
How does believing marriage is a man and a woman make a person a homophobe? Do you believe Jesus was a bigot for saying marriage is a man and a woman?
I don't believe Jesus ever say anything against anyone, he was the champion of the downtrodden, the misfits, the sick, even hater guys like you. That he would single out gays is laughable. The guy who wrote your book 200 years after the facts made that up, because he certainly wasn't quoting Jesus from memory. :lol:
First off the book of Matthew was written by a contempory who personally knew Jesus Christ. He was also moved by the Holy Spirit to remember events that happened less than 20 years from the time they happened. Christ was crucified in about 30 AD and Matthew wrote his book likely around 50 AD. Secondly, Jesus was openly vocal against what He noted as hypocrisy.
Matthew 23
New Living Translation (NLT)

Jesus Criticizes the Religious Leaders
23 Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples, 2 “The teachers of religious law and the Pharisees are the official interpreters of the law of Moses. 3 So practice and obey whatever they tell you, but don’t follow their example. For they don’t practice what they teach. 4 They crush people with unbearable religious demands and never lift a finger to ease the burden.

5 “Everything they do is for show. On their arms they wear extra wide prayer boxes with Scripture verses inside, and they wear robes with extra long tassels. 6 And they love to sit at the head table at banquets and in the seats of honor in the synagogues. 7 They love to receive respectful greetings as they walk in the marketplaces, and to be called ‘Rabbi.’

8 “Don’t let anyone call you ‘Rabbi,’ for you have only one teacher, and all of you are equal as brothers and sisters. 9 And don’t address anyone here on earth as ‘Father,’ for only God in heaven is your spiritual Father. 10 And don’t let anyone call you ‘Teacher,’ for you have only one teacher, the Messiah. 11 The greatest among you must be a servant. 12 But those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

13 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you shut the door of the Kingdom of Heaven in people’s faces. You won’t go in yourselves, and you don’t let others enter either.

15 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you cross land and sea to make one convert, and then you turn that person into twice the child of hell you yourselves are!

16 “Blind guides! What sorrow awaits you! For you say that it means nothing to swear ‘by God’s Temple,’ but that it is binding to swear ‘by the gold in the Temple.’ 17 Blind fools! Which is more important—the gold or the Temple that makes the gold sacred? 18 And you say that to swear ‘by the altar’ is not binding, but to swear ‘by the gifts on the altar’ is binding. 19 How blind! For which is more important—the gift on the altar or the altar that makes the gift sacred? 20 When you swear ‘by the altar,’ you are swearing by it and by everything on it. 21 And when you swear ‘by the Temple,’ you are swearing by it and by God, who lives in it. 22 And when you swear ‘by heaven,’ you are swearing by the throne of God and by God, who sits on the throne.

23 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you are careful to tithe even the tiniest income from your herb gardens, but you ignore the more important aspects of the law—justice, mercy, and faith. You should tithe, yes, but do not neglect the more important things. 24 Blind guides! You strain your water so you won’t accidentally swallow a gnat, but you swallow a camel!

25 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you are so careful to clean the outside of the cup and the dish, but inside you are filthy—full of greed and self-indulgence! 26 You blind Pharisee! First wash the inside of the cup and the dish, and then the outside will become clean, too.

27 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs—beautiful on the outside but filled on the inside with dead people’s bones and all sorts of impurity. 28 Outwardly you look like righteous people, but inwardly your hearts are filled with hypocrisy and lawlessness.

29 “What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you build tombs for the prophets your ancestors killed, and you decorate the monuments of the godly people your ancestors destroyed. 30 Then you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our ancestors, we would never have joined them in killing the prophets.’

31 “But in saying that, you testify against yourselves that you are indeed the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. 32 Go ahead and finish what your ancestors started. 33 Snakes! Sons of vipers! How will you escape the judgment of hell?

34 “Therefore, I am sending you prophets and wise men and teachers of religious law. But you will kill some by crucifixion, and you will flog others with whips in your synagogues, chasing them from city to city. 35 As a result, you will be held responsible for the murder of all godly people of all time—from the murder of righteous Abel to the murder of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you killed in the Temple between the sanctuary and the altar. 36 I tell you the truth, this judgment will fall on this very generation.

Jesus Grieves over Jerusalem
37 “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones God’s messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn’t let me. 38 And now, look, your house is abandoned and desolate. 39 For I tell you this, you will never see me again until you say, ‘Blessings on the one who comes in the name of the Lord!’”

First off the book of Matthew was written by a contempory who personally knew Jesus Christ.

And where does he say exactly that he knew this jesus? This 'Matthew' that wrote the Gospel does not appear to have met Jesus, because he used Mark's Gospel and the 'Q' document as the main sources for his Gospel.

Matthew's gospel contains 92% of the text of Mark!

Matthew also uses a source that historians call "Q" - a completely unidentified source who was supposedly an original disciple of Christ (or a friend of Paul), none of whose work has survived, but which was quoted/copied/used by Matthew and Luke.
The Gospel of Matthew, the Fraud!

Q Document
The Lost Sayings Gospel Q

It was until 150CE that this author called Matthew was assigned as the author. Matthew knew no such character called jesus.
 
Sorry guys, but the earliest fragment of the bible was dated to something like 130AD, a full 100 years after the facts, look it up. And that was only a fragment of one page. Most of the other stuff is dated quite a bit later, some parts are dated to have been written in around 350AD, 300+ years after the facts.
So no, Jesus never said any of what is attributed to him. They are nice myths, but he never walked on water... either. Not resurrected either. Sorry. Please try again.
 
If guns don't kill people and it's people who kill people, then why send people into war with guns? :dunno:

PS Jesus was gay.

Jesus is God and God does not sin. Jesus did all the right things for all the right reasons.

Actually, you're wrong.

Jesus is the SON of God, not God Himself.

And yes, Jesus DID sin, and it's even written about in the Bible. He was creating birds down by the river on the Sabbath, and that was considered a sin. He was even brought up before the Jewish elders because of it.

Next?

Please provide the Book, Chapter and Verses.

John 8:58
New International Version (©1984)
"I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!"
 
Sorry guys, but the earliest fragment of the bible was dated to something like 130AD, a full 100 years after the facts, look it up. And that was only a fragment of one page. Most of the other stuff is dated quite a bit later, some parts are dated to have been written in around 350AD, 300+ years after the facts.
So no, Jesus never said any of what is attributed to him. They are nice myths, but he never walked on water... either. Not resurrected either. Sorry. Please try again.

Old Testament is Old Jewish law, long before 130 AD.
 
Sorry guys, but the earliest fragment of the bible was dated to something like 130AD, a full 100 years after the facts, look it up. And that was only a fragment of one page. Most of the other stuff is dated quite a bit later, some parts are dated to have been written in around 350AD, 300+ years after the facts.
So no, Jesus never said any of what is attributed to him. They are nice myths, but he never walked on water... either. Not resurrected either. Sorry. Please try again.

Old Testament is Old Jewish law, long before 130 AD.

Ok, OT was stolen from the Jews, but new testament with all the jesus stuff, long after.

New Testament Manuscripts - ReligionFacts
 
Sorry guys, but the earliest fragment of the bible was dated to something like 130AD, a full 100 years after the facts, look it up. And that was only a fragment of one page. Most of the other stuff is dated quite a bit later, some parts are dated to have been written in around 350AD, 300+ years after the facts.
So no, Jesus never said any of what is attributed to him. They are nice myths, but he never walked on water... either. Not resurrected either. Sorry. Please try again.

Old Testament is Old Jewish law, long before 130 AD.

Ok, OT was stolen from the Jews, but new testament with all the jesus stuff, long after.

New Testament Manuscripts - ReligionFacts

Jesus was a Jew.
 

Forum List

Back
Top