- Thread starter
- #1,641
The immorality was immoral acts and harming others collaterally by those immoral acts.The immorality was living a lie and hurting women and children.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The immorality was immoral acts and harming others collaterally by those immoral acts.The immorality was living a lie and hurting women and children.
In your opinionThe immorality was immoral acts and harming others collaterally by those immoral acts.
Gay sex and any illicit sex are immoral because they lead to objectively bad consequences. That's just the facts.Agreed. Gay sex in and of itself in not immoral
That is your opinionGay sex and any illicit sex are immoral because they lead to objectively bad consequences. That's just the facts.
Would anybody argue that the AIDS epidemic was very bad? A disproportionate number of HIV cases involve gay sex. And every single instance of HIV is traceable to illicit sex, most directly, some indirectly. That's the just the facts.That is your opinion
No they are not and no they do not
That is my opinion
Would anybody argue that the AIDS epidemic was very bad? The majority of HIV cases in the US involved gay sex. And every single instance of HIV is traceable to illicit sex, most directly, some indirectly. That's the just the facts.
Likewise every single instance of VD --in addition to HIV--is and was traceable to illicit sex, either directly or indirectly. That makes my point even stronger.Veneral diseases were around long before aids. Syphilis killed many straight people
Monogamous gay sex is no more likely to produce veneral disease than monogamous straight sex
That is fact not opinion
No. There is no evidence of that at all.Likewise every single instance of VD --in addition to HIV--is and was traceable to illicit sex, either directly or indirectly. That makes my point even stronger.
Could you give an example of how HIV or VD could be contracted in a manner that isn't traceable to an act of illicit sex?No. There is no evidence of that at all.
I dismiss your claim
IV drug useCould you give an example of how HIV or VD could be contracted in a manner that isn't traceable to an act of illicit sex?
But basically you are saying you have a problem with illicit sex....not specifically gay or straight sex
And again your problem is with illicit sex....not gay sex
The rare instances of infection of HIV by IV drug use or transfusions is traceable to those who had illicit sex then infected a needle and/or blood.IV drug use
Blood transfusion
Needle stick
Is that enough? You must PROVE the origin was always from sex
And again your problem is with illicit sex....not gay sex
Much like it was curious that syphilis was overwhelmingly involved with heterosexualsBut isn't it curious why HIV cases have overwhelmingly involved homosexuals? If there is no difference, then why the disproportion of gays?
That is a claim I see no evidence forInfection of HIV by IV drug use is traceable to those who had illicit sex then infected a needle.
I'll ask again. Why have HIV patients been overwhelmingly homosexuals?Regardless your problem is with illicit sex not gay sex
That's incorrect. The vast majority of syphilis cases in the US involve homosexuals.Much like it was curious that syphilis was overwhelmingly involved with heterosexuals
That's incorrect. The vast majority of syphilis cases in the US involve homosexuals.
Ok prove that claimThat's incorrect. The vast majority of syphilis cases in the US involve homosexuals.
I'll ask again. Why are the vast majority of syphilis cases for centuries overwhelmingly heterosexual?I'll ask again. Why have HIV patients been overwhelmingly homosexuals?
Nature defines it. It doesn't matter what you or I say about it. Bad consequences result from immorality. That's the way it is.
In 2014, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men accounted for 83% of primary and secondary syphilis cases where sex of sex partner was known in the United States.Ok prove that claim