Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be faster for you if you could read. I typically force people to help themselves when possible.Your laughing at your inability to read?Go back to sleep if you cant read.Where do you come up with 99.97%?
That's your answer?
Nope, laughing at your inability to answer a simple question.
.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
If transgendered people using the restroom of their associated gender gave "sexual predators" the "freedom" to "stalk their victims", you'd have a point. Since it doesn't, you don't.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
It absolutely IS misguided law, buts it's the lawmakers that set people up to be labeled as intolerant by passing it.
Obviously someone is helping you. You ask a stupid question when everyone else can see the answer so that means you cant read.It would be faster for you if you could read. I typically force people to help themselves when possible.Your laughing at your inability to read?
Nope, laughing at your inability to answer a simple question.
How is it that I reply to your posts if I cannot read? You may want to rethink your silly position.
.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
If transgendered people using the restroom of their associated gender gave "sexual predators" the "freedom" to "stalk their victims", you'd have a point. Since it doesn't, you don't.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
It absolutely IS misguided law, buts it's the lawmakers that set people up to be labeled as intolerant by passing it.
Transgendered people have always used the restrooms of their choice. No one made an issue of it.
Now, men who look like men can enter the bathroom without question. Yes, these laws make it easier for perverts because no one can question them. It would have sent up red flags before if a guy walked into a ladies room. Now it will be the new norm.
As I said, decency is universal and I hate to see transgender people lumped in with the perverts who seriously outnumber them.
Who called you intolerant because you dont want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims? Are you saying signs on the door will stop a sexual predator from breaking the law?The left would rather that the majority be at risk even though it won't change a thing for transgenders. They live as the gender they identify with, IF they are true transgenders. When I see hairy guys dressed in a vulgar manner, I just don't trust them. Sorry, but that isn't about gender, it's about sex. Decency is a universal thing and no one should tolerate the vulgarity and disrespect from those who choose to dress and behave like porn stars when in public.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.Who called you intolerant because you dont want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims? Are you saying signs on the door will stop a sexual predator from breaking the law?The left would rather that the majority be at risk even though it won't change a thing for transgenders. They live as the gender they identify with, IF they are true transgenders. When I see hairy guys dressed in a vulgar manner, I just don't trust them. Sorry, but that isn't about gender, it's about sex. Decency is a universal thing and no one should tolerate the vulgarity and disrespect from those who choose to dress and behave like porn stars when in public.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
Signs on the door and restrictions of who uses the facility make it obvious when somebody violates those restrictions.
If I see a male walk into a female restroom or shower, I'm notifying the management of the business. If it's a public park or government property, I'm notifying the police.
.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
If transgendered people using the restroom of their associated gender gave "sexual predators" the "freedom" to "stalk their victims", you'd have a point. Since it doesn't, you don't.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
It absolutely IS misguided law, buts it's the lawmakers that set people up to be labeled as intolerant by passing it.
Transgendered people have always used the restrooms of their choice. No one made an issue of it.
Now, men who look like men can enter the bathroom without question. Yes, these laws make it easier for perverts because no one can question them. It would have sent up red flags before if a guy walked into a ladies room. Now it will be the new norm.
As I said, decency is universal and I hate to see transgender people lumped in with the perverts who seriously outnumber them.
Republican lawmakers made an issue out of it because they were pissed about gays marrying.
If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.Who called you intolerant because you dont want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims? Are you saying signs on the door will stop a sexual predator from breaking the law?The left would rather that the majority be at risk even though it won't change a thing for transgenders. They live as the gender they identify with, IF they are true transgenders. When I see hairy guys dressed in a vulgar manner, I just don't trust them. Sorry, but that isn't about gender, it's about sex. Decency is a universal thing and no one should tolerate the vulgarity and disrespect from those who choose to dress and behave like porn stars when in public.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
Signs on the door and restrictions of who uses the facility make it obvious when somebody violates those restrictions.
If I see a male walk into a female restroom or shower, I'm notifying the management of the business. If it's a public park or government property, I'm notifying the police.
I call them guys because I havent talked to all of them and asked what they would prefer to be called. The point is that super sleuth wouldnt be able to tell if they were women or men.If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.Who called you intolerant because you dont want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims? Are you saying signs on the door will stop a sexual predator from breaking the law?The left would rather that the majority be at risk even though it won't change a thing for transgenders. They live as the gender they identify with, IF they are true transgenders. When I see hairy guys dressed in a vulgar manner, I just don't trust them. Sorry, but that isn't about gender, it's about sex. Decency is a universal thing and no one should tolerate the vulgarity and disrespect from those who choose to dress and behave like porn stars when in public.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
Signs on the door and restrictions of who uses the facility make it obvious when somebody violates those restrictions.
If I see a male walk into a female restroom or shower, I'm notifying the management of the business. If it's a public park or government property, I'm notifying the police.
Maybe, but none of those "guys" (and it's interesting you called them guys), will never have a period, never get pregnant, never endure child birth or go through menopause.
It takes more than a pair of fake tits to be a woman.
What civil rights don't you enjoy?
Well..... we're not talking about me.
We're talking about certain people in society who have not had civil rights.
Who? And what are said rights?
Well, the first right would be the right to equality under the law.
If I walk into a shop and I can be refused because someone has decided they don't like me for some reason, then this isn't equality under the law.
If I can't have the same rights to inheritance of my partner, then this isn't equality under the law.
The US Constitution says government has to give you equal protection under the law--not private enterprises.
You don't have free speech at work. You say something to your boss that offends him or her, they can fire you. You don't have free speech at a movie theater. If you stand up while a movie is playing and give the crowd the Bernie Sanders platform, they will escort you out of the movie theater and perhaps have you arrested.
Oh course. Then again I wasn't asked about THE US CONSTITUTION, I was asked about RIGHTS.
So, therefore, I'm talking about rights.
The Constitution forces the US govt to protect rights. It doesn't force citizens to protect rights. However the US govt often makes laws that do protect people's rights. Like the law against murder, for example.
So, there are laws that businesses have been forced to follow by the govt. And some of these laws say they're not allowed to deny someone a service based on race, religion, gender etc.
And, as I have said, rights are limited. There are times and there are places where your free speech is not protected. So....?
Public bathrooms are supplied for a matter of convenience and as such there is no reason they can't be all inclusive.We don't have an inherent right to much of anything other than eating, choice and fuckin Ravi. Hard to guess what your point was..Do we have an inherent right to public restrooms?Individual liberty ends when someone elses liberty is compromised.
In this case, people would have to share the bathrooms when mentally ill grown men.
I am sure a lot of women would feel uncomfortable with that. I wouldn't want my son pissing beside some grown crazy female, either.
I call them guys because I havent talked to all of them and asked what they would prefer to be called. The point is that super sleuth wouldnt be able to tell if they were women or men.If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.Who called you intolerant because you dont want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims? Are you saying signs on the door will stop a sexual predator from breaking the law?The left would rather that the majority be at risk even though it won't change a thing for transgenders. They live as the gender they identify with, IF they are true transgenders. When I see hairy guys dressed in a vulgar manner, I just don't trust them. Sorry, but that isn't about gender, it's about sex. Decency is a universal thing and no one should tolerate the vulgarity and disrespect from those who choose to dress and behave like porn stars when in public.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
Signs on the door and restrictions of who uses the facility make it obvious when somebody violates those restrictions.
If I see a male walk into a female restroom or shower, I'm notifying the management of the business. If it's a public park or government property, I'm notifying the police.
Maybe, but none of those "guys" (and it's interesting you called them guys), will never have a period, never get pregnant, never endure child birth or go through menopause.
It takes more than a pair of fake tits to be a woman.
Yes there is a point. Didnt you read the post I was replying to?I call them guys because I havent talked to all of them and asked what they would prefer to be called. The point is that super sleuth wouldnt be able to tell if they were women or men.If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.Who called you intolerant because you dont want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims? Are you saying signs on the door will stop a sexual predator from breaking the law?
Signs on the door and restrictions of who uses the facility make it obvious when somebody violates those restrictions.
If I see a male walk into a female restroom or shower, I'm notifying the management of the business. If it's a public park or government property, I'm notifying the police.
Maybe, but none of those "guys" (and it's interesting you called them guys), will never have a period, never get pregnant, never endure child birth or go through menopause.
It takes more than a pair of fake tits to be a woman.
Is there a point?
None will ever have a period
None will ever get pregnant
None will endure a childbirth
None will ever go through menopause
All have a penis
You call them women?
Strange world you're from.
.
I am tired of being called intolerant because I don't want sexual predators to have the freedom to stalk their victims.
If transgendered people using the restroom of their associated gender gave "sexual predators" the "freedom" to "stalk their victims", you'd have a point. Since it doesn't, you don't.
This is a misguided law and nothing more than an excuse to label people as intolerant Christians. Any decent person objects to this free for all. Libs used to claim that everything they did, like gun control, was for the children. Where is that concern for the children now? I guess attacking the right takes precedence over the safety of people.
It absolutely IS misguided law, buts it's the lawmakers that set people up to be labeled as intolerant by passing it.
Transgendered people have always used the restrooms of their choice. No one made an issue of it.
Now, men who look like men can enter the bathroom without question. Yes, these laws make it easier for perverts because no one can question them. It would have sent up red flags before if a guy walked into a ladies room. Now it will be the new norm.
As I said, decency is universal and I hate to see transgender people lumped in with the perverts who seriously outnumber them.
Republican lawmakers made an issue out of it because they were pissed about gays marrying.
Yes there is a point. Didnt you read the post I was replying to?I call them guys because I havent talked to all of them and asked what they would prefer to be called. The point is that super sleuth wouldnt be able to tell if they were women or men.If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.Signs on the door and restrictions of who uses the facility make it obvious when somebody violates those restrictions.
If I see a male walk into a female restroom or shower, I'm notifying the management of the business. If it's a public park or government property, I'm notifying the police.
Maybe, but none of those "guys" (and it's interesting you called them guys), will never have a period, never get pregnant, never endure child birth or go through menopause.
It takes more than a pair of fake tits to be a woman.
Is there a point?
None will ever have a period
None will ever get pregnant
None will endure a childbirth
None will ever go through menopause
All have a penis
You call them women?
Strange world you're from.
The point is that he wouldnt be able to spot the men.Yes there is a point. Didnt you read the post I was replying to?I call them guys because I havent talked to all of them and asked what they would prefer to be called. The point is that super sleuth wouldnt be able to tell if they were women or men.If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. There are guys dressed like women that could walk right pass you and you wouldnt be able to tell the difference dummy.
Maybe, but none of those "guys" (and it's interesting you called them guys), will never have a period, never get pregnant, never endure child birth or go through menopause.
It takes more than a pair of fake tits to be a woman.
Is there a point?
None will ever have a period
None will ever get pregnant
None will endure a childbirth
None will ever go through menopause
All have a penis
You call them women?
Strange world you're from.
The rubbish? Yeah sure
What's the point?
I heard you dont want a woman anywhere near you no matter where you are at.Public bathrooms are supplied for a matter of convenience and as such there is no reason they can't be all inclusive.We don't have an inherent right to much of anything other than eating, choice and fuckin Ravi. Hard to guess what your point was..Do we have an inherent right to public restrooms?Individual liberty ends when someone elses liberty is compromised.
In this case, people would have to share the bathrooms when mentally ill grown men.
I am sure a lot of women would feel uncomfortable with that. I wouldn't want my son pissing beside some grown crazy female, either.
Sure there is. I don't even like taking a dump with other guys in the bathroom. I sure as hell don't want a woman in there with me.
The point is that he wouldnt be able to spot the men.Yes there is a point. Didnt you read the post I was replying to?I call them guys because I havent talked to all of them and asked what they would prefer to be called. The point is that super sleuth wouldnt be able to tell if they were women or men.Maybe, but none of those "guys" (and it's interesting you called them guys), will never have a period, never get pregnant, never endure child birth or go through menopause.
It takes more than a pair of fake tits to be a woman.
Is there a point?
None will ever have a period
None will ever get pregnant
None will endure a childbirth
None will ever go through menopause
All have a penis
You call them women?
Strange world you're from.
The rubbish? Yeah sure
What's the point?
