It is confirmed.........Trump is a retard

[Harpy Eagle]

We aren't discussing what the government decided.

Well, yeah we are. We are discussing government sanctioned marriage. Do try and keep up.

Hmmm, no, you may be discussing it, but I'm not. You don't want to discuss the real issue, so you divert by constantly bleating about what the law says. No one is disputing that the Supreme Court ruled that queers have a right to get married.

Well, do tell...what is the real issue?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Faun]

ROFL! It's either right or it's wrong, and you just said it was wrong. Things don't suddenly become right because you didn't get your way. You have admitted that homosexual marriage is not a right, but you call anyone who supports that position a bigot.

You just called yourself a bigot.

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

Yep, before the apple cart was upset everyone could drink out of a drinking fountain, just not the same one. Everyone could ride the bus, just not sit in the same seats.

how much that must pissed you off too!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

ROFL! It's either right or it's wrong, and you just said it was wrong. Things don't suddenly become right because you didn't get your way. You have admitted that homosexual marriage is not a right, but you call anyone who supports that position a bigot.

You just called yourself a bigot.

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

 

[bripat9643]

We aren't discussing what the government decided.

Well, yeah we are. We are discussing government sanctioned marriage. Do try and keep up.

Hmmm, no, you may be discussing it, but I'm not. You don't want to discuss the real issue, so you divert by constantly bleating about what the law says. No one is disputing that the Supreme Court ruled that queers have a right to get married.

Well, do tell...what is the real issue?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The real issue is whether gay marriage is a moral right. It clearly isn't. You certainly don't believe it is because you just said it wasn't. You don't believe in moral rights. You only believe in legal rights.

 

[Faun]

ROFL! It's either right or it's wrong, and you just said it was wrong. Things don't suddenly become right because you didn't get your way. You have admitted that homosexual marriage is not a right, but you call anyone who supports that position a bigot.

You just called yourself a bigot.

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

LOL

It matters not how much they shake their walkers at the government; there’s not a whit they can do about it.

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL! It's either right or it's wrong, and you just said it was wrong. Things don't suddenly become right because you didn't get your way. You have admitted that homosexual marriage is not a right, but you call anyone who supports that position a bigot.

You just called yourself a bigot.

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

The compelling reason is that marriage exists to facilitate the reproduction of the species. Homosexuality is a threat to the continuation of the species. The law shouldn't be promoting something that is a threat to our species.

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL! It's either right or it's wrong, and you just said it was wrong. Things don't suddenly become right because you didn't get your way. You have admitted that homosexual marriage is not a right, but you call anyone who supports that position a bigot.

You just called yourself a bigot.

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

LOL

It matters not how much they shake their walkers at the government; there’s not a whit they can do about it.

Sure there is. All we have to do is stuff the court with people who see things correctly instead of leftwing agenda-driven hacks.

 

[Faun]

ROFL! It's either right or it's wrong, and you just said it was wrong. Things don't suddenly become right because you didn't get your way. You have admitted that homosexual marriage is not a right, but you call anyone who supports that position a bigot.

You just called yourself a bigot.

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

The compelling reason is that marriage exists to facilitate the reproduction of the species. Homosexuality is a threat to the continuation of the species. The law shouldn't be promoting something that is a threat to our species.

Nope, that’s not the reason marriage exists nor does it become the reason marriage exists because a fucking moron like you is simply too retarded to know any better.

 

[bripat9643]

There wasn't the slightest thing unconstitutional about the law as it stood before the SC ruling. Any changes imposed by the SC are therefor new law.

Fucking moron... laws have numbers. What’s the number of this new law you idiotically think was created....

They don't have numbers when judges make them. For instance, what's the number of the law that says a state can't outlaw abortion?

LOLOL

Then it’s not a law. All federal laws are designated with a number.

Thanks for once again admitting you’re a fucking moron.

So are you saying that states can reserve marriage to a couple consisting of two genders?

<smh>

I’m saying you’re a fucking moron. You prove it with virtually every post.

That's our subsitite for logic, apparently.

 

[bripat9643]

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

The compelling reason is that marriage exists to facilitate the reproduction of the species. Homosexuality is a threat to the continuation of the species. The law shouldn't be promoting something that is a threat to our species.

Nope, that’s not the reason marriage exists nor does it become the reason marriage exists because a fucking moron like you is simply too retarded to know any better.

Of course it is. If it wasn't for sex and reproduction, marriage wouldn't exist. The fact is so obvious that you have to be suffering brain damage to deny it. If people didn't reproduce, then what would be the point of marriage?

 

[Faun]

No, I did not. Do try and keep up.

The government has chosen to sanction marriages and offer benefits to to those married. Since the government has chosen to do that, they have to apply it equally.

What is a right is to be treated equally under the law. That is what is now happening, that is what makes you so mad, people you hate are being treated fairly.

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

LOL

It matters not how much they shake their walkers at the government; there’s not a whit they can do about it.

Sure there is. All we have to do is stuff the court with people who see things correctly instead of leftwing agenda-driven hacks.

It doesn’t matter how rightwing the court’s are. No case undo this as there are no grounds upon which a case can proceed.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The real issue is whether gay marriage is a moral right. It clearly isn't. You certainly don't believe it is because you just said it wasn't. You don't believe in moral rights. You only believe in legal rights.

You are correct, there is no such thing as a moral right.

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry, turd, but the applied equally before the SC upset the applecart. Every man and woman in this country was able to get married. If rights are whatever the law says, then if it says queers can't marry someone of the same sex, then they don't have such a right.

”Every man and woman in this country was able to get married.”

Fucking moron... again... heterosexuals could marry the person they love; homosexuals could not. There is no compelling reason for such discrimination. And since marriage is a fundamental right, the Supreme Court decided gays should have equal access towards that fundamental right to legally marry the person of their choice.

Sadly, you’re simply not bright enough to grasp any of that.

The compelling reason for such discrimination is that gay people make people like bripat9643 and p@triot uncomfortable. Everyone has to think like them and look like them and act like them. And they will fight to make that happen till the day they die and the rest of the country celebrates the death of a bigot

LOL

It matters not how much they shake their walkers at the government; there’s not a whit they can do about it.

Sure there is. All we have to do is stuff the court with people who see things correctly instead of leftwing agenda-driven hacks.

It doesn’t matter how rightwing the court’s are. No case undo this as there are no grounds upon which a case can proceed.

Bullshit. An adoption agency could contest it if two queers wanted to adopt and the agency rightly concluded they couldn't provide a normal home environment.

 

[Faun]

Fucking moron... laws have numbers. What’s the number of this new law you idiotically think was created....

They don't have numbers when judges make them. For instance, what's the number of the law that says a state can't outlaw abortion?

LOLOL

Then it’s not a law. All federal laws are designated with a number.

Thanks for once again admitting you’re a fucking moron.

So are you saying that states can reserve marriage to a couple consisting of two genders?

<smh>

I’m saying you’re a fucking moron. You prove it with virtually every post.

That's our subsitite for logic, apparently.

LOLOL

You’re not posting logic. You’re posting homophobic nonsense.

 

[bripat9643]

The real issue is whether gay marriage is a moral right. It clearly isn't. You certainly don't believe it is because you just said it wasn't. You don't believe in moral rights. You only believe in legal rights.

You are correct, there is no such thing as a moral right.

So no injustice was done when slavery was the law of the land?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Of course it is. If it wasn't for sex and reproduction, marriage wouldn't exist. The fact is so obvious that you have to be suffering brain damage to deny it. If people didn't reproduce, then what would be the point of marriage?

To spend the rest of your life with the one that you love and cherish. You do know what love is, right? Do you believe in love?

If the only point of marriage was to reproduce, once that was accomplished there is no reason for the marriage to remain.

 

[bripat9643]

They don't have numbers when judges make them. For instance, what's the number of the law that says a state can't outlaw abortion?

LOLOL

Then it’s not a law. All federal laws are designated with a number.

Thanks for once again admitting you’re a fucking moron.

So are you saying that states can reserve marriage to a couple consisting of two genders?

<smh>

I’m saying you’re a fucking moron. You prove it with virtually every post.

That's our subsitite for logic, apparently.

LOLOL

You’re not posting logic. You’re posting homophobic nonsense.

You're posting queer propaganda, which is pure nonsense. It's hilarious that a guy who claims marriage has nothing to do with reproduction would accuse me of posting nonsense. There has never been a more nonsensical claim posted to this forum than that. Of course, when you defend gay marriage, you are defending an oxymoron, so it's inevitable that you will post nonsense.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The real issue is whether gay marriage is a moral right. It clearly isn't. You certainly don't believe it is because you just said it wasn't. You don't believe in moral rights. You only believe in legal rights.

You are correct, there is no such thing as a moral right.

So no injustice was done when slavery was the law of the land?

Of course an injustice was done, people have an inalienable right to freedom, not a moral right to it.

 

[bripat9643]

Of course it is. If it wasn't for sex and reproduction, marriage wouldn't exist. The fact is so obvious that you have to be suffering brain damage to deny it. If people didn't reproduce, then what would be the point of marriage?

To spend the rest of your life with the one that you love and cherish. You do know what love is, right? Do you believe in love?

If the only point of marriage was to reproduce, once that was accomplished there is no reason for the marriage to remain.

I'm not asking you why an individual might want it. I'm asking what the social purpose is.
As I said, the social purpose of marraige is to provide a healthy nurturing environment for children until they reach adulthood. Any other claims are pure moonshine.