Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I see is him talking about punishing people who do not have children.Then I guess you don't see JD's claim as a punishment even if he does?
'Good vs. Evil!'I hope libs are insulted by the phrase “childless cat ladies”
None of them were going to vote for trump anyway
Yeah, that's how you get into Yale law school, by being stupid.
Total fucking weirdo? Based on what?True, but I think the more resonant fact with voters will be that JD presents as a total fucking weirdo.
I have seen the childless cat ladies attack conservative women with children'Good vs. Evil!'What a joke.
Total fucking weirdo? Based on what?
No you haven't.I have seen the childless cat ladies attack conservative women with children
I don't see it.So any game libs can invent MAGAs can learn to play
if this is true he should write a book and tell the rest of us how to not pay,,So it was kind of hard to take him seriously when he stated unequivocally that
I don't know which is more stupid, that he believes the statement above (miserable so... miserable too) or that he believes that a cabal of childless cat ladies is the shadow government that actually runs the United States.
So I wrote him off as just stupid, possibly as lacking in brains as his running mate.
But they showed him on the evening news tonight making THIS statement:
He's what? Thirty-nine years of age and he's never had a tax return filled out or if he has, he doesn't know or understand what's on the return? People without children ALREADY pay more in taxes because if we don't have any dependents, we pay the maximum.
Vance has a wife and several children so how is it that he doesn't understand that he/they (married couples) pay significantly less in taxes than single tax filers?
Now whether or not what they save in taxes offsets the costs of raising children is a different subject but how much of a dumbass do you have to be to make the statement that he did. On second thought any of them that he did.
do you believe it is a punishment?What I see is him talking about punishing people who do not have children.
or how bout "they want to tax the successful."...a point already proven by you.Run on that
So it was kind of hard to take him seriously when he stated unequivocally that
I don't know which is more stupid, that he believes the statement above (miserable so... miserable too) or that he believes that a cabal of childless cat ladies is the shadow government that actually runs the United States.
So I wrote him off as just stupid, possibly as lacking in brains as his running mate.
But they showed him on the evening news tonight making THIS statement:
He's what? Thirty-nine years of age and he's never had a tax return filled out or if he has, he doesn't know or understand what's on the return? People without children ALREADY pay more in taxes because if we don't have any dependents, we pay the maximum.
Vance has a wife and several children so how is it that he doesn't understand that he/they (married couples) pay significantly less in taxes than single tax filers?
Now whether or not what they save in taxes offsets the costs of raising children is a different subject but how much of a dumbass do you have to be to make the statement that he did. On second thought any of them that he did.
You're a bit demented and all over the place.do you believe it is a punishment?
or how bout "they want to tax the successful."...a point already proven by you.
This aint my first rodeoNo you haven't.
I don't see it.
He said it. There was a Charlie Kirk show he said it on. You can search it out. Trump has to have known about this before he picked Vance as his running mate.
JD Vance suggested America should 'punish' people for not having children
![]()
JD Vance suggested America should 'punish' people for not having children
Trump vice presidential running mate JD Vance, under fire for his 2021 remarks calling Democrats “childless cat ladies” and saying parents should be given more voting rights than those without children, is now being criticized after video resurfaced of him suggesting people who don’t have...www.alternet.org
![]()
Vance argued for higher tax rate on childless Americans in 2021 interview
Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance advocated for higher taxes on Americans without children in a 2021 interview unearthed by ABC News.abcnews.go.com
People without children use up less resources and do not produce criminals, drug addicts, mass shooters...
One of many. Trump brags about hiring the best people for the job.An idiotic idea, that one.
thats the case now with child credit,,I’m going to break from Vance here..I’m a big way., and probably piss some of you all off in the process…
The idea that people who didn’t have children should pay more in taxes is idiotic. First, having children is a CHOICE a coupe makes, if you make that choice you need to be in a good financial situation to afford the kids. Besides, there are already an array of programs to help people struggling to raise their kids.
If someone chooses to not have kids…or, if they can’t have kids for whatever reason….they should not be penalized for that.
If you CHOOSE to have kids, your tax burden shouldn’t fall to someone else…
A golden one at that.Shit…I had to thumb up a post from procustes….now in need a shower…![]()
Dude. Mostly a TLDR. Considering shortening your threads.So it was kind of hard to take him seriously when he stated unequivocally that
I don't know which is more stupid, that he believes the statement above (miserable so... miserable too) or that he believes that a cabal of childless cat ladies is the shadow government that actually runs the United States.
So I wrote him off as just stupid, possibly as lacking in brains as his running mate.
But they showed him on the evening news tonight making THIS statement:
He's what? Thirty-nine years of age and he's never had a tax return filled out or if he has, he doesn't know or understand what's on the return? People without children ALREADY pay more in taxes because if we don't have any dependents, we pay the maximum.
Vance has a wife and several children so how is it that he doesn't understand that he/they (married couples) pay significantly less in taxes than single tax filers?
Now whether or not what they save in taxes offsets the costs of raising children is a different subject but how much of a dumbass do you have to be to make the statement that he did. On second thought any of them that he did.