It’s Time to Formally Declare America A Christian Nation.

[Stann]

My beliefs are Jewish beliefs. All Jews would object to a theocracy. Hell, look at the opposition the Ultra-Orthodox have in Israel when they propose their restrictive religious laws. What makes you think Jews would be OK under a restrictive Catholic theocracy.

You just don't like the answer.

It doesn't matter what you say, I believe you're dealing with another " ding " bat. He'll ask you a million questions and no matter how you answer it in the end he's going to attack you and say you are a problem or a threat when they are the problem.

 

[Mashmont]

It doesn't matter what you say, I believe you're dealing with another " ding " bat. He'll ask you a million questions and no matter how you answer it in the end he's going to attack you and say you are a problem or a threat when they are the problem.

Asher has never answered the question.

 

[AsherN]

Asher has never answered the question.

I've answered numerous times. You just don't like my answers.

 

[Mashmont]

I've answered numerous times. You just don't like my answers.

Nope. You've never answered it.

 

[Stann]

Asher has never answered the question.

It was very clear to me that he did. You are either obstinate or you have a comprehension problem. Try to have a good day, I plan on it. And I'm not going to waste my day having a useless conversation with somebody that doesn't know or doesn't want to comprehend what other people are saying they just want to hear their own voice well good for you I hope you can live with that

 

[Mashmont]

It was very clear to me that he did. You are either obstinate or you have a comprehension problem. Try to have a good day, I plan on it. And I'm not going to waste my day having a useless conversation with somebody that doesn't know or doesn't want to comprehend what other people are saying they just want to hear their own voice well good for you I hope you can live with that

OK great. So you can link Asher's post stating which specific teachings of Judaism any of my proposed laws violate. Excellent. We'll all wait for it.

But we know you won't. You'll run like Asher has done. I guarantee it. And then, everytime I see you, I will throw it up in your face how you lied in this post. I will refer to the post number in fact.

 

[AsherN]

OK great. So you can link Asher's post stating which specific teachings of Judaism any of my proposed laws violate. Excellent. We'll all wait for it.

But we know you won't. You'll run like Asher has done. I guarantee it. And then, everytime I see you, I will throw it up in your face how you lied in this post. I will refer to the post number in fact.

You don't like, ot can't comprehend my aanswer.

 

[Stann]

For the sixth time you didn't answer. I don't care what you personally think or what any other person thinks. I want to know which of my proposed laws go againsts official Jewish teaching. Can we all predict you will dodge the question yet again?

He said he was a Jew and he didn't believe in a theological State like you do what more can he say. And I'm sure 99% of the Jews would agree with him.

 

[Mashmont]

He said he was a Jew and he didn't believe in a theological State like you do what more can he say. And I'm sure 99% of the Jews would agree with him.

All you have to do is link where he listed the specific Jewish laws my proposed laws violated. Why can't you? lol.

 

[Mashmont]

You don't like, ot can't comprehend my aanswer.

Name the specific Jewish laws my proposed laws violated. Simple as that.

 

[Stann]

All you have to do is link where he listed the specific Jewish laws my proposed laws violated. Why can't you? lol.

There's something wrong with you. Whether you violated some Jewish law or not it's doesn't matter. Your proposing a theological state and that's the problem. That's what everyone's objecting against. I don't think I've seen one poster that supports you.

 

[Mashmont]

There's something wrong with you. Whether you violated some Jewish law or not it's doesn't matter. Your proposing a theological state and that's the problem. That's what everyone's objecting against. I don't think I've seen one poster that supports you.

You said he answered the question. So you lied. Now you divert. All as I predicted.

 

[Stann]

You said he answered the question. So you lied. Now you divert. All as I predicted.

I'm trying to tell you the nicest way possible that you're confused. He never said you broke some Jewish law. He said he did not support a theocracy, which is what you were proposing wake up already stop being a jerk it doesn't help your case at all in fact you don't have a case I don't even know why we're talking about stupid shit like this it's idiotic. Our country is not a third world country with the lot of religious zealots hanging around trying to subvert the government. We are so much better than that. It's insane for any patriotic American to propose such idiotic garbage. It's in direct contrast to the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees all of us.

 

[AsherN]

I'm trying to tell you the nicest way possible that you're confused. He never said you broke some Jewish law. He said he did not support a theocracy, which is what you were proposing wake up already stop being a jerk it doesn't help your case at all in fact you don't have a case I don't even know why we're talking about stupid shit like this it's idiotic. Our country is not a third world country with the lot of religious zealots hanging around trying to subvert the government. We are so much better than that. It's insane for any patriotic American to propose such idiotic garbage. It's in direct contrast to the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees all of us.

It's actually more than that. Those kinds of laws that restrict the freedom of a large segment of the population and oppress people are against Jewish law. There is a good reason Jews were at the forefront of the Civil Rights movement and why Rabbis marched with Dr. King.

 

[Mashmont]

I'm trying to tell you the nicest way possible that you're confused. He never said you broke some Jewish law. He said he did not support a theocracy, which is what you were proposing wake up already stop being a jerk it doesn't help your case at all in fact you don't have a case I don't even know why we're talking about stupid shit like this it's idiotic. Our country is not a third world country with the lot of religious zealots hanging around trying to subvert the government. We are so much better than that. It's insane for any patriotic American to propose such idiotic garbage. It's in direct contrast to the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees all of us.

He said he disagreed with my proposed laws because he's an observant Jew. So I asked him what Jewish laws they violate. He can't answer. Neither can you.

 

[Stann]

He said he disagreed with my proposed laws because he's an observant Jew. So I asked him what Jewish laws they violate. He can't answer. Neither can you.

Okay, I'm going to stop responding to you. He's obviously a very decent person and you are very obtuse and not a nice person at all. I'm done with you.

 

[Stann]

Okay, I'm going to stop responding to you. He's obviously a very decent person and you are very obtuse and not a nice person at all. I'm done with you.

He said he disagreed with my proposed laws because he's an observant Jew. So I asked him what Jewish laws they violate. He can't answer. Neither can you.

The most important laws you broke were common sense and common decency.

 

[Stann]

Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to formally declare America a Christian nation.

If some of the framers intended to separate Church and state (which is not 100% certain), then it’s time to correct that mistake. it’s time for a Constitutional Amendment to declare Christianity the official belief of the United States. Here’s why:

The intent of any such separation was to prevent any single denomination from dominating or punishing members of another through government. The idea was to be religion-neutral. Noble enough. But the framers made a few critical miscalculations: They incorrectly assumed:

1. That “good” laws and “Christian” laws could be separated. They can’t. There is 100% overlap. You can’t have laws that help the people without them being Christian laws.
2. That a belief vacuum is possible in our laws. It isn’t, because the opposite of religion isn’t nothing; it’s atheism.

That’s right. When you attempt to ban Christian laws, you only allow atheist laws.

Examples:
Forcing Christian groups to pay for abortions and birth control for their employees.
Forcing Christian florists, photographers, and bakers to participate in gay weddings.
Distributing condoms in government schools to teens and preteens, suggesting that sex among these immature and obviously unmarried students is morally acceptable.
Using taxpayer funds to pay for abortions abroad.
Banning the Ten Commandments from government buildings (while flying the rainbow flag).
Banning the Nativity Scenes from government buildings.
Government sanction of Kwanzaa celebrations (a made-up racist ‘holiday’).
Disallowing references to Christmas in the public schools.
Teaching Critical Race Theory (which divides people and promotes hate).
Allowing gay marriage.

This is why the left screeches so loudly about “keeping religion out of government”. It’s because they know their atheism gets free reign if it doesn’t have to compete against Christianity.

The solution is two part: First, BAN atheism and atheistic views from being promoted by all media outlets. We’ve had such decency laws before. Hollywood enacted such standards in 1934 (that have since been repealed, unfortunately). Get rid of all the immoral trash in the movies and TV. Disallow the leftwing media from promoting atheist Marxism and other atheist policies. Then, secondly promote a Constitutional Amendment to make Christianity the official belief of the land. Then we end the abortion debate, the race-baiting issue, and the anti-capitalist pro-socialist issue once and for all. The country would once again be following God’s plan, church attendance would rise again, couples would marry instead of cohabitating, the gay marriage ruling would be repealed, families would stay together and be stronger, children would grow up in two-parent homes, so there would be far less crime. And best of all, ALL Marixst atheist disinformation would be stifled, and our children would stop being poisoned by it.

Let’s do it NOW!!

For your benefit I looked up theocracies in the world. That is what you are proposing. There are seven theocracies in the world. Only one of them is a Christian state and that is the Vatican City. The other seven are all Muslim nations, Mauritania, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran and Afghanistan. All of these have repressive governments, highly restricted freedoms for their citizens, a lot of miscarriages of Justice because of the religious nature of their laws. The best example of which would be murdering gay people just because they're gay people. These nations also have a lot of wars and in fighting among different sects and most have very poor economies. America has come too far and is too great to suffer that kind of a fate. I find it reprehensible that anyone would even suggest such a thing. I am very patriotic I served in the Air Force and I know freedom is very valuable and not anything to mess with.

 

[AsherN]

For your benefit I looked up theocracies in the world. That is what you are proposing. There are seven theocracies in the world. Only one of them is a Christian state and that is the Vatican City. The other seven are all Muslim nations, Mauritania, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran and Afghanistan. All of these have repressive governments, highly restricted freedoms for their citizens, a lot of miscarriages of Justice because of the religious nature of their laws. The best example of which would be murdering gay people just because they're gay people. These nations also have a lot of wars and in fighting among different sects and most have very poor economies. America has come too far and is too great to suffer that kind of a fate. I find it reprehensible that anyone would even suggest such a thing. I am very patriotic I served in the Air Force and I know freedom is very valuable and not anything to mess with.

Waiting for the "they're Muzzies. Catholics are perfect".

A theocracy is a theocracy. The only way it can exist is by brutal repression of dissent. The Vatican is different because they are not a country in the traditional way. And they have no religious minorities.

 

[Mashmont]

For your benefit I looked up theocracies in the world. That is what you are proposing. There are seven theocracies in the world. Only one of them is a Christian state and that is the Vatican City. The other seven are all Muslim nations, Mauritania, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran and Afghanistan. All of these have repressive governments, highly restricted freedoms for their citizens, a lot of miscarriages of Justice because of the religious nature of their laws. The best example of which would be murdering gay people just because they're gay people. These nations also have a lot of wars and in fighting among different sects and most have very poor economies. America has come too far and is too great to suffer that kind of a fate. I find it reprehensible that anyone would even suggest such a thing. I am very patriotic I served in the Air Force and I know freedom is very valuable and not anything to mess with.

I said Christian. Muslim countries aren't Christian.