Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Derp....Nothing is dropped until he rules so. Hence the petition for him to do so.
Bwuhahahahaha
Educate yourself. The case has been dropped. Sullivan can not change that. He is attempting to still punish Sullivan through a contempt of court order - or more if he can (which he can't). He can NOT force the DOJ to UN-DROP the case.
Bwuhahahahaha
Educate yourself. The case has been dropped. Sullivan can not change that. He is attempting to still punish Sullivan through a contempt of court order - or more if he can (which he can't). He can NOT force the DOJ to UN-DROP the case.
By all appearances my guess is Sullivan is going to unload on Powell, Flynn, and the DoJ. If justice is to be served Flynn will get the maximum amount of time allowable, Powell will get a reprimand from the ABA for willful misconduct, and Barr will be excoriated (clearly he should be impeached or fired) for disgracing the DoJ.
How you wish it were so.By all appearances you're engaging in your own ignorant bias. The judiciary can't prosecute, nor can they tell the prosecutors who and when to prosecute. The DOJ dropped the case. That's it. It's over.
Wrong.The judge is in no legal position to say otherwise.
How you wish it were so.By all appearances you're engaging in your own ignorant bias. The judiciary can't prosecute, nor can they tell the prosecutors who and when to prosecute. The DOJ dropped the case. That's it. It's over.
Would Trumpletards like to know why Sullivan has explored the possibility of charging Flynn with perjury relative to his plea agreement?
On November 30, 2017, Mr. Flynn affirmed: “I have read every word of this [SOF], or have had it read to me. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, after consulting with my attorneys, I agree and stipulate to this [SOF], and declare under penalty of perjury that it is true and correct.” SOF, ECF No. 4 at 6. Mr. Flynn’s attorney acknowledged the same. Id.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000016f-109b-d105-af6f-97bb428b0000
Because..........."I agree and stipulate to this [SOF], and declare under penalty of perjury that it is true and correct.”
Meaning that the claims he is making now indicate he lied under penalty of perjury when he confessed. Flynn needs to decide with lie to stick with.
Got it?
No, they dropped the charges.Derp....Nothing is dropped until he rules so. Hence the petition for him to do so.
Bwuhahahahaha
Educate yourself. The case has been dropped. Sullivan can not change that. He is attempting to still punish Sullivan through a contempt of court order - or more if he can (which he can't). He can NOT force the DOJ to UN-DROP the case.
Bwuhahahahaha
Educate yourself. The case has been dropped. Sullivan can not change that. He is attempting to still punish Sullivan through a contempt of court order - or more if he can (which he can't). He can NOT force the DOJ to UN-DROP the case.
They have petioned the judge to drop the charges, dope.
Sullivan is under no obligation to accept their rationale for doing so.
"Whatever?" There is a difference. As far as your claim that the Logan Act can't touch a transition team ... link?Whatever, not convicted. They weren’t apart of the translation team, again a legally recognized governmental entity for half a century at this point. So how tf does the Logan act apply in this case? Lisa page knew she couldn’t use the Logan act at this time as well. It’s silly I’m having to make these points. Once again, the SCO decided to drop this case. Can we stop pretending like Barr is in his secret lair stroking a cat, laughing maniacally while giving an evil monologue to a captured agent 007, about his evil plan to drop charges on Flynn."No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument."You keep posting this BS from Mcgown at lawfareblog. Are you telling me it’s her point that it was in the US interest for russia to escalate, and or fuck over Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East? Also, she’s citing the Logan act as justification which even Paige knew at the time wasn’t a valid avenue for investigation. A. The transition is a legally recognized governmental entity since 1968, which Flynn was a part of. B. No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument. She knows this. You know this. Yet you keep throwing it out there."Key to the Justice Department’s argument in its motion to dismiss is the fact that, after four months of investigation without finding any derogatory information, the FBI was prepared to close its case on Flynn. A draft internal FBI document dated Jan. 4, 2017, shows that the bureau had sketched out a memo closing the probe, though the document includes the usual caveat that if new information were identified, the FBI would consider reopening the investigation.BULLSHIT - the focus of your last posts has been solely on the FBI and its case THAT HAS BEEN DROPPED
But before the case was actually closed, the FBI learned that Flynn had spoken to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in late December 2016. According to the Justice Department’s motion, the FBI had transcripts of the relevant calls, likely obtained through surveillance of Kislyak authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. By this time, Flynn had been named as Trump’s national security adviser.
In those calls, Flynn had asked Russia not to retaliate for sanctions imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for election interference. Flynn had also asked Russia to vote against a United Nations resolution regarding Israeli settlements. On their face, these calls potentially undermined the foreign policy of the United States. What’s more, on Jan. 15, 2017, Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect, made public statements that contradicted the transcripts of Flynn’s calls— a fact that, as documented in the Mueller report, “alarmed senior DOJ [Department of Justice] officials.” And so, the FBI decided to keep the investigation open. FBI agents interviewed Flynn on Jan. 24, four days after Trump took office. During that interview, Flynn falsely denied his statements regarding sanctions and the U.N. vote. He later pleaded guilty to one count of false statements for telling these lies."
Why the Flynn Interview Was Predicated
The Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is flawed in many ways, but one of its weakest arguments is that the investigation of Flynn was not properly “predicated.”www.lawfareblog.com
Bullshit.
2 people have been charged.
LOLOLSo what? Flynn is still a convicted felon. That's out of the hands of the DoJ.Derp....Nothing is dropped until he rules so. Hence the petition for him to do so.
Bwuhahahahaha
Educate yourself. The case has been dropped. Sullivan can not change that. He is attempting to still punish Sullivan through a contempt of court order - or more if he can (which he can't). He can NOT force the DOJ to UN-DROP the case.
Since sentencing has no taken place, the DOJ has the power to drop the case. It most definitely is NOT out of their hands.
Serious question: in light of the many examples of investigatory and prosecutorial misconduct by the FBI and DOJ in the Flynn case, clearly his rights to due process were repeatedly violated. Criminal cases have been thrown out of court time and again across this country . More over, no judge has the right to assume the prosecution of a defendant, nor ask for 3rd party briefs in a criminal case. The Far Left Lawfare website can offer their opinions, but the truth is that Sullivan is usurping executive powers that the Constituion does not allow him to do. What was done to Flynn was a travesty of justice that never should ave happened and should be dropped, as AG Barr has done.
LOL2 people in over 200 years. ZERO convictions."No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument."You keep posting this BS from Mcgown at lawfareblog. Are you telling me it’s her point that it was in the US interest for russia to escalate, and or fuck over Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East? Also, she’s citing the Logan act as justification which even Paige knew at the time wasn’t a valid avenue for investigation. A. The transition is a legally recognized governmental entity since 1968, which Flynn was a part of. B. No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument. She knows this. You know this. Yet you keep throwing it out there."Key to the Justice Department’s argument in its motion to dismiss is the fact that, after four months of investigation without finding any derogatory information, the FBI was prepared to close its case on Flynn. A draft internal FBI document dated Jan. 4, 2017, shows that the bureau had sketched out a memo closing the probe, though the document includes the usual caveat that if new information were identified, the FBI would consider reopening the investigation.BULLSHIT - the focus of your last posts has been solely on the FBI and its case THAT HAS BEEN DROPPED
But before the case was actually closed, the FBI learned that Flynn had spoken to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in late December 2016. According to the Justice Department’s motion, the FBI had transcripts of the relevant calls, likely obtained through surveillance of Kislyak authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. By this time, Flynn had been named as Trump’s national security adviser.
In those calls, Flynn had asked Russia not to retaliate for sanctions imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for election interference. Flynn had also asked Russia to vote against a United Nations resolution regarding Israeli settlements. On their face, these calls potentially undermined the foreign policy of the United States. What’s more, on Jan. 15, 2017, Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect, made public statements that contradicted the transcripts of Flynn’s calls— a fact that, as documented in the Mueller report, “alarmed senior DOJ [Department of Justice] officials.” And so, the FBI decided to keep the investigation open. FBI agents interviewed Flynn on Jan. 24, four days after Trump took office. During that interview, Flynn falsely denied his statements regarding sanctions and the U.N. vote. He later pleaded guilty to one count of false statements for telling these lies."
Why the Flynn Interview Was Predicated
The Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is flawed in many ways, but one of its weakest arguments is that the investigation of Flynn was not properly “predicated.”
Bullshit.
2 people have been charged.
Next?
LOLSullivan is lawyering up. The only thing he has proven is he doesn't follow the law.LOLI was talking about the DOJ'S motion and your lies about it, dope. here's your outrage over others bickering about whether the FBI'S investigation was open or not. That's gone on for pages. We know you're just trying to silence me because you can't handle me.
Once AGAIN you are attempting to make the focus of the thread about something that has already happened - the DOJ has dropped the case. It's a dead issue. Sullivan and his anti-Trump thugs can not change that. What SULLIVAN is attempting to do, however, is to do whatever he can to continue to target and punish Flynn....to include ignore the Appellate Court's order and lawyer up.
Sullivan is proving it's not a dead issue. It matters not that the DoJ wants the case dismissed -- Flynn's already a convicted felon. All that remains is sentencing him. Hopefully, Sullivan commences with that rather than giving in to the DoJ's request.
And .... it's still a law on the books and still Constitutional and can still be used to charge anyone who violates it."No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument."You keep posting this BS from Mcgown at lawfareblog. Are you telling me it’s her point that it was in the US interest for russia to escalate, and or fuck over Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East? Also, she’s citing the Logan act as justification which even Paige knew at the time wasn’t a valid avenue for investigation. A. The transition is a legally recognized governmental entity since 1968, which Flynn was a part of. B. No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument. She knows this. You know this. Yet you keep throwing it out there."Key to the Justice Department’s argument in its motion to dismiss is the fact that, after four months of investigation without finding any derogatory information, the FBI was prepared to close its case on Flynn. A draft internal FBI document dated Jan. 4, 2017, shows that the bureau had sketched out a memo closing the probe, though the document includes the usual caveat that if new information were identified, the FBI would consider reopening the investigation.BULLSHIT - the focus of your last posts has been solely on the FBI and its case THAT HAS BEEN DROPPED
But before the case was actually closed, the FBI learned that Flynn had spoken to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in late December 2016. According to the Justice Department’s motion, the FBI had transcripts of the relevant calls, likely obtained through surveillance of Kislyak authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. By this time, Flynn had been named as Trump’s national security adviser.
In those calls, Flynn had asked Russia not to retaliate for sanctions imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for election interference. Flynn had also asked Russia to vote against a United Nations resolution regarding Israeli settlements. On their face, these calls potentially undermined the foreign policy of the United States. What’s more, on Jan. 15, 2017, Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect, made public statements that contradicted the transcripts of Flynn’s calls— a fact that, as documented in the Mueller report, “alarmed senior DOJ [Department of Justice] officials.” And so, the FBI decided to keep the investigation open. FBI agents interviewed Flynn on Jan. 24, four days after Trump took office. During that interview, Flynn falsely denied his statements regarding sanctions and the U.N. vote. He later pleaded guilty to one count of false statements for telling these lies."
Why the Flynn Interview Was Predicated
The Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is flawed in many ways, but one of its weakest arguments is that the investigation of Flynn was not properly “predicated.”
Bullshit.
2 people have been charged.
One person in 1802, the other in 1852, neither convicted. This is an antiquated bullshit law that no prosecutor would ever bring to court and no judge would ever allow. It's constitutionality is questionable at best, due to it's vagueness. Which is why no one has ever been convicted under that law.
The judge does not have to vacate Flynn's guilty plea. It's within his power to first determine if the prosecution acted in good-faith in dropping the charges. Which is why he leaned on Gleeson to submit an amicus brief on that very matter.By all appearances my guess is Sullivan is going to unload on Powell, Flynn, and the DoJ. If justice is to be served Flynn will get the maximum amount of time allowable, Powell will get a reprimand from the ABA for willful misconduct, and Barr will be excoriated (clearly he should be impeached or fired) for disgracing the DoJ.
By all appearances you're engaging in your own ignorant bias. The judiciary can't prosecute, nor can they tell the prosecutors who and when to prosecute. The DOJ dropped the case. That's it. It's over. The judge is in no legal position to say otherwise. It doesn't matter if he thinks Flynn is guilty. That is the reason why he is being ordered by the Appeals Court to explain his lack of action.
For the 50th fucking time, the presidential transition team is a legal governmental entity since 1968. Flynn was incapable of violating the Logan act since he named incoming NSA. The dirtier brass of the FBI had to try to use the Logan act to justify why they were still “investigating” Flynn after they determined he was not a Russian asset. You cannot be investigated indefinitely.Who gives a shit? He wasn't charged with violating the Logan Act though I suspect he knew he had broken it when he lied to the FBI. He was charged with, and admitted to, lying to cover up the subject of his conversation with Kislyak.One person in 1802, the other in 1852, neither convicted. This is an antiquated bullshit law that no prosecutor would ever bring to court and no judge would ever allow. It's constitutionality is questionable at best, due to it's vagueness. Which is why no one has ever been convicted under that law.
Jesus Christ, the rest of the left has given up on the Logan act BS. They are now trying to retroactively say he could’ve been blackmailed by the Russians for lying. I know the lefts arguments better than you fucks.And .... it's still a law on the books and still Constitutional and can still be used to charge anyone who violates it."No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument."You keep posting this BS from Mcgown at lawfareblog. Are you telling me it’s her point that it was in the US interest for russia to escalate, and or fuck over Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East? Also, she’s citing the Logan act as justification which even Paige knew at the time wasn’t a valid avenue for investigation. A. The transition is a legally recognized governmental entity since 1968, which Flynn was a part of. B. No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument. She knows this. You know this. Yet you keep throwing it out there."Key to the Justice Department’s argument in its motion to dismiss is the fact that, after four months of investigation without finding any derogatory information, the FBI was prepared to close its case on Flynn. A draft internal FBI document dated Jan. 4, 2017, shows that the bureau had sketched out a memo closing the probe, though the document includes the usual caveat that if new information were identified, the FBI would consider reopening the investigation.BULLSHIT - the focus of your last posts has been solely on the FBI and its case THAT HAS BEEN DROPPED
But before the case was actually closed, the FBI learned that Flynn had spoken to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in late December 2016. According to the Justice Department’s motion, the FBI had transcripts of the relevant calls, likely obtained through surveillance of Kislyak authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. By this time, Flynn had been named as Trump’s national security adviser.
In those calls, Flynn had asked Russia not to retaliate for sanctions imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for election interference. Flynn had also asked Russia to vote against a United Nations resolution regarding Israeli settlements. On their face, these calls potentially undermined the foreign policy of the United States. What’s more, on Jan. 15, 2017, Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect, made public statements that contradicted the transcripts of Flynn’s calls— a fact that, as documented in the Mueller report, “alarmed senior DOJ [Department of Justice] officials.” And so, the FBI decided to keep the investigation open. FBI agents interviewed Flynn on Jan. 24, four days after Trump took office. During that interview, Flynn falsely denied his statements regarding sanctions and the U.N. vote. He later pleaded guilty to one count of false statements for telling these lies."
Why the Flynn Interview Was Predicated
The Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is flawed in many ways, but one of its weakest arguments is that the investigation of Flynn was not properly “predicated.”
Bullshit.
2 people have been charged.
One person in 1802, the other in 1852, neither convicted. This is an antiquated bullshit law that no prosecutor would ever bring to court and no judge would ever allow. It's constitutionality is questionable at best, due to it's vagueness. Which is why no one has ever been convicted under that law.
Post a link to that....For the 50th fucking time, the presidential transition team is a legal governmental entity since 1968. Flynn was incapable of violating the Logan act since he named incoming NSA.Who gives a shit? He wasn't charged with violating the Logan Act though I suspect he knew he had broken it when he lied to the FBI. He was charged with, and admitted to, lying to cover up the subject of his conversation with Kislyak.One person in 1802, the other in 1852, neither convicted. This is an antiquated bullshit law that no prosecutor would ever bring to court and no judge would ever allow. It's constitutionality is questionable at best, due to it's vagueness. Which is why no one has ever been convicted under that law.
Poor desperate lying little yellow coward, the case is DROPPED. Sullivan has ZERO authority to charge Flynn with anything. The Apellate Court, Sullivan’s superiors, have ordered him to cut his bullshit, drop the case, and provide written explanations of his illegal actions. Funny how Sullivan thinks he needs to lawyer up due to his superiors slapping him down. Coerced plea deals aren’t legal, thus no perjury. You lose as always. You are bitch slapped and dismissed fuckwit.LOLI was talking about the DOJ'S motion and your lies about it, dope. here's your outrage over others bickering about whether the FBI'S investigation was open or not. That's gone on for pages. We know you're just trying to silence me because you can't handle me.
Once AGAIN you are attempting to make the focus of the thread about something that has already happened - the DOJ has dropped the case. It's a dead issue. Sullivan and his anti-Trump thugs can not change that. What SULLIVAN is attempting to do, however, is to do whatever he can to continue to target and punish Flynn....to include ignore the Appellate Court's order and lawyer up.
Sullivan is proving it's not a dead issue. It matters not that the DoJ wants the case dismissed -- Flynn's already a convicted felon. All that remains is sentencing him. Hopefully, Sullivan commences with that rather than giving in to the DoJ's request.
Only to people with at least a double digit IQ. That leaves you out.LOL2 people in over 200 years. ZERO convictions."No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument."You keep posting this BS from Mcgown at lawfareblog. Are you telling me it’s her point that it was in the US interest for russia to escalate, and or fuck over Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East? Also, she’s citing the Logan act as justification which even Paige knew at the time wasn’t a valid avenue for investigation. A. The transition is a legally recognized governmental entity since 1968, which Flynn was a part of. B. No one has been charged with the Logan act, despite many arguable violations of it, since the law was passed in 1799. So all that blows apart her argument. She knows this. You know this. Yet you keep throwing it out there."Key to the Justice Department’s argument in its motion to dismiss is the fact that, after four months of investigation without finding any derogatory information, the FBI was prepared to close its case on Flynn. A draft internal FBI document dated Jan. 4, 2017, shows that the bureau had sketched out a memo closing the probe, though the document includes the usual caveat that if new information were identified, the FBI would consider reopening the investigation.BULLSHIT - the focus of your last posts has been solely on the FBI and its case THAT HAS BEEN DROPPED
But before the case was actually closed, the FBI learned that Flynn had spoken to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in late December 2016. According to the Justice Department’s motion, the FBI had transcripts of the relevant calls, likely obtained through surveillance of Kislyak authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. By this time, Flynn had been named as Trump’s national security adviser.
In those calls, Flynn had asked Russia not to retaliate for sanctions imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for election interference. Flynn had also asked Russia to vote against a United Nations resolution regarding Israeli settlements. On their face, these calls potentially undermined the foreign policy of the United States. What’s more, on Jan. 15, 2017, Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect, made public statements that contradicted the transcripts of Flynn’s calls— a fact that, as documented in the Mueller report, “alarmed senior DOJ [Department of Justice] officials.” And so, the FBI decided to keep the investigation open. FBI agents interviewed Flynn on Jan. 24, four days after Trump took office. During that interview, Flynn falsely denied his statements regarding sanctions and the U.N. vote. He later pleaded guilty to one count of false statements for telling these lies."
Why the Flynn Interview Was Predicated
The Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is flawed in many ways, but one of its weakest arguments is that the investigation of Flynn was not properly “predicated.”
Bullshit.
2 people have been charged.
Next?
As if that matters.
Ok, Sport.LOLSullivan is lawyering up. The only thing he has proven is he doesn't follow the law.LOLI was talking about the DOJ'S motion and your lies about it, dope. here's your outrage over others bickering about whether the FBI'S investigation was open or not. That's gone on for pages. We know you're just trying to silence me because you can't handle me.
Once AGAIN you are attempting to make the focus of the thread about something that has already happened - the DOJ has dropped the case. It's a dead issue. Sullivan and his anti-Trump thugs can not change that. What SULLIVAN is attempting to do, however, is to do whatever he can to continue to target and punish Flynn....to include ignore the Appellate Court's order and lawyer up.
Sullivan is proving it's not a dead issue. It matters not that the DoJ wants the case dismissed -- Flynn's already a convicted felon. All that remains is sentencing him. Hopefully, Sullivan commences with that rather than giving in to the DoJ's request.
Moron, he hired her to help him with his response to an appeals court which is due by Monday. Sullivan himself has not violated any law.
