I have NEVER seen a TV network promote a presidential candidate like Fox does Trump.

Here's the thing I always say: Fox News is ADMITTEDLY Republican. Built, founded and directed by. Breitbart ADMITTEDLY Republican.

Then Trump HIRES Roger "bowchicawowwow" Ailey. Who is by the way facing lawsuits from former employees right now. ANNNNNDD The Breitbart idiot to run his campaign!!

Direct link. Add in Hannity who'll say ANYTHING supporting Trump. Bam!

On the other side republicans just say EVERYONE ELSE IS LIBERAL!:bs1:
And this is what they argue and accuse. So now we're all just suppose to deal in this whining fictional reality. Ohhh the Clinton News Network! How? Oh because that's what republicans ACCUSE them of being! Huh?

You might find an anchor or two you don't like but to pretend that's ANY sort of equivilency is silly wingers shit.
:bye1:

Uh...one problem with your scenario- CNN, MSNBC, and all the networks were anti-right long before the big orange clown decided to run for president.

See? All they need is an accusation and you pretend that an accusation is the same as an admission. Its not. Let me make it simple.

One admits to being. "I am a republican"
The other is accused: "You're a Democrat"

See the difference? I bet you say no just because

Look- if I say something that offends you and don't realize it offends you, it could be because I don't understand your values. So when you as a liberal, tell me as as conservative that CNN, or any of the other stations are not at the very least left leaning, you say it without knowing what offends me about their reporting. I can watch Fox and know they are slanted right, because they are so different than all the others whose reporting offends me. If Fox were the sole source we would all be much more conservative because we would not have a perspective from the left.

I think most on the right accept Fox reports from the right, but it seems very difficult for those on the left to acknowledge the others report from the left. I believe it is because the left has owned all the media for so long.

Once again, Because from TOP to BOTTOM they are built, created and ran by Republicans. The other stations are NOT.

Its like someone pleading guilty to murder and then pointing at some random person and screaming "AND THEY ARE TOO!" :badgrin:
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.
really, you never heard of CBS, NBC or ABC? you should diversify your watch time. Ever hear of Dan Rather? Tom Brokaw? Chris Mathew's? Really? are you telling us you only watch Fox?

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.
really, you never heard of CBS, NBC or ABC? you should diversify your watch time. Ever hear of Dan Rather? Tom Brokaw? Chris Mathew's? Really? are you telling us you only watch Fox?

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:


See? Just throw in everybody and say EVERYONE ELSE is against you. Troll level is super high. Whats the proof? Oh...IDK, feelings n shit!
 
Here's the thing I always say: Fox News is ADMITTEDLY Republican. Built, founded and directed by. Breitbart ADMITTEDLY Republican.

Then Trump HIRES Roger "bowchicawowwow" Ailey. Who is by the way facing lawsuits from former employees right now. ANNNNNDD The Breitbart idiot to run his campaign!!

Direct link. Add in Hannity who'll say ANYTHING supporting Trump. Bam!

On the other side republicans just say EVERYONE ELSE IS LIBERAL!:bs1:
And this is what they argue and accuse. So now we're all just suppose to deal in this whining fictional reality. Ohhh the Clinton News Network! How? Oh because that's what republicans ACCUSE them of being! Huh?

You might find an anchor or two you don't like but to pretend that's ANY sort of equivilency is silly wingers shit.
:bye1:

Uh...one problem with your scenario- CNN, MSNBC, and all the networks were anti-right long before the big orange clown decided to run for president.

See? All they need is an accusation and you pretend that an accusation is the same as an admission. Its not. Let me make it simple.

One admits to being. "I am a republican"
The other is accused: "You're a Democrat"

See the difference? I bet you say no just because

Look- if I say something that offends you and don't realize it offends you, it could be because I don't understand your values. So when you as a liberal, tell me as as conservative that CNN, or any of the other stations are not at the very least left leaning, you say it without knowing what offends me about their reporting. I can watch Fox and know they are slanted right, because they are so different than all the others whose reporting offends me. If Fox were the sole source we would all be much more conservative because we would not have a perspective from the left.

I think most on the right accept Fox reports from the right, but it seems very difficult for those on the left to acknowledge the others report from the left. I believe it is because the left has owned all the media for so long.

Once again, Because from TOP to BOTTOM they are built, created and ran by Republicans. The other stations are NOT.

Its like someone pleading guilty to murder and then pointing at some random person and screaming "AND THEY ARE TOO!" :badgrin:
I think Dan Rather made that claim. Chris Mathews made that claim. And I believe at one time Tom Brokaw.
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.
really, you never heard of CBS, NBC or ABC? you should diversify your watch time. Ever hear of Dan Rather? Tom Brokaw? Chris Mathew's? Really? are you telling us you only watch Fox?

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:


See? Just throw in everybody and say EVERYONE ELSE is against you. Troll level is super high. Whats the proof? Oh...IDK, feelings n shit!
see back at you. You need to learn that perception equals 99% of what exists as real.

Fox has Juan what's his name openly a democrud.

Don what's his name on CNN is openly a democrud.

And again Dan Rather made up an entire story, got himself fired for doing so. wow.
 
Fox News: We're republican! And we're fighting *propaganda* the Liberal media who happens to be EVERYONE ELSE WHO ISNT SELF DESCRIBED REPUBLICANS!

CNN
ABC
NBC
Tom Browkaw
Chris Matthews
That guy
This site
IDK that person but them too!
Are guys ok to you? Yes? Add that person in it
The Kitchen Sink
Etc etc
 
Here's the thing I always say: Fox News is ADMITTEDLY Republican. Built, founded and directed by. Breitbart ADMITTEDLY Republican.

Then Trump HIRES Roger "bowchicawowwow" Ailey. Who is by the way facing lawsuits from former employees right now. ANNNNNDD The Breitbart idiot to run his campaign!!

Direct link. Add in Hannity who'll say ANYTHING supporting Trump. Bam!

On the other side republicans just say EVERYONE ELSE IS LIBERAL!:bs1:
And this is what they argue and accuse. So now we're all just suppose to deal in this whining fictional reality. Ohhh the Clinton News Network! How? Oh because that's what republicans ACCUSE them of being! Huh?

You might find an anchor or two you don't like but to pretend that's ANY sort of equivilency is silly wingers shit.
:bye1:

Uh...one problem with your scenario- CNN, MSNBC, and all the networks were anti-right long before the big orange clown decided to run for president.

See? All they need is an accusation and you pretend that an accusation is the same as an admission. Its not. Let me make it simple.

One admits to being. "I am a republican"
The other is accused: "You're a Democrat"

See the difference? I bet you say no just because

Look- if I say something that offends you and don't realize it offends you, it could be because I don't understand your values. So when you as a liberal, tell me as as conservative that CNN, or any of the other stations are not at the very least left leaning, you say it without knowing what offends me about their reporting. I can watch Fox and know they are slanted right, because they are so different than all the others whose reporting offends me. If Fox were the sole source we would all be much more conservative because we would not have a perspective from the left.

I think most on the right accept Fox reports from the right, but it seems very difficult for those on the left to acknowledge the others report from the left. I believe it is because the left has owned all the media for so long.

Once again, Because from TOP to BOTTOM they are built, created and ran by Republicans. The other stations are NOT.

Its like someone pleading guilty to murder and then pointing at some random person and screaming "AND THEY ARE TOO!" :badgrin:
I think Dan Rather made that claim. Chris Mathews made that claim. And I believe at one time Tom Brokaw.


And those three guys run NOTHING. So keep pretending they are the same as Roger Ailes because the CEO and founder is just like a host or Anchor.
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.


Did you miss ABC, CBS. NBC, NPR, CNN, PBS, promoting hilary and attacking Trump...did you miss that?
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.
really, you never heard of CBS, NBC or ABC? you should diversify your watch time. Ever hear of Dan Rather? Tom Brokaw? Chris Mathew's? Really? are you telling us you only watch Fox?

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:


See? Just throw in everybody and say EVERYONE ELSE is against you. Troll level is super high. Whats the proof? Oh...IDK, feelings n shit!
see back at you. You need to learn that perception equals 99% of what exists as real.

Your perception isnt reality....Its just what you see it as.
 
Fox is an entertainment company by its by laws.

It does not have to be fair and balanced. It can even and does lie.

You claim Fox lies yet can you prove that Fox has lied as NBC (Brian Williams) and CBS (Dan Rather)? Are NBC News and CBS News entertainment or news companies? If they are news, that makes their lies more significant.

Here is 50 to start...
None

You know Jon Stewart made a healthy living on Fox News lies and bullshit...
 
The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.

Frankly, I've never taken felicity in delegating what is rightly my own burden to others, news organizations or otherwise. News outlets are wonderful for calling attention to things at a high level, at the level of "XYZ objectively identified events occurred at a given date and time, and 'so and so' were the actors involved and they said ABC." From there, if the issue matters to me, I am quite content to "run with it" and research on my own what the background details are, what the surrounding/confounding circumstances are, etc. With that, I can then decide what I think about the event itself, its implications and perpetrators.

I think that's what everyone should do. I think too that news organizations should exit or be denied access to the opinion basis. The fact is that people need news to provide copious sums of accurate and objective information not information that leads one toward what to think about the information and certainly not full on opinions. For example (hypothetical):
  • Purely Objective:
    • 64% of the residents of Detroit earn $35K/year or less.
    • Using "such and such" methodological approach, we found that 15% of Detroit adults between 18 and 65 who sought work in July 2015 did not receive any job offers.
  • Leading Information:
    • 22% of the residents of Detroit live in poverty.
    • 15% of Detroit's adults were unemployed in July 2105.
  • Opinion:
    • Detroit's economic policies are a disaster.
    • There are no good jobs available in Detroit.
Were I to have my way, news organizations would present nothing but information of the first sort. People, I, you, everyone else, can take the bits of objective information, analyze it and arrive at a conclusion. We don't need news organizations to do that for us.
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.


Fox/Hannity are whoredogs.


Sean gets wood being Trumps bitch.
 
For the last week or so it seems like he has either had an hour long "Trump special" on every night or Hannity can't stop drooling over him every night Trump isn't on his program.

I don't want Hillary to win but at the same time I don't want a media that is in the hen house of a candidate like this. I get that the liberal media is in the tank for Hillary but you don't solve that PROBLEM by putting Trump on air every night. What happens after this election? The bar is now being established for are future elections and I don't like the direction we're heading.

The media is supposed to be a watchdog not a lapdog.
really, you never heard of CBS, NBC or ABC? you should diversify your watch time. Ever hear of Dan Rather? Tom Brokaw? Chris Mathew's? Really? are you telling us you only watch Fox?

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
Do you dumbfucks always make shit up just to knock it down? Disingenuous faggots. NOWHERE in my op did it say I only watch Fox.

Grow up fool
 
Hannity is the only program that objectively looks at both candidates.


rofl.gif


34228.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg



Chf7sduUoAEY1-x.jpg
images
 
Last edited:
I don't think we can go more then 48 hrs before Hannity has an exclusive one on one with Trump..
And I have heard that Hannity is an advisor to the Trump campaign...

Sean should have to mention this several times during every broadcast that he has Trump on...
which is pretty much every broadcast.

I liked to listen to Sean on the radio when I was driving around in the afternoons.
But man he has changed quite a bit....

I noticed it after he had to negotiate a new syndicated radio deal and more so
when FOX dropped him to the 10 PM slot in favor of Magyn Kelly.

I caught a bit of Sean's show last night and they had Trump and one of his sons on....
Hannity was kissing the sons ass so yuge and biggly that Trump was staring at Hannity
like what the fuck....

Strange election this time around.
 
Here's the thing I always say: Fox News is ADMITTEDLY Republican. Built, founded and directed by. Breitbart ADMITTEDLY Republican.

Then Trump HIRES Roger "bowchicawowwow" Ailey. Who is by the way facing lawsuits from former employees right now. ANNNNNDD The Breitbart idiot to run his campaign!!

Direct link. Add in Hannity who'll say ANYTHING supporting Trump. Bam!

On the other side republicans just say EVERYONE ELSE IS LIBERAL!:bs1:
And this is what they argue and accuse. So now we're all just suppose to deal in this whining fictional reality. Ohhh the Clinton News Network! How? Oh because that's what republicans ACCUSE them of being! Huh?

You might find an anchor or two you don't like but to pretend that's ANY sort of equivilency is silly wingers shit.
:bye1:

Uh...one problem with your scenario- CNN, MSNBC, and all the networks were anti-right long before the big orange clown decided to run for president.

See? All they need is an accusation and you pretend that an accusation is the same as an admission. Its not. Let me make it simple.

One admits to being. "I am a republican"
The other is accused: "You're a Democrat"

See the difference? I bet you say no just because

Look- if I say something that offends you and don't realize it offends you, it could be because I don't understand your values. So when you as a liberal, tell me as as conservative that CNN, or any of the other stations are not at the very least left leaning, you say it without knowing what offends me about their reporting. I can watch Fox and know they are slanted right, because they are so different than all the others whose reporting offends me. If Fox were the sole source we would all be much more conservative because we would not have a perspective from the left.

I think most on the right accept Fox reports from the right, but it seems very difficult for those on the left to acknowledge the others report from the left. I believe it is because the left has owned all the media for so long.

Once again, Because from TOP to BOTTOM they are built, created and ran by Republicans. The other stations are NOT.

Its like someone pleading guilty to murder and then pointing at some random person and screaming "AND THEY ARE TOO!" :badgrin:
Bullshit. The so-called mainstream media is, from TOP to BOTTOM, built, created and ran by Democrats.
 
The MSM is campaigning for Crooked Hillary 24/7. Hannity is the only program that objectively looks at both candidates. Hannity is respectful of The Donald so he does interviews with him. To think Hannity can offset the entire MSM is really a compliment to Hannity. Call him up tomorrow and congratulate him on his radio show.
There is nothing objective about hannity. His show is a liberal hatefest from start to finish and he doesn't even try to hide it
Exactly why I enjoy his show.
The MSM is campaigning for Crooked Hillary 24/7. Hannity is the only program that objectively looks at both candidates. Hannity is respectful of The Donald so he does interviews with him. To think Hannity can offset the entire MSM is really a compliment to Hannity. Call him up tomorrow and congratulate him on his radio show.
There is nothing objective about hannity. He is a pepper haired penis and his show is a liberal hatefest from start to finish. He doesn't even try to hide it
He's not supposed to hide it, you idiot.
If he wants to be taken seriously then he needs to show objectivity, not be a partisan lapdog hack which he is continually proving to be... Seeing how he sucks up on everything Trump is dishing out is truly pathetic. Add to that the distorted lies that he spreads about his opposition... it's an abuse of the position he holds in the media. I don't know how anybody can take him seriously and it is sad that there are people that do.
When you start including some of the liberal hacks on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, PBS, etc. in your rant about objectivity, THEN we can talk.
There are many included on the other side... I can't stand Sharpton, he is the lefts version of Hannity.
Hannity is a genius compared to Sharpton.
 
I just think whoever gets more views gets more airtime so if you're loud and create controversy, more eyeballs which means more $$ for the network. It always comes back to money in some way shape or form.
 
I just think whoever gets more views gets more airtime so if you're loud and create controversy, more eyeballs which means more $$ for the network. It always comes back to money in some way shape or form.

That's also bullshit. If it reinforces the liberal agenda, it gets airtime. If it doesn't, then you'll never hear about it.
 
There is nothing objective about hannity. His show is a liberal hatefest from start to finish and he doesn't even try to hide it
Exactly why I enjoy his show.
There is nothing objective about hannity. He is a pepper haired penis and his show is a liberal hatefest from start to finish. He doesn't even try to hide it
He's not supposed to hide it, you idiot.
If he wants to be taken seriously then he needs to show objectivity, not be a partisan lapdog hack which he is continually proving to be... Seeing how he sucks up on everything Trump is dishing out is truly pathetic. Add to that the distorted lies that he spreads about his opposition... it's an abuse of the position he holds in the media. I don't know how anybody can take him seriously and it is sad that there are people that do.
When you start including some of the liberal hacks on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, PBS, etc. in your rant about objectivity, THEN we can talk.
There are many included on the other side... I can't stand Sharpton, he is the lefts version of Hannity.
Hannity is a genius compared to Sharpton.
They are both dumbshit drones
 

Forum List

Back
Top