If No One Today Owned Slaves...

Yeah.......I asked for numbers........how many actually supported the war against the slave owning democrats?
You never answer questions, so fuck off. Apparently enough northern Dems supported the War to defeat the CSA, which you freaks are trying to raise again.
 
You never answer questions, so fuck off. Apparently enough northern Dems supported the War to defeat the CSA, which you freaks are trying to raise again.


And there you go......the tiny number of pro-war democrats was likely outnumbered by anti-war democrats......
 
In the 1860s trying to prevent a war that the democrat party was planning in order to keep people as slaves......

That you defend the democrat party, the party that was willing to start a war to keep blacks as slaves is just dumb........

The Republican President ended reconstruction because he had to deal with the democrats...again.......


The democrat party owned the slaves....the democrat party wanted to expand slavery into new states....the democrat party was pushing to restart the trans-atlantic slave trade....the democrat party started the Civil War to keep blacks as slaves.....then, when the Republican party defeated them in that war and actually freed the slaves, the democrat party started the black codes, jim crow, poll taxes and literacy tests to keep blacks from being free.....and members of the democrat party started the ku klux klan.....the democrat party fought every single Civil Rights act and the anti-lynching laws.....and only voted for the 1964 Civil Rights act after racist lyndon Johnson told them if they didn't vote for that last one, they wouldn't win national elections.......

And today, it is the democrat party and the democrat party allied teachers unions that keep black children from getting educations that would lift them out of generational poverty and crime.......

And you cast all your hate on the Republican party.....showing how dumb you really are.....
/---/ Best thing about this thread, younger people are hearing about this part of history for the first time. It's no longer taught in school. It might spark some interest to read more about it.
 
/---/ Best thing about this thread, younger people are hearing about this part of history for the first time. It's no longer taught in school. It might spark some interest to read more about it.

And that is why I do it.....for those who aren't left wing/democrat party nuts, who have never heard the counter arguments against these fascist thugs....
 
Once again: The 1850s and the southern Dems plots to separate the South from the North has always been taught, as today, in our schools.

This is nothing new.

What is new is that the MAGA and Tea Party Right are now acting like the Southern Dems of the 1850s.
 
Once again: The 1850s and the southern Dems plots to separate the South from the North has always been taught, as today, in our schools.

This is nothing new.

What is new is that the MAGA and Tea Party Right are now acting like the Southern Dems of the 1850s.
/———/ Another sack of horseshyt from our newest troll.
 
Then why do Republicans keep trying to talk about today's Democrats and slavery?

There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell young blacks as they try luring blacks into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Party had several factions in the beginning. One was the Radical Republicans. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.

As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. They wanted to keep the union together. They did not want the south to leave. They did not want war. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union.4 He wanted Congress to assure the southern states that slavery would be protected once Lincoln took office. Congress offered over fifty different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that has never been adopted, but owing to the absence of a ratification deadline, could still be adopted by the state legislatures. It would shield slavery within the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress. Although the Corwin Amendment does not explicitly use the word slavery, it was designed specifically to protect slavery from federal power. The out-going 36th United States Congress proposed the Corwin Amendment on March 2, 1861, shortly before the outbreak of the American Civil War, with the intent of preventing that war and preserving the Union. It passed Congress but was not ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures.

Several Southern states attempted to secede after the 1860 presidential election, eventually forming the Confederate States of America. Several federal legislative measures, including the Corwin Amendment, were proposed during this period in the hope of either reconciling the sections of the United States or avoiding the secession of the border states. Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin, Republicans and allies of President-elect Abraham Lincoln, introduced the Corwin Amendment, which was endorsed by the outgoing president, James Buchanan. Because it was only ratified in a handful of Northern states and Kentucky, the amendment failed to achieve its goal of preventing civil war and preserving the Union. Ultimately, it fell out of favor during the Civil War.



This was proposed by 2 republicans, it's documented fact and it's time republicans stopped posting disingenuous junk. Blacks know the history and the more you think we are stupid enough to fall for your tale and keep trying to tell it, the more we will refuse to become Republicans.


This man is the new face of White Supremacy......








Yep....Larry Elder. Sad. :(





image-8.png
 
Once again: The 1850s and the southern Dems plots to separate the South from the North has always been taught, as today, in our schools.

This is nothing new.

What is new is that the MAGA and Tea Party Right are now acting like the Southern Dems of the 1850s.


Nope...they never call them democrats.....they call them southerners or Confederates..........trying to hide the democrat party and it's slavery and racism.
 
Once again: The 1850s and the southern Dems plots to separate the South from the North has always been taught, as today, in our schools.

This is nothing new.

What is new is that the MAGA and Tea Party Right are now acting like the Southern Dems of the 1850s.
Cellbollocks /———/ Another sack of horseshyt from our newest troll.

2aguy Nope...they never call them democrats.....they call them southerners or Confederates..........trying to hide the democrat party and it's slavery and racism.

John Edgar Slow Horses: The southerners are always defined as Democrats or Whigs before the Civil War, yes.
 
Cellbollocks /———/ Another sack of horseshyt from our newest troll.

2aguy Nope...they never call them democrats.....they call them southerners or Confederates..........trying to hide the democrat party and it's slavery and racism.

John Edgar Slow Horses: The southerners are always defined as Democrats or Whigs before the Civil War, yes.


Not in school when the address the Civil War....they never mention the democrats were the slave owning party....they always use Southerners or Confederates...
 
John Edgar Slow Horses said:
Cellbollocks /———/ Another sack of horseshyt from our newest troll.

2aguy Nope...they never call them democrats.....they call them southerners or Confederates..........trying to hide the democrat party and it's slavery and racism.

John Edgar Slow Horses: The southerners are always defined as Democrats or Whigs before the Civil War, yes.

2aguy continues to repeat the lie above, but, yes, the politics in the south are always defined as Whigs and Dems (and Know Nothings 1854: I am mentioning that now).
 
The Corwin Amendment? Again?

Well.....that is all you have to protect the democrats.....

The Corwin Amendment was a desperate attempt to stop the deaths of 620,000 Americans when the democrat party started the Civil War to keep blacks as their slaves.....and yet you indict the republican party, to save the democrat party....

And you don't even see how wrong you are........


The key....



You sit in the year 2023......and smugly think you have a grasp of the situation facing the country as the democrat party pushed Civil War to keep blacks as slaves....you really are a child.....

And you defend the democrat party....you accuse the republican party of racism....when the democrat party actually is the party of racism...to this very day.....and you defend it.........the democrat party was created by two slave owners......the democrat party fought to get slavery in new states, and started the Civil war to keep blacks as their slaves......and when the republican party killed enough democrats to make them free their black slaves, the democrats started the black codes, jim crow, the kkk, literacy tests and poll taxes to keep blacks from being free.....

And you defend that party.........you are an idiot....


The Conservative, religious republicans were the abolitionists and the ones who opposed and fought against slavery......you want to focus on the word conservative in order to protect the democrat party...you are a liar and a coward.....and a shill for the racist democrat party.....

You mean Dixiecrats?
 

Forum List

Back
Top