Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When I heard that Gowdy had joined Trumps team I know they had found major amounts of provable fraud...AND THEN THERE WAS JACKY-A-W-N.
Show me one thing I said is BS.That's a lot of bullshit you've slung there.
Gee, Jack, I can't even show it all in one screen-grab!Do you have one piece of verifiable evidence of voter fraud?
View attachment 417114
Its my understanding the FBI has seized over 500 pieces of equipment from two states. IF the programing is still present on these devices or has been altered there are going to be major heads rolling.
Elections are legal procedures not media products. The president doesn't need to prove fraud, only reasonable suspicion of a crime committed in order for an investigation. Evidence belongs in courts, not in the media. The evidence the left demands won't be brought forth in a press confrontation but rather in the filing of charges.Do you have a link or article saying that Gowdy joined his team? Last I heard is that those that are alleging fraud needed to prove it.All of the libs are that way...Y-A-W-N.
AND THEN THERE WAS JACK:
The guy who told you that you couldn't trust or believe a single thing the government said or did under Trump, that it was all evil, is now telling you he isn't even the slightest bit concerned about an election that flies in the face of every common sense fact and that he trusts and believes everything they say and do implicitly as good now without even a look or concern.
When I heard that Gowdy had joined Trumps team I know they had found major amounts of provable fraud...
Its time now to sit back and watch the fireworks...
Having been a Democrat for 40 years, I think I have an idea of how the election fraud scenario came about, and where it is going. I get the sense that at about 3AM, the morning after election day, Democrat election officials in swing states saw that President Trump, with sizable vote leads, was heading right straight toward a victory.
Knowing the Democrat mindset, which is that Democrats must always do ANYTHING they can, to get power for Democrats, and keep it away from Republicans, the Democrat election officials, stopped counting votes, and held a conference among each other. My guess is they discussed what they could do to stop Trump from winning. What they came up with, was to simply report 120,000+ fictitious "votes" for Joe Biden, and none for Trump. Well, this would be a pretty good guess, because that is exactly what they did.
I also guess that these election officials who have the job of reporting vote counts, are supervised by some other Democrat who also sees a responsibility to insure power for Democrats, and as such, the election officials might have worried about losing their jobs if they allowed Trump to win.
They didn't seem to think there would be anything more serious for them than the prospect of job loss. Thus, they decided to falsify the vote reports, in favor of Biden. Democrats have a built-in perspective that they are always right. As Georgia US Senate candidate Jon Osoff said recently >> "We're on the right side of history." It looks like their mindset of always thinking that, has now put them in a lot of trouble.
I forsee the election (still in progress) as going to wind up before the US Supreme Court, with the US Dept of Justice vigorously pressing to prosecute these Democrat election frauders, to the full extent of the law.
First, if the frauders continue to press the idea that there is no evidence of election fraud, they will be laughed out of the courtroom. Secondly, the DOJ prosecutors will not have trouble proving their case and the frauders will be looking at multiple counts of violation of US Code 52, Section 20511, carrying 5 years of federal imprisonment + fines, for each count. I wouldn't want to be their shoes right now.
52 U.S. Code § 20511 - Criminal penalties
www.law.cornell.edu
That's two BS fraud calls. So yeah, I gonna call bullshit on the rest.
I notice that you don't even specify WHAT you're claiming to be a lie, let alone show a shred of evidence for it.That's a lie.
A long lie, but still just a lie.
100% mainstream media line. Yawn. Hum hum. Changes nothing.Y-A-W-N. Simply replace the word Democrat with the word Republican. Each side tries to win elections.
Again, I'm not sure what about Donald Trump inspires this kind of devotion and reverence but I've pretty much given up on that front.
Bottom line is the election will be certified and Biden will be sworn in on 1/20/2021.
This election will not wind up in front of the Supreme Court. All lawsuits are being laughed out of court and dismissed almost out of hand for lack of evidence.
I predict the lawsuit circus will be over and out by Friday.
100% mainstream media line. Yawn. Hum hum. Changes nothing.Y-A-W-N. Simply replace the word Democrat with the word Republican. Each side tries to win elections.
Again, I'm not sure what about Donald Trump inspires this kind of devotion and reverence but I've pretty much given up on that front.
Bottom line is the election will be certified and Biden will be sworn in on 1/20/2021.
This election will not wind up in front of the Supreme Court. All lawsuits are being laughed out of court and dismissed almost out of hand for lack of evidence.
I predict the lawsuit circus will be over and out by Friday.
Actually the first and best, and only needed evidence is the 5:30 AM fictitious "vote" dumps, and even that comes from the mainstream media itself (ABC NEWS). This is all the SCOTUS will need to see. Trial will be brief. >>>
View attachment 417148
That's two BS fraud calls. So yeah, I gonna call bullshit on the rest.
Gee, Jack! And here I thought you were going to find them all true!
YOU'RE AN AMAZING MAN, Jack-- -- you can ferret out the malarkey in an article without even reading it! You just look the topics up in your leftwing site designed to try to disclaim it all as nonsense.
GOOD FOR YOU.
When an election is stolen, it is stolen from ALL of us, even those content with the outcome ---- for now.
That's two BS fraud calls. So yeah, I gonna call bullshit on the rest.
Gee, Jack! And here I thought you were going to find them all true!
YOU'RE AN AMAZING MAN, Jack-- -- you can ferret out the malarkey in an article without even reading it! You just look the topics up in your leftwing site designed to try to disclaim it all as nonsense.
GOOD FOR YOU.
When an election is stolen, it is stolen from ALL of us, even those content with the outcome ---- for now.
Keep living in your fantasy world. I know you believe the election was stolen and that no just and righteous electorate would ever reject your great white savior.
Every single item on your list has been debunked, disproven, or is straight up alt-right "opinion".
It wasn't even really a challenge. Simple Google searches.
Just because you state it, doesn't mean it's true.
These lawsuits have about two or three days of life left in them.
Is there a doctor in the house ? I mean really.You people will only get my sympathy for falling for a big lie until one of you kills someone. After that you are all terrorists.
YOU KNOW what there is. And anyone who doesn't can look at the chart in Post # 28. It is all the evidence that is needed. SCOTUS will look at that alone, and confirm election for Trump, or disqualify the election, and call for a new one with very tight controls, and the previous election officials safely locked in federal prisons.That's a lot of bullshit you've slung there. So let's boil it down and I'll ask the question one more time. Do you have one piece of verifiable evidence of voter fraud? Anywhere? Something that wasn't shot down or debunked? Something that wasn't included in a lawsuit that's been thrown out in any court? Put up. If not, then you know the second part.
YOU KNOW what there is. And anyone who doesn't can look at the chart in Post # 28. It is all the evidence that is needed. SCOTUS will look at that alone, and confirm election for Trump, or disqualify the election, and call for a new one with very tight controls, and the previous election officials safely locked in federal prisons.That's a lot of bullshit you've slung there. So let's boil it down and I'll ask the question one more time. Do you have one piece of verifiable evidence of voter fraud? Anywhere? Something that wasn't shot down or debunked? Something that wasn't included in a lawsuit that's been thrown out in any court? Put up. If not, then you know the second part.
YOU KNOW what there is. And anyone who doesn't can look at the chart in Post # 28. It is all the evidence that is needed. SCOTUS will look at that alone, and confirm election for Trump, or disqualify the election, and call for a new one with very tight controls, and the previous election officials safely locked in federal prisons.That's a lot of bullshit you've slung there. So let's boil it down and I'll ask the question one more time. Do you have one piece of verifiable evidence of voter fraud? Anywhere? Something that wasn't shot down or debunked? Something that wasn't included in a lawsuit that's been thrown out in any court? Put up. If not, then you know the second part.
Of course you could punish them the same way, ...and SHOULD. But Trump supporters ARE NOT LYING. And the evidence is clear, from frauders who didn't even try to hide it. As typical Democrats (I used to be one), they so much think that they are right, that they don't forsee trouble for themselves, at any point."Knowing the Democrat mindset, which is that Democrats must always do ANYTHING they can, to get power for Democrats, and keep it away from Republicans,"
you say that with a straight face as we WATCH conservative christiabn republicans (with trump) do EVERYTHING in their power to take COMPLETE CONTROL of the government, the supreme court, the lesser courts?
seriously?
"I forsee the election (still in progress) as going to wind up before the US Supreme Court, with the US Dept of Justice vigorously pressing to prosecute these Democrat election frauders, to the full extent of the law.
First, if the frauders continue to press the idea that there is no evidence of election fraud, they will be laughed out of the courtroom. Secondly, the DOJ prosecutors will not have trouble proving their case and the frauders will be looking at multiple counts of violation of US Code 52, Section 20511, carrying 5 years of federal imprisonment + fines, for each count. I wouldn't want to be their shoes right now."
If your scenario is true....ok...
but what if the REAL TRUTH is that YOUR side is lying (to STEAL ABSOLUTE POWER!) and it is YOUR side that is cheating....
can we punish them the same way?
No time for fantasies.Keep living in your fantasy world.
I KNOW the election was stolen. To deny that would be to court unicorns and miracles. Joe's "election" was a miracle, like catching lightning in a bottle. You believe in that Jack, that's YOUR fantasy.I know you believe the election was stolen
True to form, Jack, you lie through your teeth to yourself trying to tell us with a straight face that you've searched a list of clipped url names with over 100 hours of reading within them all, figured out the story behind each, researched them all and convincingly debunked every last one beyond a shadow of a doubt.Every single item on your list has been debunked
This nonsense will get you nowhere.The difference? I'm not lying.
You are.
I KNOW the election was stolen. To deny that would be to court unicorns and miracles. Joe's "election" was a miracle, like catching lightning in a bottle. You believe in that Jack, that's YOUR fantasy.
HA HA HA .....What fraud?
Remember, the only active criminal investigation for voter fraud is for a lone Republican in Pennsylvania....with the investigation opened in August.
