Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
may not criminalize the President’s actions within his exclusive constitutional
power.
In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire
into the President’s motives.
Giving orders to the military is an exclusive constitutional power of the president. He's the Commander in Chief. And since Roberts contents that his motives can't be questioned, it follows he can order an opponent killed by the military.
How do you suggest he do that? Do something egregious so the Supreme Court reconsiders?The only way to stop it is either a new Supreme Court decision limiting this new found authority. Or an amendment to do so.
Getting public opinion for an amendment would require serious public interest. That means Biden has to abuse this new power to create the atmosphere where it won’t happen ever again.
The only way to stop it is either a new Supreme Court decision limiting this new found authority. Or an amendment to do so.
Getting public opinion for an amendment would require serious public interest. That means Biden has to abuse this new power to create the atmosphere where it won’t happen ever again.
He's already been indicted, silly.The DOJ already wont indict a sitting president. This SC ruling changes nothing in that respect.
First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.
There is NO new found authority, it has always existed, it just took Progressive Lawfare to force the court to quantify it.
Just because you don't want to make an inference going by the actual language in the ruling doesn't mean you can't make on.So, as I knew -
It's made up.
It's a series of leaps and interpretations that no reasonable people would make and has no basis in fact.
The left has specifically jumped on this seal team 6 hoax, so if it is not a orchestrated hoax, PLEASE point out the specific language that addresses that.
How do you suggest he do that? Do something egregious so the Supreme Court reconsiders?
I'm sorry but I don't agree. Killing a political opponent is wrong no matter how many members of SCOTUS claim it can be legal.I’ve said it several times. Have Trump assassinated. Order Trump’s death.
Except -
There is literally no newfound authority.
NOT WHILE HE WAS IN OFFICE. Being deliberately obtuse don't make you right. It simply makes you dishonest.He's already been indicted, silly.
I’ve said it several times. Have Trump assassinated. Order Trump’s death.
It has not always existed. Nixon required a Pardon to avoid being charged with crimes. Clinton negotiated a plea deal to end the possibility of prosecution. These are historical facts.
I KNOW.NOT WHILE HE WAS IN OFFICE. Being deliberately obtuse don't make you right. It simply makes you dishonest.
I’ve said it several times. Have Trump assassinated. Order Trump’s death.
We're there. The end justifies the means. Anything goes with us now. Reasonable people demand action.Biden should definitely use these powers to prevent Trump's re-election, for the good of nation.
I'm sorry but I don't agree. Killing a political opponent is wrong no matter how many members of SCOTUS claim it can be legal.
Killing off your political opponent isn't an act of office for a President.
And dude, seriously, either up your meds or get off the drugs.
The Supreme Court in the past 2 weeks has:
You are no longer a democracy.
- legalized gerrymandering, for partisan purposes only;
- legalized public officials receiving "tips" from people they give public contracts to - bribery;
- gave judges the power to overturn scientists; and
- immunity from prosecution for the President.
NO. I hope he does not. He can't sink to MAGA's level. If he does, then we're probably done. We're on the precipice as it is. That's when the Trumps and Bannons and Flynns win.
The Supreme Court's version of the Enabling Act of 1933 was blatant enough. The rest of the country can't be a part of this.
