Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't work that way. If the person dies from a cold, the cold IS the cause of death. If he died from cancer, then cancer is the cause of death.If a person has Cancer and eventually dies from a cold, we don't say the person died of a cold.
Your inability to understand the simplest concepts, does not reflect well on you, or the schools that failed to teach you to think.
Your inability to understand the simplest concepts, does not reflect well on you, or the schools that failed to teach you to think.
Define the concept. ...
It doesn't work that way. If the person dies from a cold, the cold IS the cause of death. If he died from cancer, then cancer is the cause of death.
We don't say, he died from a cold, but he also had high blood pressure. So let's tick the high blood pressure box on this one, we'll tick off the cold box next time.
I explained my problem with your point,
The temptation for libs in hospitals to count deaths as Convid-19, to undermine the President is real. Denying that, is not credible.
Actually, posts make intellectual dishonesty seem appropriate, since most of your's are.....The conspiracy theories posted on a thread about intellectual honesty make this thread a joke.
#186 reply to #183
I explained my problem with your point,
That exactly it. It’s your problem that you can’t answer a simple question.
if you have a problem with my pointing out that 630 patients died in 24 hours in New York because you think that is the normal daily death rate unaffected by a global pandemic then you must point out the problem with the report I posted. You don’t have a problem with it because you have not told us what your problem with it is.
You utter mush because that is all you apparently know how to do.
Post #23
The temptation for libs in hospitals to count deaths as Convid-19, to undermine the President is real. Denying that, is not credible.
Citing ‘temptation’ because you surely know if you claimed you found evidence of your rediculous conspiracy theory, you will certainly be asked to provide it.
Mush! Nothing but mush!
That reported death totals weirdness aside, the arguments for inflating the numbers are likely equivalent to those for deflating them.
. We have already seen threads reporting on inflated counts from Italy.
Your overreaction to my concern about inflating numbers, is, not called for.
www.nychealthandhospitals.org
. The temptation for libs in hospitals to count deaths as Convid-19, to undermine the President is real. Denying that, is not credible.
It doesn't work that way. If the person dies from a cold, the cold IS the cause of death. If he died from cancer, then cancer is the cause of death.If a person has Cancer and eventually dies from a cold, we don't say the person died of a cold.
We don't say, he died from a cold, but he also had high blood pressure. So let's tick the high blood pressure box on this one, we'll tick off the cold box next time.
You've got no point. It's a trivial chance that they would have an unrelated death while suffering from COVID19.Your point is silly. The chances of that just coincidentally happening are vanishingly small.If the stoke was brought on by them fighting the virus, COVID-19 was the cause of death.An elderly person with heart disease who contracts coronavirus and dies because their heart is too frail to fend off the virus is counted among the victims of COVID-19 and conspiracy nuts cry foul.Finding it suspicious when coroner's list coronavirus as the cause of death among patients with underlying health conditions is the stuff of conspiracy nuts.The topic is conspiracy theory nonsense. Doesn't belong in this zone.Can you post conspiracy crap from the nation's leading dispenser of conspiracy crap in this zone?I don't easily abide monologues-
I want to talk about intellectual honesty. I posted this in another thread
Rush Limbaugh Floats Theory That Coronavirus Deaths Are Being Inflated to Push an Agenda
Conservative talk-radio host and recent Presidential Medal of Freedom honoree Rush Limbaugh on Thursday floated the theory that deaths from coronavirus have been inflated so that governments could further “the policies they have put in place.”Citing the latest record-breaking unemployment claims...www.yahoo.com
I'm using that article as an example because I use the term intellectual honesty a lot- Rush, is a great example as well as our own beloved, I'm sure, PoliticalChic- I've said for years Rush is very intelligent, but he is hyper-partisan. I've told our very own, beloved, I'm sure, PoliticalChic, the same thing- I give them their just due for their intelligence, (and I'll add now, their tenacity as there is a lot to be said for that trait) but I can't abide their hyper-partisan intellect. Both are intelligent enough to know better and the evidence is overwhelming that there is very little difference in the Party elite outside their rhetoric, which is used as a tool to keep citizens divided. Any half wit can see there is no difference. Hitting a brick wall at 100 or at 90 still is hitting a brick wall. The only (maybe) difference is the rate of descent to the same destination- and that rate of descent is accelerating almost daily.
In the article it says what it says- I'm not going to give away the punch line- you have to read it and make your own determination.
Can you read the thread and answer the topic or go back to your hole ?
The temptation for libs in hospitals to count deaths as Convid-19, to undermine the President is real.
Denying that, is not credible.
You libs have shown that you invent reasons to put your partisan gain ahead of professional responsibilities at ever turn.
So, your pretense otherwise, is just you defending your side's bad behavior.
You libs have shown that you invent reasons to put your partisan gain ahead of professional responsibilities at ever turn.
So, your pretense otherwise, is just you defending your side's bad behavior.
What about an elderly patient who has the virus and is fighting it off, and dies of an unrelated stroke?
My example. I clearly stated "unrelated" and you immediately ignore that given, and start thinking how to blame the virus so you can count it.
You just demonstrated my point. Perfectly. Thanks for playing. See the receptionist on the way out for your lovely consolation prizes.
Actually, it's not. And you've demonstrated my point.
I think it depends on "hedging your bets".. If you're the MEDIA and want to stay immune from scrutiny for INFLATING this crisis and playing "it bleeds it leads" -- NOW when the WORST CASE NUMBERS you were pushing just a month ago don't seem so reliable --
.... then you want to INFLATE deaths.
There are 12,800 deaths already. Some of those would still be alive had the right people panicked 30 days earlier.
The media did not panic the population enough. And they should not get most of the credit for shutting the economy down. They must share that game saving play with the investor class, money changers, and yes the elders if the NBA when they canceled the season.
#186 reply to #183
I explained my problem with your point,
That exactly it. It’s your problem that you can’t answer a simple question.
if you have a problem with my pointing out that 630 patients died in 24 hours in New York because you think that is the normal daily death rate unaffected by a global pandemic then you must point out the problem with the report I posted. You don’t have a problem with it because you have not told us what your problem with it is.
You utter mush because that is all you apparently know how to do.
Post #23
The temptation for libs in hospitals to count deaths as Convid-19, to undermine the President is real. Denying that, is not credible.
Citing ‘temptation’ because you surely know if you claimed you found evidence of your rediculous conspiracy theory, you will certainly be asked to provide it.
Mush! Nothing but mush!
19,000,000 NY state population / 60 years = 316,666.66 or around 320,000 deaths a year.
www.google.com
Tally?
Coronavirus deaths are not being inflated. There is no conspiracy involved here. People close to me are in serious condition as a result of this. We will win this thing, get back on our feet again, and still prevent the Socialist Democratic Party from enacting their agenda.I don't easily abide monologues-
I want to talk about intellectual honesty. I posted this in another thread
Rush Limbaugh Floats Theory That Coronavirus Deaths Are Being Inflated to Push an Agenda
Conservative talk-radio host and recent Presidential Medal of Freedom honoree Rush Limbaugh on Thursday floated the theory that deaths from coronavirus have been inflated so that governments could further “the policies they have put in place.”Citing the latest record-breaking unemployment claims...
I'm using that article as an example because I use the term intellectual honesty a lot- Rush, is a great example as well as our own beloved, I'm sure, PoliticalChic- I've said for years Rush is very intelligent, but he is hyper-partisan. I've told our very own, beloved, I'm sure, PoliticalChic, the same thing- I give them their just due for their intelligence, (and I'll add now, their tenacity as there is a lot to be said for that trait) but I can't abide their hyper-partisan intellect. Both are intelligent enough to know better and the evidence is overwhelming that there is very little difference in the Party elite outside their rhetoric, which is used as a tool to keep citizens divided. Any half wit can see there is no difference. Hitting a brick wall at 100 or at 90 still is hitting a brick wall. The only (maybe) difference is the rate of descent to the same destination- and that rate of descent is accelerating almost daily.
In the article it says what it says- I'm not going to give away the punch line- you have to read it and make your own determination.
You might, just a suggestion, stick to the OT, which requires reading all that is written-Coronavirus deaths are not being inflated. There is no conspiracy involved here. People close to me are in serious condition as a result of this. We will win this thing, get back on our feet again, and still prevent the Socialist Democratic Party from enacting their agenda.
