Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 30,625
- 23,465
But no blame for the people in Congress that will not expand the Forest Service budget when they spend most of their funds for fighting these fires? And, now, mostly fighting to keep those fires from towns, ranches, and farms.It is the environmentalists who don't allow forest deadfall cleanups. The Forest Service would love to clear that crap out.
I blame Congress for most of the ills of this country dude. The Forest Service needs a complete change in how they do business. They have this ridiculous idea that they have to pay for someone to clear up the deadfall. This is ridiculous, they could get companies to PAY them for the right to cut the trees and a condition of that contract would be they have to clear the undergrowth too (it makes sense as it gets cleared up anyway), thus something that is now costing us taxpayers ridiculous amounts of money could be turned into a money making proposition.
Forestry/wildlife service is all a big scam. They make bookoo bucks for the government. They go in, supposed to clear out and log the pine, they take out out all the old Oak trees along the way.
Conservation my ass. It's all about using taxpayer-funded land to sell to paper mills and make a profit.
That's a lie.....In timber land there are hardly any oak trees because they do not grow well at high altitudes.
Maybe in your timber land, but not in mine.
Mine is @ 50 ft elevation.
Large trees used for timber do not grow well at those altitudes. Oaks....yes. You might have gnarly gray pines but they are full of sap and not good for timber. Old oaks will grow well at 50ft especially if there is a high aquifer.