Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income

[colfax_m]

Who cares? Let’s say it was a totally irrational decision. But it’s not illegal to make irrational hires and pay them too much money.

If it’s not illegal, you can’t investigate it. The question is irrelevant.

In some cases it certainly is illegal.

Burisma sent a lot of money to Rosemont Seneca, Biden's law firm. It's not necessarily illegal for a corporation in Ukraine to make payments to a board member's company, but is has to be for actual services rendered. Otherwise it's illegal.

That is one of the issues Ukraine is investigating.

Is there credible evidence to suggest that there were no services rendered by Biden?

If no services were rendered, there would be no evidence.

What they want is documentation that services were rendered. And PG Shokin wanted to interview Burisma's board of directors, including Hunter Biden, regarding many other issues too.

Quid Pro Joe extorted Ukraine's government to get Shokin removed and replaced with his corrupt puppet, Lutsenko. So Burisma was off the hook. But not anymore. Zelenski won and there's a new administration and they are reviewing all of Burisma cases.

And the Shokin assassination attempt is also under investigation. Biden obviously had a motive to kill Shokin, so he's naturally a suspect. And just a month after the assassination attempt, Joe Biden started pressuring Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to fire Shokin. So that raises some eyebrows too.

So you have no reason to believe that Hunter Biden failed to perform services for his salary, but you want to investigate anyway?

That would be engaging in a political witch hunt without predication. Not legal.

Bullshit. It's perfectly legal for the PGO and NABU to investigate all payments made by Burisma because of a pattern of corrupt activity, which has included bribery.

Since Joe Biden was caught on a live stream confessing that he extorted Ukraine officials into firing the Prosecutor General who was investigating Burisma and Zlochevsky, there is plenty of reasonable suspicion that the payments to Biden's firm were nothing but a bribe. Especially since Burisma and Rosemont Seneca have refused to present any contemporaneous documentation showing that Biden's firm rendered any sort of legitimate legal services to Burisma. Likely because they don't exist.

Hell, just a couple of months ago they were caught trying to bribe investigators on behalf of Zlochevsky AGAIN!.

Ukraine seizes $6million to stop probe of firm that hired Hunter Biden

Ukrainian authorities seized $6 million allegedly used for a bribe scheme - the largest in the country's history - linked to Burisma Holdings, a gas company which gave Hunter Biden a seat on its board.

www.dailymail.co.uk

There's definitely a pattern of corruption, including extortion and bribery. Therefore there's plenty of reasonable suspicion to investigate the payments to Biden.

Given the huge amount of evidence, I think we both know beyond a reasonable doubt that the payments were a bribe.

You should have read your article, there were no ties to Biden:
The seizure, which is the largest in Ukraine's history, had no ties to Biden, say authorities, who showed stacks of $100 bill at a press conference Saturday.

I did read the article, jackass.

It's more evidence a pattern of corrupt behavior by Zlochevski. Another bribe. This puts all of Burisma and Zlochevski's payments under even more suspicion, including the payments to Biden.

It's a continuation of a pattern of bribery.

Then you can investigate Zlochevski, but not Biden.

That's simply a lie.

But you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by Biden. You have evidence of wrongdoing by Zlochevski.

Probable cause needs to be specific to the person being investigated.

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

 

[kaz]

Who cares? Let’s say it was a totally irrational decision. But it’s not illegal to make irrational hires and pay them too much money.

If it’s not illegal, you can’t investigate it. The question is irrelevant.

In some cases it certainly is illegal.

Burisma sent a lot of money to Rosemont Seneca, Biden's law firm. It's not necessarily illegal for a corporation in Ukraine to make payments to a board member's company, but is has to be for actual services rendered. Otherwise it's illegal.

That is one of the issues Ukraine is investigating.

Is there credible evidence to suggest that there were no services rendered by Biden?

If no services were rendered, there would be no evidence.

What they want is documentation that services were rendered. And PG Shokin wanted to interview Burisma's board of directors, including Hunter Biden, regarding many other issues too.

Quid Pro Joe extorted Ukraine's government to get Shokin removed and replaced with his corrupt puppet, Lutsenko. So Burisma was off the hook. But not anymore. Zelenski won and there's a new administration and they are reviewing all of Burisma cases.

And the Shokin assassination attempt is also under investigation. Biden obviously had a motive to kill Shokin, so he's naturally a suspect. And just a month after the assassination attempt, Joe Biden started pressuring Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to fire Shokin. So that raises some eyebrows too.

So you have no reason to believe that Hunter Biden failed to perform services for his salary, but you want to investigate anyway?

That would be engaging in a political witch hunt without predication. Not legal.

Bullshit. It's perfectly legal for the PGO and NABU to investigate all payments made by Burisma because of a pattern of corrupt activity, which has included bribery.

Since Joe Biden was caught on a live stream confessing that he extorted Ukraine officials into firing the Prosecutor General who was investigating Burisma and Zlochevsky, there is plenty of reasonable suspicion that the payments to Biden's firm were nothing but a bribe. Especially since Burisma and Rosemont Seneca have refused to present any contemporaneous documentation showing that Biden's firm rendered any sort of legitimate legal services to Burisma. Likely because they don't exist.

Hell, just a couple of months ago they were caught trying to bribe investigators on behalf of Zlochevsky AGAIN!.

Ukraine seizes $6million to stop probe of firm that hired Hunter Biden

Ukrainian authorities seized $6 million allegedly used for a bribe scheme - the largest in the country's history - linked to Burisma Holdings, a gas company which gave Hunter Biden a seat on its board.

www.dailymail.co.uk

There's definitely a pattern of corruption, including extortion and bribery. Therefore there's plenty of reasonable suspicion to investigate the payments to Biden.

Given the huge amount of evidence, I think we both know beyond a reasonable doubt that the payments were a bribe.

You should have read your article, there were no ties to Biden:
The seizure, which is the largest in Ukraine's history, had no ties to Biden, say authorities, who showed stacks of $100 bill at a press conference Saturday.

I did read the article, jackass.

It's more evidence a pattern of corrupt behavior by Zlochevski. Another bribe. This puts all of Burisma and Zlochevski's payments under even more suspicion, including the payments to Biden.

It's a continuation of a pattern of bribery.

Then you can investigate Zlochevski, but not Biden.

That's simply a lie.

But you have no evidence of any wrongdoing by Biden. You have evidence of wrongdoing by Zlochevski.

Probable cause needs to be specific to the person being investigated.

When your son is making millions off your job, that is prima facie conflict of interest right there. You'd suddenly get that if we were talking about a Republican. You obviously have no corporate/management experience because if you did you'd know in corporate Joe would have been fired in a New York minute

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

 

[busybee01]

Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income​

Hunter Biden's $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly 'RESOLVED' Despite Claiming NO Income

No reporters are asking about the money.

us24news.com

23 Aug 2020 ~~ By Jonathan Jones

A large tax debt owed to the government by the son of former Vice President Joe Biden has disappeared, according to a report.
Hunter Biden, who has faced scrutiny over allegedly profiting from businesses internationally using his father’s influence, recently told a court in his Arkansas paternity case that he was out of work and broke.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Saturday that despite the younger Biden’s reported personal and financial woes, he was able to resolve a six-figure tax debt in a short period of time.
“Hunter Biden was hit with a $450,000 lien in July over delinquent state income taxes, which he paid off in six days despite having no discernible income,” the Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman reported.
The ability to pay nearly half a million dollars in back taxes in less than a week seems to contradict statements from Biden to an Arkansas court that he could not afford to pay child support.
In January, Biden agreed to pay the mother of a child he fathered in Arkansas, despite not having a job, retroactive to November 2018, Fox News reported.
Biden failed to turn over documents relevant to his income and was held in contempt of court, according to Fox.
After a court-ordered paternity test, Biden was found to be the child’s father.
There was also a legal dustup concerning how much Biden’s permanent monthly child support payment would be calculated.
The paternity and child support case in Arkansas furthers the mystery surrounding Biden’s ability to pay off the reported tax debt.
“A spokesman for D.C.’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer confirmed that Hunter Biden’s lien was released on July 15 after the ‘tax issue was resolved.’ The office declined to say whether Biden had paid off the debt,” The Free Beacon reported.
It is unclear what income, if any, Biden has at the moment, as his father seeks to unseat President Donald Trump in November.
Biden has been linked to a series of financial scandals.
After being hired by Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in 2014, Biden was paid a salary of $83,333 a month, Fox reported.
The high salary was paid despite the former VP’s son holding a job as a non-executive “ceremonial figure.”
It was also said by three individuals close to Biden’s Burisma deal that he never visited Ukraine, despite the exorbitant salary, according to Reuters.
Biden was reportedly paid that salary from April 2014 until November 2015.
[Snip]
In Biden’s 2017 divorce, his former wife claimed he sent the family into financial ruin by spending money on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he had sexual relations.”
Kathleen Biden said the family was left with massive debts by Biden’s alleged activities, including tax debt, medical bills and credit cards that were maxed out.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Comment:
Hmm...., If it is any consolation, I don’t think Hunter is going to help him during the election.
Trump is going to highlight this early and often and frankly it does not take a rocket scientist to see that something is wrong with the Ukraine and China deals, but wait.... there is even more to come out.
The Biden’s played the same scheme in other Eastern European countries as well as Iraq where Biden’s brother landed a lucrative contract in an area where he had no expertise.
It would be a shame if Hunter put all those dollars up hi nose...
the question is where is that $1.4 billion dollar China deal money?

Hunter Biden is not running for anything. If you want to go there then maybe we should look at the sorruption of Trump and how Trump's businesses and the federal government have been intertwined.

Trump’s Corruption Was On Full Display At The RNC

Eric Trump is running the president’s company and is under investigation in New York, but spoke at the convention Tuesday. That was only the beginning.

www.huffpost.com

 

[busybee01]

Hunter Biden’s $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly ‘RESOLVED’ Despite Claiming NO Income​

Hunter Biden's $450,000 Tax Debt Gets Suddenly 'RESOLVED' Despite Claiming NO Income

No reporters are asking about the money.

us24news.com

23 Aug 2020 ~~ By Jonathan Jones

A large tax debt owed to the government by the son of former Vice President Joe Biden has disappeared, according to a report.
Hunter Biden, who has faced scrutiny over allegedly profiting from businesses internationally using his father’s influence, recently told a court in his Arkansas paternity case that he was out of work and broke.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Saturday that despite the younger Biden’s reported personal and financial woes, he was able to resolve a six-figure tax debt in a short period of time.
“Hunter Biden was hit with a $450,000 lien in July over delinquent state income taxes, which he paid off in six days despite having no discernible income,” the Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman reported.
The ability to pay nearly half a million dollars in back taxes in less than a week seems to contradict statements from Biden to an Arkansas court that he could not afford to pay child support.
In January, Biden agreed to pay the mother of a child he fathered in Arkansas, despite not having a job, retroactive to November 2018, Fox News reported.
Biden failed to turn over documents relevant to his income and was held in contempt of court, according to Fox.
After a court-ordered paternity test, Biden was found to be the child’s father.
There was also a legal dustup concerning how much Biden’s permanent monthly child support payment would be calculated.
The paternity and child support case in Arkansas furthers the mystery surrounding Biden’s ability to pay off the reported tax debt.
“A spokesman for D.C.’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer confirmed that Hunter Biden’s lien was released on July 15 after the ‘tax issue was resolved.’ The office declined to say whether Biden had paid off the debt,” The Free Beacon reported.
It is unclear what income, if any, Biden has at the moment, as his father seeks to unseat President Donald Trump in November.
Biden has been linked to a series of financial scandals.
After being hired by Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in 2014, Biden was paid a salary of $83,333 a month, Fox reported.
The high salary was paid despite the former VP’s son holding a job as a non-executive “ceremonial figure.”
It was also said by three individuals close to Biden’s Burisma deal that he never visited Ukraine, despite the exorbitant salary, according to Reuters.
Biden was reportedly paid that salary from April 2014 until November 2015.
[Snip]
In Biden’s 2017 divorce, his former wife claimed he sent the family into financial ruin by spending money on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he had sexual relations.”
Kathleen Biden said the family was left with massive debts by Biden’s alleged activities, including tax debt, medical bills and credit cards that were maxed out.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Comment:
Hmm...., If it is any consolation, I don’t think Hunter is going to help him during the election.
Trump is going to highlight this early and often and frankly it does not take a rocket scientist to see that something is wrong with the Ukraine and China deals, but wait.... there is even more to come out.
The Biden’s played the same scheme in other Eastern European countries as well as Iraq where Biden’s brother landed a lucrative contract in an area where he had no expertise.
It would be a shame if Hunter put all those dollars up hi nose...
the question is where is that $1.4 billion dollar China deal money?

Hunter Biden was not hired to the Burisma board as a "ceremonial figure". He was hired to head Burisma's legal team.

Ukrainian Employer of Joe Biden’s Son Hires a D.C. Lobbyist

An obscure private Ukrainian natural gas company has been hiring friends and family of Secretary of State John Kerry and Vice President Joe Biden, while seeking to influence Congress

time.com

BY MICHAEL SCHERER

JULY 7, 2014 10:39 PM EDT

When Vice President Joe Biden’s son, R. Hunter Biden, joined the board of a private Ukrainian oil and natural gas company this spring, he explained his new job as a legal one, disconnected from any effort to influence the Obama Administration. In a press release, the younger Biden boasted of his abilities on issues like improving corporate transparency.

And Burisma certainly had their share of legal troubles for Hunter Biden to solve for them. Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevskyi had fled the country to Moscow to avoid prosecution.

Joe Biden held back $1 billion in US treasury loan guarantees, which were needed to secure over $30 brillion in other loans to bail out Ukraine.

Biden certainly took care of Burisma's legal problems. He gave President Poroshenko and Prime Minister Yatsenyuk an ultimatum. Either fire the prosecutor general who is investigating Burisma, and replace him with a puppet, or Ukraine becomes financially insolvent.

That puppet was Biden's "solid", Yuriy Lutsenko, who had recently served prison time for corruption in office until his sentence was commuted after an appeal by Hunter Biden's fellow Burisma board member, Alexander Kwasniewski.
,

Ukraine: Yanukovych Pardons Lutsenko

Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych has pardoned jailed former Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko, a close ally of imprisoned former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.

www.rferl.org

But there was a problem. Biden's corrupt puppet didn't have a law degree and had never practiced law. He never even went to law school, fer crissakes. And under Ukrainian law, the Prosecutor General was required to have a law degree and a minimum number of years experience as an attorney.

Facing Quid Pro Joe's threats, the Ukrainian parliament had no choice. In a special session, they actually changed the law that required the country's top attorney be an actual fucking real life attorney with a law degree and everything.

As much of scandal as that was, no matter how embarrassing and degrading it was, no matter how outraged the people were, the Ukrainian parliament had to do it. Joe Biden made them an offer they couldn't refuse.

It's horrible.

So they went with someone that had no training or experience in Ukrainian law???

We went with a president who had no prior training or even the slightest knowledge of the constitution -- so lets not pretend that experience and expertise is supposed to matter now...You trumpers take pride in hating expertise....

You're a full of shit delusional TDS afflicted moron.

DJT has tons of experience as a successful leader and top executive. He was the president of the Trump Organization since the 1970s.

Trump has declared bankruptcy 6 times. He has failed in every consumer driven business he tried.

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

So, Trump blew the roof off of Obama’s economic performance, but that doesn’t mean he blew the roof off of Obama’s economic numbers?

This is why it’s impossible to have a normal conversation with you.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

So, Trump blew the roof off of Obama’s economic performance, but that doesn’t mean he blew the roof off of Obama’s economic numbers?

This is why it’s impossible to have a normal conversation with you.

I already explained that like five times now. How stupid are you?

Winston Churchill: I can explain it to you. I cannot comprehend it for you

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

View attachment 380090

A graph that starts at the bottom of the recession when Obama took office doesn't contradict anything I said.

That the Obama jobless non-recovery was the worst recession recovery since WWII and other than the great depression the worst recession recovery since long before that isn't a matter of opinion, it's economic data. Your bull shit charts can't refute that, it's basic economic data

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

View attachment 380090

A graph that starts at the bottom of the recession when Obama took office doesn't contradict anything I said

but according to morons like you -- Trump also inherited a recession -- in fact, the economy was a disaster under Obama..

Or was that just bullshit??

Pretty much like the bullshit you are spouting now?

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

View attachment 380090

A graph that starts at the bottom of the recession when Obama took office doesn't contradict anything I said

but according to morons like you -- Trump also inherited a recession -- in fact, the economy was a disaster under Obama..

Or was that just bullshit??

Pretty much like the bullshit you are spouting now?

Yes, it's bull shit. I never said it was a recession when Trump entered office. Morons like you make up stupid shit no one ever said.

Just FYI, what you did is referred to as a strawman fallacy

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

View attachment 380090

A graph that starts at the bottom of the recession when Obama took office doesn't contradict anything I said

but according to morons like you -- Trump also inherited a recession -- in fact, the economy was a disaster under Obama..

Or was that just bullshit??

Pretty much like the bullshit you are spouting now?

Trump did so much better than Obama by having the same performance.

Because the standard for Obama is waaaay up here and the standard for Trump is waaaay down there.

 

[kaz]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

View attachment 380090

A graph that starts at the bottom of the recession when Obama took office doesn't contradict anything I said

but according to morons like you -- Trump also inherited a recession -- in fact, the economy was a disaster under Obama..

Or was that just bullshit??

Pretty much like the bullshit you are spouting now?

Trump did so much better than Obama by having the same performance.

Because the standard for Obama is waaaay up here and the standard for Trump is waaaay down there.

Changing words again. I said Trump's performance was way better. It's his numbers that I said were similar. I said they were better, I did not say the same. But I explained why that's different.

I'm tired of your constantly changing the words from one post to the next to the next to persist in your lie. I'm not going to keep playing this game with you. Address my posts and stop misquoting me

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, there were several posts in the middle, all were of YOU saying Trump was supposed to shock and awe you, none of me saying that he did

Except for the reply where you LITERALLY said he did.

He did.

Oh, the one you just quoted. Oh wait, you didn't. Liar.

I didn’t what? Just quote you saying what you are claiming you didn’t say?

I quoted you, twice now. Inability to recognize reality is a sign of mental disorder. But I think you’re actually just trolling.

Bullshit Democrat tactics:

1) Ignore requests for quotes for your bull shit claims

2) Then claim you already provided quotes you didn't provide

In post 261, I provided the quote you requested.

That post doesn't say anything. You cut the entire conversation, liar

It includes the quote of you saying the thing you said you didn’t say.

It’s right there. Black and white. Clear as crystal. You lose. Good day, sir!

"He did" could mean anything, Darline

Not in this case. It was an immediate to a question. Want to see what it that question was?

No, you cut it from the quote box chain

I said Trump was way better than Obama, he was. You keep constantly changing the context to avoid owning up to your own bull shit.

Obama was painfully slow, a terrible recovery. Trump blew that away. Now you're twisting that to being an all time historical reference. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's jobless, lame, virtually non-existent recovery.

You're a contradiction in a hypocrisy in a misquote

I asked why didn’t Trump blow the roof off , you said he did. Then you pretended you didn’t. Now you’re pretending that I lied about it.

You're still obviously removing the context for your agenda to make my quote sound like it wasn't.

And I just addressed that. Your question was in the context of Obama. Trump blew the roof of Obama's numbers. You keep deleting the context because you know you're lying

Such a hypocrite. Accusing me of deleting context when you left out replies that were proving you wrong.

He should have blown the roof off the sucker just getting back to where we started.

If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

He did. This is you again criticizing Trump for shutting down the economy while demand he shut down the economy.

From the discussion in the quotes (above):

Colfax: If Obama was such a screw up, why didn’t Trump blow the roof off like you say?

kaz: You're going to have to remind me when I said Trump blew people away

That was your question and my response. Explain without being pedantic how that is saying I said Trump did blow people away

And you’re back to waffling all over the place. can’t tell what the hell you’re saying because you just change your argument every 5 seconds.

One second you’re saying Trump did something great. Next second you’re saying you never said that. Then you’re back to saying he did amazing.

Im done.

Right. I said Trump blew the roof off Obama's non-recovery, exactly as I said. What confused you about that?

You obviously know that and were lying since you repeatedly kept removing the context from the quote

Makes zero difference. Trump’s economic numbers are minimally different from Obama’s.

Which would make sense other than Obama started at the bottom of a deep recession and should have had fantastic numbers for free just by ending the recession and the economy recovering. Yet Trump still had better numbers. He blew the cover off the ball compared to Obama for sure

Trump did not blow the roof off of any of Obama’s numbers.

Which is what I’ve been saying this entire time but you decided to throw a massive multi page hissy fit trying to avoid talking about it.

You added the word "numbers" to change the context of the quote yet again. I didn't say Trump's numbers blew away Obama's numbers anywhere. You're such a total liar. It's the short putt Obama had to great numbers that he face planted on.

Trump's numbers were "better," that's true. But I said it was the economic performance that blew the roof off Obama. It did. Obama got an economy at the depths of a deep recession. It's remarkable how bad he was to not be able to recover from that, he was truly terrible. And I can tell you what he did. He kept threatening business with more taxes, regulation and government hate. No way they were investing when the President kept saying he would destroy them

Why can't you provide any data to back up your delusions??

View attachment 380090

A graph that starts at the bottom of the recession when Obama took office doesn't contradict anything I said

but according to morons like you -- Trump also inherited a recession -- in fact, the economy was a disaster under Obama..

Or was that just bullshit??

Pretty much like the bullshit you are spouting now?

Trump did so much better than Obama by having the same performance.

Because the standard for Obama is waaaay up here and the standard for Trump is waaaay down there.

Changing words again. I said Trump's performance was way better. It's his numbers that I said were similar. I said they were better, I did not say the same. But I explained why that's different.

I'm tired of your constantly changing the words from one post to the next to the next to persist in your lie. I'm not going to keep playing this game with you. Address my posts and stop misquoting me

Oh, okay. The numbers weren’t the same, they were similar.

As if that makes any difference.

Rather than make arguments about substance, you bitch and whine about language that has no effect on meaning. Loser.

So his numbers were the similar, but performance better. I supppse you define performance by feelings and not data? That’s what I’ve observed in the Trump cult. Facts matter far less than feelings. Trump knows this. It’s why he’s been successful. He sells feelings.