Zone1 Juneteenth is Just Another Day to Spread The Hate Towards White People

[IM2]

I'm pretty sure every civilization has engaged in combat. One of the big problems is that white people think all Indians are the same. We are not. There are over 500 tribes and to think we all think and act the same way is absurd. For example, my tribe did not wear a headdress. Those were worn by plains Indians. There was never any such thing as a Cherokee princess. Anyone who claims such things in their line is mistaken. There were some tribes that were totally badass and if you stepped foot on their land for the wrong reason you won't be leaving. Tribes like the Comanche Apache Lakota and others were like this. There were five tribes that the government considered to have assimilated to white culture. Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. These five tribes had developed economic ties with whites. They adopted European clothing, spoke English, practiced Christianity. The government called us the "Five Civilized Tribes." This is exactly what they told us they wanted. Where did it get us? Fucking nowhere. They still killed us. You can't kill a people that refuses to die. We are still here and we are more united than ever.

On a side note, there is a documentary called "Rumble: The Indians Who Rocked The World." It's mainly about Native American musicians that most people don't realize were Natives, but there is a lot of history about the kinship between blacks and Indians. It's quite eye opening.

For those who like math, African polyrhythms + Native American '4 on the floor stomp'= AMERICAN MUSIC.

True. They do Native Americans like they do Africans. We're all the same to the racist. They talk about Africans selling each other, when in reality these were rival nations on the continent that was not called Africa in the first place. It was called Alkebulan. Just like "America" was not called that by the indigenous people here.

According to what I have learned the very constitution and form of government we have was patterned partly on the Iroquois League. Yep, just as in Africa the European came over here and practiced deception in order to get what they coveted.

These guys are too arrogant to even perceive the punishment that God, or the Great Spirit, has waiting for them. Then try threaten everybody with civil war, LOL! You can't beat anyone if you can't kill their spitit. As it says in the bible these guys say they believe, "Do not fear the one who can kill your body, fear the one who can send you to hell." These guys are ignorant.

Thank you for the lesson my brother.

 

[Unkotare]

?????????????

"[all] white people think all Indians are the same."

Fucking hypocrite.

 

[Unkotare]

True. They do Native Americans like they do Africans. We're all the same to the racist. They talk about Africans selling each other, when in reality these were rival nations on the continent that was not called Africa in the first place. It was called Alkebulan. Just like "America" was not called that by the indigenous people here.

According to what I have learned the very constitution and form of government we have was patterned partly on the Iroquois League. Yep, just as in Africa the European came over here and practiced deception in order to get what they coveted.

These guys are too arrogant to even perceive the punishment that God, or the Great Spirit, has waiting for them. Then try threaten everybody with civil war, LOL! You can't beat anyone if you can't kill their spitit. As it says in the bible these guys say they believe, "Do not fear the one who can kill your body, fear the one who can send you to hell." These guys are ignorant.

Thank you for the lesson my brother.

"They," "they," those guys," they."
Fucking hypocrite.

 

[Clyde 154]

You're not making any sense, Islam is not a race, IM1 specified non-whites who colonized Europe. There are white Muslims but I must have missed the part in history class where Spain was colonized and turned into an Islamic nation. Can you post a link so I can expand my knowledge base?

Again........there are no brown or olive skinned Muslims? LAMO Right after the RACE CARD is played by all race baiters....its the IGNORANCE CARD. Speaking of "olive skinned" peoples.......I suppose the Roman Empire never existed. All the wars and violence in history are the fault of the WHITE MAN? No "Ottoman Empire.........No Mongol Empire......and of course NO RED MAN on RED MAN wars..........thousands of years before the WHITE MAN came to North America. No Japanese wars........no Chinese warring factions.

You can play the "ignorance card"......but do you expect people to believe that you are as think you dumb you are? Once again.......ISLAM invaded and conquered SPAIN.......which is located in Europe. Muslim conquest of Spain - Wikipedia

Fact: You do not even know........MY SKIN COLOR, yet you are judging based upon nothing but an ingrained bigotry of hatred toward the white man. You do realize there have been more WHITES that have been enslaved than any minority. There were MILLIONS of white Christian Europeans enslaved by Muslims...........

Research Suggests White Slavery Was Much More Common

Editor's note (3/21/20): For an update on this story, visit: Why is a 16-year-old book on slavery so popular now? A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been...

news.osu.edu

 

[Stryder50]

White racists will always be a problem, for everyone.

Racists of any color will be a problem for everyone.
Take a look in your mirror, you'll see a problem to many.

 

[IM2]

Again........there are no brown or olive skinned Muslims? LAMO Right after the RACE CARD is played by all race baiters....its the IGNORANCE CARD. Speaking of "olive skinned" peoples.......I suppose the Roman Empire never existed. All the wars and violence in history are the fault of the WHITE MAN? No "Ottoman Empire.........No Mongol Empire......and of course NO RED MAN on RED MAN wars..........thousands of years before the WHITE MAN came to North America. No Japanese wars........no Chinese warring factions.

You can play the "ignorance card"......but do you expect people to believe that you are as think you dumb you are? Once again.......ISLAM invaded and conquered SPAIN.......which is located in Europe. Muslim conquest of Spain - Wikipedia

Fact: You do not even know........MY SKIN COLOR, yet you are judging based upon nothing but an ingrained bigotry of hatred toward the white man. You do realize there have been more WHITES that have been enslaved than any minority. There were MILLIONS of white Christian Europeans enslaved by Muslims...........

Research Suggests White Slavery Was Much More Common

Editor's note (3/21/20): For an update on this story, visit: Why is a 16-year-old book on slavery so popular now? A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been...

news.osu.edu

Lol! What's being assessed is the AMERICAN system of white racial preferences. Not ancient Muslim slavery. Muslims didn't create apartheid in America. The white racist always tries to deflect and blame shift while simultaneously lecturing blacks about personal responsibility.

 

[IM2]

Racists of any color will be a problem for everyone.
Take a look in your mirror, you'll see a problem to many.

The response to white racism is nott racism.

 

[IM2]

Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican? | PragerU

The south used to vote Democrat. Now it votes Republican. Why the switch? Was it, as some people say, because the GOP decided to appeal to racist whites?…

www.prageru.com

Try not using Dennis Prager.

 

[Stryder50]

And thats what the majority of whites do in this forum. The truth is not race baiting. I have heard Asians bitching. Don't be white talking for Asians.

Whites are the beneficiaries of a long line of government handouts nobody else have receiveed. The Asians making the most money are from India and most of them are so because of the governments H1B Visa program. Take away Indian income and Asians don't look so good. You really need to shut up with this ignorance you spew. The white man is on Native American ancestral lands that he stole. You are here living on handouts they allowed you to have. Because they could have wiped out every white person who got off the boat when they got here.

Whites couldn't even grow food if not for Native Americans. The first whites that landed in Virginia had to resort to eating their dead. So humble yourself son because you're posting jibberish.

Those "Asians" from India, mostly Sikh, are considered Caucasian = "white".
Oriental Asians; Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, for the most part have done as well as any other ethnic/race. Although lately they are being discriminated against by some colleges, being limited to admissions that match their population percentage(or less) in place of academic achievement.

The "jibberish" here is lumping all "whites" as one of a kind, which is just as racist as any other form of that oft misapplied term.

According to Ancestry.com, my two sons are one quarter Black, Nigerian. Their mother would be one half Black, but she passed away before learning that part of her ancestry. By appearance, she was barely "tan", could have passed for Hispanic or Eurasian. One son is very white, looks Aryan. The other has a hint of "off-white" appearance, but has been mistaken for Hispanic. Still, genetically, per DNA, at one-quarter they both would be "Black" more than those whom at 1/8th-1/16th ancestry will claim to be "Native American".

Point is, too many people make "Race" a more important issue than it needs to or should be.

For what it's worth(FWIW) it was Spain and Portugal that started the import of Black Africans to their Americas colonies because Native Americans had died off in too great of numbers to fill the demand for slaves. Eventually the British, French, and Dutch also did such. IIRC, only about one out of ten Black African slaves came to the 13 colonies, the others going to other colonies in parts of Central, South America, and the Carib.

FWIW, Article I. Section 9. of the USA Constitution prohibited the import of "slaves" after 1808. Not an outright ban on slavery admittedly, but a step in that direction. Note that as with the War of Independence, the Constitution also reflected the Compromises needed to keep the thirteen colonies united, first in War of Independence from England, and then in common cause of a united nation via the Constitution. As with most of the world back then and ever since, it was a "one step at a time" process of ending slavery, which had existed since the dawn of civilizations. For that matter, the dogma of Islam still allows slavery and several Islamic nations have de-facto slavery still.

 

[Stryder50]

Try not using Dennis Prager.

Prager is more objective than your biased Leftist/Marxist sources.

 

[Stryder50]

The response to white racism is nott racism.

BULLSHIT!

Unless you'll agree that the response to black racism (or yellow, red, orange, purple, green, etc.) is "nott" racism.

 

[Stryder50]

True. They do Native Americans like they do Africans. We're all the same to the racist. They talk about Africans selling each other, when in reality these were rival nations on the continent that was not called Africa in the first place. It was called Alkebulan. Just like "America" was not called that by the indigenous people here.

According to what I have learned the very constitution and form of government we have was patterned partly on the Iroquois League. Yep, just as in Africa the European came over here and practiced deception in order to get what they coveted.

These guys are too arrogant to even perceive the punishment that God, or the Great Spirit, has waiting for them. Then try threaten everybody with civil war, LOL! You can't beat anyone if you can't kill their spitit. As it says in the bible these guys say they believe, "Do not fear the one who can kill your body, fear the one who can send you to hell." These guys are ignorant.

Thank you for the lesson my brother.

For the most part "America" is mostly used by and applied to the United States of America. Other parts of the North and South American continents use other names; Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Peru, Chile, etc. Names of lands/regions have changed over time throughout history, across the planet.

As for the continent Africa, being referred to as "Alkebulan";
...
However, there is one significance about Africa’s name which has been a subject of debate for decades. Several schools of thought have emerged on the true name of what we today know as Africa. A school of thought argue that the name Africa never originated from within the people and her people were never associated with the name. In fact, this school argues that Africa was initially named Alkebulan and was widely referred to as Alkebulan before the name Africa was birthed.

In Kemetic History of Afrika, Dr cheikh Anah Diop writes, “The ancient name of Africa was Alkebulan. Alkebu-lan “mother of mankind” or “garden of Eden”.” Alkebulan is the oldest and the only word of indigenous origin. It was used by the Moors, Nubians, Numidians, Khart-Haddans (Carthagenians), and Ethiopians. Africa, the current misnomer adopted by almost everyone today, was given to this continent by the ancient Greeks and Romans.”

These first sets of Africans conquered empires, moving from one region to another, adding more territories to the Nations’ masses creating today the 2nd largest continent in the world. The moors, to date, hold the topmost position as one of the strongest, richest, and educated empires the whole of history has encountered.

He goes on to argue along with historians in this school that the continent was also called, by many names aside Alkebulan. These names include Ortigia, Corphye, Libya, and Ethiopia.
...

What Is Africa's Original Name?

The name Africa is a phenomenon. Home to 1.216 billion people, the world’s second-largest population and 2nd largest continent after Asia.

guardian.ng

As for those "Carthagenians";
...
The Punic people, or Carthaginians, were a Semitic people in the Western Mediterranean who migrated from Tyre, Phoenicia[1] to North Africa during the Early Iron Age. In modern scholarship, the term Punic, the Latin equivalent of the Greek-derived term Phoenician, is exclusively used to refer to Phoenicians in the western Mediterranean, following the line of the Greek East and Latin West.

The largest Punic settlement was Ancient Carthage (essentially modern Tunis), but there were 300 other settlements along the North African coast from Leptis Magna in modern Libya to Mogador in southern Morocco,[2] as well as western Sicily, southern Sardinia, the southern and western coasts of the Iberian Peninsula, Malta, and Ibiza. Their language, Punic, was a dialect of Phoenician, one of the Northwest Semitic languages originating in the Levant.[3]
...

Punic people - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Stryder50]

Again........there are no brown or olive skinned Muslims? LAMO Right after the RACE CARD is played by all race baiters....its the IGNORANCE CARD. Speaking of "olive skinned" peoples.......I suppose the Roman Empire never existed. All the wars and violence in history are the fault of the WHITE MAN? No "Ottoman Empire.........No Mongol Empire......and of course NO RED MAN on RED MAN wars..........thousands of years before the WHITE MAN came to North America. No Japanese wars........no Chinese warring factions.

You can play the "ignorance card"......but do you expect people to believe that you are as think you dumb you are? Once again.......ISLAM invaded and conquered SPAIN.......which is located in Europe. Muslim conquest of Spain - Wikipedia

Fact: You do not even know........MY SKIN COLOR, yet you are judging based upon nothing but an ingrained bigotry of hatred toward the white man. You do realize there have been more WHITES that have been enslaved than any minority. There were MILLIONS of white Christian Europeans enslaved by Muslims...........

Research Suggests White Slavery Was Much More Common

Editor's note (3/21/20): For an update on this story, visit: Why is a 16-year-old book on slavery so popular now? A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been...

news.osu.edu

EXCERPT from link;
...
“Much of what has been written gives the impression that there were not many slaves and minimizes the impact that slavery had on Europe,” Davis said. “Most accounts only look at slavery in one place, or only for a short period of time. But when you take a broader, longer view, the massive scope of this slavery and its powerful impact become clear.”

Davis said it is useful to compare this Mediterranean slavery to the Atlantic slave trade that brought black Africans to the Americas. Over the course of four centuries, the Atlantic slave trade was much larger – about 10 to 12 million black Africans were brought to the Americas. But from 1500 to 1650, when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy, more white Christian slaves were probably taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas, according to Davis.

“One of the things that both the public and many scholars have tended to take as given is that slavery was always racial in nature – that only blacks have been slaves. But that is not true,” Davis said. “We cannot think of slavery as something that only white people did to black people.”

During the time period Davis studied, it was religion and ethnicity, as much as race, that determined who became slaves.

“Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland,” he said.

Pirates (called corsairs) from cities along the Barbary Coast in north Africa – cities such as Tunis and Algiers – would raid ships in the Mediterranean and Atlantic, as well as seaside villages to capture men, women and children. The impact of these attacks were devastating – France, England, and Spain each lost thousands of ships, and long stretches of the Spanish and Italian coasts were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants. At its peak, the destruction and depopulation of some areas probably exceeded what European slavers would later inflict on the African interior.

Although hundreds of thousands of Christian slaves were taken from Mediterranean countries, Davis noted, the effects of Muslim slave raids was felt much further away: it appears, for example, that through most of the 17th century the English lost at least 400 sailors a year to the slavers.

Even Americans were not immune. For example, one American slave reported that 130 other American seamen had been enslaved by the Algerians in the Mediterranean and Atlantic just between 1785 and 1793.

Davis said the vast scope of slavery in North Africa has been ignored and minimized, in large part because it is on no one’s agenda to discuss what happened.

The enslavement of Europeans doesn’t fit the general theme of European world conquest and colonialism that is central to scholarship on the early modern era, he said. Many of the countries that were victims of slavery, such as France and Spain, would later conquer and colonize the areas of North Africa where their citizens were once held as slaves. Maybe because of this history, Western scholars have thought of the Europeans primarily as “evil colonialists” and not as the victims they sometimes were, Davis said.
...

Research Suggests White Slavery Was Much More Common

Editor's note (3/21/20): For an update on this story, visit: Why is a 16-year-old book on slavery so popular now? A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been...

news.osu.edu

 

[Stryder50]

Speaking of the Moors;
...
The term Moor is an exonym first used by Christian Europeans to designate the Muslim inhabitants of the Maghreb, al-Andalus (Iberian Peninsula), Sicily and Malta during the Middle Ages.

Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people.[1] The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica observed that the term had "no real ethnological value."[2] Europeans of the Middle Ages and the early modern period variously applied the name to Arabs and Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans.[3]

The term has also been used in Europe in a broader sense to refer to Muslims in general,[4] especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in al-Andalus or North Africa.[5] During the colonial era, the Portuguese introduced the names "Ceylon Moors" and "Indian Moors" in South Asia and Sri Lanka, and the Bengali Muslims were also called Moors.[6] In the Philippines, the longstanding Muslim community, which predates the arrival of the Spanish, now self-identifies as the "Moro people", an exonym introduced by Spanish colonizers due to their Muslim faith.

In 711, troops mostly formed by Moors from northern Africa led the Umayyad conquest of Hispania. The Iberian Peninsula then came to be known in Classical Arabic as al-Andalus, which at its peak included most of Septimania and modern-day Spain and Portugal. In 827, the Moors occupied Mazara on Sicily, developing it as a port.[7] They eventually went on to consolidate the rest of the island. Differences in religion and culture led to a centuries-long conflict with the Christian kingdoms of Europe, which tried to reclaim control of Muslim areas; this conflict was referred to as the Reconquista. In 1224, the Muslims were expelled from Sicily to the settlement of Lucera, which was destroyed by European Christians in 1300. The fall of Granada in 1492 marked the end of Muslim rule in Spain, although a Muslim minority persisted until their expulsion in 1609.[8]
...

Moors - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It seems that "Moor" refers to nationality and/or ethnic, and these peoples were of a few types or "race" ranging from white thru black.

 

[IM2]

Those "Asians" from India, mostly Sikh, are considered Caucasian = "white".
Oriental Asians; Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, for the most part have done as well as any other ethnic/race. Although lately they are being discriminated against by some colleges, being limited to admissions that match their population percentage(or less) in place of academic achievement.

The "jibberish" here is lumping all "whites" as one of a kind, which is just as racist as any other form of that oft misapplied term.

According to Ancestry.com, my two sons are one quarter Black, Nigerian. Their mother would be one half Black, but she passed away before learning that part of her ancestry. By appearance, she was barely "tan", could have passed for Hispanic or Eurasian. One son is very white, looks Aryan. The other has a hint of "off-white" appearance, but has been mistaken for Hispanic. Still, genetically, per DNA, at one-quarter they both would be "Black" more than those whom at 1/8th-1/16th ancestry will claim to be "Native American".

Point is, too many people make "Race" a more important issue than it needs to or should be.

For what it's worth(FWIW) it was Spain and Portugal that started the import of Black Africans to their Americas colonies because Native Americans had died off in too great of numbers to fill the demand for slaves. Eventually the British, French, and Dutch also did such. IIRC, only about one out of ten Black African slaves came to the 13 colonies, the others going to other colonies in parts of Central, South America, and the Carib.

FWIW, Article I. Section 9. of the USA Constitution prohibited the import of "slaves" after 1808. Not an outright ban on slavery admittedly, but a step in that direction. Note that as with the War of Independence, the Constitution also reflected the Compromises needed to keep the thirteen colonies united, first in War of Independence from England, and then in common cause of a united nation via the Constitution. As with most of the world back then and ever since, it was a "one step at a time" process of ending slavery, which had existed since the dawn of civilizations. For that matter, the dogma of Islam still allows slavery and several Islamic nations have de-facto slavery still.

Whites made the issue race and still do. I know what happened in the slavetrade, trans atlantic and the trans saharan trade whites racists use to deflect. So I don't need the white splaning.

Or the excuses about what 1808 did. Because it is not as you say.

America had every chance not to implement slavery. We are told how the so-called founders of this country created the way to end slavery when they wrote the constitution. Many will cite the fact they made the importation of slaves illegal by 1808 as evidence. But refusing to stop importing slaves did not end the slaving business in the United States. What it produced was an original American industry-slave breeding.

“During the fifty-three years from the prohibition of the African slave trade by federal law in 1808 to the debacle of the Confederate States of America in 1861, the Southern economy depended on the functioning of a slave-breeding industry, of which Virginia was the number-one supplier.”

If America had continued to import slaves, it would have diluted the market, thereby driving down the price of slaves. Slave sellers could not have this. So instead of the truth, we are told that “our nearer to God than thee” founders, in all their benevolent glory, looked towards a future whereby slavery would be no more. According to some, the so-called founders had a dream whereby little black boys and little black girls would no longer be enslaved because of the color of their skin. This is the story we are supposed to believe. However, reality does not show that.

“In fact, most American slaves were not kidnapped on another continent. Though over 12.7 million Africans were forced onto ships to the Western hemisphere, estimates only have 400,000-500,000 landing in present-day America. How then to account for the four million black slaves who were tilling fields in 1860? “The South,” the Sublettes write, “did not only produce tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton as commodities for sale; it produced people.” Slavers called slave-breeding “natural increase,” but there was nothing natural about producing slaves; it took scientific management. Thomas Jefferson bragged to George Washington that the birth of black children was increasing Virginia’s capital stock by four percent annually.”

To be blunt, America had slave breeding “factories” where enslaved people were forced to breed.

These “farms” generally had at least a 2:1 female to male ratio.17 In some states, slave production was the number 1 industry. Virginia led the nation in slave production, and PRESIDENT Thomas Jefferson was one of the leading producers.

This industry included an “employer”-based health care program. Enslaved women may have been the first people in America to get free health care. I do not say this to be funny because the reason why that happened was both sad and simple; after the importation of slaves was made illegal, dependence on slave labor hinged on the continued births of children by healthy slave women. The only way left to maintain the system was by increasing the number of slaves through births.

Due to this, a black woman’s ability to reproduce was of the utmost economic importance to southern planters and slave breeders. Because of that, slave owners had to monitor the health of slave women. But since the overall goal was the mass production of human beings, slave women often began “breeding” while very young and were forced to have numerous children. Most slave women could “retire” after ten to fifteen births, if they survived.

You want to talk about slavery on the Barbbary Coast. None of us live on what was then the Barbary Coast and never have. Furthermore you and others like you REFFUSE TO DEBATE THE JIM CROW APARTHEID IN AMERICA AFTER SLAVERY. All your argument amounts to is a long boring total dodge of the topic of white racism in America.

You don't to all this for July 4th. Using your logic, nearly every nation that has ever existed came about as the result of a revolution or some type of civil war. So then what make July 4th so special?

It is a shame that in the year 2023 there are whites who whites continue to be such racists that they even oppose a holiday celebrating when America freed blacks from slavery.

 

[IM2]

But from 1500 to 1650, when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy, more white Christian slaves were probably taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas, according to Davis.

Approximately 1 million whites were enslaved on the Barbary Coast in total as opposed to the 12 million blacks sent to the Americas. Leopold killed more Africans than that. Your postings are disingenuous and really they are off topic.

 

[IM2]

Did the white slaves on the Barbary Coast where none of us live or have ever lived endure this?

Slavery came equipped with a company “orientation” program. This “orientation” was called seasoning. In this program, slaves did not learn about the company’s history, employee policy, workplace safety, vacation time, or company benefit packages. The slave orientation program was between 1 to 7 years. During “seasoning,” Africans were robbed of their names, language, culture, mores, history, spirituality and forced to assimilate into a European-style culture. They were forced to adapt to dark to dark working hours, poor nutrition, and miserable, unsanitary living conditions. If disease didn’t kill them, slaves endured physical and psychological torture so brutal that it is estimated that between seven and fifty percent of the slaves in this “orientation” program died. The object of this training program was to prepare the slaves for work on the plantation. “Seasoning” was the original cancel culture.

“Many died in the first few weeks or months from dysentery, malnutrition, several types of worm infections, change of diet and climate, and the White man’s diseases. One reason is that the Slaves were terribly weakened by the trauma of the Middle Passage voyage and the addition of exposure to diseases, inadequate nutrition, bad water, work exhaustion from being unaccustomed to the “sunrise-to-sunset gang labor,” and cruelty were simply overwhelming. Immediately, new owners and their overseers obliterated the identities of their newly acquired Slaves by breaking their wills and by severing any bonds with their African past. Such occurred while the Slaves were being forced to adapt to new and horrendous working and living conditions; to learn a new language; and to adopt new customs.”

Ben Davis, What is the seasoning process for slaves? April 10, 2021, https://www.mvorganizing.org/what-is-the-seasoning-processfor-slaves/

Paulette Brown-Hinds, “Seasoning” The Slaves, Black Voice News, February 19, 2009, "Seasoning" The Slaves - Black Voice News

 

[IM2]

Davis said the vast scope of slavery in North Africa has been ignored and minimized, in large part because it is on no one’s agenda to discuss what happened.

Bullshit. However, we are discussing Jeneteenth. This holiday refers to America. What you are talking about didn't happen in America and most certainly did not last as long. After that slavery ended there were no white codes or other laws passed that denied whites any freedoms or opportunities on the same Barbary Coast. Again, your argument is disingenuous and all you're doing is showing a prime example of white racism as it is done in the 21st Century.

 

[Stryder50]

Bullshit. However, we are discussing Jeneteenth. This holiday refers to America. What you are talking about didn't happen in America and most certainly did not last as long. After that slavery ended there were no white codes or other laws passed that denied whites any freedoms or opportunities on the same Barbary Coast. Again, your argument is disingenuous and all you're doing is showing a prime example of white racism as it is done in the 21st Century.

And you are also being disingenuous and showing a prime example of black racism as done in the USA in the 21st century.
BTW, learn to spell. It's "Juneteenth" not "Jeneteenth".

FYI, on my mother's side we are Armenian. Your Muslim friends engaged in genocide on my people last century. We don't get a Federal Holiday off from work.
You can stuff your hubris and racism where the Sun don't shine!

Armenian genocide - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Clyde 154]

Lol! What's being assessed is the AMERICAN system of white racial preferences. Not ancient Muslim slavery. Muslims didn't create apartheid in America. The white racist always tries to deflect and blame shift while simultaneously lecturing blacks about personal responsibility.

The American system of WHITE RACISM? You mean the history of the democrat party in its attempt to silence all human rights for Minorities and WOMEN? That racist history? This is a simple question..........present "ONE" example of a Republican of history owning another human being.

FYI: This RACIST NATION that you are speaking of.......the Republic of the United States of America is responsible for legislating all the laws pertaining to minority and female civil rights. There is not ONE act of legislation that did not come from the representative majority. All the rights possessed by minorities and women are due to the Republic of the United States' legislating Laws.

Does this MAJORITY action look like RACISM to you?

Stop acting like someone owes anyone because of the color of their skin.........Civil rights have been in existence for well over half century. Stop crying for MORE SOUP PLEASE through the act of RACE BAITING, it does nothing but cause DIVISION. And its the same party that endorsed slavery and attempted to stop women from having equal rights that is promoting this division..........THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

Never mind that White America........elected a Black president, because of the color of his skink. It must have been from SHAME because his term in the white demonstrated that he was a dumb as rock and was nothing but a puppet on a string reading from a Teleprompter.....a person that never held any job in the private sector that grew up sucking on the Government tit.......taking advantage of the majority acts of legislation that granted favor to skin color.