Siberian
Gold Member
- Jan 3, 2021
- 969
- 252
- Thread starter
- #61
or vice versa, as West Germany had over Eastern Germany.Taiwan is China. Its official name is the Republic of China. The Communist party of China has no more legacy over the island than a socialist East Germany had over the West Germany.
But if the bigger part of Germany, the Western one absorbed the smaller part of it (Thanks to the USSR, Anglo-Saxons again opposed reunification of Germany) - China has full right to do the same.
Or the smaller part of Germany absorbed the bigger part of Germany. That's totally unclear. And in your form of logic Germany had the right to occupy Czechia and big parts of Poland - and to "absorbe" many many other regions all around Germany. Such ideas make not a big sense.
if it was concensual and with good will, with refedendum - why not?
by the way, Western Germany absorbed Eastern Germany in 1989 not in a democratic way, without any referendum, by force
in this sence it is not different from Anshlus or partition of Czechoslovamia or Silezia
Present FRG is not different from Hitler's Reuch in this sence
though, to put Historic context here - Russia/USSR has always advocated united and strong Germany, while Anglo-Saxons have always opposed it, viewing Russo-German alliance as ths biggest threat to Anglo-Saxon dominance in the World.
So, every time Anglo-Saxons succeeded in directing Germany against Russia it ended with World WR and major catastrophe for the continent and human kind.