Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uhhh ... three nights at the Tahiti Bar, Grill and Bait Shop just outside St. Louis (meals included)
And what do I get if I win?
Three nights at the Tahiti Bar, Grill, and Bait Shop just outside St. Louis (but you have to pay for the meals)
I don't want to go to St. Louis or anywhere in that vicinity. I want to go to the Bahamas or Hawaii, and I want all expenses paid and that includes my meals.
Well, now that we've opened negotiations .... ever been to beautiful downtown Burbank? (settle for McDonalds?)
Nope and nope. McDonald's? WTH? Lol. No way.
And what do I get if I win?
Three nights at the Tahiti Bar, Grill, and Bait Shop just outside St. Louis (but you have to pay for the meals)
I don't want to go to St. Louis or anywhere in that vicinity. I want to go to the Bahamas or Hawaii, and I want all expenses paid and that includes my meals.
Well, now that we've opened negotiations .... ever been to beautiful downtown Burbank? (settle for McDonalds?)
Nope and nope. McDonald's? WTH? Lol. No way.
Hey! It's just an opening offer ...... (I read Trump's book on the Art of the Deal)
The estimated cost is a little over $20 billion. That's a lot less than what I-10 cost. Labor, materials etc. are all considered in the cost.
I really doubt that any wall is going to be built. Besides, if we remove incentives for them being here, then they won't be clamoring to come here, so a wall is really not necessary. AND, I think people would just be able to find a way to get around it. They have all kinds of "drug tunnels" as it is right now.
The drug tunnels are only there because we refuse to commit the funds necessary to solve the problem. Ground penetrating radar, as well as heat sensors, can accurately plot the locations of the tunnels in a single aircraft pass. It's not a question of capability - only of will.
But we wouldn't need to do all of that if we just remove the incentives. If there is nothing here for them, they aren't going to come.
There will always be something here for them ... in order to remove those incentives, we have to become them. As long as there is a fiscal difference, or a freedom difference, or a enhanced future difference, we become the preferred location. We can't remove all that ....
If they can't have jobs or social services support, then they won't come here.
Three nights at the Tahiti Bar, Grill, and Bait Shop just outside St. Louis (but you have to pay for the meals)
I don't want to go to St. Louis or anywhere in that vicinity. I want to go to the Bahamas or Hawaii, and I want all expenses paid and that includes my meals.
Well, now that we've opened negotiations .... ever been to beautiful downtown Burbank? (settle for McDonalds?)
Nope and nope. McDonald's? WTH? Lol. No way.
Hey! It's just an opening offer ...... (I read Trump's book on the Art of the Deal)
That is WAY too low ball an offer. Lol.
I really doubt that any wall is going to be built. Besides, if we remove incentives for them being here, then they won't be clamoring to come here, so a wall is really not necessary. AND, I think people would just be able to find a way to get around it. They have all kinds of "drug tunnels" as it is right now.
The drug tunnels are only there because we refuse to commit the funds necessary to solve the problem. Ground penetrating radar, as well as heat sensors, can accurately plot the locations of the tunnels in a single aircraft pass. It's not a question of capability - only of will.
But we wouldn't need to do all of that if we just remove the incentives. If there is nothing here for them, they aren't going to come.
There will always be something here for them ... in order to remove those incentives, we have to become them. As long as there is a fiscal difference, or a freedom difference, or a enhanced future difference, we become the preferred location. We can't remove all that ....
If they can't have jobs or social services support, then they won't come here.
Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?The drug tunnels are only there because we refuse to commit the funds necessary to solve the problem. Ground penetrating radar, as well as heat sensors, can accurately plot the locations of the tunnels in a single aircraft pass. It's not a question of capability - only of will.
But we wouldn't need to do all of that if we just remove the incentives. If there is nothing here for them, they aren't going to come.
There will always be something here for them ... in order to remove those incentives, we have to become them. As long as there is a fiscal difference, or a freedom difference, or a enhanced future difference, we become the preferred location. We can't remove all that ....
If they can't have jobs or social services support, then they won't come here.
Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?But we wouldn't need to do all of that if we just remove the incentives. If there is nothing here for them, they aren't going to come.
There will always be something here for them ... in order to remove those incentives, we have to become them. As long as there is a fiscal difference, or a freedom difference, or a enhanced future difference, we become the preferred location. We can't remove all that ....
If they can't have jobs or social services support, then they won't come here.
Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Put your money where your mouth is. I'm betting there will be no wall.
Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?There will always be something here for them ... in order to remove those incentives, we have to become them. As long as there is a fiscal difference, or a freedom difference, or a enhanced future difference, we become the preferred location. We can't remove all that ....
If they can't have jobs or social services support, then they won't come here.
Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?If they can't have jobs or social services support, then they won't come here.
Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Send you? No.
Take you? Now, we can talk.
I agree. One big step would be to overturn the surpreme courts decision that public education has to be provided to illegal immigrants. Take away all the other freebies. Take away federal funds from sanctuary cites. Enforce laws to penalize employers that hire illegals (e-verify).The estimated cost is a little over $20 billion. That's a lot less than what I-10 cost. Labor, materials etc. are all considered in the cost.What's not feasible about it? It's a much smaller project than building I-10.
Who is going to pay for this ginormous project? Taxpayers? I'm sure THAT will go over well. It would be an extremely expensive endeavor. There is labor, materials, etc. to consider.
I really doubt that any wall is going to be built. Besides, if we remove incentives for them being here, then they won't be clamoring to come here, so a wall is really not necessary. AND, I think people would just be able to find a way to get around it. They have all kinds of "drug tunnels" as it is right now.
The drug tunnels are only there because we refuse to commit the funds necessary to solve the problem. Ground penetrating radar, as well as heat sensors, can accurately plot the locations of the tunnels in a single aircraft pass. It's not a question of capability - only of will.
But we wouldn't need to do all of that if we just remove the incentives. If there is nothing here for them, they aren't going to come.
Actually it's not the same thing. Entering the US without proper documentation is a criminal offense and you can be charged with a misdemeanor. You can be charge as a felon for repeated offenses and jailedA very small part of Mexico's 122 million people enter the US illegally. There are about 6 million undocumented Mexican immigrants in the US. About 3 million entered the US illegally and the rest overstayed their visas which means a relatively small percent of the people are entering the US illegally. It doesn't make any sense to them that the US, as wealthy as it is can't protect it's own boarders. This is why they went ballistic when Trump wanted them pay for a wall.I do feel bad for the GOOD people of Mexico, but just like we can't take in every stray cat or dog, we cannot take care of all their people. They need to make some positive changes in their own country. That is the ONLY way things will get better there.
That is TOO many. Entered the US illegally or are residing in the US illegally -same fucking thing.
No problem, if he hates you, then he will simply leave you there. If you hate him then you can leave him there.Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Send you? No.
Take you? Now, we can talk.
What if we hate each other? Then we would be stuck there together!
Actually it's not the same thing. Entering the US without proper documentation is a criminal offense and you can be charged with a misdemeanor. You can be charge as a felon for repeated offenses and jailedA very small part of Mexico's 122 million people enter the US illegally. There are about 6 million undocumented Mexican immigrants in the US. About 3 million entered the US illegally and the rest overstayed their visas which means a relatively small percent of the people are entering the US illegally. It doesn't make any sense to them that the US, as wealthy as it is can't protect it's own boarders. This is why they went ballistic when Trump wanted them pay for a wall.I do feel bad for the GOOD people of Mexico, but just like we can't take in every stray cat or dog, we cannot take care of all their people. They need to make some positive changes in their own country. That is the ONLY way things will get better there.
That is TOO many. Entered the US illegally or are residing in the US illegally -same fucking thing.
Overstaying a visa is a status violation. If you leave the country within a month of expiration, nothing happens. However if you stay long enough then you are subject to deportation and you can be barred legal entrance for 10 years. Overstaying a visa is not a criminal offense and there is no penalty. You can not be jailed. You can be detailed by the INS up 30 days if you are flagged for removal. Local police can't hold you more than 24 hours unless you are charged with a crime. Deportation which is referred to as removal is not consider punishment because there is no crime.
Our tracking system of visas is so poor, that we often don't know if or when many people with visas leave the country.
No problem, if he hates you, then he will simply leave you there. If you hate him then you can leave him there.Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Send you? No.
Take you? Now, we can talk.
What if we hate each other? Then we would be stuck there together!
Wearing a live mike in front a TV production crew camera? Yeah, I guess there are such men that really want to make a statement about how they really feel about women.Just listening to what our fearless leader has to say.No, he grabs'em by the pussy, not their balls.
Did he grab your pussy? Is that why you're so whiny?
When Trump meets with world leaders, he'll probably be tagged as Donald "Grab'em by the Pussy" Trump. Funny thing is Donald will probably love it. T-Shirts are now being sold on the Internet and a new game is available. Copies of the unedited tape is being made available abroad translated in over 60 languages. However, it will probably be edited in a number of countries, primarily Muslim countries where such filth is not allow.
So what? A lot of guys talk dirty about women. So? Policy is more important important than his silly bragging.
It was supposed to be an "off the record" conversation. Duh. I'm a woman and I don't really care about what he said. LOTS of women will in fact let him touch their pussies because he's super rich! Get real.
If you make this bet with Spare Change, I suspect he will concede to lose the bet just to get you there. After all, there will be no way to objectively score who wins the bet anyway to determine a winner.No problem, if he hates you, then he will simply leave you there. If you hate him then you can leave him there.Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Send you? No.
Take you? Now, we can talk.
What if we hate each other? Then we would be stuck there together!
I would totally stay there forever! Lol.
I'll be at the beach - with my umbrella drink and sand castle.Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?Sure they will .... if there is a chance for a better life for their children, they'll come. I absolutely agree we should remove the fiscal incentives - no welfare, no medicaid, no food stamps - but that doesn't remove the potential for a better life. Honestly, if it decreases the chances your son is going to be a drug cartel member, or your daughter is going to be attacked by gangsters, any father would consider it.
Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Send you? No.
Take you? Now, we can talk.
What if we hate each other? Then we would be stuck there together!
Wearing a live mike in front a TV production crew camera? Yeah, I guess there are such men that really want to make a statement about how they really feel about women.Just listening to what our fearless leader has to say.Did he grab your pussy? Is that why you're so whiny?
When Trump meets with world leaders, he'll probably be tagged as Donald "Grab'em by the Pussy" Trump. Funny thing is Donald will probably love it. T-Shirts are now being sold on the Internet and a new game is available. Copies of the unedited tape is being made available abroad translated in over 60 languages. However, it will probably be edited in a number of countries, primarily Muslim countries where such filth is not allow.
So what? A lot of guys talk dirty about women. So? Policy is more important important than his silly bragging.
It was supposed to be an "off the record" conversation. Duh. I'm a woman and I don't really care about what he said. LOTS of women will in fact let him touch their pussies because he's super rich! Get real.
Do women ever talk dirty about men? I mean this seems like such a double standard.
Some wome love "bad" men. So what if Chris Brown to likes beat women, there are thousands of young women that would hook up with him in a heartbeat.Wearing a live mike in front a TV production crew camera? Yeah, I guess there are such men that really want to make a statement about how they really feel about women.Just listening to what our fearless leader has to say.Did he grab your pussy? Is that why you're so whiny?
When Trump meets with world leaders, he'll probably be tagged as Donald "Grab'em by the Pussy" Trump. Funny thing is Donald will probably love it. T-Shirts are now being sold on the Internet and a new game is available. Copies of the unedited tape is being made available abroad translated in over 60 languages. However, it will probably be edited in a number of countries, primarily Muslim countries where such filth is not allow.
So what? A lot of guys talk dirty about women. So? Policy is more important important than his silly bragging.
It was supposed to be an "off the record" conversation. Duh. I'm a woman and I don't really care about what he said. LOTS of women will in fact let him touch their pussies because he's super rich! Get real.
Do women ever talk dirty about men? I mean this seems like such a double standard.
I'll be at the beach - with my umbrella drink and sand castle.Oh, I think we can agree I'm right and you're wrong .... see how easy that was?Well, we will have to disagree about this issue. I don't think they would risk it if there was no pay off. They wouldn't really have a much better life if they were homeless either.
Are you willing to send me to the Bahamas if I'm right?
Send you? No.
Take you? Now, we can talk.
What if we hate each other? Then we would be stuck there together!
