- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
Using airpower and select spec ops missions to kill ISIS terrorists and help the ISF repel them is a better option than letting ISIS take over Iraq or Iran to take over Iraq making a bigger Iran.
Of course I'm sure plenty of liberal and losertarian idiots in this thread spewed their ignorance on this matter based on no experience in the military and watching Hollywood movies as their education on foreign policy/national security matters. Samson afterall is a "5-star General" according to him.
The fucktards never cease to amaze me.
The ISIS mujahideen go to Syria where they are militarily strengthened by the Obama administration which provides them money and materiel in order to oppose Bashar al-Assad.
Then they travel to Iraq where they use their newly found wealth to remove the shiites from power.
US Foreign policy where the (a) left hand does not know what the right is doing and (b) is afflicted by frequent blowbacks.
.
Yeah, it's an awful mess for sure. For some reason Obama became obsessed with getting rid of Assad. It is eerily similar to Bush's obsession with getting rid of Hussein. That obsession has led to Obama funding & arming some very nasty Terror-linked groups in Syria. He clearly strengthened them. And now they're rampaging across Syria and Iraq. It was a huge blunder. Assad's the safer play, and so was Saddam Hussein.