How does the left defend

[Hutch Starskey]

He's highlighting the need for strict vetting of people entering this country. I'm not surprised you would interrupt that as wishing for more attacks.

Except these attacks aren't being carried out by immigrants either here or over there. They are being carried out by people who were born there and have been shunted off into a state of poverty.

So he's going to vet people so that their children or grandchildren won't commit "terrorist" acts based on whatever our stupid policies in 20 years are?

How about spending the next 20 years not having stupid policies?

Are you seriously suggesting these attacks have nothing to do with their open boarder policy?

How do the actions of a natural citizen reflect on or otherwise pertain to current immigration policy?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I am still wondering why our President hasn't retaliated for the bombing in Manchester...is he gunshy?

He has. That's what the travel ban was/is all about. Is your noggin made of wood?

Trump has banned Muslim-Americans from traveling to the UK???

when did that happen???

Huh? Go back to your bong and stop making a fool out of yourself. Libtards! You're good for poking fun of, nothing more.

By your 'logic' wouldn't Trump banning Muslim-Americans from traveling to the UK be a good gesture towards our ally?

No, that's isn't my logic that's your stupidity. How can a US president ban immigration elsewhere? It makes no sense.

That's why I consistently say you people shouldn't vote. You can't think. You can only believe what you're been trained to think but it isn't something you can do on your own.

No, that's isn't my logic that's your stupidity. How can a US president ban immigration elsewhere?

He said nothing of immigration, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I am still wondering why our President hasn't retaliated for the bombing in Manchester...is he gunshy?

He has. That's what the travel ban was/is all about. Is your noggin made of wood?

No but yours is.

A travel ban barring Muslims from the US would affect terrorism in the UK exactly how?

Thats the UK's problem.

Thats the UK's problem

So, WTF is trump talking about then?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ok…except when kids were attacked In Syria we sent Tomahawks into an airbase and some missed the runway.

Why would we worry about kids in Syria but not kids in the UK?

Kids in Syria are trained to use machine guns and grenades.

Okay? What in the heck does that have to do with anything?

Being bred to murder the infidel?
You tell me, oh Bleeding Heart Liberal.

Were you bred to be ignorant?

I was pointing out that when kids in Syria were killed, we shot missiles in there.
When kids in the UK were killed, we have done nothing.

For some reason, you can’t wrap your brain around the discussion. Then again, it’s so tiny, it’s not surprising.

Don't understand your logic here. We retaliated against the government for Syria -- because we accused THEM of gassing people. Maybe right, maybe some one of the other 43 other fighting Islamic factions did it.

But NOW you expect us to bomb BRITAIN because they harbor unassimilated neighborhoods of Muslims subject to radicalization? Or are you demanding Trump bomb ISIS in Syria again to "retaliate"? We're doing that A LOT every week. And obviously, the threats are ALREADY in place in Western countries. WHO should we bomb on Tues?

Mecca....talk about a game changer

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I am still wondering why our President hasn't retaliated for the bombing in Manchester...is he gunshy?

He has. That's what the travel ban was/is all about. Is your noggin made of wood?

No but yours is.

A travel ban barring Muslims from the US would affect terrorism in the UK exactly how?

Thats the UK's problem.

Ok…except when kids were attacked In Syria we sent Tomahawks into an airbase and some missed the runway.

Why would we worry about kids in Syria but not kids in the UK?

Kids in Syria are trained to use machine guns and grenades.

Which kids?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They defend it by insulting Trump

CNN host calls Trump 'piece of sh*t' over renewed call for travel ban - The American Mirror

I just wish this was happening closer to 2018. Better yet Nov 2020

There is something WAY wrong with WISHING for a terror attack in order to affect elections. Way wrong.

He's highlighting the need for strict vetting of people entering this country. I'm not surprised you would interrupt that as wishing for more attacks.

Tell me, how can anyone vet anyone coming out of a war zone?

Good point.
Build refugee ovens instead of camps.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They defend it by insulting Trump

CNN host calls Trump 'piece of sh*t' over renewed call for travel ban - The American Mirror

I just wish this was happening closer to 2018. Better yet Nov 2020

There is something WAY wrong with WISHING for a terror attack in order to affect elections. Way wrong.

He's highlighting the need for strict vetting of people entering this country. I'm not surprised you would interrupt that as wishing for more attacks.

Tell me, how can anyone vet anyone coming out of a war zone?

The focus is on countries that don't have a process in place to properly vet people.
Will the travel ban prevent terrorist from entering the US? No.
Will it help? Absolutely.

Btw... thanks for quoting my post. It's when I realized auto fill let me down. lol

Will it help? Absolutely.

Outline the current process and explain why it would help.

 

[flacaltenn]

Once again conservatives using a terrible incident to further a partisan agenda.

Hey buckeye45_73 go fuck yourself with a pineapple

How many times in month do you need to IGNORE terrorists attacks before YOU --- get an agenda??? That's the question. You got one? Other than attacking conservatives for caring?

Is that how you cons show you care? By using a terrorist attack as a reason to bash liberals?

Go fuck yourself, you sack of shit

I'll ignore your lashing out at me. But you need to go read what you just did in the post above. YOU lashed out at Conservatives (and I quote) for "using a terrible incident to further a partisan agenda". And then when I ask you a couple easy ass questions on YOUR agenda --- you turn around -- falsely accuse me of BEING a Conservative, which is ridiculous if you've read my stuff -- and accuse me of using a terrorist attack to bash Liberals.

Which is EXACTLY what you DID in the previous post. I hate both warring tribes. I'm a 25 year independent from your ethically bankrupt wars. AND -- I'm a TRUE Liberal. Not a fake one hiding as a Progressive in the Dem Party.

And I'm NOT Islamophobic at all. I'm phobic of severe CULTURAL disconnects when you pack immigrants in from places in the world whose practices and values are in SEVERE conflict with Western values. Especially --- if they are just coming here to SURVIVE -- and NOT because they WANT to be Americans.

Now -- let's try again. How many terrorists attacks/month in London will it take before you DEVELOP or share your "agenda" on the issues???

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Once again conservatives using a terrible incident to further a partisan agenda.

Hey buckeye45_73 go fuck yourself with a pineapple

How many times in month do you need to IGNORE terrorists attacks before YOU --- get an agenda??? That's the question. You got one? Other than attacking conservatives for caring?

Is that how you cons show you care? By using a terrorist attack as a reason to bash liberals?

Go fuck yourself, you sack of shit

Flacal is about as much a conservative as I am a demoquack. He ain't and I ain't

 

[flacaltenn]

Kids in Syria are trained to use machine guns and grenades.

Okay? What in the heck does that have to do with anything?

Being bred to murder the infidel?
You tell me, oh Bleeding Heart Liberal.

Were you bred to be ignorant?

I was pointing out that when kids in Syria were killed, we shot missiles in there.
When kids in the UK were killed, we have done nothing.

For some reason, you can’t wrap your brain around the discussion. Then again, it’s so tiny, it’s not surprising.

Don't understand your logic here. We retaliated against the government for Syria -- because we accused THEM of gassing people. Maybe right, maybe some one of the other 43 other fighting Islamic factions did it.

But NOW you expect us to bomb BRITAIN because they harbor unassimilated neighborhoods of Muslims subject to radicalization? Or are you demanding Trump bomb ISIS in Syria again to "retaliate"? We're doing that A LOT every week. And obviously, the threats are ALREADY in place in Western countries. WHO should we bomb on Tues?

Mecca....talk about a game changer

If we were in the 12th Century, you'd be a fine Field Marshall. But putting Holy Sites on the Kill List, really is NOT a solution to anything in the 21st Century.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Okay? What in the heck does that have to do with anything?

Being bred to murder the infidel?
You tell me, oh Bleeding Heart Liberal.

Were you bred to be ignorant?

I was pointing out that when kids in Syria were killed, we shot missiles in there.
When kids in the UK were killed, we have done nothing.

For some reason, you can’t wrap your brain around the discussion. Then again, it’s so tiny, it’s not surprising.

Don't understand your logic here. We retaliated against the government for Syria -- because we accused THEM of gassing people. Maybe right, maybe some one of the other 43 other fighting Islamic factions did it.

But NOW you expect us to bomb BRITAIN because they harbor unassimilated neighborhoods of Muslims subject to radicalization? Or are you demanding Trump bomb ISIS in Syria again to "retaliate"? We're doing that A LOT every week. And obviously, the threats are ALREADY in place in Western countries. WHO should we bomb on Tues?

Mecca....talk about a game changer

If we were in the 12th Century, you'd be a fine Field Marshall. But putting Holy Sites on the Kill List, really is NOT a solution to anything in the 21st Century.

Its the Crusader in me

 

[edward37]

Being bred to murder the infidel?
You tell me, oh Bleeding Heart Liberal.

Were you bred to be ignorant?

I was pointing out that when kids in Syria were killed, we shot missiles in there.
When kids in the UK were killed, we have done nothing.

For some reason, you can’t wrap your brain around the discussion. Then again, it’s so tiny, it’s not surprising.

Don't understand your logic here. We retaliated against the government for Syria -- because we accused THEM of gassing people. Maybe right, maybe some one of the other 43 other fighting Islamic factions did it.

But NOW you expect us to bomb BRITAIN because they harbor unassimilated neighborhoods of Muslims subject to radicalization? Or are you demanding Trump bomb ISIS in Syria again to "retaliate"? We're doing that A LOT every week. And obviously, the threats are ALREADY in place in Western countries. WHO should we bomb on Tues?

Mecca....talk about a game changer

If we were in the 12th Century, you'd be a fine Field Marshall. But putting Holy Sites on the Kill List, really is NOT a solution to anything in the 21st Century.

Its the Crusader in me

Sassy you're cracking me up

 

[Luddly Neddite]

They defend it by insulting Trump

CNN host calls Trump 'piece of sh*t' over renewed call for travel ban - The American Mirror

I just wish this was happening closer to 2018. Better yet Nov 2020

How does the right defend wishing for a terrorist attack?

Tipsycatlover The way you always want innocent people hated is just plain sick and vile.



But my question is, how does the right defend siding with terrorists?


.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[JoeB131]

Are you including the 30% who are still in the Middle East trying to get tot Europe and the US?
Of course not.

Well, since they aren't, no.

You continue to reveal that you are an ignorant, slow witted imbecile. If you can't see the difference it is simply because you choose not to. When a thing doesn't fit your narrative you pretend it isn't there.

Well, no, I guess I'm not seeing a big difference between the two. In fact, since I am more likely to be shot seeing a Batman movie by a guy like Holmes who thinks he's the Joker, than I am by a guy like Mateen who shoots up a gay bar because he can't reconcile his homosexuality with his religious beliefs, I'd probably be more worried about the latter.

Since I do go out to see Batman movies and not Gay bars.

Job makes a living getting Muslims jobs in IT.

I make money helping a lot of people get jobs. I don't ask their religion because it isn't relevant.

 

[JoeB131]

well they dint have guns in england but people die anyway.
the problem.is you want to ban the tools but excuse the people who do this shit.
how about executing murderers and let law abiding people be free

Okay. so you aren't for harrassing Muslims who aren't involved in terrorism, then?

 

[JoeB131]

well first of all, you guys make excuses for these thugs.
second terrirism is about changing culture not about racism or insanity, jesus you guys are dumb

Nobody is making excuses for the terrorists. We just don't assign collective guilt.

I just ask the question why you think a guy who yells "Allah Akbar" before shooting something up is scarier than a guy who yells, "Why So Serious?"

 

[Mac1958]

this latest attack. I guess diversity and multiculturalism are more important than human lives. Anything for the cause

They don't have to defend anything. They just have to utilize their standard deflect/pivot/attack strategy.

1. Step One - Either quickly minimize, trivialize or completely ignore the attack
2. Step Two - Prepare your personal attack on the person who brought it up
3. Step Three - Launch personal attack, add some name-calling for color

Easy as pie. And they've become VERY good at it.
.

 

[candycorn]

I am still wondering why our President hasn't retaliated for the bombing in Manchester...is he gunshy?

He has. That's what the travel ban was/is all about. Is your noggin made of wood?

No but yours is.

A travel ban barring Muslims from the US would affect terrorism in the UK exactly how?

Are you stupid? We encourage all of them not to take these filth, but we can only control us. So how is a travel ban bad?

Well, if you’re asking me, because it is based on religion. I would prefer that we take in 10% of the people we currently allow from every other nation. Use our resources chiefly on native Americans.

Wait what? You want 10% of the current legal immigration?

I'm going to throw out some numbers...just to have a population. I base them on nothing...

I mean, if you have X number of people who have given up looking for work who are NOT counted as unemployed. Lets just say that number if 3,000,000 or one in 100 Adults.
Then you have the 5% unemployment of people who are drawing benefits and are registered with State unemployment offices. That would be 15,000,000 or so.

That is 18 million folks. Like I said, those number are just for argument.

That is 18,000,000 adults who are not employed just for the sake of argument or whatever. Why in the hell are you opening the gates for new immigrants to come in here and take jobs that native Americans (Americans born here) can be doing? When I was up in the NE, I took UBER to several venues. The second UBER I took from the airport to the local rental car office was driven by a lady in a Burka. I'm guessing she wasn't born here. That is a job that an out of work factory worker could be doing. And its not just that type of job. When you don't have a supply of Hindu Engineers, Microsoft or Facebook would have to, perhaps, hire one out of State U who perhaps isn't 100% proficient and train them. Oh the horror!!!

 

[IM2]

This is ignorant. All of these people are the first to cry abut how all of them are not this or that but are willing to assign all of them to all other groups of people.

The left has nothing to defend.

 

[candycorn]

this latest attack. I guess diversity and multiculturalism are more important than human lives. Anything for the cause

They don't have to defend anything. They just have to utilize their standard deflect/pivot/attack strategy.

1. Step One - Either quickly minimize, trivialize or completely ignore the attack
2. Step Two - Prepare your personal attack on the person who brought it up
3. Step Three - Launch personal attack, add some name-calling for color

Easy as pie. And they've become VERY good at it.
.