Ivermectin will be available without a prescription for Covid-19 treatment...

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[munkle]

Also bleach doesn't need a prescription.

Can you answer these studies rather than make childish remarks? Let's take it one step further. If the government and media have been lying to you about Ivermectin, what else have they been lying about?

COVID cases and deaths in Chiapas Mexico after Ivermectin Program. Source: “Epidemiologic Analysis on Ivermectin in COVID-19, July 2021”

FROM

https://ivmmeta.com/

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 82 studies
Covid Analysis, Apr 9, 2022, Version 186 [Together Trial analysis, Strongyloides, BBC, GMK]


•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 53 studies from 48 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (39 primary outcome, 36 most serious outcome).

•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 63% [53‑72%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

•Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 54 of 82 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.

•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 24% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm. Multiple treatments are typically used in combination, which may be significantly more effective.

•No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Denying the efficacy of treatments increases mortality, morbidity, collateral damage, and endemic risk.

•Over 20 countries have adopted ivermectin for COVID-19. The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.

•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.

Evidence base used for other COVID-19 approvals
Medication	Studies	Patients	Improvement
Molnupiravir (UK)	1	775	50%
Budesonide (UK)	1	1,779	17%
Remdesivir (USA EUA)	1	1,063	31%
Casirivimab/i.. (USA EUA)	1	799	66%
Ivermectin evidence	82	129,808	64% [56‑71%]

HIGHLIGHTS

Ivermectin reduces risk for COVID-19 with very high confidence for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, progression, recovery, cases, viral clearance, and in pooled analysis.

We show traditional outcome specific analyses and combined evidence from all studies, incorporating treatment delay, a primary confounding factor in COVID-19 studies.

Real-time updates and corrections, transparent analysis with all results in the same format, consistent protocol for 40 treatments.


MORE >>> https://ivmmeta.com/


US Military Documents: Ivermectin “Works Throughout All Phases of Illness”

 

[Who_Me?]

COVID cases and deaths in Chiapas Mexico after Ivermectin Program. Source: “Epidemiologic Analysis on Ivermectin in COVID-19, July 2021”

FROM

https://ivmmeta.com/

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 82 studies
Covid Analysis, Apr 9, 2022, Version 186 [Together Trial analysis, Strongyloides, BBC, GMK]


•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 53 studies from 48 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (39 primary outcome, 36 most serious outcome).

•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 63% [53‑72%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

•Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 54 of 82 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.

•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 24% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm. Multiple treatments are typically used in combination, which may be significantly more effective.

•No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Denying the efficacy of treatments increases mortality, morbidity, collateral damage, and endemic risk.

•Over 20 countries have adopted ivermectin for COVID-19. The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.

•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.

Evidence base used for other COVID-19 approvals
Medication	Studies	Patients	Improvement
Molnupiravir (UK)	1	775	50%
Budesonide (UK)	1	1,779	17%
Remdesivir (USA EUA)	1	1,063	31%
Casirivimab/i.. (USA EUA)	1	799	66%
Ivermectin evidence	82	129,808	64% [56‑71%]

HIGHLIGHTS

Ivermectin reduces risk for COVID-19 with very high confidence for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, progression, recovery, cases, viral clearance, and in pooled analysis.

We show traditional outcome specific analyses and combined evidence from all studies, incorporating treatment delay, a primary confounding factor in COVID-19 studies.

Real-time updates and corrections, transparent analysis with all results in the same format, consistent protocol for 40 treatments.


MORE >>> https://ivmmeta.com/


US Military Documents: Ivermectin “Works Throughout All Phases of Illness”

Did you draw that graph yourself?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

REALLY JACK? Do I really need to go back and pull up all the posts of the past day showing again all the questions I've asked you in the past 24 hours you've totally ignored? Maybe you just can't read for shit. Are you a bot, Jack?

How about this: For every question I can produce since yesterday I've asked, you must pay the USMB another $100 each or be banned one year for each question ignored. Let's get a mod involved Jack to police this. Could be a $1500 fellswoop for the forum!

Since you claim I haven't asked you anything, you should be eager to take that bet!!!

Oh, and, if I can't produce even one question you've ignored the past day, I will leave this forum forever. Fair?

Go for it, asshat. You don't have the testicular fortitude to start your voter fraud thread. Why would I think you could deliver ANYTHING except blustering and bravado?

You are a cuck. End of story.

Oh, and while we are busy staying on the subject of Ivermectin...it doesn't help COVID-19.
Here's another source for ya.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869

 

[otto105]

Can you answer these studies rather than make childish remarks? Let's take it one step further. If the government and media have been lying to you about Ivermectin, what else have they been lying about?

COVID cases and deaths in Chiapas Mexico after Ivermectin Program. Source: “Epidemiologic Analysis on Ivermectin in COVID-19, July 2021”

FROM

https://ivmmeta.com/

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 82 studies
Covid Analysis, Apr 9, 2022, Version 186 [Together Trial analysis, Strongyloides, BBC, GMK]


•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 53 studies from 48 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (39 primary outcome, 36 most serious outcome).

•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 63% [53‑72%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

•Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 54 of 82 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.

•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 24% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm. Multiple treatments are typically used in combination, which may be significantly more effective.

•No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Denying the efficacy of treatments increases mortality, morbidity, collateral damage, and endemic risk.

•Over 20 countries have adopted ivermectin for COVID-19. The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.

•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.

Evidence base used for other COVID-19 approvals
Medication	Studies	Patients	Improvement
Molnupiravir (UK)	1	775	50%
Budesonide (UK)	1	1,779	17%
Remdesivir (USA EUA)	1	1,063	31%
Casirivimab/i.. (USA EUA)	1	799	66%
Ivermectin evidence	82	129,808	64% [56‑71%]

HIGHLIGHTS

Ivermectin reduces risk for COVID-19 with very high confidence for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, progression, recovery, cases, viral clearance, and in pooled analysis.

We show traditional outcome specific analyses and combined evidence from all studies, incorporating treatment delay, a primary confounding factor in COVID-19 studies.

Real-time updates and corrections, transparent analysis with all results in the same format, consistent protocol for 40 treatments.


MORE >>> https://ivmmeta.com/


US Military Documents: Ivermectin “Works Throughout All Phases of Illness”

Because your posted stats are fake.

The website is fake.

 

[badger2]

... In Tennessee...

Ivermectin on its way to becoming available without prescription in Tennessee

Ivermectin will soon be available for the treatment or covid19 without a prescription in Tennessee.

www.wsmv.com

Good news. Hope Missouri follows suit...

Two years late, unfortunately.

 

[badger2]

You most likely then had an infection of the Omicron variant which is very mild whether treated or not.

The good news is that if it was Omicron you're going to have much stronger and longer lasting immunity than any of the vaccines provide.

You are not educated well enough on the subject to flap your lips about it. Scientific fact: Omicron mutation N969K is a vaccine-linked mutation.

 

[gipper]

The vaccines were never intended to be a cure.

Did you miss Old Joe saying that taking the jab means never getting Covid?

Plus taking it does appear to weaken your immune system according to this…so you can catch Covid. A win-win for big pharma and eugenicists like Billy Gates.

It doesn’t get any more insane than this: the more you vaccinate, the greater your chance of getting COVID. Vaccinate 3 times and your risk of getting COVID is 3 times worse than an unvaccinated person.

Government data from Australia, New Zealand, the UK, shows that the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to being infected:

1. The Covid-19 Scam & Vaccines (see section entitled “Fully-vaccinated infected at twice the rate of the un-vaccinated” for the UK data)
2. NZ Ministry of Health data shows Triple Vaccinated are now more Vulnerable to Covid Infection and Hospitalisation than the Unvaccinated
3. Record breaking wave of Covid-19 across Australia sees deaths 1700% higher than the start of the Pandemic; & the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 of them
4. UK Government COVID-19 vaccine surveillance reports: Look for Table 13 or 14 entitled: ”Unadjusted rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation and death in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.” For Weeks 4 and beyond, look at the first two columns. You’ll see that the numbers get worse and worse and worse over time. There is no way to explain this effect other than the vaccine is making people more and more susceptible to infection over time, likely by destroying our natural immunity. Here is the most recent table (from Week 13):
5. The More You Vax, the Weaker Your Immune System Becomes - LewRockwell

 

[eagle1462010]

Go for it, asshat. You don't have the testicular fortitude to start your voter fraud thread. Why would I think you could deliver ANYTHING except blustering and bravado?

You are a cuck. End of story.

Oh, and while we are busy staying on the subject of Ivermectin...it doesn't help COVID-19.
Here's another source for ya.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869

Rest of the world calls you a troll Loser. Rightfully so Were you drooped on your head at birth or did the jab fry your brain?

 

[Lesh]

Ivermectin advocates often cite "dozens" of studies that show benefits of ivermectin in combating COVID-19, but a closer look at the studies shows that some of them have been retracted for flawed or fabricated data and analysis, while many randomized trials have shown no benefits. There have been some small studies that did suggest positive effects of ivermectin on treating COVID-19 patients, but no large, rigorous, randomized controlled trial has shown that ivermectin is effective at treating or preventing COVID-19, medical experts say.



The general consensus in the medical community now is that there's not enough data to recommend ivermectin for routine use as a COVID-19 treatment, said Dr. Adrian Hernandez, professor of medicine and vice dean and executive director of Duke Clinical Research Institute, who is leading a nationwide clinical trial on potential treatments for COVID-19. And doctors point out that there are side effect risks with any pharmaceuticals, so using the medication for unintended purposes may be dangerous.

But have at it. Deworm yourself instead of getting vaccinated as hundreds of millions have done successfully...because Russian sock puppets tell you to

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Rest of the world calls you a troll Loser. Rightfully so Were you drooped on your head at birth or did the jab fry your brain?

Stay out of it. My little shadow wants to be a pain in the ass. It's none of your concern.

 

[eagle1462010]

Ivermectin advocates often cite "dozens" of studies that show benefits of ivermectin in combating COVID-19, but a closer look at the studies shows that some of them have been retracted for flawed or fabricated data and analysis, while many randomized trials have shown no benefits. There have been some small studies that did suggest positive effects of ivermectin on treating COVID-19 patients, but no large, rigorous, randomized controlled trial has shown that ivermectin is effective at treating or preventing COVID-19, medical experts say.



The general consensus in the medical community now is that there's not enough data to recommend ivermectin for routine use as a COVID-19 treatment, said Dr. Adrian Hernandez, professor of medicine and vice dean and executive director of Duke Clinical Research Institute, who is leading a nationwide clinical trial on potential treatments for COVID-19. And doctors point out that there are side effect risks with any pharmaceuticals, so using the medication for unintended purposes may be dangerous.

But have at it. Deworm yourself instead of getting vaccinated as hundreds of millions have done successfully...because Russian sock puppets tell you to

9 out of 10 people working at Pfizer agrees with you. Other guy is on coffee break

 

[eagle1462010]

Stay out of it. My little shadow wants to be a pain in the ass. It's none of your concern.

Then go post in traffic.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Did you miss Old Joe saying that taking the jab means never getting Covid?

Plus taking it does appear to weaken your immune system according to this…so you can catch Covid. A win-win for big pharma and eugenicists like Billy Gates.

It doesn’t get any more insane than this: the more you vaccinate, the greater your chance of getting COVID. Vaccinate 3 times and your risk of getting COVID is 3 times worse than an unvaccinated person.

Government data from Australia, New Zealand, the UK, shows that the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to being infected:

1. The Covid-19 Scam & Vaccines (see section entitled “Fully-vaccinated infected at twice the rate of the un-vaccinated” for the UK data)
2. NZ Ministry of Health data shows Triple Vaccinated are now more Vulnerable to Covid Infection and Hospitalisation than the Unvaccinated
3. Record breaking wave of Covid-19 across Australia sees deaths 1700% higher than the start of the Pandemic; & the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 of them
4. UK Government COVID-19 vaccine surveillance reports: Look for Table 13 or 14 entitled: ”Unadjusted rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation and death in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.” For Weeks 4 and beyond, look at the first two columns. You’ll see that the numbers get worse and worse and worse over time. There is no way to explain this effect other than the vaccine is making people more and more susceptible to infection over time, likely by destroying our natural immunity. Here is the most recent table (from Week 13):
5. The More You Vax, the Weaker Your Immune System Becomes - LewRockwell

Spreading lies like this kills people.
1.https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-britain/fact-check-vaccinated-people-in-britain-are-not-dying-at-a-higher-rate-than-the-unvaccinated-idUSL1N2RP28I
2. & 3. Thanks to their high vaccination rates both populations have recently spiked to worldwide significant infection rates for the first time due to the Omicron variant. Both then show spikes in deaths rates and are currently declining.
4. & 5. Typical politically motivated statistical lying.
Each respective government obviously says otherwise.. because they must remain accountable to the people, not bunches of wackos.

 

[Ghost1776]

Ivermectin doesn't help with COVID.

Lmfao WRONG!
and REDESIVIR ( death is near ) it killed lead singer of Queen Freddy Mercury I think was his name.

 

[gipper]

Spreading lies like this kills people.
1.https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-britain/fact-check-vaccinated-people-in-britain-are-not-dying-at-a-higher-rate-than-the-unvaccinated-idUSL1N2RP28I
2. & 3. Thanks to their high vaccination rates both populations have recently spiked to worldwide significant infection rates for the first time due to the Omicron variant. Both then show spikes in deaths rates and are currently declining.
4. & 5. Typical politically motivated statistical lying.
Each respective government obviously says otherwise.. because they must remain accountable to the people, not bunches of wackos.

Well then, our government, media, big pharma, and our medical establishment are killing people. After all, they’ve lied repeatedly.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Well then, our government, media, big pharma, and our medical establishment are killing people. After all, they’ve lied repeatedly.

That's your excuse? Both sides do it?

 

[gipper]

That's your excuse? Both sides do it?

But one side has all the motives. Do you see it?

 

[Grumblenuts]

But one side has all the motives. Do you see it?

Having no motive to lie makes it okay?

 

[Zincwarrior]

But one side has all the motives. Do you see it?

Can you confirm the countries which use it as a standard course of treatment for Covid? That would be helpful to see how they do vs. countries that do not.