I just want to thank

so, who do you think had a team of hackers sophisticated and coordinating enough to pull off the hacking IF NOT your Lover Vlad?

The RNC?

The GOP?

The Trump Campaign?
 
the left for trying to start WW3 all because they're butthurt over losing an election.

I agree with Vlad, put up or shut up

Lets see those cards libtarda

Russia challenges US to prove campaign hacking claims or shut up
Russia to US: Prove campaign hacking claims or shut up - CNN.com
they don't have to prove crud to Vlad the Impaler and you are just a Russian pawn for taking the murderous scum's side over our own 17 Intelligence agencies...

Please, go live in russia, Vlad has a bedroom for you....
...agencies that have REFUSED to bring said evidence to congress at their request. Only a lefty loon thinks that passes the smell test. It's obvious that it's political orders from the top. Oh, and hell yes I'll take Putin's word over obama's.
jebus! :rolleyes:


The Intelligence Community (IC) is refusing to provide the House Intelligence Committee with a requested Thursday briefing on Russian interference with the U.S. election, citing an ongoing review of the matter requested by President Obama.

According to a statement, the IC will not be offering comment to Congress until it completes that review, which will cover foreign interference in the electoral process since 2008.
"Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress — and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods," the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said in a statement.

What bullshit, they leak this but arent ready?

Sounds like they are trying to destabilize Country and its treason. Hang them.all.
 
the left for trying to start WW3 all because they're butthurt over losing an election.

I agree with Vlad, put up or shut up

Lets see those cards libtarda

Russia challenges US to prove campaign hacking claims or shut up
Russia to US: Prove campaign hacking claims or shut up - CNN.com
they don't have to prove crud to Vlad the Impaler and you are just a Russian pawn for taking the murderous scum's side over our own 17 Intelligence agencies...

Please, go live in russia, Vlad has a bedroom for you....
...agencies that have REFUSED to bring said evidence to congress at their request. Only a lefty loon thinks that passes the smell test. It's obvious that it's political orders from the top. Oh, and hell yes I'll take Putin's word over obama's.
jebus! :rolleyes:


The Intelligence Community (IC) is refusing to provide the House Intelligence Committee with a requested Thursday briefing on Russian interference with the U.S. election, citing an ongoing review of the matter requested by President Obama.

According to a statement, the IC will not be offering comment to Congress until it completes that review, which will cover foreign interference in the electoral process since 2008.
"Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress — and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods," the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said in a statement.
EXACTLY. They will leak it to the press but not provide ANY evidence. That's OK with you? How corrupt!
-the minute Comey reported to the congressional committee members on Benghazi that they found more emails on Huma's husband's laptop that could be duplicates, he didn't know yet, Republican Congress critters RAN TO THE PRESS and squealed louder than pigs...

- Throughout the Clinton investigation, supposed FBI leakers were informing Fox News on the investigation...at least once a week with something new that Fox and other Right wing outlets got from them and touted as if it were news and correct information.

Are you saying these two leaks were okay and believable....
but when it is something that affects a party that you support, leaks are no longer valid and should never be believed?

-
 
so, who do you think had a team of hackers sophisticated and coordinating enough to pull off the hacking IF NOT your Lover Vlad?

The RNC?

The GOP?

The Trump Campaign?


China
N KOREA
Iran
Israel
Russia

All the capcity and have hacked us before. And that doesn't include groups like anonymous or even leaks within the DNC or Hillary campaign or the Obama administration (NSA) So it could be alot.of folks.
 
the left for trying to start WW3 all because they're butthurt over losing an election.

I agree with Vlad, put up or shut up

Lets see those cards libtarda

Russia challenges US to prove campaign hacking claims or shut up
Russia to US: Prove campaign hacking claims or shut up - CNN.com
they don't have to prove crud to Vlad the Impaler and you are just a Russian pawn for taking the murderous scum's side over our own 17 Intelligence agencies...

Please, go live in russia, Vlad has a bedroom for you....
...agencies that have REFUSED to bring said evidence to congress at their request. Only a lefty loon thinks that passes the smell test. It's obvious that it's political orders from the top. Oh, and hell yes I'll take Putin's word over obama's.
jebus! :rolleyes:


The Intelligence Community (IC) is refusing to provide the House Intelligence Committee with a requested Thursday briefing on Russian interference with the U.S. election, citing an ongoing review of the matter requested by President Obama.

According to a statement, the IC will not be offering comment to Congress until it completes that review, which will cover foreign interference in the electoral process since 2008.
"Once the review is complete in the coming weeks, the Intelligence Community stands ready to brief Congress — and will make those findings available to the public consistent with protecting intelligence sources and methods," the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said in a statement.
EXACTLY. They will leak it to the press but not provide ANY evidence. That's OK with you? How corrupt!
-the minute Comey reported to the congressional committee members on Benghazi that they found more emails on Huma's husband's laptop that could be duplicates, he didn't know yet, Republican Congress critters RAN TO THE PRESS and squealed louder than pigs...

- Throughout the Clinton investigation, supposed FBI leakers were informing Fox News on the investigation...at least once a week with something new that Fox and other Right wing outlets got from them and touted as if it were news and correct information.

Are you saying these two leaks were okay and believable....
but when it is something that affects a party that you support, leaks are no longer valid and should never be believed?

-


What fox news? Only fox news? Or is fox news the only one to publish anything against the queen?

But if I recall you guys didnt take any of that seriously so dont bring that shit up now.
 
so, who do you think had a team of hackers sophisticated and coordinating enough to pull off the hacking IF NOT your Lover Vlad?

The RNC?

The GOP?

The Trump Campaign?




Hacking of what ? The voting machines or the Wikileaks revelations? Julian Assange, the UK ambassador and multiple high ranking intelligence agents have said that it is bullshit. What I want to know is why are leftards more worried about whom may have leaked them than they are about the contents?? "Spirit cooking" ??? Comet Ping-pong and the obsession with walnut sauce, pizza, pasta "chicken lovers"??????? All of which are pedophile code words. Leftards are like a cheating husband that didn't lock his phone and his wife searches it and finds out that he is having an affair......instead of being shamed over it? He is pissed because his wife didn't trust him enough to leave his phone alone.....un-FUCKING believable.....
 
I didn't misquote you, stop lying, you said you don't know, the fact that I also don't know is irrelevant, as YOU were the one with original claim on motivations behind hacking the GOP.

You were arguing that the very attempt at hacking of GOP is proof that Russians were even handed, did not favor one candidate. But that's based based entirely on premise of knowing what their interest in those emails was.


No that was carbonera dipshit, he added the article to the thread.
The problem is you guys change your tune as we crush your points. You can start a new thread to tell us what you think went down. Id love to see you articulate it, but you wont because youre a pussy that knows this whole thing is utter bullshit and is causing a diplomatic crises.

"his argument is crushing you"...but you won't even take up defending it? Please.

We've just been over what we know and what we don't and bottom line is that at this point all revelations are consistent with Putin looking to get back at America through cyber attacks on our political institutions, while getting their lapdog in the White House to lift the sanctions.


No we dont know. We do know there is politics in the Intelligence agencies for sure. But since they wont talk to Congress we have no idea whats going on.

Time for hearings after Trump is sworn in and lets see Clinton and her server in this whole mess, cant wait for this.

Ridiculous. If we cant trust our own intelligence with unanimous consensus then what the fuck can we trust? I'm not going down the ridiculous rabbit hole.

There will be a full declassified report on this soon enough.


Well when they leak, it makes it political, thats when you cant trust them. Either release the report or shut the fuck up.

WHICH THEY ARE soo....wtf are you saying?
 
Hacking of what ? The voting machines or the Wikileaks revelations? Julian Assange, the UK ambassador and multiple high ranking intelligence agents have said that it is bullshit. What I want to know is why are leftards more worried about whom may have leaked them than they are about the contents?? "Spirit cooking" ??? Comet Pinbg-pong and the obsession with walnut sauce, pizza, pasta "chicken lovers"??????? Leftards are like a cheating husband that didn't lock his phone and his wife searches it and finds out that he is having an affair......instead of being shamed over it? He is pissed because his wife didn't trust him enough to leave his phone alone.....un-FUCKING believable.....

Who the fuck is Julian Assange? He is responsible to no one except himself, knows nothing except what the Russians would allow him to know assuming they hacked. His word is worth little.

And which "high ranking intelligence agents " said that DNC hacking by Russians is bullshit? World would like to know.
 
Hacking of what ? The voting machines or the Wikileaks revelations? Julian Assange, the UK ambassador and multiple high ranking intelligence agents have said that it is bullshit. What I want to know is why are leftards more worried about whom may have leaked them than they are about the contents?? "Spirit cooking" ??? Comet Pinbg-pong and the obsession with walnut sauce, pizza, pasta "chicken lovers"??????? Leftards are like a cheating husband that didn't lock his phone and his wife searches it and finds out that he is having an affair......instead of being shamed over it? He is pissed because his wife didn't trust him enough to leave his phone alone.....un-FUCKING believable.....

Who the fuck is Julian Assange? He is responsible to no one except himself, his word is worth right about nothing.

And which "high ranking intelligence agents " said that DNC hacking by Russians is bullshit? World would like to know.



Which high ranking oficials said that Russia passed off hacked e-mails to Assange? James Clapper said that it didn't happen. The leak was within the alphabet agencies and DNC insiders that were pissed about how Sanders was done....again....I ask you as to why you are more pissed about the fact that these damning e-mails were brought to light than you are about the contents????
 
No that was carbonera dipshit, he added the article to the thread.
The problem is you guys change your tune as we crush your points. You can start a new thread to tell us what you think went down. Id love to see you articulate it, but you wont because youre a pussy that knows this whole thing is utter bullshit and is causing a diplomatic crises.

"his argument is crushing you"...but you won't even take up defending it? Please.

We've just been over what we know and what we don't and bottom line is that at this point all revelations are consistent with Putin looking to get back at America through cyber attacks on our political institutions, while getting their lapdog in the White House to lift the sanctions.


No we dont know. We do know there is politics in the Intelligence agencies for sure. But since they wont talk to Congress we have no idea whats going on.

Time for hearings after Trump is sworn in and lets see Clinton and her server in this whole mess, cant wait for this.

Ridiculous. If we cant trust our own intelligence with unanimous consensus then what the fuck can we trust? I'm not going down the ridiculous rabbit hole.

There will be a full declassified report on this soon enough.


Well when they leak, it makes it political, thats when you cant trust them. Either release the report or shut the fuck up.

WHICH THEY ARE soo....wtf are you saying?


No if youre gonna leak it now, release it now. They are leading and causing issues its all politics.
 
Your pals in the RW press are now agreeing that the Russians hacked the campaigns.

Russian hackers tried and failed to breach RNC
Do you realize the link you used contradicted your statement?

'...that the Russians HACKED the campaigns' Versus '...TRIED and FAILED'...

The link you used states ONLY the DNC's campaign was hacked, NOT the GOP's.

You are illiterate:

"Russian hackers reportedly tried to hack Republican National Committee computer networks with the same techniques that allowed them to gain access to its Democratic counterpart."

Which part of 'allowed them to gain access' don't you understand?

Which part of they tried to hack BOTH do you not understand?

Which party of the pubs have better security do you not understand.

Only a liberal would post this and say it was a conspiracy to hack into just the dems, you just posted both....

First of all, GOP is not the same as Trump. In fact many in GOP had some strong opinions against him (a lot still do).

Even if we assume GOP claims are true, that they weren't successfully hacked (how would they know?), there is no indication that hackers would release emails if they were harmful to Trump, on the contrary they could have been looking to embarrass GOP if it continued to oppose Trump. Having some extra leverage against Trump himself is just a cherry on top.


So in other words you dont know anything?

This is a giant fishing expedition.

So lets play the if game

If they tried to hack both, it under cuts your argument they were one sided.

If they couldnt hack the pubs, its not our fault our leaders are smarter than democrats.

And why dont we see if they had access to clintons server
And if they did hack into it, Clinton should be in jail.

Buckeye 45 has laid it out succinctly in post 19. The left does NOT have a leg to stand on. Either way it comes out, it is the far lefts fault, period!

For the rest of the conservatives----->this is the type of response that should be used with libs so that outsiders reading these forums see it. Once a post like this is put forth, DRIVE IT DOWN THEIR THROATS until they answer it. Even Helen Keller would be able to see their avoidance of answering these types of points.
 
What bullshit, they leak this but arent ready?

Sounds like they are trying to destabilize Country and its treason. Hang them.all.

You mean like Comey "leaked" that Hillary's emails showed up of Weiner's computer and they were obtaining a warrant to investigate. That leak?


No Comey stated it, the buck stopped with him and he said they were, it wasnt a leak. Its Obamas appointed FBI Director, blame Obama then, shit.
 
Which high ranking oficials said that Russia passed off hacked e-mails to Assange? James Clapper said that it didn't happen. The leak was within the alphabet agencies and DNC insiders that were pissed about how Sanders was done....again....I ask you as to why you are more pissed about the fact that these damning e-mails were brought to light than you are about the contents????

He CERTAINLY did not say that.

During the election, Mr. Clapper issued a statement on Oct. 7 saying the intelligence community is confident “that the Russian government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.”

He said the disclosures by Wikileaks and two other sites “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.”

But more than a month later on Nov. 17, he told the House committee his agencies “don’t have good insight” on whether Russia-directed people provided the actual emails to Wikileaks.

James Clapper: We ‘don’t have good insight’ into alleged Russian hacking

Congress is currently giving Clepper until January 13th to release the full report on the matter.
 
Hacking of what ? The voting machines or the Wikileaks revelations? Julian Assange, the UK ambassador and multiple high ranking intelligence agents have said that it is bullshit. What I want to know is why are leftards more worried about whom may have leaked them than they are about the contents?? "Spirit cooking" ??? Comet Pinbg-pong and the obsession with walnut sauce, pizza, pasta "chicken lovers"??????? Leftards are like a cheating husband that didn't lock his phone and his wife searches it and finds out that he is having an affair......instead of being shamed over it? He is pissed because his wife didn't trust him enough to leave his phone alone.....un-FUCKING believable.....

Who the fuck is Julian Assange? He is responsible to no one except himself, knows nothing except what the Russians would allow him to know assuming they hacked. His word is worth little.

And which "high ranking intelligence agents " said that DNC hacking by Russians is bullshit? World would like to know.
James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, for one.


"The overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, three American officials said on Monday.

While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named."

snip

'"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials. "Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow."

The Federal Bureau of Investigation, whose evidentiary standards require it to make cases that can stand up in court, declined to accept the CIA's analysis - a deductive assessment of the available intelligence - for the same reason, the three officials said.'

Exclusive: Top U.S. spy agency has not embraced CIA assessment on Russia hacking - sources

Bottom line, there is no proof known to the FBI or the Director of National Intelligence that supports the CIA's allegations that Russia tried to influence the election. That's why Obama is refusing to allow the intel agencies to testify before Congress.
 
What bullshit, they leak this but arent ready?

Sounds like they are trying to destabilize Country and its treason. Hang them.all.

You mean like Comey "leaked" that Hillary's emails showed up of Weiner's computer and they were obtaining a warrant to investigate. That leak?

No Comey stated it, the buck stopped with him and he said they were, it wasnt a leak. Its Obamas appointed FBI Director, blame Obama then, shit.

It was highly irregular if not illegal for the FBI to make public details of an investigation that was ongoing, and which ultimately went nowhere.

There were also leaks that a faction of pro-Trump agents within the FBI wanted her charged, all of which came out less than 2 weeks before the election.

As for the RNC, it was hacked. The CIA was fairly clear in that assessment, and the question becomes, why didn't the hackers release anything they found there.
 
What bullshit, they leak this but arent ready?

Sounds like they are trying to destabilize Country and its treason. Hang them.all.

You mean like Comey "leaked" that Hillary's emails showed up of Weiner's computer and they were obtaining a warrant to investigate. That leak?


No Comey stated it, the buck stopped with him and he said they were, it wasnt a leak. Its Obamas appointed FBI Director, blame Obama then, shit.

Comey stated it in a way that left the public with COMPLETELY FALSE impression that there was something in the emails that implicated Clinton beyond what was already known, while getting Trump room to breathe out of negative news cycle.

Comey directly interfered in the election and numbers directly show the effect of his clearly calculated actions.
 
What bullshit, they leak this but arent ready?

Sounds like they are trying to destabilize Country and its treason. Hang them.all.

You mean like Comey "leaked" that Hillary's emails showed up of Weiner's computer and they were obtaining a warrant to investigate. That leak?

No Comey stated it, the buck stopped with him and he said they were, it wasnt a leak. Its Obamas appointed FBI Director, blame Obama then, shit.

It was highly irregular if not illegal for the FBI to make public details of an investigation that was ongoing, and which ultimately went nowhere.

There were also leaks that a faction of pro-Trump agents within the FBI wanted her charged, all of which came out less than 2 weeks before the election.

As for the RNC, it was hacked. The CIA was fairly clear in that assessment, and the question becomes, why didn't the hackers release anything they found there.


So, he did it, and in July you guys were happy he did it different lying.
You guys really need to.learn consistancy and if hacking is a.problem, you guys should be against Hillary, but as we know you only fit your arguments to you need at the time.
 
So, he did it, and in July you guys were happy he did it different lying.
You guys really need to.learn consistancy and if hacking is a.problem, you guys should be against Hillary, but as we know you only fit your arguments to you need at the time.

So when things were done, true or false, which benefitted Trump, you're OK with the dirty tricks and lies, regardless of whether the Russians did it or the FBI did in in violation of all of its rules and codes of ethics, you're OK with it.

Comey didn't lie in July when he dismissed the investigation and said no charges were recommended. But he sure lied in October about what was going on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top